‘It’s more like checking in with an old friend’: A qualitative study of medical students’ experiences with longitudinal coaches throughout medical school

References

• Atkinson A, Watling CJ, Brand P. 2022. Feedback and coaching. Eur J Pediatr. 181(2):441–446. doi: 10.1007/s00431-021-04118-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann T. 2018. Failure in coaching: between professional craft and the art of creating a relationship, management for professionals. In: kunert S, editor. Strategies in failure management. Management for professionals. Cham (Switzerland): Springer; p. 175–189.
   Google Scholar
• Baenziger K, Chan M, Colman S. 2023. Coaching in postgraduate competency-based medical education: a qualitative exploration of three models. Acad Psychiatry. 47(1):10–17. doi: 10.1007/s40596-022-01628-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baepler P, Walker JD. 2014. Active learning classrooms and educational alliances: changing relationships to improve learning. New Drctns for Teach & Learn. 2014(137):27–40. doi: 10.1002/tl.20083.
   Google Scholar
• Bakke BM, Sheu L, Hauer KE. 2020. Fostering a feedback mindset: a qualitative exploration of medical students’ feedback experiences with longitudinal coaches. Acad Med. 95(7):1057–1065. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barato JB, Moneo MR. 2021. Can coaching contribute to the development of self-regulation? Similarities and differences between these two processes. Coach Int J Theory Res Pract. 15(2):166–179. doi: 10.1080/17521882.2021.1929362.
   Google Scholar
• Bernabeo EC, Holtman MC, Ginsburg S, Rosenbaum JR, Holmboe ES. 2011. Lost in transition: the experience and impact of frequent changes in the inpatient learning environment. Acad Med. 86(5):591–598. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318212c2c9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bing-You R, Hayes V, Palka T, Ford M, Trowbridge R. 2022. Desperately seeking feedback: a phenomenographic study of medical students’ experiences during a 4-year longitudinal feedback curriculum. J Maine Med Cent. 4(1):1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Bluckert P. 2005. Critical factors in executive coaching – the coaching relationship. Ind Commer Train. 37(7):336–340. doi: 10.1108/00197850510626785.
   Google Scholar
• Bordin E. 1994. Theory and research of the therapeutic working alliance: new directions. In: horvath AO, Greenberg LS, editors. The Working Alliance. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; p. 13–37.
   Google Scholar
• Boud D, Molloy E. 2013. Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 38(6):698–712. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2012.691462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen L, Marshall M, Murdoch-Eaton D. 2017. Medical student perceptions of feedback and feedback behaviors within the context of the “educational alliance. Acad Med. 92(9):1303–1312. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks JV, Istas K, Barth BE. 2020. Becoming a coach: experiences of faculty educators learning to coach medical students. BMC Med Educ. 20(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02119-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutrer WB, Atkinson HG, Friedman E, Deiorio N, Gruppen LD, Dekhtyar M, Pusic M. 2018. Exploring the characteristics and context that allow master adaptive learners to thrive. Med Teach. 40(8):791–796. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1484560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson P, Henderson M, Mahoney P, Phillips M, Ryan T, Boud D, Molloy E. 2019. What makes for effective feedback: staff and student perspectives. Assess Eval Higher Educ. 44(1):25–36. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1467877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day A, De Haan E, Sills C, Bertie C, Blass E. 2008. Coaches’ experiences of critical moments in the coaching. Int Coach Psychol Rev. 3(3):207–218. doi: 10.53841/bpsicpr.2008.3.3.207.
   Google Scholar
• Deiorio NM, Carney PA, Kahl LE, Bonura EM, Juve AM. 2016. Coaching: a new model for academic and career achievement. Med Educ Online. 21(1):33480. doi: 10.3402/meo.v21.33480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deiorio N, Foster KW, Santen SA. 2021. Coaching a learner in medical education. Acad Med. 96(12):1758–1758. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elster MJ, O'Sullivan PS, Muller-Juge V, Sheu L, Kaiser SV, Hauer KE. 2022. Does being a coach benefit clinician-educators? a mixed methods study of faculty self-efficacy, job satisfaction and burnout. Perspect Med Educ. 11(1):45–52. doi: 10.1007/s40037-021-00676-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell L, Cuncic C, Hartford W, Hatala R, Ajjawi R. 2023. Goal co-construction and dialogue in an internal medicine longitudinal coaching programme. Med Educ. 57(3):265–271. doi: 10.1111/medu.14942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlay L. 2002. Negotiating the swamp: the opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qual Res. 2(2):209–230. doi: 10.1177/146879410200200205.
   Google Scholar
• Graddy R, Wright S. 2016. On the value of coaching in medicine. Acad Med. 91(8):1037–1037. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant AM. 2014. Autonomy support, relationship satisfaction and goal focus in the coach–coachee relationship: which best predicts coaching success? Coach Int J Theory Res Pract. 7(1):18–38. doi: 10.1080/17521882.2013.850106.
   Google Scholar
• Gyllensten K, Palmer S, Nilsson E, Regner AM, Frodi A. 2010. Experiences of cognitive coaching: a qualitative study. bpsicpr. 5(2):98–108. doi: 10.53841/bpsicpr.2010.5.2.98.
   Google Scholar
• Hauer KE, Iverson N, Quach A, Yuan P, Kaner S, Boscardin C. 2018. Fostering medical students’ lifelong learning skills with a dashboard, coaching and learning planning. Perspect Med Educ. 7(5):311–317. doi: 10.1007/s40037-018-0449-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauer KE, Chang A, van Schaik SM, Lucey C, Cowell T, Teherani A. 2022. It’s all about the trust and building a foundation:" evaluation of a longitudinal medical student coaching program. Teach Learn Med. 35(5):550–564. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2022.2111570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmboe E, Ginsburg S, Bernabeo E. 2011. The rotational approach to medical education: time to confront our assumptions? Med Educ. 45(1):69–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03847.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 15(9):1277–1288. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao S, Hsieh M, Lee P. 2017. Coaching competency and trust in coach in sport teams. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 12(3):319–327. doi: 10.1177/1747954117710508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiger ME, Varpio L. 2020. Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE guide No. 131. Med Teach. 42(8):846–854. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefroy J, Watling C, Teunissen PW, Brand P. 2015. Guidelines: the do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. Perspect Med Educ. 4(6):284–299. doi: 10.1007/s40037-015-0231-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovell B. 2018. What do we know about coaching in medical education? A literature review. Med Educ. 52(4):376–390. doi: 10.1111/medu.13482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maini A, Saravanan Y, Singh TA, Fyfe M. 2020. Coaching skills for medical education in a VUCA world. Med Teach. 42(11):1308–1309. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1788713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcdante K, Simpson D. 2018. Choosing when to advise, coach, or mentor. J Grad Med Educ. 10(2):227–228. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-18-00111.1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maxwell JA. 2022. Qualitative research design: an interactive approach. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Mazotti L, O'Brien B, Tong L, Hauer KE. 2011. Perceptions of evaluation in longitudinal versus traditional clerkships. Med Educ. 45(5):464–470. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03904.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molloy E, Boud D. 2013. Seeking a different angle on feedback in clinical education: the learner as seeker, judge and user of performance information. Med Educ. 47(3):227–229. doi: 10.1111/medu.12116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molloy E, Bearman M. 2019. Embracing the tension between vulnerability and credibility: ‘intellectual candour’ in health professions education. Med Educ. 53(1):32–41. doi: 10.1111/medu.13649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson J. 2017. Using conceptual depth criteria: addressing the challenge of reaching saturation in qualitative research. Qual Res. 17(5):554–570. doi: 10.1177/1468794116679873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. 2014. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 89(9):1245–1251. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmos-Vega FM, Stalmeijer RE, Varpio L, Kahlke R. 2022. A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE guide No. 149. Med Teach. 45(3):241–251. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palamara K, Kauffman C, Stone VE, Bazari H, Donelan K. 2015. Promoting success: a professional development coaching program for interns in medicine. J Grad Med Educ. 7(4):630–637. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-14-00791.1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parsons AS, Kon RH, Plews-Ogan M, Gusic ME. 2021. You can have both: coaching to promote clinical competency and professional identity formation. Perspect Med Educ. 10(1):57–63. doi: 10.1007/s40037-020-00612-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phinney LB, Fluet A, O'Brien BC, Seligman L, Hauer KE. 2021. Using activity theory to explore how changes in a work-based assessment tool can alter feedback systems in clerkships. Acad Med. 96(11S):S212–S213. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pusic MV, Hall E, Billings H, Branzetti J, Hopson LR, Regan L, Gisondi MA, Cutrer WB. 2022. Educating for adaptive expertise: case examples along the medical education continuum. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 27(5):1383–1400. doi: 10.1007/s10459-022-10165-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassbach CE, Blankenburg R. 2018. A novel pediatric residency coaching program: outcomes after one year. Acad Med. 93(3):430–434. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandars J, Cleary TJ. 2011. Self-regulation theory: applications to medical education: AMEE guide No. 58. Med Teach. 33(11):875–886. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.595434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheu L, Hauer KE, Schreiner K, van Schaik SM, Chang A, O'Brien BC. 2020. A friendly place to grow as an educator": a qualitative study of community and relationships among medical student coaches. Acad Med. 95(2):293–300. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telio S, Ajjawi R, Regehr G. 2015. The "educational alliance" as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education. Acad Med. 90(5):609–614. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telio S, Regehr G, Ajjawi R. 2016. Feedback and the educational alliance: examining credibility judgements and their consequences. Med Educ. 50(9):933–942. doi: 10.1111/medu.13063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toh RQE, Koh KK, Lua JK, Wong RSM, Quah ELY, Panda A, Ho CY, Lim N-A, Ong YT, Chua KZY, et al. 2022. The role of mentoring, supervision, coaching, teaching and instruction on professional identity formation: a systematic scoping review. BMC Med Educ. 22(1):531.,. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03589-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling CJ, LaDonna KA. 2019. Where philosophy meets culture: exploring how coaches conceptualise their roles. Med Educ. 53(5):467–476. doi: 10.1111/medu.13799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Ridder JM, Berk FCJ, Stokking KM, ten Cate O. 2015. Feedback providers’ credibility impacts students’ satisfaction with feedback and delayed performance. Med Teach. 37(8):767–774. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.970617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Schaik S, Obadia S. 2017. Creating, supporting, and sustaining a coaching program. In: deiorio NM, Hammoud MM, editors. Coaching in medical education: A faculty handbook. Accelerating change in medical education consortium. USA: American Medical Association. p. 43–49.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff M, Morgan H, Jackson J, Skye E, Hammoud M, Ross PT. 2020. Academic coaching: insights from the medical student’s perspective. Med Teach. 42(2):172–177. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1670341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar