Learning by concordance (LbC) to develop professional reasoning skills: AMEE Guide No. 141

References

• Abelson RP. 1975. Concepts for representing mundane reality in plans. In: Bobrow DG, Collins A, editors. Representation and understanding: studies in cognitive science. New-York: Academic Press; p. 273–309.
   Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Collins A, Duguid P. 1989. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ Res. 18(1):32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Charlin B, Boshuizen HPA, Custers EJ, Feltovich P. 2007. Scripts and clinical reasoning. Med Educ. 41(12):1178–1184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlin B, Deschênes M-F, Dumas J-P, Lecours J, Vincent A-M, Kassis J, Guertin L, Gagnon R, Robert D, Foucault A, et al. 2018. Concevoir une formation par concordance pour développer le raisonnement professionnel: quelles étapes faut-il parcourir? Pédagogie médicale. 19(3):143–149.
   Google Scholar
• Charlin B, Fernandez N. 2016. Préparer et animer une formation par concordance. In: Pelaccia T, editor. Comment (mieux) former et évaluer les étudiants en médecine et en sciences de la santé? Bruxelles (Belgique): De Boeck Supérieur; p. 325–340.
   Google Scholar
• Charlin B, Tardif J, Boshuizen HPA. 2000. Scripts and medical diagnostic knowledge: theory and applications for clinical reasoning instruction and research. Acad Med. 75(2):182–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlin B, Van der Vleuten C. 2004. Standardized assessment in context of uncertainty: the script concordance approach. Eval Health Prof. 27(3):304–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins A, Brown JS, Holum A. 1991. Cognitive apprenticeship: making thinking visible. Am Educ. 15(3):6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Custers EJ. 2015. Thirty years of illness scripts: theoretical origins and practical applications. Med Teach. 37(5):457–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deschênes M-F, Dubé S, Tremblay K, Pelletier I, Jacques-Bélair J, Ostiguy D, Buisson A. 2019. Élaboration d’une autoévaluation basée sur la concordance de jugement professionnel des enseignants. Rapport de recherche. Montréal (Canada): Programme d’aide à la recherche sur l’enseignement et l’apprentissage (PAREA), Ministère de l’Éducation et de l’Enseignement supérieur du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Deschênes M-F, Goudreau J. 2017. Addressing the development of both knowledge and clinical reasoning in nursing through the perspective of script concordance: an integrative literature review. JNEP. 7(12):28–38.
   Google Scholar
• Deschênes M-F, Goudreau J, Fernandez N. 2020. Learning strategies used by undergraduate nursing students in the context of a digital educational strategy based on script concordance: a descriptive study. Nurse Educ Today. 95:104607–104609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dory V, Gagnon R, Vanpee D, Charlin B. 2012. How to construct and implement script concordance tests: insights from a systematic review. Med Educ. 46(6):552–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumont K, Loye N, Goudreau J. 2015. Le potentiel diagnostique des questions d’un test de concordance de scripts pour évaluer le raisonnement clinique infirmier. Pédagogie Médicale. 16(1):49–64.
   Google Scholar
• Feltovich PJ, Barrows HS. 1984. Issues of generality in medical problem solving. In: Schmidt HG, De Volder ML, editors. Tutorials in problembased learning: a new direction in teaching the health professions. Assen (The Netherlands): Van Gorcum; p. 128–142.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez N, Foucault A, Dubé S, Robert D, Lafond C, Vincent A-M, Kassis J, Kazitani D, Charlin B. 2016. Learning-by-Concordance (LbC): introducing undergraduate students to the complexity and uncertainty of clinical practice. Can Med Ed J. 7(2):e104–e113.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foucault A, Dubé S, Fernandez N, Gagnon R, Charlin B. 2015. Learning medical professionalism with the online concordance-of-judgment learning tool (CJLT): a pilot study. Med Teach. 37(10):955–960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournier JP, Demeester A, Charlin B. 2008. Script concordance tests: guidelines for construction. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 8(1):18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon R, Charlin B, Coletti M, Sauvé E, Van der Vleuten C. 2005. Assessment in the context of uncertainty: how many members are needed on the panel of reference of a script concordance test? Med Educ. 39(3):284–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giet D, Massart V, Gagnon R, Charlin B. 2013. Le test de concordance de script en 20 questions. Pédagogie médicale. 14(1):39–48.
   Google Scholar
• Goudreau J, Boyer L, Létourneau D. 2014. Clinical nursing reasoning in nursing practice: a cognitive learning model based on a think aloud methodology. Qual Adv Nurs Educ Avancées en formation infirmière. 1(1):1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Guertin L, Lavigne P, Boucher A, Charlin B. Forthcoming 2019. Cancer de la thyroïde. Formation par concordance réalisée sur la plateforme Meduse®. Fédération des médecins spécialistes du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Lave J, Wenger E. 1991. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lecours J, Bernier F, Friedmann D, Jobin V, Charlin B, Fernandez N. 2018. Learning-by-concordance for family physicians: revealing its value for continuing professional development in dermatology. MedEdPublish. [1–15 p.]. https://www.mededpublish.org/manuscripts/1988.
   Google Scholar
• Lubarsky S, Dory V, Audétat M-C, Custers EJ, Charlin B. 2015. Using script theory to cultivate illness script formation and clinical reasoning in health professions education. Can Med Educ J. 6(2):e61–e70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lubarsky S, Dory V, Duggan P, Gagnon R, Charlin B. 2013. Script concordance testing: from theory to practice: AMEE guide no. 75. Med Teach. 35(3):184–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons K, McLaughlin JE, Khanova J, Roth MT. 2017. Cognitive apprenticeship in health sciences education: a qualitative review. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 22(3):723–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power A, Lemay J-F, Cooke S. 2016. Justify your answer: the role of written think aloud in script concordance testing. Teach Learn Med. 29(1):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schank R, Abelson R. 1977. Script, plans, goals and understanding: an inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Sibert L, Fournier J-P. 2015. ECNI- Épreuve TCS Test de concordance de script. Guide méthodologique. Paris (France): Les Éditions Maloine.
   Google Scholar
• Tedesco-Schneck M. 2019. Use of script concordance activity with the think-aloud approach to foster clinical reasoning in nursing students. Nurse Educ. 44(5):275–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan SH, Tor E, Hudson JN. 2020. Examining response process validity of script concordance testing: a think-aloud approach. Int J Med Educ. 11:127–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar