Medical student and trainee doctor views on the ‘good’ doctor: Deriving implications for training from a Q-methods study

References

• Academy of Medical Royal Colleges (AOMRC). 2012. Curriculum for a broad based training programme. London: AOMRC.
   Google Scholar
• Amin Z. 2000. Q methodology – a journey into the subjectivity of human mind. Singapore Med J. 41(8):410–414.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baker R, Thompson C, Mannion R. 2006. Q methodology in health economics. J Health Serv Res Policy. 11(1):38–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, Watt G, Wyke S, Guthrie B. 2012. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. The Lancet. 380(9836):37–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullock A, Webb K, Muddiman E, MacDonald J, Allery L, Pugsley L. 2018. Enhancing the quality and safety of care through training generalist doctors: a longitudinal, mixed-methods study of a UK broad-based training programme. BMJ Open. 8(4):e021388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig L, Mullan K. 2010. Parenthood, gender and work-family time in the United States, Australia, Italy, France and Denmark. J Marriage Fam. 72(5):1344–1361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross RM. 2005. Exploring attitudes: the case for Q methodology. Health Educ Res. 20(2):206–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruess S, Cruess R, Steinert Y. 2008. Role modelling-making the most of a powerful teaching strategy. BMJ. 336(7646):718–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donner JC. 2001. Using Q-sorts in participatory processes: an introduction to the methodology. In Social analysis: selected tools and techniques social development papers. Washington, DC: The World Banks Social Development Department
   Google Scholar
• Ellingsen I, Storksen I, Stephens P. 2010. Q methodology in social work research. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 13(5):395–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier AH, Furstenberg FF. 2002. The transition to adulthood: a time use perspective. Ann Am Acad Political Soc Sci. 580(1):153–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaw A. 2016. Precision medicine and improving future health care to an ageing population. Perspect Public Health. 136(2):77–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GMC. 2017. Generic professional capabilities framework. https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/generic-professional-capabilities-framework–0817_pdf-70417127.pdf2017.
   Google Scholar
• Greenaway D. 2013. Shape of training: securing the future of excellent medical care. London: General Medical Council.
   Google Scholar
• Harris K, Oatley C, Mumford S, Pham PK, Nunns H. 2021. Introducing Q methodology to program evaluators. Am J Evaluat. 42(3):439–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensel D. 2014. Typologies of professional identity among graduating baccalaureate-prepared nurses. J Nurs Scholarsh. 46(2):125–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho GWK. 2017. Examining perceptions and attitudes: a review of Likert-type scales versus Q-Methodology. West J Nurs Res. 39(5):674–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild A, Machung A. 2012. The second shift: working families and the revolution at home. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Jovic E, Wallace JE, Lemaire J. 2006. The generation and gender shifts in medicine: an exploratory survey of internal medicine physicians. BMC Health Serv Res. 6:55–55-65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JRCPTB. 2019. New internal medicine curriculum: https://www.jrcptb.org.uk/sites/default/files/IM_Curriculum_Sept2519.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jung HP, Wensing M, de Wilt A, Olesen F, Grol R. 2000. Comparison of patients’ preferences and evaluations regarding aspects of general practice care. Fam Pract. 17(3):236–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin S, Skea Z, Entwistle V, Zwarensten M, Dick J. 2001. Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations. Cochrane Library. 2001(4):1–67.
   Google Scholar
• Liberati EG, Gorli M, Scaratti G. 2016. Invisible walls within multidisciplinary teams: disciplinary boundaries and their effects on integrated care. Soc Sci Med. 150:31–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I, et al. 2001. Preferences of patients for patient centred approach to consultation in primary care: observational study. BMJ. 322(7284):467–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown M, Thomas D. 1988. Q-methodology. Newbury Park (CA): SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Mechanic D, Meyer S. 2000. Concepts of trust among patients with serious illness. Soc Sci Med. 51(5):657–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer SW, Cawston PG, Bikker AP. 2007. Quality in general practice consultations; a qualitative study of the views of patients living in an area of high socio-economic deprivation in Scotland. BMC Fam Pract. 8(1):22–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monrouxe L. 2016. Theoretical insights into the nature and nurture of professional identities. In: Cruess R, Cruess S, Steinert Y, editors. Teaching medical professionalism, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muddiman E, Bullock A, Allery L, MacDonald J, Webb K, Pugsley L. 2016b. Black sheep in the herd’? The role, status and identity of generalist doctors in secondary care. Health Serv Manage Res. 29(4):124–131.
   Google Scholar
• Muddiman E, Bullock A, Macdonald J, Allery L, Webb K, Pugsley L. 2016a. It’s surprising how differently they treat you: a qualitative analysis of trainee reflections on a new programme for generalist doctors. BMJ Open. 6(9):e011239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muddiman E, Bullock A, Hampton J, Allery L, MacDonald J, Webb K, Pugsley L. 2019. Disciplinary boundaries and integrating care: using Q-methodology to understand trainee views on being a good doctor. BMC Med Educ. 19(1):59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer A, Noden B, Walker Z, Aarts R, Ferro J. 2011. General population and medical student perceptions of good and bad doctors in Mozambique. Educ Health. 24(1):387–399.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramlo S. 2016. Mixed method lessons learned from 80 years of Q methodology. J Mix Methods Res. 10(1):28–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimmer A. 2015. Broad based training recruitment is closed to help fill more GP training posts. BMJ Careers. http://careers.bmj.com/careers/advice/Broad_based_training_recruitment_is_closed_to_help_fill_more_GP_training_posts.
   Google Scholar
• Stafford M, Steventon A, Thorlby R, Fisher R, Turton C, Deeny S. 2018. Briefing: understanding the health care needs of people with multiple conditions. The Health Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Stainton RW. 1995. Q-methodology. In: Smith J, Harre R, Van Langenhove L, editors, Rethinking methods in psychology. New York (NY): SAGE; p. 178–207.
   Google Scholar
• Stenner P, Watts S, Worrell M. 2008. Q methodology. In: Willig C, Stainton W, editors. The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson W. 1953. The study of behaviour: Q technique and its methodology. Chicago (IL): The University Press of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Steven RB. 1993. A primer on Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity. 16(3/4):91–138.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor M, MacRae A. 2011. What makes a good psychiatrist? Psychiatrist. 35(2):75–75.
   Google Scholar
• UKSTSG. 2017. Report from the UK Shape of Training Steering Group (UKSTSG). https://www.shapeoftraining.co.uk/static/documents/content/Shape_of_Training_Final_SCT0417353814.pdf2017.
   Google Scholar
• Valenta AL, Wigger U. 1997. Q-methodology: definition and application in health care informatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 4(6):501–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh S, Arnold B, Pickwell‐Smith B, Summers B. 2016. What kind of doctor would you like me to be? Clin Teach. 13(2):98–101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watts S, Stenner P. 2005. Doing Q methodology: theory, method and interpretation. Qual Res Psychol. 2(1):67–91.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. 2018. Fact sheet: ageing and health. http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health2018.
   Google Scholar
• Young-Mee L, Duck-Sun A. 2007. A preliminary study for exploring the attributes of being a 'good doctor. Korean J Med Educ. 19(4):313–323.
   Google Scholar
• Zabala A. 2014. qmethod: a package to explore human perspectives using Q methodology. The R J. 6(2):163–173.
   Google Scholar