1,356
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Teaching and assessment of clinical diagnostic reasoning in medical students

ORCID Icon, &

References

  • Barrows HS, Feltovich PJ. 1987. The clinical reasoning process. Med Educ. 21(2):86–91.
  • Bing-You R, Hayes V, Varaklis K, Trowbridge R, Kemp H, McKelvy D. 2017. Feedback for learners in medical education: What Is known? A scoping review. Acad Med. 92(9):1346–1354.
  • Bonifacino E, Follansbee WP, Farkas AH, Jeong K, McNeil MA, DiNardo DJ. 2019. Implementation of a clinical reasoning curriculum for clerkship-level medical students: a pseudo-randomized and controlled study. Diagnosis. 6(2):165–172.
  • Bordage G. 1999. Why did I miss the diagnosis? Some cognitive explanations and educational implications. Acad Med. 74(10 Suppl):S138–S143.
  • Branch WT, Jr., Paranjape A. 2002. Feedback and reflection: teaching methods for clinical settings. Acad Med. 77(12 Part 1):1185–1188.
  • Croskerry P. 2003. Cognitive forcing strategies in clinical decisionmaking. Ann Emerg Med. 41(1):110–120.
  • Croskerry P, Campbell SG. 2021. A cognitive autopsy approach towards explaining diagnostic failure. Cureus. 13(8):41.
  • Downing SM. 2003. Validity: on meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ. 37(9):830–837.
  • Eva KW. 2005. What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning. Med Educ. 39(1):98–106.
  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. 2007. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 39(2):175–191.
  • Graber ML, Franklin N, Gordon R. 2005. Diagnostic error in internal medicine. Arch Intern Med. 165(13):1493–1499.
  • Hattie J, Timperley H. 2007. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res. 77(1):81–112.
  • IBMCorp. 2016. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. Version 24.0.
  • Kunina-Habenicht O, Hautz WE, Knigge M, Spies C, Ahlers O. 2015. Assessing clinical reasoning (ASCLIRE): instrument development and validation. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 20(5):1205–1224.
  • Linn A, Khaw C, Kildea H, Tonkin A. 2012. Clinical reasoning – a guide to improving teaching and practice. Aust Fam Physician. 41(1–2):18–20.
  • McHugh ML. 2012. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med. 22(3):276–282.
  • Monteiro SD, Sherbino J, Patel A, Mazzetti I, Norman GR, Howey E. 2015. Reflecting on diagnostic errors: taking a second look is not enough. J Gen Intern Med. 30(9):1270–1274.
  • Norcini J, Burch V. 2007. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Med Teach. 29(9):855–871.
  • Norman GR, Monteiro SD, Sherbino J, Ilgen JS, Schmidt HG, Mamede S. 2017. The causes of errors in clinical reasoning: cognitive biases, knowledge deficits, and dual process thinking. Acad Med. 92(1):23–30.
  • Pelgrim EA, Kramer AW, Mokkink HG, van der Vleuten CP. 2012. The process of feedback in workplace-based assessment: organisation, delivery, continuity. Med Educ. 46(6):604–612.
  • Rencic J, Trowbridge RL, Jr., Fagan M, Szauter K, Durning S. 2017. Clinical reasoning education at US medical schools: results from a national survey of internal medicine clerkship directors. J Gen Intern Med. 32(11):1242–1246.
  • Shulman LS. 2005. Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus. 134(3):52–59.
  • Thampy H, Willert E, Ramani S. 2019. Assessing clinical reasoning: targeting the higher levels of the pyramid. J Gen Intern Med. 34(8):1631–1636.
  • Trimble M, Hamilton P. 2016. The thinking doctor: clinical decision making in contemporary medicine. Clin Med. 16(4):343–346.
  • Weinberg NS, Stason WB. 1998. Managing quality in hospital practice. Int J Qual Health Care. 10(4):295–302.
  • Williams RG, Klamen DL. 2012. Examining the diagnostic justification abilities of fourth-year medical students. Acad Med. 87(8):1008–1014.
  • Young M, Thomas A, Gordon D, Gruppen L, Lubarsky S, Rencic J, Ballard T, Holmboe E, Da Silva A, Ratcliffe T, et al. 2019. The terminology of clinical reasoning in health professions education: implications and considerations. Med Teach. 41(11):1277–1284.
  • Zayyan M. 2011. Objective structured clinical examination: the assessment of choice. Oman Med J. 26(4):219–222.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.