390
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Peer preferences and educational decisions: heterogeneous associations across student socioeconomic status

ORCID Icon
Pages 374-393 | Received 11 Mar 2022, Accepted 29 Nov 2022, Published online: 28 Dec 2022

References

  • Ammermueller, Andreas, and Jörn‐Steffen Pischke. 2009. “Peer Effects in European Primary Schools: Evidence from the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study.” Journal of Labor Economics 27 (3): 315–348. doi:10.1086/603650.
  • Andersen, Simon Calmar, and Morten Hjortskov. 2022. “The Unnoticed Influence of Peers on Educational Preferences.” Behavioural Public Policy 6 (4): 530–553. doi:10.1017/bpp.2019.14.
  • Angrist, Joshua D., and Jörn-Steffen Pischke. 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics : An Empiricist’s Companion, edited by Joshua D. Angrist and Jörn-Steffen Pischke. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 3:21–81.
  • Ball, Stephen J., and Carol Vincent. 1998. “I Heard It on the Grapevine’: ‘Hot’ Knowledge and School Choice.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 19 (3): 377–400. doi:10.1080/0142569980190307.
  • Baumeister, Roy F., and Mark R. Leary. 1995. “The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation.” Psychological Bulletin 117 (3): 497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497.
  • Birkelund, Jesper Fels. 2020. “Sources of Change in the Primary and Secondary Effects of Social Class Origin on Educational Decisions: Evidence from Denmark, 2002–2016.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 68 (August): 100504. doi:10.1016/j.rssm.2020.100504.
  • Boudon, Raymond. 1974. “Education, Opportunity, and Social Inequality.” In Changing Prospects in Western Societies. New York: Wiley.
  • Breen, Richard, Kristian Bernt Karlson, and Anders Holm. 2018. “Interpreting and Understanding Logits, Probits, and Other Nonlinear Probability Models.” Annual Review of Sociology 44 (1): 39–54. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041429.
  • Breen, R., H. G. Van de Werfhorst, and M. M. Jæger. 2014. “Deciding under Doubt: A Theory of Risk Aversion, Time Discounting Preferences, and Educational Decision-Making.” European Sociological Review 30 (2): 258–270. doi:10.1093/esr/jcu039.
  • Buchmann, Claudia, and Ben Dalton. 2002. “Interpersonal Influences and Educational Aspirations in 12 Countries: The Importance of Institutional Context.” Sociology of Education 75 (2): 99–122. doi:10.2307/3090287.
  • Carbonaro, William, and Joseph Workman. 2016. “Intermediate Peer Contexts and Educational Outcomes: Do the Friends of Students’ Friends Matter?” Social Science Research 58 (July): 184–197. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.02.005.
  • Choi, Kate H., R. Kelly Raley, Chandra Muller, and Catherine Riegle-Crumb. 2008. “Class Composition: Socioeconomic Characteristics of Coursemates and College Enrollment.” Social Science Quarterly 89 (4): 846–866. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00587.x.
  • Coleman, James S., Ernest Q. Campbell, Carol J. Hobson, James McPartland, Alexander M. Mood, Frederick D. Weinfield, and Robert L. York. 1966. Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Crosnoe, Robert, and Chandra Muller. 2014. “Family Socioeconomic Status, Peers, and the Path to College.” Social Problems 61 (4): 602–624. doi:10.1525/sp.2014.12255.
  • Danish Ministry of Children and Education. 2019. “Notat 9. Og 10. Klasseelevers Søgning Til Ungdomsuddannelser.” https://www.uvm.dk/-/media/filer/uvm/stat/pdf19/190326-notat-9-og-10-klasseelevers-soegning-til-uu-2019.pdf?la=da.
  • Danish Ministry of Children and Education. 2020. “Overview of the Danish Education System.” https://eng.uvm.dk/general-overview/overview-of-the-danish-education-system.
  • Davis, James A. 1966. “The Campus as a Frog Pond: An Application of the Theory of Relative Deprivation to Career Decisions of College Men.” American Journal of Sociology 72 (1): 17–31. doi:10.1086/224257.
  • DiPrete, Thomas A. 2002. “Life Course Risks, Mobility Regimes, and Mobility Consequences: A Comparison of Sweden, Germany, and the United States.” American Journal of Sociology 108 (2): 267–309. doi:10.1086/344811.
  • Downey, Douglas B., and Dennis J. Condron. 2016. “Fifty Years since the Coleman Report: Rethinking the Relationship between Schools and Inequality.” Sociology of Education 89 (3): 207–220. doi:10.1177/0038040716651676.
  • Erikson, R., and F. Rudolphi. 2010. “Change in Social Selection to Upper Secondary School - Primary and Secondary Effects in Sweden.” European Sociological Review 26 (3): 291–305. doi:10.1093/esr/jcp022.
  • Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Forster, Andrea G., and Herman G. Van de Werfhorst. 2019. “Navigating Institutions: Parents’ Knowledge of the Educational System and Students’ Success in Education.” European Sociological Review. doi:10.1093/esr/jcz049.
  • Frank, Kenneth A., Chandra Muller, Kathryn S. Schiller, Catherine Riegle-Crumb, Anna Strassmann Mueller, Robert Crosnoe, and Jennifer Pearson. 2008. “The Social Dynamics of Mathematics Coursetaking in High School.” AJS; American Journal of Sociology 113 (6): 1645–1696. doi:10.1086/587153.
  • Grodsky, E., and C. Riegle-Crumb. 2010. “Those Who Choose and Those Who Don’t: Social Background and College Orientation.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 627 (1): 14–35. doi:10.1177/0002716209348732.
  • Heisig, Jan Paul, Merlin Schaeffer, and Johannes Giesecke. 2017. “The Costs of Simplicity: Why Multilevel Models May Benefit from Accounting for Cross-Cluster Differences in the Effects of Controls.” American Sociological Review 82 (4): 796–827. doi:10.1177/0003122417717901.
  • Hill, Lori Diane. 2008. “School Strategies and the ‘College-Linking’ Process: Reconsidering the Effects of High Schools on College Enrollment.” Sociology of Education 81 (1): 53–76. doi:10.1177/003804070808100103.
  • Holm, Anders, Anders Hjorth-Trolle, and Mads Meier Jæger. 2019. “Signals, Educational Decision-Making, and Inequality.” European Sociological Review 35 (4): 447–460. doi:10.1093/esr/jcz010.
  • Holm, Anders, Mads Meier Jæger, Kristian Bernt Karlson, and David Reimer. 2013. “Incomplete Equalization: The Effect of Tracking in Secondary Education on Educational Inequality.” Social Science Research 42 (6): 1431–1442. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.06.001.
  • Jæger, M. M. 2009. “Equal Access but Unequal Outcomes: Cultural Capital and Educational Choice in a Meritocratic Society.” Social Forces 87 (4): 1943–1971. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.12.029.
  • Jæger, Mads Meier, and Anders Holm. 2007. “Does Parents’ Economic, Cultural, and Social Capital Explain the Social Class Effect on Educational Attainment in the Scandinavian Mobility Regime?” Social Science Research 36 (2): 719–744. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.11.003.
  • Jennings, Jennifer L., David Deming, Christopher Jencks, Maya Lopuch, and Beth E. Schueler. 2015. “Do Differences in School Quality Matter More than We Thought? New Evidence on Educational Opportunity in the Twenty-First Century.” Sociology of Education 88 (1): 56–82. doi:10.1177/0038040714562006.
  • Jensen, Vibeke M., and Astrid W. Rasmussen. 2011. “Danish Education Registers.” Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 39 (7 Suppl): 91–94. doi:10.1177/1403494810394715.
  • Jørgensen, Christian Helms. 2017. “The Danish Apprenticeship System and the Nordic Model of Education.” Paper presented at 6th ITEPE Workshop Segmentalism. Re-Visited. Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Juul, Ida. 2011. “Pathways in Denmark: A Historical Perspective on the Construction of Pathways within and between Different Parts of the Danish Education System and How This Has Affected the VET System.” The Australian Journal of Vocational Education and Training in School 9: 24–31.
  • Karlson, Kristian Bernt. 2011. “Multiple Paths in Educational Transitions: A Multinomial Transition Model with Unobserved Heterogeneity.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 29 (3): 323–341. doi:10.1016/j.rssm.2011.02.001.
  • Karlson, Kristian Bernt. 2013. “Summarizing Primary and Secondary Effects.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 33 (1): 72–82. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.rssm.2013.01.001.
  • Kelley, Harold H. 1952. “Two Functions of Reference Groups.” In Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues, Readings in Social Psychology, edited by Guy E. Swanson, Theodore M. Newcomb, and Eugene L. Hartley, 410–414. New York: Holt.
  • Lareau, Annette. 2015. “Cultural Knowledge and Social Inequality.” American Sociological Review 80 (1): 1–27. doi:10.1177/0003122414565814.
  • Legewie, Joscha, and Thomas A. DiPrete. 2012. “School Context and the Gender Gap in Educational Achievement.” American Sociological Review 77 (3): 463–485. doi:10.1177/0003122412440802.
  • Malatinszky, Aron, and David J. Armor. 2021. “Comment on M.G. Sciffer, L.B. Perry, & A.M. McConney, ‘Critiques of Socio-Economic School Compositional Effects: Are They Valid?” British Journal of Sociology of Education 42 (5-6): 609–615. doi:10.1080/01425692.2021.1929843.
  • Marsh, Herbert W., and Kit-Tai Hau. 2003. “Big-Fish–Little-Pond Effect on Academic Self-Concept: A Cross-Cultural (26-Country) Test of the Negative Effects of Academically Selective Schools.” The American Psychologist 58 (5): 364–376. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.5.364.
  • Marsh, Herbert W., and John W. Parker. 1984. “Determinants of Student Self-Concept: Is It Better to Be a Relatively Large Fish in a Small Pond Even If You Don’t Learn to Swim as Well?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47 (1): 213–231. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.47.1.213.
  • McDonough, Patricia M. 1997. Choosing Colleges: How Social Class and Schools Structure Opportunity. 1st ed. New York: State University of New York Press.
  • McNeish, Daniel, and Kathryn R. Wentzel. 2017. “Accommodating Small Sample Sizes in Three-Level Models When the Third Level Is Incidental.” Multivariate Behavioral Research 52 (2): 200–215. Taylor & Francis: doi:10.1080/00273171.2016.1262236.
  • Merton, Robert K, and Alice S. Rossi. 1968. “Contributions to the Theory of Reference Group Behavior.” In Social Theory and Social Structure, edited by Robert K. Merton, 279–334. New York: The Free Press.
  • Munk, Martin D. 2013. “Completion of Upper Secondary Education: What Mechanisms Are at Stake?” Comparative Social Research 30 (January): 255–291. doi:10.1108/S0195-6310(2013)0000030013.
  • Palardy, Gregory J. 2015. “High School Socioeconomic Composition and College Choice: Multilevel Mediation via Organizational Habitus, School Practices, Peer and Staff Attitudes.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 26 (3): 329–353. doi:10.1080/09243453.2014.965182.
  • Palardy, Gregory J. 2020. “The Impact of Socioeconomic Segregation in U.S. High Schools on Achievement, Behavior, and Attainment and the Mediating Effects of Peers and School Practices.” In International Perspectives in Educational Effectiveness Research, edited by J. E. Hall, P. Sammons, and A. Lindorff, 109–132. London, UK: Springer.
  • Pfeffer, Fabian T. 2008. “Persistent Inequality in Educational Attainment and Its Institutional Context.” European Sociological Review 24 (5): 543–565. doi:10.1093/esr/jcn026.
  • Riegle-Crumb, Catherine, George Farkas, and Chandra Muller. 2006. “The Role of Gender and Friendship in Advanced Course Taking.” Sociology of Education 79 (3): 206–228. doi:10.1177/003804070607900302.
  • Riegle-Crumb, Catherine, and Karisma Morton. 2017. “Gendered Expectations: Examining How Peers Shape Female Students’ Intent to Pursue STEM Fields.” Frontiers in Psychology 8 (MAR): 329. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00329.
  • Robinson, Karen Jeong, and Josipa Roksa. 2016. “Counselors, Information, and High School College-Going Culture: Inequalities in the College Application Process.” Research in Higher Education 57 (7): 845–868. Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/s11162-016-9406-2.
  • Roksa, Josipa, and Karen Jeong Robinson. 2017. “Cultural Capital and Habitus in Context: The Importance of High School College-Going Culture.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 38 (8): 1230–1244. doi:10.1080/01425692.2016.1251301.
  • Rosenqvist, Erik. 2018. “Two Functions of Peer Influence on Upper-Secondary Education Application Behavior.” Sociology of Education 91 (1): 72–89. doi:10.1177/0038040717746113.
  • Rumberger, Russell W., and Gregory J. Palardy. 2005. “Does Segregation Still Matter? The Impact of Student Composition on Academic Achievement in High School.” Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education 107 (9): 1999–2045. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ718513&site=ehost-live. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00583.x.
  • Sacerdote, B. (2011). Peer effects in education: How might they work, how big are they and how much do we know thus far? In E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, & L. Woessmann (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 3, pp. 250–277). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.
  • Sciffer, Michael G., Laura Perry, and Andrew McConney. 2021. “Appropriate Modelling of School Compositional Effects: A Response to Malatinszky and Armor, and Marks.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 42 (5-6): 627–632. doi:10.1080/01425692.2021.1959301.
  • Sciffer, Michael G., Laura B. Perry, and Andrew McConney. 2020. “Critiques of Socio-Economic School Compositional Effects: Are They Valid?” British Journal of Sociology of Education 41 (4): 462–475. doi:10.1080/01425692.2020.1736000.
  • Seaton, Marjorie, Herbert W. Marsh, and Rhonda G. Craven. 2010. “Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect.” American Educational Research Journal 47 (2): 390–433. doi:10.3102/0002831209350493.
  • Skov, Peter Rohde. 2016. The Company You Keep: The Effects of Peers and Disruptive Behavior on Educational Achievement and Choice of Education. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.
  • Snijders, Tom, and Roel Bosker. 2012. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Applied Multilevel Analysis. London: Sage.
  • Thijs, Jochem, Maykel Verkuyten, and Petra Helmond. 2010. “A Further Examination of the Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect: Perceived Position in Class, Class Size, and Gender Comparisons.” Sociology of Education 83 (4): 333–345. doi:10.1177/0038040710383521.
  • Van de Werfhorst, Herman G, and Jonathan J. B. Mijs. 2010. “Achievement Inequality and the Institutional Structure of Educational Systems: A Comparative Perspective.” Annual Review of Sociology 36 (1): 48–64. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102538.
  • Van den Broeck, Laura, Isis Vandelannote, Jannick Demanet, and Mieke Van Houtte. 2021. “High School Never Ends. Normative and Comparative Peer Group Effects on Higher Education Outcomes through the School-Level Students’ Expectation Culture.” Educational Review, May: 1–26. doi:10.1080/00131911.2021.1923459.
  • Wahler, Susanne, Sandra Buchholz, and Stine Møllegaard. 2016. “Educational Inequalities in Tracked Danish Upper Secondary Education.” In Models of Secondary Education and Social Inequality, edited by Hans Peter Blossfeld, Sandra Buchholz, Jan Skopek, and Moris Triventi, 197–210. EduLIFE Lifelong Learning Series. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi:10.4337/9781785367267.00022.
  • West, Anne, and Rita Nikolai. 2013. “Welfare Regimes and Education Regimes: Equality of Opportunity and Expenditure in the EU (and US).” Journal of Social Policy 42 (3): 469–493. doi:10.1017/S0047279412001043.
  • Wiederkehr, Virginie, Céline Darnon, Sébastien Chazal, Serge Guimond, and Delphine Martinot. 2015. “From Social Class to Self-Efficacy: Internalization of Low Social Status Pupils’ School Performance.” Social Psychology of Education 18 (4): 769–784. doi:10.1007/s11218-015-9308-8.
  • Wilms, Douglas. 2010. “School Composition and Contextual Effects on Student Outcomes.” Teachers College Record 112 (4): 1008–1037.
  • Wood, Joanne V. 1996. “What Is Social Comparison and How Should We Study It?” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22 (5): 520–537. doi:10.1177/0146167296225009.
  • Zwier, Dieuwke, Sara Geven, Thijs Bol, and Herman G. Van de Werfhorst. 2022. “Let’s Stick Together: Peer Effects in Secondary School Choice and Variations by Student Socio-Economic Background.” European Sociological Review. doi:10.1093/esr/jcac033.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.