Weekly near-peer tutoring sessions improve students’ performance on basic medical sciences and USMLE Step1 examinations

References

• Alcamo AM, Davids AR, Way DP, Lynn DJ, Vandre DD. 2010. The impact of a peer-designed and led USMLE step 1 review course: improvement in preparation and scores. Acad Med. 85(10):S45–S48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arja SB, Wilson L, Fatteh S, Kottathveetil P, Fateh AM, Arja SB. 2021. Medical education during COVID-19: response at one medical school. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 9(3):176–182.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Batchelder AJ, Rodrigues CM, Lin LY, Hickey PM, Johnson C, Elias JE. 2010. The role of students as teachers: four years’ experience of a large-scale, peer-led programme. Med Teach. 32(7):547–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck A, Wood C, Helms R, Arvizo C, Cherry BM, Ziats NP. 2016. Peer-assisted learning in introductory histopathology improves learner scores and delivers learner satisfaction. MedSciEduc. 26(1):85–92.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner JM, Bird JB, Willey JM. 2017. Formative assessment in an integrated curriculum: identifying at-risk students for poor performance on USMLE Step 1 using NBME custom exam questions. Acad Med. 92(11S):S21–S25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulte C, Betts A, Garner K, Durning S. 2007. Student teaching: views of student near-peer teachers and learners. Med Teach. 29(6):583–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CK, Hughes J, Jr, Samuels AD. 2016. Using simulation modeling approach to predict USMLE steps 1 and 2 performances. Int J Educ Pedag Sci. 10(8):2887–2899.
   Google Scholar
• Coumarbatch J, Robinson L, Thomas R, Bridge PD. 2010. Strategies for identifying students at risk for USMLE step 1 failure. Fam Med. 42(2):105–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dadafarin S, Petersen KH. 2021. Randomized trial of a year-long USMLE Step 1 preparation near-peer teaching program. Med Sci Educ. 31(3):1065–1071.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evans DJ, Cuffe T. 2009. Near-peer teaching in anatomy: an approach for deeper learning. Anat Sci Educ. 2(5):227–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field M, Burke JM, McAllister D, Lloyd DM. 2007. Peer-assisted learning: a novel approach to clinical skills learning for medical students. Med Educ. 41(4):411–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallan AJ, Offner GD, Symes K. 2016. Vertical integration of biochemistry and clinical medicine using a near-peer learning model. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 44(6):507–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandy RA, Herial NA, Khuder SA, Metting PJ. 2008. Use of curricular and extracurricular assessments to predict performance on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) step 1: a multi-year study. Learn Assist Rev. 13(2):27–35.
   Google Scholar
• Giordano C, Hutchinson D, Peppler R. 2016. A predictive model for USMLE step 1 scores. Cureus. 8(9):e769.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guiot HM, Franqui-Rivera H. 2018. Predicting performance on the United States Medical Licensing Examination step 1 and step 2 clinical knowledge using results from previous examinations. AMEP. 9:943–949.
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg MH, Dela Cruz E, Longino A, Longino N, Çoruh B, Merel SE. 2021. Development of a single-institution virtual internal medicine subinternship with near-peer teaching in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Acad Med. 96(12):1706–1710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horneffer A, Fassnacht U, Oechsner W, Huber-Lang M, Boeckers TM, Boeckers A. 2016. Effect of didactically qualified student tutors on their tutees’ academic performance and tutor evaluation in the gross anatomy course. Ann Anat. 208:170–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson TA, Evans DJ. 2012. Can medical students teach? A near-peer-led teaching program for year 1 students. Adv Physiol Educ. 36(3):192–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong L, Smith Z, Longino A, Merel SE, McDonough K. 2020. Virtual peer teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. MedSciEduc. 30(4):1361–1362.
   Google Scholar
• Karpicke JD. 2012. Retrieval-based learning: active retrieval promotes meaningful learning. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 21(3):157–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpicke JD, Grimaldi PJ. 2012. Retrieval-based learning: a perspective for enhancing meaningful learning. Educ Psychol Rev. 24(3):401–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalil MK, Hawkins HG, Crespo LM, Buggy J. 2018. The design and development of prediction models for maximizing students’ academic achievement. MedSciEduc. 28(1):111–117.
   Google Scholar
• Kibble JD. 2009. A peer-led supplemental tutorial project for medical physiology: implementation in a large class. Adv Physiol Educ. 33(2):111–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landoll RR, Bennion LD, Maggio LA. 2021. Understanding excellence: a qualitative analysis of high-performing learner study strategies. Med Sci Educ. 31(3):1101–1108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morgan KM, Northey EE, Khalil MK. 2017. The effect of near‐peer tutoring on medical students’ performance in anatomical and physiological sciences. Clin Anat. 30(7):922–928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison CA, Ross LP, Fogle T, Butler A, Miller J, Dillon GF. 2010. Relationship between performance on the NBME comprehensive basic sciences self-assessment and USMLE step 1 for US and Canadian medical school students. Acad Med. 85(10):S98–S101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson AJ, Nelson SV, Linn AM, Raw LE, Kildea HB, Tonkin AL. 2013. Tomorrow’s educators … today? Implementing near-peer teaching for medical students. Med Teach. 35(2):156–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees EL, Quinn PJ, Davies B, Fotheringham V. 2016. How does peer teaching compare to faculty teaching? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Teach. 38(8):829–837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rengier F, Rauch PJ, Partovi S, Kirsch J, Nawrotzki R. 2010. A three-day anatomy revision course taught by senior peers effectively prepares junior students for their national anatomy exam. Ann Anat. 192(6):396–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawhill A, Butler A, Ripkey D, Swanson DB, Subhiyah R, Thelman J, Walsh W, Holtzman KZ, Angelucci K. 2004. Using the NBME self-assessments to project performance on USMLE step 1 and step 2: impact of test administration conditions. Acad Med. 79(10):S55–S57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenoy A, Petersen KH. 2020. Peer tutoring in preclinical medical education: a review of the literature. Med Sci Educ. 30(1):537–544.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tanenbaum EJ, Johnson JH, Jordan E, Cottral J, Tenore C, Burton WB, McGinn AP, Raff AC. 2016. An effective evidence-based student run near-peer support group for the USMLE Step 1 exam. MedSciEduc. 26(4):691–699.
   Google Scholar
• ten Cate O, Durning S. 2007. Dimensions and psychology of peer teaching in medical education. Med Teach. 29(6):546–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Cate O, van de Vorst I, van den Broek S. 2012. Academic achievement of students tutored by near-peers. Int J Med Educ. 3:6–13.
   Google Scholar
• Tolsgaard MG, Gustafsson A, Rasmussen MB, HØiby P, Müller CG, Ringsted C. 2007. Student teachers can be as good as associate professors in teaching clinical skills. Med Teach. 29(6):553–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein CE, Palmer DR, Acee TW. 2016. LASSI user’s manual: learning and study strategies. Clearwater (FL): H&H.
   Google Scholar
• West C, Kurz T, Smith S, Graham L. 2014. Are study strategies related to medical licensing exam performance? Int J Med Educ. 5:199–204.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wong JG, Waldrep TD, Smith TG. 2007. Formal peer-teaching in medical school improves academic performance: the MUSC supplemental instructor program. Teach Learn Med. 19(3):216–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar