Community engagement by faculties of medicine: A scoping review of current practices and practical recommendations

References

• Arksey H, O’Malley L. 2005. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 8(1):19–32.
   Google Scholar
• [AFMC] Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada. 2019. Joint commitment to action on indigenous health. https://afmc.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/AFMC_Position_Paper_JCAIH_EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• [AFMC] Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada. 2021. Priorities social accountability. https://www.afmc.ca/index.php/en/priorities/social-accountability
   Google Scholar
• Black KZ, Hardy CY, De Marco M, Ammerman AS, Corbie-Smith G, Council B, Ellis D, Eng E, Harris B, Jackson M, et al. 2013. Beyond incentives for involvement to compensation for consultants: increasing equity in CBPR approaches. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 7(3):263–270.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boelen C. 1992. Medical education reform: the need for global action. Acad Med. 67(11):745–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boelen C. 2000. Towards unity for health: challenges and opportunities for partnership in health development – a working paper. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Boelen C. 2011. Consensus Mondial sur la Responsabilité Sociale des Facultés de Médecine [Global consensus on social accountability of medical schools]. Santé Publique. 23(3):247–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boelen C, Dharamsi S, Gibbs T. 2012. The social accountability of medical schools and its indicators. Educ Health. 25(3):180–194.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boelen C, Heck JE. 1995. Defining and measuring the social accountability of medical schools. In: Who/Hrh/95.7. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/59441.
   Google Scholar
• Boelen C, Pearson D, Kaufman A, Rourke J, Woollard R, Marsh DC, Gibbs T. 2016. Producing a socially accountable medical school: AMEE Guide No. 109. Med Teach. 38(11):1078–1091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boelen C, Woollard B. 2009. Social accountability and accreditation: a new frontier for educational institutions. Med Educ. 43(9):887–894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolduc N, Grand’Maison P. 2007. Towards unity for health: lessons for health development in Canada. Educ Health. 20(2):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein S, Baker R, Navarro P, Mackey S, Speed D, Sullivan M. 2017. Putting research in place: an innovative approach to providing contextualized evidence synthesis for decision makers. Syst Rev. 6(1):1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracht N, Finnegan JR, Rissel C, Weisbrod R, Gleason J, Corbett J, Veblen-Mortenson S. 1994. Community ownership and program continuation following a health demonstration project. Health Educ Res. 9(2):243–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Brunger F, Wall D. 2016. “What do they really mean by partnerships?” Questioning the unquestionable good in ethics guidelines promoting community engagement in indigenous health research? Qual Health Res. 26(13):1862–1877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Interprofessional Health Leadership Collaborative. 2015. Community engagement for health system change: starting from social accountability. http://www.ipe.utoronto.ca/sites/default/files/CommunityEngagementforHealthSystemChange.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1997. Principles of community engagement. 1st ed. Atlanta (GA): CDC/ATSDR Committee on Community Engagement.
   Google Scholar
• Clinical and Translational Science Awards Consortium. 2011. Principles of community engagement. 2nd ed. Atlanta (GA): National Institutes of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke M, Irby DM, Sullivan W, Ludmerer KM. 2006. American Medical Education 100 years after the Flexner report. N Engl J Med. 355(13):1339–1344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbie-Smith G, Ammerman AS, Katz ML, St. George DMM, Blumenthal C, Washington C, Weathers B, Keyserling TC, Switzer B. 2003. Trust, benefit, satisfaction, and burden: a randomized controlled trial to reduce cancer risk through African-American churches. J Gen Intern Med. 18(7):531–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowe M, Sheppard L. 2011. A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: alternative tool structure is proposed. J Clin Epidemiol. 64(1):79–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai MU, Bellamy C, Guy K, Costa M, O'Connell MJ, Davidson L. 2019. “If You Want to Know About the Book, Ask the Author”: Enhancing community engagement through participatory research in clinical mental health settings. Behav Med. 45(2):177–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy G, Ross SJ, Woolley TS, Sivamalai S, Whaleboat D, Miller A. 2013. Processes and outcomes for a successful engagement between a medical school and a remote indigenous community in North Queensland, Australia. Rural Rem Health. 13:2277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox CE, Morford TG, Fine A, Gibbons MC. 2004. The Johns Hopkins Urban Health Institute: a collaborative response to urban health issues. Acad Med. 79(12):1169–1174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. 2013. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 13(1):117–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Srauss AL. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Piscataway (NJ): Aldine Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Godin K, Stapleton J, Kirkpatrick SI, Hanning RM, Leatherdale ST. 2015. Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada. Syst Rev. 4(1):1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gordon M, Daniel M, Patricio M. 2019. What do we mean by ‘systematic’ in health education systematic reviews and why it matters! Med Teach. 41(8):956–957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon M, Grafton-Clarke C, Hill E, Gurbutt D, Patricio M, Daniel M. 2019. Twelve tips for undertaking a focused systematic review in medical education. Med Teach. 41(11):1232–1238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health Canada. 2001. Social accountability: a vision for Canadian medical schools. http://www.iime.org/documents/hawkins.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis-Selinger S, Ho K, Novak Lauscher H, Liman Y, Stacy E, Woollard R, Buote D. 2008. Social accountability in action: University-community collaboration in the development of an interprofessional aboriginal health elective. J Interprof Care. 22(sup1):61–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamuzora P, Maluka S, Ndawi B, Byskov J, Hurtig AK. 2013. Promoting community participation in priority setting in district health systems: experiences from Mbarali district, Tanzania. Glob Health Action. 6:22669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kone A, Sullivan M, Senturia KD, Chrisman NJ, Ciske SJ, Krieger JW. 2000. Improving collaboration between researchers and communities. Public Health Rep. 115(2–3):243–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieger J, Allen C, Cheadle A, Ciske S, Schier JK, Senturia K, Sullivan M. 2002. Using community-based participatory research to address social determinants of health: lessons learned from Seattle partners for healthy communities. Health Educ Behav. 29(3):361–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leamy M, Bird V, Le Boutillier C, Williams J, Slade M. 2011. Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis. Br J Psychiatry. 199(6):445–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK. 2010. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Sci. 5(1):69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Altman D, Antes G, Atkins D, Barbour V, Barrowman N, Berlin JA, et al. 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLOS Med. 6(7):e1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart L, Prisma P, PRISMA-P Group. 2015. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 4:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. 2018. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 18(1):143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noonan EJ, Sawning S, Combs R, Weingartner LA, Martin LJ, Jones VF, Holthouser A. 2018. Engaging the transgender community to improve medical education and prioritize healthcare initiatives. Teach Learn Med. 30(2):119–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson J, Pearce PF, Ferguson LA, Langford CA. 2017. Understanding scoping reviews: definition, purpose, and process. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 29(1):12–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston R, Larkins S, Taylor J, Judd J. 2016. Building blocks for social accountability: a conceptual framework to guide medical schools. BMC Med Educ. 16(1):227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schardt C, Adams MB, Owens T, Keitz S, Fontelo P. 2007. Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 7(1). DOI:10.1186/1472-6947-7-16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon NM. 2005. Health information generation and utilization for informed decision-making in equitable health service management: the case of Kenya partnership for health program. Int J Equity Health. 4:8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Styres S, Zinga D, Bennett S, Bomberry M. 2010. Walking in two worlds: engaging the space between indigenous community and academia. Can J Educ. 33(3):617–648.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas A, Lubarsky S, Durning SJ, Young ME. 2017. Knowledge syntheses in medical education: demystifying scoping reviews. Acad Med. 92(2):161–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson LG, Davis PM. 2008. Best medical practices in social accountability and continuing professional development: a survey and literature review. J Interprof Care. 22(sup1):30–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, Moher D, Peters MDJ, Horsley T, Weeks L, et al. 2018. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 169(7):467–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. 2015. Honouring the truth, reconciling for the future: summary of the final report of the Truth and Reconcilliation Commission of Canada. Winnipeg (MB): Truth and Reconcilliation Commission of Canada. https://ehprnh2mwo3.exactdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Executive_Summary_English_Web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vlayen J, Aertgeerts B, Hannes K, Sermeus W, Ramaekers D. 2005. A systematic review of appraisal tools for clinical practice guidelines: multiple similarities and one common deficit. Int J Qual Health Care. 17(3):235–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar