964
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Third year medical students impersonalize and hedge when providing negative upward feedback to clinical faculty

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Afonso NM, Cardozo LJ, Mascarenhas OA, Aranha AN, Shah C. 2005. Are anonymous evaluations a better assessment of faculty teaching performance? A comparative analysis of open and anonymous evaluation processes. Fam Med. 37(1):43–47.
  • Armson H, Lockyer JM, Zetkulic M, Konings KD, Sargeant J. 2019. Identifying coaching skills to improve feedback use in postgraduate medical education. Med Educ. 53(5):477–493.
  • Baker K. 2010. Clinical teaching improves with resident evaluation and feedback. Anesthesiology. 113(3):693–703.
  • Binder R, Garcia P, Johnson B, Fuentes-Afflick E. 2018. Sexual harassment in medical schools: the challenge of covert retaliation as a barrier to reporting. Acad Med. 93(12):1770–1773.
  • Bould MD, Sutherland S, Sydor DT, Naik V, Friedman Z. 2015. Residents’ reluctance to challenge negative hierarchy in the operating room: a qualitative study. Can J Anaesth. 62(6):576–586.
  • Brown P, Levinson SC. 1987. Politeness: some universals in language usage. Vol. 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Caldicott CV, Faber-Langendoen K. 2005. Deception, discrimination, and fear of reprisal: lessons in ethics from third-year medical students. Acad Med. 80(9):866–873.
  • Chung MP, Thang CK, Vermillion M, Fried JM, Uijtdehaage S. 2018. Exploring medical students’ barriers to reporting mistreatment during clerkships: a qualitative study. Med Educ Online. 23(1):1478170.
  • Daberkow DW, 2nd, Hilton C, Sanders CV, Chauvin SW. 2005. Faculty evaluations by medicine residents using known versus anonymous systems. Med Educ Online. 10(1):4380.
  • Doja A, Bould MD, Clarkin C, Eady K, Sutherland S, Writer H. 2016. The hidden and informal curriculum across the continuum of training: a cross-sectional qualitative study. Med Teach. 38(4):410–418.
  • Donnelly MB, Woolliscroft JO. 1989. Evaluation of clinical instructors by third-year medical students. Acad Med. 64(3):159–164.
  • Dudek NL, Dojeiji S, Day K, Varpio L. 2016. Feedback to supervisors: is anonymity really so important? Acad Med. 91(9):1305–1312.
  • Eva KW, Armson H, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Mann K, Sargeant J. 2012. Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: on the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 17(1):15–26.
  • Finn K, Chiappa V, Puig A, Hunt DP. 2011. How to become a better clinical teacher: a collaborative peer observation process. Med Teach. 33(2):151–155.
  • Fluit CV, Bolhuis S, Klaassen T, DE Visser M, Grol R, Laan R, Wensing M. 2013. Residents provide feedback to their clinical teachers: reflection through dialogue. Med Teach. 35(9):e1485–e1492.
  • Fraser B. 2010. Pragmatic competence: the case of hedging. In: Kaltenbock G, Mihatsch W, Schneider S, editors. New approaches to hedging. London: Brill.
  • Ginsburg S, Regehr G, Lingard L, Eva KW. 2015. Reading between the lines: faculty interpretations of narrative evaluation comments. Med Educ. 49(3):296–306.
  • Ginsburg S, van der Vleuten C, Eva KW, Lingard L. 2016. Hedging to save face: a linguistic analysis of written comments on in-training evaluation reports. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 21(1):175–188.
  • Hafferty FW, Gaufberg EH, O'Donnell JF. 2015. The role of the hidden curriculum in “on doctoring” courses. AMA J Ethics. 17(2):130–139.
  • Irby DM, Gillmore GM, Ramsey PG. 1987. Factors affecting ratings of clinical teachers by medical students and residents. J Med Educ. 62(1):1–7.
  • Janss R, Rispens S, Segers M, Jehn KA. 2012. What is happening under the surface? Power, conflict and the performance of medical teams. Med Educ. 46(9):838–849.
  • Johnson NR, Chen J. 2006. Medical student evaluation of teaching quality between obstetrics and gynecology residents and faculty as clinical preceptors in ambulatory gynecology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 195(5):1479–1483.
  • Jug R, Jiang XS, Bean SM. 2019. Giving and receiving effective feedback: a review article and how-to guide. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 143(2):244–250.
  • Kogan JR, Conforti LN, Bernabeo EC, Durning SJ, Hauer KE, Holmboe ES. 2012. Faculty staff perceptions of feedback to residents after direct observation of clinical skills. Med Educ. 46(2):201–215.
  • Kost A, Combs H, Smith S, Klein E, Kritek P, Robins L, Cianciolo AT, Butani L, Gigante J, Ramani S. 2015. A proposed conceptual framework and investigation of upward feedback receptivity in medical education. Teach Learn Med. 27(4):359–361.
  • Kudisch JD, Fortunato VJ, Smith AF. 2006. Contextual and individual difference factors predicting individuals' desire to provide upward feedback. Group Organ Manag. 31(4):503–529.
  • Lefroy J, Watling C, Teunissen PW, Brand P. 2015. Guidelines: the do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. Perspect Med Educ. 4(6):284–299.
  • Lim DW, White JS. 2015. How do surgery students use written language to say what they see? A framework to understand medical students’ written evaluations of their teachers. Acad Med. 90(11 Suppl):S98–S106.
  • Lindahl MW, Unger ML. 2010. Cruelty in student teaching evaluations. Coll Teach. 58(3):71–76.
  • Litzelman DK, Stratos GA, Marriott DJ, Skeff KM. 1998. Factorial validation of a widely disseminated educational framework for evaluating clinical teachers. Acad Med. 73(6):688–695.
  • Mann K, van der Vleuten C, Eva K, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornan T, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Sargeant J. 2011. Tensions in informed self-assessment: how the desire for feedback and reticence to collect and use it can conflict. Acad Med. 86(9):1120–1127.
  • Martinez W, Lehmann LS, Thomas EJ, Etchegaray JM, Shelburne JT, Hickson GB, Brady DW, Schleyer AM, Best JA, May NB, et al. 2017. Speaking up about traditional and professionalism-related patient safety threats: a national survey of interns and residents. BMJ Qual Saf. 26(11):869–880.
  • Menachery EP, Wright SM, Howell EE, Knight AM. 2008. Physician-teacher characteristics associated with learner-centered teaching skills. Med Teach. 30(5):e137–e144.
  • Myers KA, Zibrowski EM, Lingard L. 2011. A mixed-methods analysis of residents’ written comments regarding their clinical supervisors. Acad Med. 86(10 Suppl):S21–S24.
  • Ose SO. 2016. Using Excel and Word to structure qualitative data. J Appl Soc Sci. 10(2):147–162.
  • Ramani S, Konings KD, Mann KV, Pisarski EE, van der Vleuten CPM. 2018. About politeness, face, and feedback: exploring resident and faculty perceptions of how institutional feedback culture influences feedback practices. Acad Med. 93(9):1348–1358.
  • Ramani S, Krackov SK. 2012. Twelve tips for giving feedback effectively in the clinical environment. Med Teach. 34(10):787–791.
  • Ramani S, Post SE, Konings K, Mann K, Katz JT, van der Vleuten C. 2017. “It’s just not the culture”: a qualitative study exploring residents’ perceptions of the impact of institutional culture on feedback. Teach Learn Med. 29(2):153–161.
  • Rees CE, Monrouxe LV. 2011. Medical students learning intimate examinations without valid consent: a multicentre study. Med Educ. 45(3):261–272.
  • Ritchie J, Spencer L. 1994. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman B, Burgess R, editors. Analyzing qualitative data. London and New York: Routledge; p. 173–194.
  • Robins L, Smith S, Kost A, Combs H, Kritek PA, Klein EJ. 2020. Faculty perceptions of formative feedback from medical students. Teach Learn Med. 32(2):168–175.
  • Sargeant J, Lockyer JM, Mann K, Armson H, Warren A, Zetkulic M, Soklaridis S, Konings KD, Ross K, Silver I, et al. 2018. The R2C2 model in residency education: how does it foster coaching and promote feedback use? Acad Med. 93(7):1055–1063.
  • Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, Van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. 2008. Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 13(3):275–288.
  • Shea JA, Bellini LM. 2002. Evaluations of clinical faculty: the impact of level of learner and time of year. Teach Learn Med. 14(2):87–91.
  • Smith SR, Paulen LJ. 1984. Use of anonymous student evaluations of faculty members in U.S. medical schools. J Med Educ. 59(3):196–197.
  • van de Ridder JMM, Berk FCJ, Stokking KM, Ten Cate OTJ. 2015. Feedback providers’ credibility impacts students’ satisfaction with feedback and delayed performance. Med Teach. 37(8):767–774.
  • van Wyk J, McLean M. 2007. Maximizing the value of feedback for individual facilitator and faculty development in a problem-based learning curriculum. Med Teach. 29(1):e26–e31.
  • Vanstone M, Grierson L. 2019. Medical student strategies for actively negotiating hierarchy in the clinical environment. Med Educ. 53(10):1013–1024.
  • Walker AG, Smither JW. 1999. A five-year study of upward feedback: what managers do with their results matter. Pers Psychol. 52(2):393–423.
  • Watling C, Driessen E, van der Vleuten CP, Vanstone M, Lingard L. 2013. Beyond individualism: professional culture and its influence on feedback. Med Educ. 47(6):585–594.
  • Zhou AY, Baker P. 2014. Confounding factors in using upward feedback to assess the quality of medical training: a systematic review. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 11:17.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.