Co-creating scholarship through collaborative writing in health professions education: AMEE Guide No. 143

References

• Aitchison C, Guerin C. 2014. Writing groups for doctoral education and beyond: innovations in practice and theory. London; New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Azer SA. 2016. Exploring the top-cited and most influential articles in medical education. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 36(1):S32–S41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin C, Chandler GE. 2002. Improving faculty publication output: the role of a writing coach. J Prof Nurs. 18(1):8–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates J, Schrewe B, Ellaway RH, Teunissen PW, Watling C. 2019. Embracing standardisation and contextualisation in medical education. Med Educ. 53(1):15–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boice R. 1994. How writers journey to comfort and fluency: a psychological adventure. Westport: CT Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Bordage G. 2009. Conceptual frameworks to illuminate and magnify. Med Educ. 43(4):312–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordage G, Lineberry M, Yudkowsky R. 2016. Conceptual frameworks to guide research and development (R&D) in health professions education. Acad Med. 91(12):e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer EL. 1990. Scholarship reconsidered: priorities of the professoriate. Princeton (NJ): Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer EL. 1996. The scholarship of engagement. J Public Service Outreach. 1(1):11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Burke DT, Judelson AL, Schneider JC, DeVito MC, Latta D. 2002. Reading habits of practicing physiatrists. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 81(10):779–787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins JC. 2001. Good to great: why some companies make the leap–and others don’t. 1st ed. New York, NY: HarperBusiness.
   Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM. 2002. Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
   Google Scholar
• DocuViz: Visualizing Collaborative Writing. 2015. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; CHI 2015, April 18–23 Seoul, Republic of Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck CS. 1990. Self-theories and goals: their role in motivation, personality, and development. Nebr Symp Motiv. 38:199–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck CS. 2016. Mindset: the new psychology of success. Updated edition. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC. 2019. The fearless organization: creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Fontanarosa P, Bauchner H, Flanagin A. 2017. Authorship and team science. JAMA. 318(24):2433–2437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frassl MA, Hamilton DP, Denfeld BA, de Eyto E, Hampton SE, Keller PS, Sharma S, Lewis ASL, Weyhenmeyer GA, O’Reilly CM, et al. 2018. Ten simple rules for collaboratively writing a multi-authored paper. PLOS Comput Biol. 14(11):e1006508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner C. 1998. Mentoring: towards a professional friendship. Mentor Tutoring: Partnersh Learn. 6(1–2):77–84.
   Google Scholar
• Glassick CE. 2000. Boyer’s expanded definitions of scholarship, the standards for assessing scholarship, and the elusiveness of the scholarship of teaching. Acad Med. 75(9):877–880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorsky D, Mann K, Sargeant J. 2016. Project management and leadership: practical tips for medical school leaders. MedEdPublish. 5(3):41.
   Google Scholar
• Grzybowski SC, Bates J, Calam B, Alred J, Martin RE, Andrew R, Rieb L, Harris S, Wiebe C, Knell E, et al. 2003. A physician peer support writing group. Fam Med. 35(3):195–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays R, Masters K. 2020. Publishing ethics in medical education: guidance for authors and reviewers in a changing world. MedEdPublish. 9(1):48.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmeyer A, Newton M, Scott C. 2007. Valuing the scholarship of integration and the scholarship of application in the academy for health sciences scholars: recommended methods. Health Res Policy Syst. 5(5):5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ilgen JS, Artino AR, Jr., Simpson D, Yarris LM, Chretien KC, Sullivan GM. 2016. Group peer review: the breakfast of champions. J Grad Med Educ. 8(5):646–649.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim HC, Eklundh KS. 2001. Reviewing practices in collaborative writing. Comput Support Coop Work. 10:246–259.
   Google Scholar
• Last S, Neveu C. 2019. Chapter 4.3. Collaborative writing. In Technical writing essentials. Victoria (BC): University of Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard L, Watling C. 2020. Beyond feedback: 11 tips for coaching writing. Perspect Med Educ. 9(6):370–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfarlane B. 2017. The ethics of multiple authorship: power, performativity and the gift economy. Stud HighEduc. 42(7):1194–1210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavis B, Durning SJ, Uijtdehaage S. 2019. Authorship order in medical education publications: in search of practical guidance for the community. Teach Learn Med. 31(3):288–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKimm J, O’Sullivan H. 2016. When I say … leadership. Med Educ. 50(9):896–897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKimm J, Vogan CL. 2020. Followership: much more than simply following the leader. BMJLeader. 4:41–44.
   Google Scholar
• Meo SA, Hassan A, Aqil M, Usmani AM. 2015. Medical education research in GCC countries. BMC Med Educ. 15:8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meo SA, Sattar K, Ullah CH, Alnassar S, Hajjar W, Usmani AM. 2019. Progress and prospects of medical education research in Asian Countries. Pak J Med Sci. 35(6):1475–1481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabout JC, Parreira MR, Teresa FB, Carneiro FM, da Cunha HF, Ondei LD, Caramori SS, Soares TN. 2015. Publish (in a group) or perish (alone): the trend from single- to multi-authorship in biological papers. Scientrometrics. 102(1):357–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ness V, Duffy K, McCallum J, Price L. 2014. Getting published: reflections of a collaborative writing group. Nurse Educ Today. 34(1):1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nivet MA, Castillo-Page L, Schoolcraft Conrad S. 2016. A diversity and inclusion framework for medical education. Acad Med. 91(7):1031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramani S, McKimm J, Findyartini A, Nadarajah VD, Hays R, Chisolm MS, Filipe HP, Fornari A, Kachur EK, Kusurkar RA, et al. 2021. Twelve tips for developing a global community of scholars in health professions education. Med Teach. 43(8):966–971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renwick K, Selkrig M, Manathunga C, Keamy RK. 2020. Community engagement is…: revisiting Boyer’s model of scholarship. Higher Educ Res Dev. 39(6):1232–1246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards BF, Cardell EM, Chow CJ, Moore KB, Moorman KL, O'Connor M, Hart SE. 2020. Discovering the benefits of group peer review of submitted manuscripts. Teach Learn Med. 32(1):104–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts LW. 2017. Addressing authorship issues prospectively: a heuristic approach. Acad Med. 92(2):143–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts R. 2018. Why ascribing authorship is important. Aust J Rural Health. 26(2):72–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Deci EL. 2017. Self-determination theory: basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saint S, Christakis DA, Saha S, Elmore JG, Welsh DE, Baker P, Koepsell TD. 2000. Journal reading habits of internists. J Gen Intern Med. 15(12):881–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinert Y, McLeod PJ, Liben S, Snell L. 2008. Writing for publication in medical education: the benefits of a faculty development workshop and peer writing group. Med Teach. 30(8):e280–e285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens FC, Simmonds Goulbourne JD. 2012. Globalization and the modernization of medical education. Med Teach. 34(10):e684–e689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling C. 2016. The three 'S's of editing: story, structure, and style. Perspect Med Educ. 5(5):300–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger E. 2000. Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems. Organization (Lond). 7(2):225–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger E, McDermott RA, Snyder W. 2002. Cultivating communities of practice: a guide to managing knowledge. Boston (MA): Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yarris LM, Chan TM, Gottlieb M, Juve AM. 2019. Finding your people in the digital age: virtual communities of practice to promote education scholarship. J Grad Med Educ. 11(1):1–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar