2,033
Views
87
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Recording Manifestations of Cultural Ecosystem Services in the Landscape

&
Pages 649-667 | Published online: 02 Oct 2012

References

  • Antrop, M. (1997). The concept of traditional landscapes as a base for landscape evaluation and planning. The example of Flanders Region. Landscape and Urban Planning, 38, 105–117.
  • Brown, G. (2005). Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management: Methods and applications. Society and Natural Resources, 18, 1–23.
  • Brown, G., & Weber, D. (2012). Measuring change in place values using public participation GIS (PPGIS). Applied Geography, 34, 316–324.
  • Brück, J. (2005). Experiencing the past? The development of a phenomenological archaeology in British prehistory. Archaeological Dialogues, 12, 45–72.
  • Chan, K. M. A., Goldstein, J., Satterfield, T., Hannahs, N., Kikiloi, K., Naidoo, R., Vadeboncoeur, N., & Woodside, U. (2011). Cultural services and non-use values. In P. Kareiva, H. Tallis, T. H. Ricketts, G. C. Daily, & S. Polasky (Eds.), Natural Capital: Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services (pp. 206–228). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Council of Europe (2000). The European Landscape Convention. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
  • de Groot, R., & Ramakrishnan, P. S. (2005). Cultural and amenity services. In R. Hassan, R. Scholes, & N. Ash (Eds.), Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends, The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Series (pp. 455–476). Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Dobson, S. (2011). Sustaining place through community walking initiatives. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 1, 109–121.
  • Eiter, S. (2010). Landscape as an area perceived through activity: Implications for diversity management and conservation. Landscape Research, 35, 339–359.
  • EPCL (European Pathways to the Cultural Landscape 2000–2003) (2003). Pathways To Europe’s Landscape. available at http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/publications/pathways-to-europes-landscape/ (accessed 2 February 2012).
  • Fagerholm, N., & Käyhkö, N. (2009). Participatory mapping and geographical patterns of the social landscape values of rural communities in Zanzibar, Tanzania. Fennia, 187, 43–60.
  • Fairclough, G., Lambrick, G., & Hopkins, D. (2002). Historic landscape characterisation in England and a Hampshire case study. In G. Fairclough, & S. Rippon (Eds.), Europe’s Cultural Landscape: Archaeologists and the Management of Change (pp. 69–83). Exeter: Short Run Press.
  • Foard, G. (1978). Systematic fieldwalking and the investigation of Saxon settlement in Northamptonshire. World Archaeology, 9, 357–374.
  • Gee, K., & Burkhard, B. (2010). Cultural ecosystem services in the context of offshore wind farming: A case study from the west coast of Schleswig-Holstein. Ecological Complexity, 7, 349–358.
  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
  • Grant, J., Gorin, S., & Fleming, N. (2008). Fieldwalking. In J. Grant, S. Gorin, & N. Fleming (Eds.), The Archaeology Coursebook: An Introduction to Themes, Sites, Methods, and Skills (pp. 11–13). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
  • Guo, Z. W., Zhang, L., & Li, Y. M. (2010). Increased dependence of humans on ecosystem services and biodiversity. PLoS ONE, 5, 10).
  • Head, L. (2012). Conceptualising the human in cultural landscapes and resilience thinking. In T. Plieninger, & C. Bieling (Eds.), Resilience and the Cultural Landscape. Understanding and Managing Change in Human-Shaped Environments, pp. 65–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jones, M. (2003). The concept of cultural landscape: Discourse and narratives. In H. Palang, & G. Fry (Eds.), Landscape Interfaces: Cultural Heritage in Changing Landscapes (pp. 21–51). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Jones-Walters, L. (2008). Biodiversity in multifunctional landscapes. Journal for Nature Conservation, 16, 117–119.
  • MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2003). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Norton, L., Inwood, H., Crowe, A., & Baker, A. (2012). Trialling a method to quantify the ‘cultural services’ of the English landscape using Countryside Survey data. Land Use Policy, 29, 449–455.
  • O’Brien, E. (2006). A question of value: What do trees and forests mean to people in Vermont? Landscape Research, 31, 257–275.
  • Palang, H., & Fry, G. (2003). Landscape interfaces. In H. Palang, & G. Fry (Eds.), Landscape Interfaces: Cultural Heritage in Changing Landscapes (pp. 1–13). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Plieninger, T. (2012). Monitoring directions and rates of change in trees outside forests through multitemporal analysis of map sequences. Applied Geography, 32, 566–576.
  • Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Peterson, G. D., & Bennett, E. M. (2010). Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. PNAS, 107, 5242–5247.
  • Reichertz, J. (2004). Objective hermeneutics and hermeneutic sociology of knowledge. In U. Flick, E. von Kardoff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A Companion to Qualitative Research (pp. 290–295). London: SAGE.
  • Research Group Ecosystem Services (2011). Market-Based Instruments for Ecosystem Services—Drivers, Impacts and Policy Options Using the Example of Climate Protection and Nature Conservation in Central-European Cultural Landscapes. available at http://www.ecosystemservices.de (accessed 16 June 2011).
  • Rey Benayas, J. M., Newton, A. C., Diaz, A., & Bullock, J. M. (2009). Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: A meta-analysis. Science, 325, 1121–1124.
  • Schaich, H., Bieling, C., & Plieninger, T. (2010). Linking ecosystem services with cultural landscape research. GAIA—Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 19, 269–277.
  • Smith, L. (2006). Uses of Heritage. London: Routledge.
  • Stephenson, J. (2008). The cultural values model: An integrated approach to values in landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 84, 127–139.
  • Stewart, W., Liebert, D., & Larkin, K. (2004). Community identities as visions for landscape change. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69, 315–334.
  • Swanwick, C. (2004). The assessment of countryside and landscape character in England: An overview. In K. Bishop, & A. Phillips (Eds.), Countryside Planning: New Approaches to Management and Conservation (pp. 109–124). London: Earthscan.
  • Swanwick, C., & Land Use Consultants (2002). Landscape Character Assessment: Guidance for England and Scotland. available at http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/Images/lcaguidance_tcm6-7460.pdf (accessed 2 February 2012).
  • The Research Box, Land Use Consultants, & Minter, R. (2009). Experiencing Landscape: Capturing the Cultural Services and Experiential Qualities of Landscape. Natural England Commissioned Report NECR024, available at http://naturalengland.etraderstores.com/NaturalEnglandShop/NECR024 (accessed 2 February 2012).
  • Tilley, C. (1994). A Phenomenology of Landscape. Oxford: Berg.
  • Tilley, C. (2005). Phenomenological archaeology. In C. Renfrew, & P. Bahn (Eds.), Archaeology: The Key Concepts (pp. 201–207). London: Routledge.
  • Turner, S. (2007). Historic Landscape Characterisation: A landscape archaeology for research, management and planning. Landscape Research, 31, 385–398.
  • Troy, A., & Wilson, M. A. (2006). Mapping ecosystem services: Practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer. Ecological Economics, 60, 435–449.
  • Tyrväinen, L., Mäkinen, K., & Schipperijn, J. (2007). Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 79, 5–19.
  • UK NEA (United Kingdom National Ecosystem Assessment) (2011). Cultural Services. Technical Report, Chapter 16, available at http://uknea.unep-wcmc.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=fF4HTvoKo5Q%3d&tabid=82 (accessed 1 July 2011).
  • UNESCO (2011). Preliminary Study on the Technical and Legal Aspects Relating to the Desirability of a New International Standard-Setting Instrument on Landscape. 186 EX/21. Paris: UNESCO Executive Board.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.