The impact of tracking by attainment on pupil self-confidence over time: demonstrating the accumulative impact of self-fulfilling prophecy

References

• Archer, L., B. Francis, S. Miller, B. Taylor, A. Tereshchenko, A. Mazenod, D. Pepper, and M.-C. Travers. 2018. “The Symbolic Violence of Setting: A Bourdieusian Analysis of Mixed Methods Data on Secondary Students’ Views about Setting.” British Educational Research Journal 44 (1): 119–140. doi:10.1002/berj.3321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, H. 1963. Outsiders. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belfi, B., M. Goos, B. De Fraine, and J. Van Damme. 2012. “The Effect of Class Composition by Gender and Ability on Secondary School Students’ School Well-Being and Academic Self-Concept: A Literature Review.” Educational Research Review 7 (1): 62–74. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2011.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boaler, J. 1997. “Setting, Social Class and Survival of the Quickest.” British Educational Research Journal 23 (5): 575–595. doi:10.1080/0141192970230503.
   Google Scholar
• Boaler, J., D. Wiliam, and M. Brown. 2000. “Students’ Experiences of Ability Grouping—Disaffection, Polarisation and the Construction of Failure.” British Educational Research Journal 26 (5): 631–648. doi:10.1080/713651583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chmielewski, Anna K., Hanna Dumont, and Ulrich Trautwein. 2013. “Tracking Effects Depend on Tracking Type: An International Comparison of Students’ Mathematics Self-Concept.” American Educational Research Journal 50 (5): 925–957. doi:10.3102/0002831213489843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. 2nd ed.New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, P., B. Taylor, F. Francis, L. Archer, J. Hodgen, A. Mazenod, and A. Tereshchenko. 2019. “The Misallocation of Students to Academic Sets in Maths: A Study of Secondary Schools in England” British Educational Research Journal 45 (4): 873–897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunne, M., S. Humphreys, J. Sebba, A. Dyson, F. Gallannaugh, and D. Muijs. 2007. Effective Teaching and Learning for Pupils in Low Attaining Groups (London, DFES).
   Google Scholar
• Education Endowment Foundation. 2018. Education Endowment Foundation Toolkit. London: EEF. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/evidence-summaries/teaching-learning-toolkit/setting-or-streaming/
   Google Scholar
• Education Endowment Foundation. 2020. Statement on Statistical Significance and Uncertainty of Impact Estimates for EEF Evaluations. London: EEF. Accessed 10 March 2020. http://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, Becky, Paul Connolly, Louise Archer, Jeremy Hodgen, Anna Mazenod, David Pepper, Seaneen Sloan, Becky Taylor, Antonina Tereshchenko, and Mary-Claire Travers. 2017. “Attainment Grouping as Self-Fulfilling Prophesy? A Mixed Methods Exploration of Self Confidence and Set Level among Year 7 Students.” International Journal of Educational Research 86: 96–108. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2017.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, B., J. Hodgen, N. Craig, B. Taylor, L. Archer, A. Mazenod, A. Tereshchenko, and P. Connolly. 2019. “Teacher ‘Quality’ and Attainment Grouping: The Role of within-School Teacher Deployment in Social and Educational Inequality.” Teaching and Teacher Education 77: 183–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, B., B. Taylor, and A. Tereshchenko. 2020. Reassessing ‘Ability’ Grouping: Improving Practice for Equity and Attainment. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 1997. Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gamoran, A. 1992. “Synthesis of Research: Is Ability Grouping Equitable?” Educational Leadership 50 (2): 11–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollway, W., and T. Jefferson. 2013. Doing Qualitative Research Differently: A Psychosocial Approach. 2nd ed.London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ireson, J., S. Hallam, and C. Hurley. 2005. “What Are the Effects of Ability Grouping on GCSE Attainment?” British Educational Research Journal 31 (4): 443–458. doi:10.1080/01411920500148663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ireson, J., and S. Hallam. 2009. “Academic Self-Concepts in Adolescence: Relations with Achievement and Ability Grouping in Schools.” Learning and Instruction 19 (3): 201–213. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, B. 1964. Streaming: An Education System in Miniature. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Jussim, L., J. Eccles, and S. J. Madon. 1996. “Social Perception, Social Stereotypes, and Teacher Expectations: Accuracy and the Quest for the Powerful Self-Fulfilling Prophecy.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 28: 281–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jussim, L., and K. Harber. 2005. “Teacher Expectations and Self-Fulfilling Prophecies: Knowns and Unknowns, Resolved and Unresolved Controversies.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 9 (2): 131–155. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulik, C.-L C., and J. A. Kulik. 1982. “Effects of Ability Grouping on Secondary School Students: A Meta-Analysis of Evaluation Findings.” American Educational Research Journal 19 (3): 415–428. doi:10.3102/00028312019003415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutnick, P., J. Sebba, P. Blatchford, M. Galton, J. Thorpe, H. With MacIntyre, and L. Berdondini. 2005. The Effects of Pupil Grouping: Literature Review. Research Report 688. London: DfES.
   Google Scholar
• Lemert, E. M. 1951. Social Pathology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Liem, Gregory Arief D., Dennis M. McInerney, and Alexander S. Yeung. 2015. “Academic Self-Concepts in Ability Streams: Considering Domain Specificity and Same-Stream Peers.” The Journal of Experimental Education 83 (1): 83–109. doi:10.1080/00220973.2013.876227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, W. C., C. K. Wang, and E. J. Parkins. 2005. “A Longitudinal Study of Students’ Academic Self-Concept in a Streamed Setting: The Singapore Context.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 75 (4): 567–586. doi:10.1348/000709905X42239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macleod, S., C. Sharp, D. Bernardinelli, A. Skipp, and S. Higgins. 2015. Supporting the Attainment of Disadvantaged Pupils: articulating Success and Good Practice. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, R. 2016. Ability Grouping in Primary Schools. London: Critical Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mazenod, A., B. Francis, L. Archer, J. Hodgen, B. Taylor, T. Tereshchenko, and D. Pepper. 2019. “Nurturing Learning or Encouraging Dependency? Teacher Constructions of Students in Lower Attainment Groups in English Secondary Schools.” Cambridge Journal of Education 49 (1): 53–68. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2018.1441372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. 1948. “The Self Fulfilling Prophecy.” Antioch Review 8: 195.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, Herbert W., Marjorie Seaton, Ulrich Trautwein, Oliver Lüdtke, K. T. Hau, Alison J. O’Mara, and Rhonda G. Craven. 2008. “The Big-Fish-Little-Pond-Effect Stands up to Critical Scrutiny: Implications for Theory, Methodology and Further Research.” Educational Psychology Review 20 (3): 319–350. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9075-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H., and J. W. Parker. 1984. “Determinants of Student Self-Concept: Is It Better to Be a Relatively Large Fish in a Small Pond Even If You Don’t Learn to Swim as Well?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47 (1): 213–231. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.47.1.213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGillicuddy, D., and D. Devine. 2018. “Turned off” or “Ready to Fly” – Ability Grouping as an Act of Symbolic Violence in Primary School.” Teaching and Teacher Education 70: 88–99. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, M. O., & Mullis, I. V. S. eds. 2012. Methods and Procedures in TIMSS and PIRLS 2011. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Moller, S., and E. Stearns. 2012. “Tracking success: high school curricula and labor market outcomes by race and gender.” Urban Education 47 (6): 1025–1054. doi:10.1177/0042085912454440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., and M. Dunne. 2010. “Setting by Ability–or is It? a Quantitative Study of Determinants of Set Placement in English Secondary Schools.” Educational Research 52 (4): 391–407. doi:10.1080/00131881.2010.524750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S., M. O. Martin, P. Foy, and M. Hooper. 2016. TIMSS 2015 international results in mathematics. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/international-results/
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, J. 1985. How Schools Structure Inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, J. 1986. “Tracking, Inequality, and the Rhetoric of Reform: Why Schools Don’t Change.” Journal of Education 168 (1): 60–80. doi:10.1177/002205748616800104.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W. 1984. “Magnitude of Teacher Expectancy Effects on Pupil IQ as a Function of the Credibility of Expectancy Inductions: A Synthesis of Findings from 18 Experiments.” Journal of Educational Psychology 76 (1): 85–97. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.1.85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R., and L. Jacobson. 1968. Pygmalion in the Classroom: Teacher Expectations and Student Intellectual Development. New York: Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, P., B. Styles, M. Walker, J. Morrison, J. Nelson, and K. Kettlewell. 2018. Best Practice in Grouping Students Intervention A: Best Practice in Setting Evaluation Report and Executive Summary. London: Education Endowment Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. 1990. “Achievement Effects of Ability Grouping in Secondary Schools: A Best Evidence Synthesis.” Review of Educational Research 60 (3): 471–499. doi:10.3102/00346543060003471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., L. Jussim, J. Eccles, M. Van Noy, S. J. Madon, and P. Palumbo. 1998. “Self-Fulfilling Prophecies, Perceptual Biases, and Accuracy at the Individual and Group Level.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 34 (6): 530–561. doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenbergen-Hu, S.,. M. C. Makel, and P. Olszewski-Kubilius. 2016. “What One Hundred Years of Research Says about the Effects of Ability Grouping and Acceleration on K–12 Students’ Academic Achievement: Findings of Two Second-Order Meta-Analyses.” Review of Educational Research 86 (4): 849–899. doi:10.3102/0034654316675417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand, S. 2012. “The White British–Black Caribbean Achievement Gap: tests, Tiers and Teacher Expectations.” British Educational Research Journal 38 (1): 75–101. doi:10.1080/01411926.2010.526702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Styles, Roy. 2017. Protocol for the Evaluation of Best Practice in Grouping Students Intervention a – Best Practice in Setting. London: Education Endowment Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B., B. Francis, L. Archer, J. Hodgen, A. Mazenod, A. Tereshchenko, and D. Pepper. 2018. ‘Why is it difficult for schools to establish equitable practices in allocating students to attainment ‘sets’?’. British Journal of Educational Studies 67 (1): 5–24. doi:10.1080/00071005.2018.1424317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Houtte, M., J. Demanet, and P. Stevens. 2012. “Self-Esteem of Academic and Vocational Students: Does within-School Tracking Sharpen the Difference?” Acta Sociologica 55 (1): 73–89. doi:10.1177/0001699311431595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar