Institutional hierarchies and research impact: new academic currencies, capital and position-taking in UK higher education

References

• Ashwin, Paul. 2012. “How Often Are Theories Developed through Empirical Research into Higher Education?” Studies in Higher Education 37 (8): 941–955. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.557426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, Zoe. 2007. “Research Must Show Payoff.” https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/research-must-show-payoff/310770.article.
   Google Scholar
• Bastow, Simon, Patrick, Dunleavy, and Jane Tinkler. 2014. The Impact of the Social Sciences: How Academics and Their Research Make a Difference, Impact of the Social Sciences. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Boliver, Vikki. 2015. “Are There Distinctive Clusters of Higher and Lower Status Universities in the UK?” Oxford Review of Education 41 (5): 608–627. doi:10.1080/03054985.2015.1082905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1975. “The Specificity of the Scientific Field and the Social Conditions of the Progress of Reason.” Social Science Information 14: 19–47. doi:10.1177/053901847501400602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature, edited by Randal Johnson. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, John. 2000. “Higher Education Research in the UK: A Short Overview and a Case Study.” In The Institutional Basis of Higher Education Research, edited by Stefanie Schwarz and Ulrich Teichler, 87–97. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cardiff University 2014. Challenging the International Policy Consensus on Skills, Knowledge and Human Capital in the Global Economy (ID 3488). Cardiff University. https://impact.ref.ac.uk/casestudies/CaseStudy.aspx?Id=3488
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Burton R. 1983. The Higher Education System: Academic Organisation in Cross-National Perspective London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, Sue. 2012. “Conceptualising Higher Education Research and/or Academic Development as “Fields”: A Critical Analysis.” Higher Education Research & Development 31 (5): 667–678. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.690369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colley, Helen. 2014. “What (a) to Do about ‘Impact’: A Bourdieusian Critique.” British Educational Research Journal 40 (4): 660–681. doi:10.1002/berj.3112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, Cristina. 2016. “Double Gamers: Academics between Fields.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 37 (7): 993–1013. doi:10.1080/01425692.2014.982861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin, Anne M. 2016. “Reputational Capital in ‘the PR University’: Public Relations and Market Rationalities.” Journal of Cultural Economy 9 (4): 396–409. doi:10.1080/17530350.2016.1179663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deer, Cecile. 2003. “Bourdieu on Higher Education: The Meaning of the Growing Integration of Educational Systems and Self- Reflective Practice.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 24 (2): 195–206. doi:10.1080/01425690301904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlop, Claire A. 2018. “The Political Economy of Politics and International Studies Impact: REF2014 Case Analysis.” British Politics 13(3): 270–294. doi:10.1057/s41293-018-0084-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastwood, David. 2007. Future Framework for Research Assessment and Funding. Circular Letter Number 06/2007. Higher Education Funding Council for England https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100303171159/http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/circlets/2007/cl06_07/
   Google Scholar
• Felt, Ulrike. 2016. “Of Timescapes and Knowledgescapes.” In New Languages and Landscapes of Higher Education, edited by Peter Scott, Jim Gallacher, and Gareth Parry, 129–148. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gauthier, Michelle. 2004. “Incentives and Accountability: The Canadian Context.” Higher Education Management and Policy 16 (2): 95–107. doi:10.1787/hemp-v16-art18-en.
   Google Scholar
• Garforth, Lisa, and Anne Kerr. 2011. “Interdisciplinarity and the social sciences: capital, institutions and autonomy.” British Journal of Sociology 62 (4): 657–676. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2011.01385.x.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, Jonathan, and Benedict Wilkinson. 2014. “Sausages, Evidence and the Messiness of Policymaking.” Policy Wonkers, 11 November. https://blogs.kcl.ac.uk/policywonkers/sausages-evidence-and-the-messiness-of-policymaking/.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, Trisha, and Nick Fahy. 2015. “Research Impact in the Community-Based Health Sciences: An Analysis of 162 Case Studies from the 2014 UK Research Excellence Framework.” Bmc Medicine 13 (1): 232–243. doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0467-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harland, Tony. 2012. “Higher Education as an Open-Access Discipline.” Higher Education Research & Development 31 (5): 703–710. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.689275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, C., S. Carnochan, and Mj Austin. 2014. “Using Qualitative Data- Mining for Practice Research in Child Welfare.” Child Welf 93 (6): 7–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, Diana. 2012. “Performance-Based University Research Funding Systems.” Research Policy 41 (2): 251–261. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HEFCE (Higher Education Funding Council for England). 2016. “REF impact.” Higher Education Funding Council for England. Accessed January 16. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/rsrch/REFimpact/.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, Steven. 2016. “Assessing (for) Impact: Future Assessment of the Societal Impact of Research.” Palgrave Communications 2 (1): 1–7. doi:10.1057/palcomms.2016.73.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, Randy. 1999. Analyzing Documentary Accounts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Holligan, Chris, Michael Wilson, and Walter Humes. 2011. “Research Cultures in English and Scottish University Education Departments: An Exploratory Study of Academic Staff Perceptions.” British Educational Research Journal 37 (4): 713–734. doi:10.1080/01411926.2010.489146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, Wei. 2008. “Domination in a Scientific Field: Capital Struggle in a Chinese Isotope Lab.” Social Studies of Science 38 (4): 543–570. doi:10.1177/0306312706092456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehm, Barbara M. 2015. “Higher Education as a Field of Study and Research in Europe.” European Journal of Education 50 (1): 60–74. doi:10.1111/ejed.12100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellard, N. M., and M. Śliwa. 2016. “Business and Management Impact Assessment in Research Excellence Framework 2014: Analysis and Reflection.” British Journal of Management 27 (4): 693–711. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laing, Karen, Laura Mazzoli Smith, and Liz Todd. 2018. “The Impact Agenda and Critical Social Research in Education: Hitting the Target but Missing the Spot?” Policy Futures in Education 16 (2): 169–184. doi:10.1177/1478210317742214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, William. 2009. “Reconnecting the Research–Policy–Practice Nexus in Higher Education: ‘Evidence- Based Policy’ in Practice in National and International Contexts.” Higher Education Policy 22 (2): 119–140. doi:10.1057/hep.2008.3.
   Google Scholar
• Lomer, Sylvie, Vassiliki Papatsiba, and Rajani Naidoo. 2018. “Constructing a National Higher Education Brand for the UK: Positional Competition and Promised Capitals.” Studies in Higher Education 43 (1): 134–153. doi:10.1080/03075079.2016.1157859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, Lisa. 2006. The Research Game in Academic Life Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcella, Rita, Hayley Lockerbie, and Lyndsay Bloice. 2016. “Beyond REF 2014: The Impact of Impact Assessment on the Future of Information Research.” Journal of Information Science 42 (3): 369–385. doi:10.1177/0165551516636291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marginson, Simon. 1997. Markets in Education St. Leonards: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Marginson, Simon. 2008. “Global Field and Global Imagining: Bourdieu and Worldwide Higher Education.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 29 (3): 303–315. doi:10.1080/01425690801966386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, Marcelo, Justin J. W. Powell, Mike Zapp, and Gert Biesta. 2017. “How Does Research Evaluation Impact Educational Research? Exploring Intended and Unintended Consequences of Research Assessment in the United Kingdom, 1986–2014.” European Educational Research Journal 16 (6): 820–842. doi:10.1177/1474904117730159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mars, Matthew M., and Gary Rhoades. 2012. “Socially Oriented Student Entrepreneurship: A Study of Student Change Agency in the Academic Capitalism Context.” The Journal of Higher Education 83 (3): 435–459. doi:10.1353/jhe.2012.0015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maton, Karl. 2000. “Languages of Legitimation: The Structuring Significance for Intellectual Fields of Strategic Knowledge Claims.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 21 (2): 147–167. doi:10.1080/713655351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, Hugh P. 2015. “Research Assessment: The Impact of Impact.” International Journal of Nursing Studies 52 (1): 1–3. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.11.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, Robert K. 1968. “The Matthew Effect in Science.” Science 159 (3810): 56–63. doi:10.1126/science.159.3810.56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middlehurst, Robin. 2014. “Higher Education Research Agendas for the Coming Decade: A UK Perspective on the Policy-Research Nexus.” Studies in Higher Education 39 (8): 1475–1487. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.949538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan Jones, M.,. C. Manville, and J. Chataway. 2017. “Learning from the UK’s Research Impact Assessment Exercise: A Case Study of a Retrospective Impact Assessment Exercise and Questions for the Future.” Journal of Technology Transfer. doi:10.1007/s10961-017-9608-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musselin, Christine. 2018. “New Forms of Competition in Higher Education.” Socio-Economic Review 16 (3): 657–683. doi:10.1093/ser/mwy033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naidoo, Rajani. 2004. “Fields and Institutional Strategy: Bourdieu on the Relationship between Higher Education, Inequality and Society.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 25 (4): 457–471. doi:10.1080/0142569042000236952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowotny, Helga, Peter Scott, and Michael Gibbons. 2003. “Introduction: ‘Mode 2’ Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge.” Minerva 41 (3): 179–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oancea, Alis. 2013. “Interpretations of Research Impact in Seven Disciplines.” European Educational Research Journal 12 (2): 242–250. doi:10.2304/eerj.2013.12.2.242.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connell, Catherine. 2018. “Examining Differentiation in Academic Responses to Research Impact Policy: Mediating Factors in the Context of Educational Research.” Studies in Higher Education 44: 1–16. doi:10.1080/03075079.2018.17556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pain, Rachel, Mike Kesby, and Kye Askins. 2011. “Geographies of Impact: power, Participation and Potential.” Area 43 (2): 183–188. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00978.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papatsiba, Vassiliki. 2013. “The Idea of Collaboration in the Academy: Its Epistemic and Social Potentials and Risks for Knowledge Generation.” Policy Futures in Education 11 (4): 436–448. doi:10.2304/pfie.2013.11.4.436.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, Lindsay. 2008. “Documents and Action.” In The SAGE Handbook of Social Research Methods, edited by Pertti Alasuutari, Leonard Bickman, and Julia Brannen., 479–492. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, Linda L. 2009. “Symbolic Capital and Academic Fields.” Management Communication Quarterly 23 (1): 127–134. doi:10.1177/0893318909335420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosinger, Kelly Ochs, Barrett J. Taylor, Lindsay Coco, and Sheila Slaughter. 2016. “Organizational Segmentation and the Prestige Economy: Deprofessionalization in High- and Low-Resource Departments.” The Journal of Higher Education 87 (1): 27–54. doi:10.1080/00221546.2016.11777393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreier, Margrit. 2014. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis edited by Uwe Flick, 170–183. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, Peter. 1999. “The Research-Policy Gap.” Journal of Education Policy 14 (3): 317–337. doi:10.1080/026809399286378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, Tom. 2012. “Impacted Geographers: A Response to Pain, Kesby and Askins.” Area 44 (1): 117–119. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01067.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Katherine E., and Ellen Stewart. 2017. “We Need to Talk about Impact: Why Social Policy Academics Need to Engage with the UK’s Research Impact Agenda.” Journal of Social Policy 46 (1): 109–127. doi:10.1017/S0047279416000283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S.,. V. Ward, and A. House. 2011. “Impact’ in the Proposals for the UK’s Research Excellence Framework: Shifting the Boundaries of Academic Autonomy.” Research Policy 40 (10): 1369–1379. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, N. 2016. Building on Success and Learning from Experience: An Independent Review of the Research Excellence Framework. London: Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.
   Google Scholar
• Tight, Malcolm. 2014. “Discipline and Theory in Higher Education Research.” Research Papers in Education 29 (1): 93–110. doi:10.1080/02671522.2012.729080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titscher, Stefan Meyer, Michael Ruth Wodak, and Eva Vetter. 2000. Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrichsen, Tomas Coates. 2014. Knowledge Exchange Performance and the Impact of HEIF in the English Higher Education Sector. HEFCE. https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140711202732/http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/pubs/indirreports/2014/keperformanceandtheimpactofheif/2014_keheifimpact.pdf
   Google Scholar
• University of Oxford. 2014. SKOPE (Skills, Knowledge and Organisational Performance): Influencing Policy in the UK and Abroad – a Study of Cumulative Impact (ID 14572). University of Oxford. https://impact.ref.ac.uk/casestudies/CaseStudy.aspx?Id=14572
   Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, Richard. 2016. “Impact in the REF: Issues and Obstacles.” Studies in Higher Education 41 (2): 199–214. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.915303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, Richard, and Jennifer Chubb. 2018. “Evaluating ‘Impact’ in the UK’s Research Excellence Framework (REF): Liminality, Looseness and New Modalities of Scholarly Distinction.” Studies in Higher Education: 44 (9): 1554–1566. doi:10.1080/03075079.2018.1455082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, Richard, and Mark Olssen. 2016. “Excellence’ and Exclusion: The Individual Costs of Institutional Competitiveness.” A Review of Science, Learning and Policy 54 (2): 201–218. doi:10.1007/s11024-016-9298-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar