https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8792-2870
References
- Baeten M, Kyndt E, Struyven K, Dochy F. 2010. Using student-centered learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educ Res Rev. 5(3):243–260.
- Beckwith JB. 1991. Approaches to learning, their context, and relationship to assessment performance. High Educ. 22(1):17–30.
- Biggs J. 1996. Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment: thinking about teaching and learning. High Educ. 32(3):347–364.
- Biggs J, Kember D, Leung DYP. 2001. The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. Br J Educ Psychol. 71(Pt 1):133–149.
- Dinsmore DL, Alexander PA. 2012. A critical discussion of deep and surface processing: what it means, how it is measured, the role of context, and model specification. Educ Psychol Rev. 24(4):499–567.
- Dolmans DHJM. 2019. How theory and design-based research can mature PBL practice and research. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 24(5):879–891.
- Dolmans DHJM, De Grave W, Wolfhagen IHAP, van der Vleuten CPM. 2005. Problem-based learning: future challenges for educational practice and research. Med Educ. 39(7):732–741.
- Dolmans DHJM, Loyens SMM, Marcq H, Gijbels D. 2016. Deep and surface learning in problem-based learning: a review of the literature. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 21(5):1087–1112.
- Gijbels D, Van de Watering G, Dochy F, Van den Bossche P. 2005. The relationship between students’ approaches to learning and the assessment of learning outcomes. Eur J Psychol Educ. 20(4):327–341.
- Godoy S. 2009. Validação para o Brasil da escala Revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) [Validation of the scale Revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) for Brazil]. http://medcontent.metapress.com/index/A65RM03P4874243N.pdf.
- Hennink MM, Kaiser BN, Marconi VC. 2017. Code saturation versus meaning saturation: how many interviews are enough?. Qual Health Res. 27(4):591–608.
- Michaelsen LK, Parmelee DX, McMahon KK, Levine RE. 2008. Team-based learning for health professions education – a guide to using small groups for improving learning. Sterling, VA: Ed Stylus Publishing.
- Reimschisel T, Herring AL, Huang J, Minor TJ. 2017. A systematic review of the published literature on team-based learning in health professions education. Med Teach. 39(12):1227–1237.
- Salvador DF, Rolando LGR, Oliveira D. d, Vasconcellos RFRR. 2017. Uso Do Questionário MSLQ Na Avaliação Da Motivação E Estratégias De Aprendizagem De Estudantes Do Ensino Médio De Biologia, Física E Matemática [Use of MSQL questionnaire in assessment of motivation and learning strategies of college students from biology, physics and mathematics]. Rev Educ Ciências Matemática. 7(2):56–73.
- Scouller K. 1998. The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches: multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Educ. 35(4):453–272.
- Struyven K, Dochy F, Janssens S, Gielen S. 2006. On the dynamics of students’ approaches to learning: the effects of the teaching/learning environment. Learn Instr. 16(4):279–294.
- Trigwell K, Prosser M. 1991. Improving the quality of student learning: the influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. High Educ. 22(3):251–266.
- Trigwell K, Prosser M, Waterhouse F. 1999. Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. Higher Educ. 37(1):57–70.
- Van der Vleuten C, Schuwirth L. 2005. Assessment: assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes. Med Educ. 39(3):309–317.
- Wolters CA, Pintrich PR, Karabenick SA. 2003. Assessing academic self-regulated learning. In: K. A. Moore, L. H. Lippman, editors. The Search Institute series on developmentally attentive community and society. What do children need to flourish: conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media; p. 251–270.