Qualitative content analysis of the highly cited articles in medical education: Trends and characteristics associated with citation of published studies in medical education research

References

• Azer SA. 2015. The top-cited articles in medical education: a bibliometric analysis. Acad Med. 90(8):1147–1161. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azer SA. 2016. Exploring the top-cited and most influential articles in medical education. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 36(1):S32–S41. doi:10.1097/CEH.0000000000000085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azer SA, Azer S. 2016. Bibliometric analysis of the top-cited gastroenterology and hepatology articles. BMJ Open. 6(2):e009889. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer E, Compton-Lilly C, Li G, Razfar A. 2020. Community, collaboration, and the co-construction of learning: JLR as a space for literacy dialogue. J Literacy Res. 52(1):3–5. doi:10.1177/1086296X19899250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornmann L, de Moya Anegón F, Leydesdorff L. 2010. Do scientific advancements lean on the shoulders of giants? A bibliometric investigation of the Ortega hypothesis. PLoS One. 5(10):e13327. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley EH, Curry LA, Devers KJ. 2007. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Serv Res. 42(4):1758–1772. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00684.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaham M, Wears RL, Weber E. 2002. Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. JAMA. 287(21):2847–2850. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cianciolo AT. 2017. Actions (can) speak louder than words. Teach Learn Med. 29(4):361–362. doi:10.1080/10401334.2017.1384256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitroff A, Davis WK. 1996. Content analysis of research in undergraduate medical education. Acad Med. 71(1):60–67. doi:10.1097/00001888-199601000-00019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kyngäs H. 2008. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 62(1):107–115. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault M. 1980. Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings. New York: Vintage; p. 1972–1977.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield E. 1979. Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? Scientometrics. 1(4):359–375. doi:10.1007/BF02019306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield E. 1986. Which medical journals have the greatest impact? Ann Intern Med. 105(2):313–320. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-105-2-313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield E. 1996. Fortnightly review: how can impact factors be improved? BMJ. 313(7054):411–413. doi:10.1136/bmj.313.7054.411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield E, Welljams-Dorof A. 1992. Of Nobel class: a citation perspective on high impact research authors. Theor Med. 13(2):117–135. doi:10.1007/BF02163625.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lundman B. 2004. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 24(2):105–112. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays DG, Singh AA. 2011. The basics of qualitative data management and analysis: qualitative inquiry in clinical and educational settings. New York (NY): Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heeren A, Maurage P. 2014. Scientific activity is a better predictor of Nobel award chances than dietary habits and economic factors. PLOS One. 9(3):1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannidis JPA, Boyack KW, Small H, Sorensen AA, Klavans R. 2014. Bibliometrics: is your most cited work your best? Nature. 514(7524):561–562. doi:10.1038/514561a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King DA. 2004. The scientific impact of nations. Nature. 430(6997):311–316. doi:10.1038/430311a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimäki M, Batty GD, Kawachi I, Virtanen M, Singh-Manoux A, Brunner EJ. 2014. Don’t let the truth get in the way of a good story: an illustration of citation bias in epidemiologic research. Am J Epidemiol. 180(4):446–448. doi:10.1093/aje/kwu164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klosik DF, Bornholdt S. 2014. The citation wake of publications detects Nobel laureates’ papers. PLOS One. 9(12):e113184. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine DM, Barsky AJ, Fox RC, Freidin RB, Williams SR, Wysong JA. 1974. Trends in medical education research: past, present, and future. J Med Educ. 49(2):129–136. doi:10.1097/00001888-197402000-00001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McLaughlin JE, Roth MT, Glatt DM, Gharkholonarehe N, Davidson CA, Griffin LM, Esserman Patsopoulos NA, Ioannidis JP, Analatos AA. 2006. Origin and funding of the most frequently cited papers in medicine: database analysis. BMJ. 332(7549):1061–1064. doi:10.1136/bmj.38768.420139.80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearsol JA. 1988. Reconceptualizing Inquiry in Medical Education. Prof Educ Res Notes. 9(3):5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Regehr G. 2004. Trends in medical education research. Acad Med. 79(10):939–947. doi:10.1097/00001888-200410000-00008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts TE. 2018. Back to the future: celebrating 40 years of academic achievement in medical education. Med Teach. 40(6):559–560. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2018.1463948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosmarakis ES, Vergidis PI, Soteriades ES, Paraschakis K, Papastamataki PA, Falagas ME. 2005. Estimates of global production in cardiovascular diseases research. Int J Cardiol. 100(3):443–449. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.11.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotgans JI. 2012. The themes, institutions, and people of medical education research 1988–2010: content analysis of abstracts from six journals. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 17(4):515–527. doi:10.1007/s10459-011-9328-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar