990
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

School choice, institutional environments and the precarisation of teachers’ working conditions in not-for-profit charter schools

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 237-259 | Received 09 Dec 2020, Accepted 18 Nov 2021, Published online: 17 Dec 2021

References

  • Abadie, Alberto, and Guido W. Imbens. 2006. “Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects.” Econometrica 74 (1): 235–267. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00655.x.
  • ADE. 2019. Pliego de Peticiones Del 28 de Febrero Del 2019. Bogotá: Asociación Distrital de Trabajadores y Trabajadoras de la Educación.
  • Angrist, Joshua, Eric Bettinger, and Michael Kremer. 2006. “Long-Term Educational Consequences of Secondary School Vouchers: evidence from Administrative Records in Colombia.” American Economic Review 96 (3): 847–862. doi:10.1257/aer.96.3.847.
  • Baker, Bruce D., and Jill L. Dickerson. 2006. “Charter Schools, Teacher Labor Market Deregulation, and Teacher Quality.” Educational Policy 20 (5): 752–778. doi:10.1177/0895904805284118.
  • Balarin, María, Clara Fontdevila, Paola Marius, and María Fernanda Rodríguez. 2019. “Educating on a Budget: The Subsistence Model of Low-Fee Private Schooling in Peru.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 27: 132. doi:10.14507/epaa.27.4328.
  • Balarín, María. 2016. “La Privatización Por Defecto y el Surgimiento de Las Escuelas Privadas de Bajo Costo en el Perú – ¿Cuáles Son Sus Consecuencias?” Revista de la Asociación de Sociología de la Educación 9 (2): 181–196.
  • Barrera-Osorio, Felipe. 2006. “The Impact of Private Provision of Public Education: Empirical Evidence from Bogotá’s Concession Schools.” In Impact Evaluation Series No. 10. Washington: World Bank.
  • Barrera-Osorio, Felipe. 2009. “The Concession Schools of Bogotá, Colombia.” In School Choice International: Exploring Public-Private Partnerships, edited by Rajashri Chakrabarti and Paul E. Peterson, 193–218. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • Bifulco, Robert, and Christian Buerger. 2015. “The Influence of Finance and Accountability Policies on Location of New York State Charter Schools.” Journal of Education Finance 40 (3): 193–221.
  • Bocanegra Acosta, H. 2014. “La Flexibilización Laboral: formas y Reformas en la Educación Pública.” Revista Republicana 16: 99–131.
  • Bomotti, Sally, Rick Ginsberg, and Brian Cobb. 1999. “Teachers in Charter and Traditional Schools.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 7: 22. doi:10.14507/epaa.v7n22.1999.
  • Booker, Kevin, Scott M. Gilpatric, Timothy Gronberg, and Dennis Jansen. 2007. “The Impact of Charter School Attendance on Student Performance.” Journal of Public Economics 91 (5–6): 849–876. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.09.011.
  • Bromley, Patricia, and Walter W. Powell. 2012. “From Smoke and Mirrors to Walking the Talk: Decoupling in the Contemporary World.” Academy of Management Annals 6 (1): 483–530. doi:10.1080/19416520.2012.684462.
  • Bunnell, Tristan. 2016. “Teachers in International Schools: A Global Educational ‘Precariat’?” Globalisation, Societies and Education 14 (4): 543–559. doi:10.1080/14767724.2015.1068163.
  • Caliendo, Marco, and Sabine Kopeinig. 2008. “Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching.” Journal of Economic Surveys 22 (1): 31–72. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x.
  • Castillo, Mauricio, Javier Sáenz, Mario Pérez, Alfredo Sarmiento, Sergio Ardila, Camilo Hernández, Nubia López, et al. 2018. Aprendizajes y Retos de Los Colegios en Concesión en Bogotá. Bogotá: Secretaría de Educación de Bogotá.
  • Concejo de, Bogotá. 2018. “Concejo de Bogotá Aprueba Proyecto de Acuerdo Por Medio Del Cual se Otorgan Vigencias Futuras a la Administración Para Construir 13 Colegios en Modalidad de Concesión.” Accessed October 30. http://concejodebogota.gov.co/concejo-de-bogota-aprueba-proyecto-de-acuerdo-por-medio-del-cual-se/cbogota/2018-07-16/194049.php.
  • Congreso de Colombia. 1990. Ley 50 de 1990. Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional de Colombia.
  • Congreso de Colombia. 2002. Ley 789 de 2002. Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional de Colombia.
  • Congress of the United States of America. 2015. Every Student Succeeds Act. Washington: The Congressional Record.
  • Cornejo Chávez, R. 2009. “Secondary School Teachers’ Working Conditions and Well-Being/Discomfort in Santiago, Chile.” Educação & Sociedade 30 (107): 409–426. doi:10.1590/S0101-73302009000200006.
  • Corte Suprema de Justicia 1997. Sentencia de Febrero 14 de 1997. Bogotá: Sala de Casación Laboral.
  • DANE. 2020. “Educación Formal.”
  • Diaz, Claudia. 2018. “Domestic Coalitions in the Variation of Education Privatization: An Analysis of Chile, Argentina, and Colombia.” Journal of Education Policy: 647–668. doi:10.1080/02680939.2018.1460494.
  • Edwards, D. Brent, David DeMatthews Jr, and Hilary Hartley. 2017. “Public-Private Partnerships, Accountability, and Competition: Theory versus Reality in the Charter Schools of Bogotá, Colombia.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 25: 10. doi:10.14507/epaa.25.2556.
  • Edwards, D. Brent, and Andreu Termes Jr. 2019. “Los Colegios en Concesión de Bogotá: Los Límites de la Eficiencia Económica de Los Programas Chárter.” Revista Colombiana de Educación 1 (91) 91–116. doi: 10.17227/rce.num76-6891.
  • Epple, Dennis, Richard Romano, and Ron Zimmer. 2015. “Charter Schools: A Survey of Research on Their Characteristics and Effectiveness.” In Handbook of the Economics of Education, edited by Eric A. Hanushek, Stephen Machin, and Ludger Woessmann. North Holland: Elsevier.
  • FECODE. 2019. Pliego de Peticiones Del 14 de Febrero de 2019. Bogotá: Federación Colombiana de Trabajadores de la Educación.
  • Fredriksson, Anders. 2009. “On the Consequences of the Marketisation of Public Education in Sweden: For-Profit Charter Schools and the Emergence of the ‘Market-Oriented Teacher.” European Educational Research Journal 8 (2): 299–310. doi:10.2304/eerj.2009.8.2.299.
  • Friedman, Milton, and Rose Friedman. 1980. Free to Choose: A Personal Statement. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • García, Martha Cecilia. 2001. “Luchas y Movimientos Cívicos en Colombia.” In Movimientos Sociales, Estado y Democracia en Colombia, edited by Mauricio Archila and Mauricio Pardo, 88–124. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
  • Gaviria, Alejandro, and Claudia Marcela Umaña. 2002. “Estructura Salarial de Los Docentes Públicos en Colombia.” Coyuntura Social 264: 104–120.
  • Greene, Jay P., Paul E. Peterson, and Jiangtao Du. 1999. “Effectiveness of School Choice.” Education and Urban Society 31 (2): 190–213. doi:10.1177/0013124599031002005.
  • Gronberg, Timothy J., Dennis W. Jansen, and Lori L. Taylor. 2012. “The relative efficiency of charter schools: A cost frontier approach.” Economics of Education Review 31 (2): 302–317. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.07.001
  • Heckman, J. J., H. Ichimura, and P. E. Todd. 1997. “Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme.” The Review of Economic Studies 64 (4): 605–654. doi:10.2307/2971733.
  • Henig, Jeffrey, R. Thomas, T. Holyoke, Heath Brown, and Natalie Lacireno‐Paquet. 2005. “The Influence of Founder Type on Charter School Structures and Operations.” American Journal of Education 111 (4): 487–588. doi:10.1086/431181.
  • Jackson, C. Kirabo. 2012. “School Competition and Teacher Labor Markets: Evidence from Charter School Entry in North Carolina.” Journal of Public Economics 96 (5-6): 431–448. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.12.006.
  • Jackson, Michelle Victoria. 2013. Determined to Succeed? Performance Versus Choice in Educational Attainment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Available from home with a valid library card http://TM9QT7LG9G.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&L=TM9QT7LG9G&S=JCs&C=TC0000820710&T=marc&tab=BOOKS. Available onsite at NYPL http://WU9FB9WH4A.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&L=WU9FB9WH4A&S=JCs&C=TC0000820710&T=marc&tab=BOOKS.
  • Keigher, Ashley, and Freddie Cross. 2010. Teacher Attrition and Mobility: Results from the 2008–09 Teacher Follow-up Survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
  • Lubienski, Christopher. 2003. “Innovation in Education Markets: Theory and Evidence on the Impact of Competition and Choice in Charter Schools.” American Educational Research Journal 40 (2): 395–443. doi:10.3102/00028312040002395.
  • Means, Alexander J. 2017. “Generational Precarity, Education, and the Crisis of Capitalism: Conventional, Neo-Keynesian, and Marxian Perspectives.” Critical Sociology 43 (3): 339–354. doi:10.1177/0896920514564088.
  • Meyer, John W., John Boli, George M. Thomas, and Francisco O. Ramirez. 1997. “World Society and the Nation-State.” American Journal of Sociology 103 (1): 144–181. doi:10.1086/231174.
  • Miñana, Carlos. 2010. “Políticas Neoliberales y Neoinstitucionales en un Marco Constitucional Adverso. Reformas Educativas en Colombia 1991-2010.” Propuesta Educativa 34 (19): 37–52.
  • Ministerio de Educación Nacional. 1979. Decreto 2277 de Septiembre 14 de 1979. Bogotá : Imprenta Nacional de Colombia.
  • Ministerio de Educación Nacional. 2002. Decreto 1278 de Junio 19 de 2002. Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional de Colombia.
  • Ocampo, José Antonio. 2004. Entre Las Reformas y el Conflicto: Economía y Política en Colombia. Bogotá: Editorial Norma.
  • OECD. 2017. The Pursuit of Gender Equality: An Uphill Battle. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • OECD. 2020a. “Teaching hours.” Accessed January 20. https://data.oecd.org/teachers/teaching-hours.htm.
  • OECD. 2020b. “OECD Data.” Accessed April 1. https://www.oecd.org/gender/data/gender-wage-gap.htm.
  • Pagan, Adrian, and Aman Ullah. 1999. Nonparametric Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Patrinos, Harry Anthony, Felipe Barrera-Osori, and Juliana Guáqueta. 2009. The Role and Impact of Public-Private Partnerships in Education. Washington: The World Bank.
  • Peña, Margarita. 2004. “Discriminación Positiva en Las Políticas Educativas de Bogotá: El Caso de Los Colegios en Concesión.” In Políticas Educativas y Equidad, edited by Juan Eduardo García Huidobro, 155–160. Santiago de Chile: UNICEF.
  • Pineda, Pedro. 2015. The Entrepreneurial Research University in Latin America: Global and Local Models in Chile and Colombia, 1950-2015. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Presidencia de la República. 2002. Decreto 1850 de 2002, Diario Oficial No. 44.901. Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional de Colombia.
  • Presidente de la República de Colombia. 1977. “Decreto Número 128 de 1977.” In Diario Oficial 34725. Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional de Colombia.
  • Province of Alberta. 2002/2018. School Act: Charter Schools Regulation 212/2002 with Amendments up to and Including Alberta Regulation 28/2018. Edmonton: Alberta Queen’s Printer.
  • Ramirez, Francisco O., John W. Meyer, and Julia Lerch. 2016. “World Society and the Globalization of Educational Policy.” In The Handbook of Global Education Policy, edited by Karen Mundy, Andy Green, Lingard Bob, and Antoni Verger, 43–63. Malden: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Renzulli, Linda A. 2005. “Organizational Environments and the Emergence of Charter Schools in the United States.” Sociology of Education 78 (1): 1–26. doi:10.1177/003804070507800101.
  • Renzulli, Linda A., Heather Macpherson Parrott, and Irenee R. Beattie. 2011. “Racial Mismatch and School Type: Teacher Satisfaction and Retention in Charter and Traditional Public Schools.” Sociology of Education 84 (1): 23–48. doi:10.1177/0038040710392720.
  • Rosenbaum, Paul. 2017. Observation and Experiment: An Introduction to Causal Inference. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Rubin, D. 1974. “Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Experiments.” Journal of Educational Psychology 66 (5): 688–701. doi:10.1037/h0037350.
  • Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America. 2002. No Child Left behind Act of 2001. Washington: The Congressional Record.
  • SIMAT. 2018. “Sistema de Matrícula Estudiantil de Educación Básica y Media.” Ministerio de Educación Nacional de Colombia, Accessed January 30. https://www.sistemamatriculas.gov.co/
  • Skoufias, Emmanuel, and Joseph Shapiro. 2006. “Evaluating the Impact of Mexico’s Quality Schools Program: The Pitfalls of Using Nonexperimental Data.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4036. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • SNIES. 2020. "Sistema Nacional de Información de Educación Superior." Accessed March 31. www.mineducacion.gov.co/snies/.
  • Sporre, Karin. 2017. “Value Conflicts and Faith Based Schools: In Contemporary Sweden.” Nordic Journal of Religion and Society 26 (2): 175–191. doi:10.18261/ISSN1890-7008-2013-02-05.
  • Taylor, Lori L. 2008. “Competition and Teacher Pay.” Economic Inquiry 48 (3): 603–620. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.2008.00130.x.
  • Termes, Andreu, Antoni Verger, and Xavıer Bonal. 2017. “Mitos y Asunciones de Las Escuelas Chárter: Un Análisis de Los Colegios en Concesión de Bogotá.” Educação & Sociedade 38 (141): 911–934. doi:10.1590/es0101-73302017173097.
  • Torres, A. C. 2014. “Are we Architects or Construction Workers?” Re-Examining Teacher Autonomy and Turnover in Charter Schools.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 22: 124. doi:10.14507/epaa.v22.1614.
  • Umpstead, Regina, Benjamin Jankens, Pablo Ortega Gil, Linda Weiss, and Bruce Umpstead. 2016. “School Choice in Spain and the United States: A Comparative Study.” Global Education Review 3 (2): 84–102.
  • Verger, Antoni, Mauro Moschetti, and Clara Fontdevila. 2017. La Privatización Educativa en América Latina: Una Cartografía de Políticas, Tendencias y Trayectorias. Barcelona: Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona.
  • Wei, Xin, Deepa Patel, and Viki M. Young. 2014. “Opening the “Black Box”: Organizational Differences between Charter Schools and Traditional Public Schools.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 22: 3. doi:10.14507/epaa.v22n3.2014.
  • West, Anne, Dabney Ingram, and Audrey Hind. 2006. “Skimming the Cream”: Admissions to Charter Schools in the United States and to Autonomous Schools in England.” Educational Policy 20 (4): 615–639. doi:10.1177/0895904805284054.