Approaches to considering sex and gender in continuous professional development for health and social care professionals: An emerging paradigm

References

• Bairey Merz CN, Mark S, Boyan BD, Jacobs AK, Shah PK, Shaw LJ, Taylor D, Marbán E. 2010. Proceedings from the scientific symposium: sex differences in cardiovascular disease and implications for therapies. J Women’s Health. 19:1059–1072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barros del Río MA, Sánchez de Madariaga I. 2016. A practical guide to address gender bias in academia and research. Madrid: Fundación General de la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• CIHR. 2017. Report on Consultations with Official Language Minority Communities. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton JA. 2016. Studying both sexes: a guiding principle for biomedicine. FASEB J. 30:519–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coen S, Banister E. 2012. What a difference sex and gender make: a gender, sex and health research casebook. Ottawa, Canada: CIHR Institute of Gender and Health.
   Google Scholar
• Davis D, Evans M, Jadad A, Perrier L, Rath D, Ryan D, Sibbald G, Straus S, Rappolt S, Wowk M, Zwarenstein M. 2003. The case for knowledge translation: shortening the journey from evidence to effect. BMJ. 327:33–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis DR, Galbraith H, American College of Chest Physicians, C. Science Policy. 2009. Continuing medical education effect on practice performance: effectiveness of continuing medical education: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Educational Guidelines. Chest. 135:42S–48S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day S, Mason R, Tannenbaum C, Rochon PA. 2017. Essential metrics for assessing sex & gender integration in health research proposals involving human participants. PloS One. 12:e0182812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchesne A, Tannenbaum C, Einstein G. 2017. Funding agency mechanisms to increase sex and gender analysis. Lancet. 389:699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferlie EB, Shortell SM. 2001. Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: a framework for change. Milbank Q. 79:281–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser G. 2016. Annual Report of the Commissioner of Official Languages. Ottawa, Canada, Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages.
   Google Scholar
• GENDER-NET. Tools for IGAR: Guidelines and Checklists. [accessed 2018 Apr 5]. http://igar-tool.gender-net.eu/en/tools-for-igar
   Google Scholar
• Gendered Innovations. n.d. Rethinking Concepts and Theories. [accessed 2018 Apr 5]. http://genderedinnovations.stanford.edu/methods/concepts.html
   Google Scholar
• Godin G, Belanger-Gravel A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. 2008. Healthcare professionals’ intentions and behaviours: a systematic review of studies based on social cognitive theories. Implement Sci. 3:36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson BE, Pederson A, Boscoe M. 2006. Gender-based analysis and wait times: New questions, new knowledge. Toronto, ON, Canada: National Coordinating Group on Health Care Reform and Women.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson JL, Greaves L, Repta R. 2009. Better science with sex and gender: Facilitating the use of a sex and gender-based analysis in health research. Int J Equity Health. 8:14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson J, Sharman Z, Vissandjee B, Stewart DE. 2014. Does a change in health research funding policy related to the integration of sex and gender have an impact? PLoS One. 9:e99900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jull J, Giles A, Graham ID. 2017. Community-based participatory research and integrated knowledge translation: advancing the co-creation of knowledge. Implement Sci. 12:150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick JD, Kirkpatrick WK. 2016. Kirkpatrick’s four levels of training evaluation. Alexandria, VA: ATD Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles M, 1984. Andragogy in action: applying modern principles of adult learning. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kuehner C. 2017. Why is depression more common among women than among men? Lancet Psychiatry. 4:146–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Légaré F, Bekker H, Desroches S, Politi M, Stacey D, Borduas F, Cheater FM, Cornuz J, Coutu MF, Donner-Banzhoff N, et al. 2010. Effective continuing professional development for translating shared decision making in primary care: A study protocol. Implement Sci. 5:83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Légaré F, Borduas F, Freitas A, Jacques A, Godin G, Luconi F, Grimshaw J. 2014. Development of a simple 12-item theory-based instrument to assess the impact of continuing professional development on clinical behavioral intentions. PLoS One. 9:e91013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moerman CJ, Deurenberg R, Haafkens JA. 2009. Locating sex-specific evidence on clinical questions in MEDLINE: a search filter for use on OvidSP™. BMC Med Res Methodol. 9:25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academy of Science. 2010. Redesigning continuing education in the health professions. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Neill J, Tabish H, Welch V, Petticrew M, Pottie K, Clarke M, Evans T, Pardo Pardo J, Waters E, White H, Tugwell P. 2014. Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health. J Clin Epidemiol. 67:56–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raz L, Miller VM. 2012. Considerations of sex and gender differences in preclinical and clinical trials. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 214: 127–147.
   Google Scholar
• Rojek MK, Jenkins MR. 2016. Improving medical education using a sex- and gender-based medicine lens. J Women's Health. 25:985–989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe-Finkbeiner K. 2004. The F-word: Feminism in jeopardy: women, politics, and the future. Emeryville, CA: Seal Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sarmast H, Mosavianpour M, Collet J-P, Kissoon N. 2014. TDF (Theoretical Domains Framework): how inclusive are TDF domains and constructs compared to other tools for assessing barriers to change? BMC Health Serv Res. 14:P81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sex and Gender Medical Education Summit Proceedings. 2015. Sex and gender medical education summit proceedings. USA: Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. 2016. Census Profile, 2016 Census: Quebec [province] and Canada. [accessed 2018 Apr 5]. http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/dp-pd/prof/details/page.cfm?Lang=E&Tab =1&Geo1=PR&Code1=24&Geo2=PR&Code2=01&Data=Count&SearchText=quebec&SearchType=Begins&SearchPR =01&B1=Language&TABID =1
   Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum C, Clow B, Haworth-Brockman M, Voss P. 2017. Sex and gender considerations in Canadian clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review. CMAJ Open. 5:E66–E73.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tannenbaum C, Greaves L, Graham ID. 2016. Why sex and gender matter in implementation research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 16:145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turecki G, Brent DA. 2016. Suicide and suicidal behaviour. The Lancet. 387:1227–1239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. 2015. Indigenous peoples and participatory health research: planning and management-preparing research agreements. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Witteman HO, Hendricks M, Straus S, Tannenbaum C. 2017. Female grant applicants are equally successful when peer reviewers assess the science, but not when they assess the scientist. Biorxiv. 232868.
   Google Scholar