Mind the gap: Teachers’ conceptions of student-staff partnership and its potential to enhance educational quality

References

• Andrews A, Jeffries J, St Aubyn B. 2013. By appointment to Birmingham City University students: promoting student engagement through partnership working. In: Nygaard C, Brand S, Bartholomew P, Millard L, editors. Student engagement: identity, motivation and community. Oxfordshire: Libri Publishing; p. 199–212.
   Google Scholar
• ASPIRE Initiative: International Association for Medical Education in Europe. 2012. [accessed 2019 Apr 8]. https://www.aspire-to-excellence.org/Areas+of+Excellence/
   Google Scholar
• Bendermacher GWG, Oude Egbrink MGA, Wolfhagen I, Dolmans D. 2017. Unravelling quality culture in higher education: a realist review. High Educ. 73(1):39–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bicket M, Misra S, Wright SM, Shochet R. 2010. Medical student engagement and leadership within a new learning community. BMC Med Educ. 10(1):1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovill C, Bulley C. 2011. A model of active student participation in curriculum design-exploring desirability and possibility. In: Rust C, editor. Improving Student Learning (18) Global theories and local practices: institutional, disciplinary and cultural variations. Oxford: The Oxford Centre for Staff and Educational Development; p. 176–188.
   Google Scholar
• Bovill C, Cook-Sather A, Felten P. 2011. Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: implications for academic developers. Int J Acad Devel. 16(2):133–145.
   Google Scholar
• Bovill C, Cook-Sather A, Felten P, Millard L, Moore-Cherry N. 2016. Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships. High Educ. 71(2):195–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandl K, Mandel J, Winegarden B. 2017. Student evaluation team focus groups increase students’ satisfaction with the overall course evaluation process. Med Educ. 51(2):215–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks J, McCluskey S, Turley E, King N. 2015. The utility of template analysis in qualitative psychology research. Qual Res Psychol. 12(2):202–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnes B. 2015. Understanding resistance to change – building on Coch and French. J Change Manag. 15(2):92–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather A. 2014. Multiplying perspectives and improving practice: what can happen when undergraduate students collaborate with college faculty to explore teaching and learning. Instr Sci. 42(1):31–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook‐Sather A, Bovill C, Felten P. 2014. Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: a guide for faculty. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather A, Luz A. 2015. Greater engagement in and responsibility for learning: what happens when students cross the threshold of student-faculty partnership. High Educ Res Dev. 34(6):1097–1109.
   Google Scholar
• Delpish A, Darby A, Holmes A, Knight-McKenna M, Mihans R, King C, Felten P. 2010. Equalizing voices: student-faculty partnership in course design. In Werder C, Otis M, editors. Engaging student voices: in the study of teaching and learning. Sterling (VA): Stylus Publishing; p. 96–114.
   Google Scholar
• Dieter PE. 2008. Quality management of medical education at the Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, University of Technology Dresden, Germany. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 37(12):1038–1040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy KA, O’Neill P A. 2003. Involving medical students in staff development activities. Med Teach. 25(2):191–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujikawa H, Wong J, Kurihara H, Kitamura K, Nishigori H. 2015. Why do students participate in medical education? Clin Teach. 12(1):46–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin A, Cook V. 2009. Acting on evaluation: twelve tips from a national conference on student evaluations. Med Teach. 31(2):101–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey M, Flint A, Harrington K. 2014. Engagement through partnership: students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York: The Higher Education Academy. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/resources/engagement_through_partnership.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Könings KD, Seidel T, Van Merriënboer J. 2014. Participatory design of learning environments: Integrating perspectives of students, teachers, and designers. Instr Sci. 42(1):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens SE, Meeuwissen SNE, Dolmans D, Bovill C, Könings KD. 2019. Student participation in the design of learning and teaching: Disentangling the terminology and approaches. Med Teach. 41(10):1203–1205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens SE, Spruijt A, Wolfhagen I, Whittingham JRD, Dolmans D. 2019. A students’ take on student-staff partnerships: experiences and preferences. Assess Eval Higher Educ. 44(6):910–919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews KE, Dwyer A, Hine L, Turner J. 2018. Conceptions of students as partners. High Educ. 76(6):957–971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters H, Zdravkovic M, João Costa M, Celenza A, Ghias K, Klamen D, Weggemans M. 2018. Twelve tips for enhancing student engagement. Med Teach. 41:632–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seale J. 2010. Doing student voice work in higher education: an exploration of the value of participatory methods. Brit Educ Res J. 36(6):995–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Berkel H, Scherpbier A, Hillen H, Van der Vleuten C. 2010. Lessons from problem-based learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar