Avoid ‘running before we can walk’ in medical education research: The importance of design and development research

John Sandarsa Edge Hill University Medical School, Ormskirk, UKCorrespondence[email protected]

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3930-387X View further author information

Dario Cecilio-Fernandesb Department of Medical Psychology and Psychiatry, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8746-1680 View further author information

Rakesh Patelc University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5770-328X View further author information

Roghayeh Gandomkard Department of Medical Education, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7262-6243 View further author information

References

Branchaw JL, Butz AR, Smith AR. 2020. Evaluation of the second edition of entering research: a customizable curriculum for apprentice-style undergraduate and graduate research training programs and courses. CBE Life Sci Educ. 19(1):ar11.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Chen W, Reeves TC. 2020. Twelve tips for conducting educational design research in medical education. Med Teach. 42(9):980–986.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Eldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, Lancaster GA, on behalf of the PAFS consensus group. 2016. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. BMJ. 355:i5239.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Institute of Education Sciences & National Science Foundation. 2013. Common guidelines for education research and development. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences and National Science Foundation. [accessed 2020 Nov 2]. https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2013/nsf13126/nsf13126.pdf.
Google Scholar
Orsmond GI, Cohn ES. 2015. The distinctive features of a feasibility study: objectives and guiding questions. OTJR (Thorofare N J). 35(3):169–177.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Penuel WR, Riedy R, Barber MS, Peurach DJ, LeBouef WA, Clark T. 2020. Principles of collaborative education research with stakeholders: toward requirements for a new research and development Infrastructure. Rev Educ Res. 90(5):627–674.
Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Avoid ‘running before we can walk’ in medical education research: The importance of design and development research

References

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Avoid ‘running before we can walk’ in medical education research: The importance of design and development research

References

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date