Twelve tips for teaching in virtual reality

References

• Bimberg P, Weissker T, Kulik A. 2020. On the Usage of the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire for Virtual Reality Research. Proceedings - 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces, VRW 2020; Mar 22–26; Atlanta, GA. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). p 464–467. doi:10.1109/VRW50115.2020.00098.
   Google Scholar
• Chattha UA, Janjua UI, Anwar F, Madni TM, Cheema MF, Janjua SI. 2020. Motion sickness in virtual reality: an empirical evaluation. IEEE Access. 8:130486–130499. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3007076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow J, Smith L. 2003. Using co-teaching as a means of facilitating interprofessional collaboration in health and social care. J Interprof Care. 17(1):45–55. doi:10.1080/1356182021000044139.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gan W, Mok TN, Chen J, She G, Zha Z, Wang H, Li H, Li J, Zheng X. 2023. Researching the application of virtual reality in medical education: one-year follow-up of a randomized trial. BMC Med Educ. 23(1):3. doi:10.1186/S12909-022-03992-6/TABLES/2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand C, Olaiya R, Elmasry M. 2020. Virtual Reality for teaching clinical skills in medical education. New Perspectives on Virtual and Augmented Reality: finding New Ways to Teach in a Transformed Learning Environment. UK: Routledge; p. 203–210. doi:10.4324/9781003001874-13.
   Google Scholar
• Hew KF, Lo CK. 2018. Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 22(1):720. doi:10.1186/S12909-018-1144-Z/TABLES/4.
   Google Scholar
• Kim HY, Kim EY. 2023. Effects of medical education program using virtual reality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 20(5):3895. doi:10.3390/IJERPH20053895.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kyaw BM, Saxena N, Posadzki P, Vseteckova J, Nikolaou CK, George PP, Divakar U, Masiello I, Kononowicz AA, Zary N, et al. 2019. Virtual reality for health professions education: systematic review and meta-analysis by the digital health education collaboration. J Med Internet Res. 21(1):e12959. doi:10.2196/12959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kye B, Han N, Kim E, Park Y, Jo S. 2021. Educational applications of metaverse: possibilities and limitations. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 18:32. doi:10.3352/JEEHP.2021.18.32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer RE, Makransky G, Parong J. 2022. The promise and pitfalls of learning in immersive virtual reality. Int J Hum–Comp Interact. 39(11):2229–2238. 10.1080/10447318.2022.2108563. doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2108563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchant Z, Goetz ET, Cifuentes L, Keeney-Kennicutt W, Davis TJ. 2014. Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: a meta-analysis. Comp Educ. 70:29–40. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.033.
   Google Scholar
• Mott M, Cutrell E, Gonzalez Franco M, Holz C, Ofek E, Stoakley R, Ringel Morris M. 2019. Accessible by design: an opportunity for virtual reality. Adjunct Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR-Adjunct 2019, p. 451–454. doi:10.1109/ISMAR-ADJUNCT.2019.00122.
   Google Scholar
• Nursing and Midwifery Council. 2023. Simulated practice learning. https://www.nmc.org.uk/standards/guidance/supporting-information-for-our-education-and-training-standards/simulated-practice-learning/.
   Google Scholar
• Onyesolu M, Victor C, Ebere O, Ngozi O. 2013. Pedagogy: instructivism to socio-constructivism through virtual reality. IJACSA. 4(9):40–47. doi:10.14569/IJACSA.2013.040907.
   Google Scholar
• Pottle J. 2019. Virtual reality and the transformation of medical education. Future Healthc J. 6(3):181–185. doi:10.7861/fhj.2019-0036.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomas PA, Kern DE, Hughes MT, Chen BY. 2015. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach. In Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), p. 951–952. Baltimore (MD): Johns Hopkins University Press. https://pure.johnshopkins.edu/en/publications/curriculum-development-for-medical-education-a-six-step-approach.
   Google Scholar
• Tong L, Jung S, Li RC, Lindeman RW, Regenbrecht H. 2020. Action units: exploring the use of directorial cues for effective storytelling with swivel-chair virtual reality; action units: exploring the use of directorial cues for effective storytelling with swivel-chair virtual reality. Proceedings of the 32nd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction; Dec 2–4; Sydney, NSW, Australia. Sydney (Australia): ACM; p. 45–54. doi:10.1145/3441000.3441063.
   Google Scholar
• W3C. 2021. XR Accessibility User Requirements. https://www.w3.org/TR/xaur/.
   Google Scholar
• Winkelmes MA, Boye A, Tapp S, Felten P, Finley APP. 2019. Transparent design in higher education teaching and leadership: a guide to implementing the transparency framework institution-wide to improve learning and retention. Stylus Publishing LLC; pp. 233. https://www.routledge.com/Transparent-Design-in-Higher-Education-Teaching-and-Leadership-A-Guide/Winkelmes-Boye-Tapp/p/book/9781620368237.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Xu X, Jiang H, Ding Y. 2020. The effectiveness of virtual reality-based technology on anatomy teaching: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Med Educ. 20(1):127. doi:10.1186/S12909-020-1994-Z/FIGURES/5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar