‘This is not the jungle, this is my barbecho’: semantics of ethnoecological landscape categories in the Bolivian Amazon

References

• Abraão, M. B., Shepard, G. H., Nelson, B. W., Baniwa, J. C., & Andello, G. Y. D. W. (2010). Baniwa vegetation classification in the white-sand Campinarana habitat of the northwest Amazon, Brazil. In L. M. Johnson & E. S. Hunn (Eds.), Landscape ethnoecology. Concepts of biotic and physical space (pp. 83–115). New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Basso, K. H. (1996). Wisdom sits in places. Landscape and language among the Western Apache. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
   Google Scholar
• Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 1–46.10.1037/h0027577
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, B. (1992). Ethnobiological classification. Principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, B., & Kay, P. (1969). Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdy, G., DeWalt, S. J., Chávez Michel, L. R., Roca, A., Deharo, E., Muñoz, V., … Gimenez, A. (2000). Medicinal plants uses of the Tacana, an Amazonian Bolivian ethnic group. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 70, 87–109.10.1016/S0378-8741(99)00158-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bromhead, H. (2011). Ethnogeographical categories in English and Pitjantjatjara/Yankunytjatjara. Language Sciences, 33, 58–75.10.1016/j.langsci.2010.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burenhult, N. (2008). Streams of words: Hydrological lexicon in Jahai. Language Sciences, 30, 182–199.10.1016/j.langsci.2006.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burenhult, N., & Levinson, S. C. (2008). Language and landscape: A cross-linguistic perspective. Language Sciences, 30, 135–150.10.1016/j.langsci.2006.12.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comber, A. J., Fisher, P. F., & Wadsworth, R. A. (2005). What is land cover? Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 32, 199–209.10.1068/b31135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Descola, P. (1996). In the society of nature. A native ecology in Amazonia. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DRAE. (2014). Diccionario de la Lengua Española (DRAE). Madrid: Espasa.
   Google Scholar
• Duvall, C. S. (2008). Classifying physical geographic features: The case of Maninka farmers in southwestern Mali. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 90, 327–348.10.1111/geob.2008.90.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESRI. (2015). Mapping the earth’s ecology (Vol. 36). Redlands, CA. Retrieved April 4, 2016, from http://www.esri.com/esri-news/arcnews/winter1415articles/mapping-the-earths-ecology
   Google Scholar
• Egenhofer, M. J., & Mark, D. M. (1995). Naive geography. In A. U. Frank & W. Kuhn (Eds.), Spatial information theory: A theoretical basis for GIS (pp. 1–15). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Feranec, J., Jaffrain, G., Soukup, T., & Hazeu, G. (2010). Determining changes and flows in European landscapes 1990–2000 using CORINE land cover data. Applied Geography, 30, 19–35.10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleck, D., & Harder, J. D. (2000). Matses Indian rainforest habitat classification and mammalian diversity in Amazonian Peru. Journal of Ethnobiology, 20(1), 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Fuentes, A. (2005). Una introducción a la vegetación de la región de Madidi. Ecología En Bolivia, 40, 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Furbee, L. (1989). A folk expert system: Soils classification in the Colca Valley, Peru. Anthropological Quarterly, 62, 83–102.10.2307/3318128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore, M. P., Ríos Ochoa, S., & Ríos Flores, S. (2010). The cultural significance of the habitat mañaco taco to the Maijuna of the Peruvian Amazon. In L. M. Johnson & E. S. Hunn (Eds.), Landscape ethnoecology. Concepts of biotic and physical space (pp. 141–158). New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, F., & Chrisman, N. (1998). Boundary objects and the social construction of GIS technology. Environment and Planning A, 30, 1683–1694.10.1068/a301683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hissink, K. (1989). Die Tacana. Ergebnisse der Frobenius-Expedition nach Bolivien 1952 bis 1954 [The Takana. Findings of the Frobenius-Expedition to Bolivia from 1952 to 1954]. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
   Google Scholar
• Hoeschele, W. (2000). Geographic information engineering and social ground truth in Attappadi, Kerala State, India. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90, 293–321.10.1111/0004-5608.00196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunn, E. (1975). A measure of the degree of correspondence of folk to scientific biological classification. American Ethnologist, 2, 309–327.10.1525/ae.1975.2.2.02a00080
   Google Scholar
• Hunn, E. S., & Meilleur, B. A. (2010). Toward a theory of landscape ethnoecological classification. In L. M. Johnson & E. S. Hunn (Eds.), Landscape ethnoecology. Concepts of biotic and physical space (pp. 15–26). New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. M. (2000). “A place that’s good”, Gitksan landscape perception and ethnoecology. Human Ecology, 28, 301–325.10.1023/A:1007076221799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. M. (2011). Language, landscape and ethnoecology, reflections from northwestern Canada. In D. M. Mark, A. G. Turk, N. Burenhult, & D. Stea (Eds.), Landscape in language. Transdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 291–326). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/clu
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L., & Hunn, E. (2010). Landscape ethnoecology. Concepts of biotic and physical space. New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, D. L. (2015). Participant observation. In R. Scott & S. Kosslyn (Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 1–15). New York, NY: Wiley.10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0247
   Google Scholar
• Jungerius, P. D. (1998). Indigenous knowledge of landscape–Ecological zones among traditional herbalists: A case study in Keiyo District, Kenya. GeoJournal, 44, 51–60.10.1023/A:1006851813051
   Google Scholar
• Kienast, F., Frick, J., van Strien, M. J., & Hunziker, M. (2015). The Swiss landscape monitoring program—A comprehensive indicator set to measure landscape change. Ecological Modelling, 295, 136–150.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehm, Z. (2012). Los Takanas [The Takana]. In D. Villar & I. Combès (Eds.), Las tierras bajas de Bolivia. Miradas históricas y antropológicas [The Bolivian lowlands. Historical and anthropological perspectives] (pp. 177–197). Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia: El País.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• López, A., Atran, S., Coley, J. D., Medin, D. L., & Smith, E. E. (1997). The tree of life: Universal and cultural features of folkbiological taxonomies and inductions. Cognitive Psychology, 32, 251–295.10.1006/cogp.1997.0651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, R. (2015). Landmarks. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mark, D. M., & Turk, A. G. (2003). Landscape categories in Yindjibarndi: Ontology, environment and language. In W. Kuhn, M. Worboys, & S. Timpf (Eds.), Spatial information theory. Foundations of geographic information science (pp. 28–45). Berlin: Springer.10.1007/b13481
   Google Scholar
• Mark, D. M., Turk, A. G., Burenhult, N., & Stea, D. (2011). Landscape in language. Transdisciplinary perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/clu
   Google Scholar
• Medin, D. L., Ross, N. O., Atran, S., Cox, D., Coley, J., Proffitt, J. B., & Blok, S. (2006). Folkbiology of freshwater fish. Cognition, 99, 237–273.10.1016/j.cognition.2003.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meilleur, B. A. (2010). The structure and role of folk ecological knowledge in Les Allues, Savoie (France). In L. M. Johnson & E. S. Hunn (Eds.), Landscape ethnoecology. Concepts of biotic and physical space (pp. 159–174). New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mihas, E. (2015). Landscape terms in Alto Perené Kampa (Arawak) of Peru. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 42, 101–135.
   Google Scholar
• Mücher, C. A., Klijn, J. A., Wascher, D. M., & Schaminée, J. H. J. (2010). A new European landscape classification (LANMAP): A transparent, flexible and user-oriented methodology to distinguish landscapes. Ecological Indicators, 10, 87–103.10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.03.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, T. A., & Bailey, B. (1991). A biological assessment of the Alto Madidi region adjacent areas of northwest Bolivia RAP (Working Papers). Washington, DC: Conservation International.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto Mosqueira, G. (2011). Lenguaje y habla popular en el pueblo Cruceño-Camba [Language and popular speech of the Santa Cruz-Camba people] (Cuaderno de Trabajo No. 6.) Retrieved July 15, 2016, from http://issuu.com/richardosinagamunoz/docs/cuaderno_de_trabajo_no._6_-.lenguaj
   Google Scholar
• Posey, D. A. (1985). Indigenous management of tropical forest ecosystems: The case of the Kayapó Indians of the Brazilian Amazon. Agroforestry Systems, 3, 139–158.10.1007/BF00122640
   Google Scholar
• Price, B., Kienast, F., Seidl, I., Ginzler, C., Verburg, P. H., & Bolliger, J. (2015). Future landscapes of Switzerland: Risk areas for urbanisation and land abandonment. Applied Geography, 57, 32–41.10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyes-García, V., Vadez, V., Huanca, T., Leonard, W., & Wilkie, D. (2005). Knowledge and consumption of wild plants: A comparative study in two Tsimane’ villages in the Bolivian Amazon. Ethnobotany Research & Applications, 3, 201–208.
   Google Scholar
• Riu-Bosoms, C., Vidal, T., Duane, A., Onrubia, A. F.-L., Gueze, M., Luz, A. C., … Reyes-Garcia, V. (2014). Exploring indigenous landscape classification across different dimensions: A case study from the Bolivian Amazon. Landscape Research, 40, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, P. (2001). Fixed categories in a portable landscape: The causes and consequences of land-cover categorization. Environment and Planning A, 33, 161–179.10.1068/a3379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, G. H., Yu, D. W., & Nelson, B. (2004). Ethnobotanical ground-truthing and forest diversity in the Western Amazon. In T. J. S. Carlson & L. Maffi (Eds.), Ethnobotany and conservation of biocultural diversity. Bronx, NY: New York Botanical Garden Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, G., Yu, D., Lizarralde, M., & Italiano, M. (2001). Rainforest habitat classification among the Matsigenka of the Peruvian Amazon. Journal of Ethnobiology, 21(1), 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B., & Mark, D. M. (2001). Geographical categories: An ontological investigation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15, 591–612.10.1080/13658810110061199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tagil, S., & Jenness, J. (2008). GIS-based automated landform classification and topographic, landcover and geologic attributes of landforms around the Yazoren Polje, Turkey. Journal of Applied Sciences, 8, 910–921.10.3923/jas.2008.910.921
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., & Taylor, M. (1991). Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? Cognitive Psychology, 23, 457–482.10.1016/0010-0285(91)90016-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. R. (2003). Linguistic categorization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, B., & Hemenway, K. (1983). Categories of environmental scenes. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 121–149.10.1016/0010-0285(83)90006-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wartmann, F. M. (2016). From space to place in the Bolivian Amazon—Exploring and representing folk landscape categories with ethnographic and GIS approaches. (PhD thesis). University of Zurich, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Wartmann, F. M., Egorova, E., Derungs, C., Purves, R. S., & Mark, D. M. (2015). More than a list: What outdoor free listings of landscape categories reveal about commonsense geographic concepts and memory search strategies. In S. I. Fabrikant, M. Raubal, S. Freundschuh, & S. Bell (Eds.), Spatial information theory (pp. 224–243). Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wartmann, F. M., Haller, T., & Backhaus, N. (2016). “Institutional shopping” for natural resource management in a protected area and indigenous territory in the Bolivian Amazon. Human Organization, 75:218–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellen, C. C., & Sieber, R. E. (2013). Toward an inclusive semantic interoperability: The case of Cree hydrographic features. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27, 168–191.10.1080/13658816.2012.688975
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M., Kuhn, W., & Painho, M. (2012). The influence of landscape variation on landform categorization. Journal of Spatial Information Science, 5, 51–73.
   Google Scholar