Integrated and decentralised protection and development of mountain landscapes

References

• Agrawal, A., & Ribot, J. C. (1999). Accountability in decentralization: A framework with South Asian and West African cases. The Journal of Developing Areas, 33, 473–502.
   Google Scholar
• Arnesen, T., Overvåg, K., Glørsen, E., Schurman, C., & Riise, Ø. (2010). Fjellområder og fjellkommuner i Sør-Norge. Definisjon, avgrensning og karakterisering [Mountain areas and mountain municipalities in southern Norway: Definitions, delimitations, and characterizations]. ØF-rapport 08/2010. Lillehammer: Østlandsforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Asplan, V. (2008). Evaluering av prøveprosjekt med lokal forvaltning av Dovrefjell-Sunndalsfjella nasjonalpark og tilliggende verneområder [Evaluation of a trailproject for local management of Dovrefjell-Sunndalsfjella National Park and adjacent protected areas]. Sandvika: Asplan Viak.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S., & Eckerberg, K. (2008). Conclusion. Combining old and new governace in pursuit of sustainable development. In S. Baker & K. Eckerberg (Eds.), In pursuit of sustainable development: New governance practices at the sub-national level in Europe (pp. 208–228). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bugge, H. C. (2011). Lærebok i miljøforvaltningsrett [Textbook on environmental-administration law]. (3rd ed.). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Clemetsen, M. (1999). Fra kontroll til tillit. Partnerskap som drivkraft i forvaltningen av verdifulle kulturlandskap [From control to trust. Partnership as driving force to management of valuable culture landscapes]. In M. Eggen, A. K. Geelmuyden, & K. Jørgensen (Eds.), Landskapet vi lever i (pp. 204–215). Oslo: Norsk Arkitekturforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Clemetsen, M., & Underdal, I. B. (2005). Aurland natur- og kulturpark. Utvikling av ein modell for støttefunksjonar for natur- og kulturbasert verdiskaping [Aurland nature- and culture park. Development of a model for supporting nature- and culture based value adding]. Rapport nr. 2-2005. Aurland: Aurland Naturverkstad BA.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. (2000, October 20). The European landscape convention. ETS No. 176. Florence: Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Eckerberg, K., & Joas, M. (2004). Multilevel-environmental governance: A concept under stress? Local Environment, 9, 405–412. doi:10.1080/1354983042000255315
   Google Scholar
• Falleth, E. I., & Hovik, S. (2006). Lokal forvaltning av store verneområder. Evaluering av kommual forvaltning i Setesdal Vesthei-Ryfylkeheiane [Local management of larger protected areas. Evaluation of municipal managment of Setesdal Vesthei-Ryfylkeheiane]. NIBR-rapport 2006:18. Oslo: Norsk institutt for by- og regionforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Falleth, E. I., & Hovik, S. (2009). Local government and nature conservation in Norway: Desentralisation as a strategy in environmental policy. Local Environment, 14, 221–231. doi:10.1080/13549830802692849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedreheim, G. E. (2013). Value creation on Norway’s green gold. An analysis of policy formulation and implementation in the field of nature conservation. PhD in Sociology no. 12. University of Nordland, Bodø.
   Google Scholar
• Feyeh, F. B. (2016). Nature parks as instruments for sustainable integrated regional development: Review of a survey of opinions from stakeholders in Luxembourg. Parks, 22, 89–101.10.2305/IUCN.CH.2014.PARKS
   Google Scholar
• Gambino, R., & Peano, A. (Eds.). (2015). Nature policies and landscape policies. Towards an alliance. Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-05410-0
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, T. (2007). Protected areas and regional development: Conflicts and opportunities. In I. Mose (Ed.), Protected areas and regional development in Europe. Towards a new model for the 21st century (pp. 26–36). Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, T., & Siegrist, D. (2016). The Swiss landscape policy from the European landscape convention perspective—experiences and challenges. In K. Jørgensen, M. Clemetsen, A. K. Thoren, & T. Richardson (Eds.), Mainstreaming landscape through the European landscape convention (pp. 149–160). Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hongslo, E., Hovik, S., Zachrisson, A., & Lundberg, Å. K. Å. (2016). Decentralization of conservation management in Norway and Sweden-different translations of an international trend. Society & Natural Resources, 29, 998–1014. doi:10.1080/08941920.2015.1086456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., Lloyd, G., & Illsley, B. (2002). National parks in Scotland: Balancing environment and economy. European Planning Studies, 10, 665–670.10.1080/09654310220145387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehnen, N., Mose, I., & Strijker, D. (2013). Governance and sense of place: Half a century of a German nature park. Environmental Policy and Governance, 23, 46–62.10.1002/eet.v23.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messerli, B., & Messerli, P. (2007). From local projects in the Alps to global change programmes in mountain areas: The development of interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the last 25 years. In M. F. Price (Ed.), Mountain area research & management. Integrated approaches (pp. 24–48). London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Mose, I. (Ed.). (2007). Protected areas and regional development in Europe. Towards a new model for the 21st century. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Mose, I., & Weixlbaumer, N. (2007). A new paradigm for protected areas in Europe? In I. Mose (Ed.), Protected areas and regional development in Europe. Towards a new model for the 21st century (pp. 3–19). Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Nordregio. (2004). Mountain areas in Europe: Analysis of mountain areas in EU member states, acceding and other European countries. Stockholm: Nordregio.
   Google Scholar
• NOU. (2013:10). Naturens goder—om verdier av økosystemtjenester [Natural benefits—on the values of ecosystem services]. Oslo: Miljøverndepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Plieninger, T., & Bieling, C. (2012). Connecting cultural landscapes to resilience. In T. Plieninger & C. Bieling (Eds.), Resilience and the cultural landscape: Understanding and managing change in human shaped environments (pp. 3–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139107778
   Google Scholar
• Ribot, J. C. (2004). Waiting for democracy: The politics of choice in natural resource decentralization. Washington, DC: World Resource Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Riksrevisjonen. (2014). Riksrevisjonens undersøking av forvaltninga av nasjonalparkar [The office of the auditor general’s inspection of the administration of national parks]. Riksrevisjonens administrative rapport nr. 1 2014. Oslo: Riksrevisjonen.
   Google Scholar
• Selman, P., & Knight, M. (2006). On the nature of virtuous change in cultural landscapes: Exploring sustainability through qualitative models. Landscape Research, 31, 295–307.10.1080/01426390600783517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skjeggedal, T., Overvåg, K., & Riseth, J. Å. (2016). Land-use planning in Norwegian mountain areas: Local development or nature protection? European Planning Studies, 24, 344–363. doi:10.1080/09654313.2015.1048187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistisk Sentralbyrå. (2013a). Arealbruk og arealressurser [Land use and land capabilities]. Retrieved October 2, 2014 from http://www.ssb.no/natur-og-miljo/statistikker/arealstat
   Google Scholar
• Statistisk Sentralbyrå. (2013b). Vernede områder [Protected areas]. Retrieved October 2, 2014 from http://www.ssb.no/natur-og-miljo/statistikker/arealvern
   Google Scholar
• Stenseke, M., Lindborg, R., Dahlberg, A., & Slätmo, E. (2012). System or arena? Conceptual concerns around the analysis of landscape dynamics. In T. Plieninger & C. Bieling (Eds.), Resilience and the cultural landscape: Understanding and managing change in human shaped environments (pp. 80–94). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139107778
   Google Scholar
• St.prp. nr. 65. (2002–2003) (2003). Tilleggsbevilgninger og omprioriteringer i statsbudsjettet medregnet folketrygden [Additional grants and reordering of priorities in the state budget takind into account the National Insurance Scheme 2003]. Oslo: Finansdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Terry, L. D. (1995). Leadership of public bureaucracies: The administrator as conservator. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zachrisson, A. (2009). Commons protected for or from the people. Co-management in the Swedish mountain areas? (Dissertation). Department of Political Science, Umeå University, Umeå.
   Google Scholar