Box-ticking and Olympic high jumping – Physicians’ perceptions and acceptance of national physician validation systems

References

• Ahmed K, Khan RS, Darzi A, Athanasiou T, Hanna GB. 2013. Recertification: What do specialists think about skill assessment?. Surgeon. 11:120–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer J, Lynn N, Roberts M, Coombes L, Gale T, de Regand Bere S. 2015. A systematic review on the impact of licensing examinations for doctors in countries comparable to the UK.
   Google Scholar
• Bach S. 2005. New directions in performance management. In: Bach S, editor. Managing human resources: personnel management in transition. 4th ed. New York: Blackwell Publishing. p. 289ff.
   Google Scholar
• Blaschke LM. 2012. Heutagogy and lifelong learning: a review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. IRRODL. 13:56–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell WR, Boudreau JW. 2000. Employee satisfaction with performance appraisals and appraisers: the role of perceived appraisal use. Human Resource Dev Quarterly. 11:283–299.
   Google Scholar
• Boulet J, van Zanten M. 2014. Ensuring high-quality patient care: the role of accreditation, licensure, specialty certification and revalidation in medicine. Med Educ. 48:75–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen GA. 2006. Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts. Int J Qualitative Methods. 5:12–23.
   Google Scholar
• Boylan O, Bradley T, McKnight A. 2005. Gp perceptions of appraisal: professional development, performance management, or both?. Br J Gen Pract. 55:544–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan N, Bryce M, Pearson M, Wong G, Cooper C, Archer J. 2017. Towards an understanding of how appraisal of doctors produces its effects: a realist review. Med Educ. 51:1002–1013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlain JM. 2010. Portfolio-based performance appraisal for doctors: a case of paperwork compliance. Sociol Res Online. 15:8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. 2006. Coding in grounded theory practice. In: Silverman D, editor. Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Conlon M. 2003. Appraisal: the catalyst of personal development. BMJ. 327:389–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA, Holmboe ES, Sorensen KJ, Berger RA, Wilkinson JM. 2015. Getting maintenance of certification to work: a grounded theory study of physicians' perceptions. JAMA Intern Med. 175:35–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drazen JM, Weinstein DF. 2010. Considering recertification. N Engl J Med. 362:946–947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubravec M. 2011. Board certification/recertification/maintenance of certification – a malignant growth. J Am Phys Surg. 16:52–53.
   Google Scholar
• Frank JR, Snell LS, Cate OT, Holmboe ES, Carraccio C, Swing SR, Harris P, Glasgow NJ, Campbell C, Dath D, et al. 2010. Competency-based medical education: theory to practice. Med Teach. 32:638–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodyear-Smith F, Whitehorn M, McCormick R. 2003. General practitioners' perceptions of continuing medical education's role in changing behaviour. Educ Health (Abingdon, England). 16:328–338.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gulikers JTM, Bastiaens TJ, Kirschner PA, Kester L. 2006. Relations between student perceptions of assessment authenticity, study approaches and learning outcome. Studies Educ Eval. 32:381–400.
   Google Scholar
• Horsley T, Lockyer J, Cogo E, Zeiter J, Bursey F, Campbell C. 2016. National programmes for validating physician competence and fitness for practice: a scoping review. BMJ Open. 6:e010368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal MZ, Akbar S, Budhwar P. 2015. Effectiveness of performance appraisal: an integrated framework. Int J Manag Rev. 17:510–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempkens D, Dieterle WE, Butzlaff M, Wilson A, Böcken J, Rieger MA, Wilm S, Vollmar HC. 2009. German ambulatory care physicians' perspectives on continuing medical education – a national survey. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 29:259–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjaer NK, Steenstrup AP, Pedersen LB, Halling A. 2014. Continuous professional development for gps: experience from Denmark. Postgrad Med J. 90:383–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Links MJ. 2018. Beyond competency-based continuing professional development. Medical Teacher. 40:253–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipner RS, Bylsma WH, Arnold GK, Fortna GS, Tooker J, Cassel CK. 2006. Who is maintaining certification in internal medicine—and why? A national survey 10 years after initial certification. Ann Intern Med. 144:29–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockyer J, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornan T, Holmboe E, Loney E, Mann K, Sargeant J. 2011. Feedback data sources that inform physician self-assessment. Med Teach. 33:e113–e120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockyer J, Bursey F, Richardson D, Frank JR, Snell L, Campbell C. 2017. Competency-based medical education and continuing professional development: a conceptualization for change. Med Teach. 39:617–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGivern G, Ferlie E. 2007. Playing tick-box games: Interrelating defences in professional appraisal. Human Relat. 60:1361–1385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountford J, Shojania KG. 2012. Refocusing quality measurement to best support quality improvement: local ownership of quality measurement by clinicians. BMJ Qual Saf. 21:519–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen JE, Lous J, Adeler HF, Olesgaard P, Maagaard RR, Olesen F. 2002. General practitioners' continuing medical education: a prospective study from the county of aarhus. Scand J Prim Health Care. 20:198–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinke S. 2003. Does the form really matter? Leadership, trust, and acceptance of the performance appraisal process. Rev Public Personnel Administr. 23:23–37.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Deci EL. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 55:68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sehlbach C, Govaerts MJ, Mitchell S, Rohde GGU, Smeenk FWJM, Driessen EW. 2018. Doctors on the move: A european case study on the key characteristics of national recertification systems. BMJ Open. 8:e019963.
   Google Scholar
• Solé M, Panteli D, Risso-Gill I, Döring N, Busse R, McKee M, Legido-Quigley H. 2014. How do medical doctors in the european union demonstrate that they continue to meet criteria for registration and licencing? Clin Med (Lond). 14:633–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar