Is it socioeconomic or academic? Disentangling sources of peer effects on student achievement

References

• Ammermueller, A., and J. S. Pischke. 2006. “Peer Effects in European Primary Schools: Evidence from PIRLS.” NBER Working Paper No. 12180, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Anders, J., M. Henderson, V. Moulton, and A. Sullivan. 2018. “The Role of Schools in Explaining Individuals’ Subject Choices at Age 14.” Oxford Review of Education 44 (1): 75–93. doi:10.1080/03054985.2018.1409973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angrist, J. D. 2014. “The Perils of Peer Effects.” Labour Economics 30: 98–108. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2014.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armor, D., G. Marks, and A. Malatinszky. 2018. “The Impact of School SES on Student Achievement: Evidence from U.S. Statewide Achievement Data.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 40 (4): 613–630. doi:10.3102/0162373718787917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, A., S. Burgess, P. Gregg, C. Propper, and S. Proud. 2008. “The Impact of Classroom Peer Groups on Pupil GCSE Results.” CMPO Working Paper Series; no. 08/187. Bristol: Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Auguste, S., and J. P. Valenzuela. 2004. Do Students Benefit from School Competition? Evidence from Chile. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Bietenbeck, J. 2020. “The Long-Term Impacts of Low-Achieving Childhood Peers: Evidence from Project STAR.” Journal of the European Economic Association 18 (1): 392–426. doi:10.1093/jeea/jvy049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bifulco, R., J. M. Fletcher, and S. L. Ross. 2011. “The Effect of Classmate Characteristics on Post-Secondary Outcomes: Evidence from the Add Health.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 3 (1): 25–53. doi:10.1257/pol.3.1.25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brault, M., M. Janosz, and I. Archambault. 2014. “Effects of School Composition and School Climate on Teacher Expectations of Students: A Multilevel Analysis.” Teaching and Teacher Education 44: 148–159. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, M. A., and T. R. Sass. 2013. “Classroom Peer Effects and Student Achievement.” Journal of Labor Economics 31 (1): 51–82. doi:10.1086/666653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrasco, A., G. Gutiérrez, and C. Flores. 2017. “Failed Regulations and School Composition: Selective Admission Practices in Chilean Primary Schools.” Journal of Education Policy 32 (5): 642–672. doi:10.1080/02680939.2017.1312549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chumacero, R., D. Gomez, and R. Paredes. 2011. “I Would Walk 500 Miles (If It Paid): Vouchers and School Choice in Chile.” Economics of Education Review 30 (5): 1103–1114. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.05.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clotfelter, C. T., H. Ladd, and J. Vigdor. 2006. “Teacher-Student Matching and the Assessment of Teacher Effectiveness.” Journal of Human Resources XLI (4): 778–820. doi:10.3368/jhr.XLI.4.778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contreras, D., P. Sepúlveda, and S. Bustos. 2010. “When Schools Are the Ones That Choose: The Effects of Screening in Chile.” Social Science Quarterly 91 (5): 1349–1368. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00735.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Fraine, B., J. Van Damme, G. Van Landeghem, M. C. Opdenakker, and P. Onghena. 2003. “The Effect of Schools and Classes on Language Achievement.” British Educational Research Journal 29 (6): 841–859. doi:10.1080/0141192032000137330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duflo, E., P. Dupas, and M. Kremer. 2011. “Peer Effects, Teacher Incentives, and the Impact of Tracking: Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation in Kenya.” American Economic Review 101 (5): 1739–1774. doi:10.1257/aer.101.5.1739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupriez, V., C. Monseur, M. Van Campenhoudt, and D. Lafontaine. 2012. “Social Inequalities of Post-Secondary Educational Aspirations: Influence of Social Background, School Composition and Institutional Context.” European Educational Research Journal 11 (4): 504–519. doi:10.2304/eerj.2012.11.4.504.
   Google Scholar
• Elacqua, G., M. Schneider, and J. Buckley. 2006. “School Choice in Chile: Is It Class or the Classroom?” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 25 (3): 577–601. doi:10.1002/pam.20192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elacqua, G. 2012. “The Impact of School Choice and Public Policy on Segregation: Evidence from Chile.” International Journal of Educational Development 32 (3): 444–453. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2011.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, C., and A. Carrasco. 2013. (Des)igualdad de oportunidades para elegir escuela. Preferencias, libertad de elección y segregación escolar. Espacio Público.
   Google Scholar
• Gallego, F., and A. Hernando. 2009. “On the Determinants and Implications of School Choice: Semi-Structural Simulations for Chile.” Economía 9 (1): 197–239. doi:10.1353/eco.0.0016.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, S., and S. Telhaj. 2016. “Peer Effects: Evidence from Secondary School Transition in England.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 78 (4): 548–575. doi:10.1111/obes.12095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godoy, F., F. Salazar, and E. Treviño. 2014. Prácticas de selección en el sistema escolar chileno: Tipos de requisitos de postulación, legitimación en el sistema y las debilidades de la Ley. Informes para la Política Educativa. Chile, Santiago: Centro de Políticas Comparadas de Educación, Universidad Diego Portales.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, G., and A. Carrasco. 2021. “Chile’s Enduring Educational Segregation: A Trend Unchanged by Different Cycles of Reform.” British Educational Research Journal 47 (6): 1611–1634. doi:10.1002/berj.3746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, T. J., and S. Kwak. 2012. “What is a Peer? The Role of Network Definitions in Estimation of Endogenous Peer Effects.” Applied Economics 44 (3): 289–302. doi:10.1080/00036846.2010.505557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E., J. Kain, J. Markman, and S. Rivkin. 2003. “Does Peer Ability Affect Student Achievement?” Journal of Applied Econometrics 18.5: 527–544. doi:10.1002/jae.741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harker, R., and R. Nash. 1996. “Academic Outcomes and School Effectiveness: Type “a” and Type “B” Effects. New Zealand.” Journal of Educational Studies 31 (2): 143–170. doi:10.1076/sesi.15.2.177.30432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoxby, C., and G. Weingarth. 2005. “Taking Race Out of the Equation: School Reassignment and the Structure of Peer Effects.” Working Paper. N° 7887, National Bureau of Economic Research
   Google Scholar
• Hoxby, C. 2000. Peer Effects in the Classroom: Learning from Gender and Race Variation. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, C. T., and M. Urquiola. 2006. “The Effects of Generalized School Choice on Achievement and Stratification: Evidence from Chile’s Voucher Program.” Journal of Public Economics 90 (8–9): 1477–1503. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauen, D. L., and S. M. Gaddis. 2013. “Exposure to Classroom Poverty and Test Score Achievement: Contextual Effects or Selection?” American Journal of Sociology 118 (4): 943–979. doi:10.1086/668408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazear, E. 2001. “Educational Production.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (3): 777–803. doi:10.1162/00335530152466232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malatinszky, A., and D. Armor. 2021. “Comment on M.G. Sciffer, L.B. Perry, and A.M. McConney, “Critiques of Socio-Economic School Compositional Effects: Are They Valid?” British Journal of Sociology of Education 42 (5–6): 609–615. doi:10.1080/01425692.2021.1929843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manski, C. 1993. “Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem.” The Review of Economic Studies 60 (3): 531–542. doi:10.2307/2298123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, G. N. 2015. “Are School-SES Effects Statistical Artefacts? Evidence from Longitudinal Population Data.” Oxford Review of Education 41 (1): 122–144. doi:10.1080/03054985.2015.1006613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, G. 2021. “School Socioeconomic-Background Effects Are Generally Small: A Response to Sciffer, Perry, and McConney.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 42 (5–6): 616–626. doi:10.1080/01425692.2021.1929842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEwan, P. J. 2003. “Peer Effects on Student Achievement: Evidence from Chile.” Economics of Education Review 22 (2): 131–141. doi:10.1016/S0272-7757(02)00005-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikulyuk, A., and J. Braddock. 2018. “K-12 School Diversity and Social Cohesion: Evidence in Support of a Compelling State Interest.” Education and Urban Society 50 (1): 5–37. doi:10.1177/0013124516678045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizala, A., and F. Torche. 2012. “Bringing the Schools Back in: The Stratification of Educational Achievement in the Chilean Voucher System.” International Journal of Educational Development 32 (1): 132–144. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2010.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina, A., and S. Lamb. 2022. “School Segregation, Inequality and Trust in Institutions: Evidence from Santiago.” Comparative Education 58 (1): 72–90. doi:10.1080/03050068.2021.1997025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opdenakker, M., J. Van Damme, B. De Fraine, G. Van Landeghem, and P. Onghena. 2002. “The Effect of Schools and Classes on Mathematics Achievement.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 13 (4): 399–427. doi:10.1076/sesi.13.4.399.10283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paloyo, A. 2020. “Peer Effects in Education: Recent Empirical Evidence.” In The Economics of Education: A Comprehensive Review. 2nd ed., edited by S. Bradley and C. Green, 291–305. London, United Kingdom: Elsevier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, G. 2019. “Familiarity Does Not Breed Contempt.” American Economic Review 109 (3): 774–809. doi:10.1257/aer.20180044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumberger, R. W., and G. J. Palardy. 2005. “Does Segregation Still Matter? The Impact of Student Composition on Academic Achievement in High School.” Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education 107 (9): 1999–2045. doi:10.1177/016146810510700905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumberger, R. W., and J. D. Willms. 1992. “The Impact of Racial and Ethnic Segregation on the Achievement Gap in California High Schools.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 14 (4): 377–396. doi:10.1177/016146810510700905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacerdote, B. 2011. “Peer Effects in Education: How Might They Work, How Big Are They and How Much Do we Know Thus Far?” In Handbook of the Economics of Education. Vol. 3, edited by E. Hanushek, S. Machin, and L. Woessmann. Saint Louis: Elsevier Science & Technology. 249–277.
   Google Scholar
• Sacerdote, B. 2014. “Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Analysis of Peer Effects: Two Steps Forward?” Annual Review of Economics 6 (1): 253–272. doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-071813-104217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneeweis, N., and R. Winter-Ebmer. 2007. “Peer Effects in Austrian Schools.” Empirical Economics 32 (2–3): 387–409. doi:10.1007/s00181-006-0091-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciffer, M., L. Perry, and A. McConney. 2020. “Critiques of Socioeconomic School Compositional Effects: Are They Valid?” British Journal of Sociology of Education 41 (4): 462–475. doi:10.1080/01425692.2020.1736000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciffer, M., L. Perry, and A. McConney. 2021. “Appropriate Modelling of School Compositional Effects: A Response to Malatinszky and Armor, and Marks.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 42 (5–6): 627–632. doi:10.1080/01425692.2021.1959301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shure, N. 2021. “Non-Cognitive Peer Effects in Secondary Education.” Labour Economics 73: 102074. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2021.102074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirin, S. R. 2005. “Socioeconomic Status and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review of Research.” Review of Educational Research 75 (3): 417–453. doi:10.3102/00346543075003417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• South, S. J., E. P. Baumer, and A. Lutz. 2003. “Interpreting Community Effects on Youth Educational Attainment.” Youth & Society 35 (1): 3–36. doi:10.1177/0044118X03254560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sund, K. 2009. “Estimating Peer Effects in Swedish High School Using School, Teacher, and Student Fixed Effects.” Economics of Education Review 28 (3): 329–336. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2008.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taut, S., and J. Escobar. 2012. El efecto de las características de los pares en el aprendizaje de estudiantes chilenos de enseñanza media. Technical Reports Mideuc.
   Google Scholar
• Thrupp, M. 1999. Schools Making a Difference: Let’s Be Realistic! School Mix, School Effectiveness and the Social Limits of Reform. Buckingham: Open University Press
   Google Scholar
• Thrupp, M., H. Lauder, and T. Robinson. 2002. “School Composition and Peer Effects.” International Journal of Educational Research 37 (5): 483–504. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00016-8.
   Google Scholar
• Treviño, E., J. P. Valenzuela, and C. Villalobos. 2016. “Within-School Segregation in the Chilean School System: What Factors Explain It? How Efficient is This Practice for Fostering Student Achievement and Equity?” Learning and Individual Differences 51 (C): 367–375. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ewijk, R., and P. Sleegers. 2010. “The Effect of Peer Socioeconomic Status on Student Achievement: A Meta-Analysis.” Educational Research Review, 5 (2): 134–150. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willms, J. 2010. “School Composition and Contextual Effects on Student Outcomes.” Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education 112 (4): 1008–1037. doi:10.1177/016146811011200408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willms, J. D. 1986. “Social Class Segregation and Its Relationship to Pupils’ Examination Results in Scotland.” American Sociological Review 51 (2): 224–241. doi:10.2307/2095518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, R., and P. Nguyen-Hoang. 2016. “Endogenous Peer Effects: Fact or Fiction?” The Journal of Educational Research 109 (1): 37–49. doi:10.1080/00220671.2014.918528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar