The drone’s eye: applications and implications for landscape architecture

References

• Amoroso, N. (2010). The exposed city: Mapping the urban invisibles . London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Anker, P. (2001). Imperial ecology: Environmental order in the British empire, 1895–1945 . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Appleyard, D. (1977). Understanding professional media. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Human behavior and environment: Advances in theory and research (pp. 43–88). New York, NY : Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4684-0808-9
   Google Scholar
• Baird, C. T. , & Szczygiel, B. (2007). Sociology of professions: The evolution of landscape architecture in the United States. Landscape Review , 12 (1), 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Beardsley, J. (2000). A word for landscape architecture. Harvard Design Magazine , 12 , 56–63.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (Ed.). (2014). Implosions / explosions: Towards a study of planetary urbanization . Berlin: Jovis Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, A. (1996). The sky’s the limit . Metropolis , 15 (8), 66–69.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, E. S. (2002). Representing place . Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, E. S. (2007). Earth-mapping . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chrisman, N. R. (2005). Full circle: More than just social implications of GIS. Cartographica , 40 (4), 23–35.10.3138/8U64-K7M1-5XW3-2677
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, R. , & Bennett Moses, L. B. (2014). The regulation of civilian drones’ impacts on public safety. Computer Law & Security Review , 30 , 263–285.10.1016/j.clsr.2014.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coley, R. , & Lockwood, D. (2015). As above, so below: Triangulating drone culture. Culture Machine , 16 , 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Corner, J. (1999). The agency of mapping. In D. Cosgrove (Ed.), Mappings (pp. 213–252). London: Reaktion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cosgrove, D. (1999). Liminal geometry and elemental landscape. In J. Corner (Ed.), Recovering landscape (pp. 201–119). New York, NY : Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cosgrove, D. (2008). Geography and vision . London: I.B. Taurus.
   Google Scholar
• Couclelis, H. (2009). The abduction in geographic information science. Lecture Notes in Computer Science , 5756 , 342–356.10.1007/978-3-642-03832-7
   Google Scholar
• Dettmar, J. , & Weilacher, U. (2003). Landscape as process. Topos , 44 , 76–81.
   Google Scholar
• Devriendt, L. , & Bonne, J. (2014). UAS Mapping as an alternative for land surveying techniques? The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XL-3 (W1), 39–45.10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-3-W1-39-2014
   Google Scholar
• Eckbo, G. , & Porterfield, N. (1970). Too much analysis or designers’ fantasy? An eckbo-porterfield exchange Landscape Architecture , 60 (3), 201–202.
   Google Scholar
• Egginton, Z. (2012). Hollywood Landscapes. In E. Buhmann , S. M. Ervin , & M. Pietsch (Eds.), Digital landscape architecture 2012: Peer reviewed proceedings at anhalt university of applied sciences (pp. 445–454). Heidelberg, DE: Wichmann.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. (2015). Less talk more drone: Social research with UAVs. Journal of Geography in Higher Education , 39 (1), 182–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, R. (2007). Environmental psychology and sustainable development. Journal of Social Issues , 63 , 199–212.10.1111/josi.2007.63.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girot, C. (1999). Towards a general theory of landscape. Topos , 28 , 33–41.
   Google Scholar
• Girot, C. (2013). The elegance of topology. In C. Girot , A. Freytag , A. Kirchengast , & D. Richter (Eds.), Topology: Topical thoughts on the contemporary landscape (pp. 79–115). Berlin, DE: Jovis.
   Google Scholar
• Girot, C. , & Melsom, J. (2014). The return of the aviators. Topos , 86 , 102–107.
   Google Scholar
• Hackenberry, M. , Hoff, J. , Jens, R. , & Selker, T. (2006). A mindset for user-centered spatial applications. Cognitive Processes , 7 (1), 49–51.10.1007/s10339-006-0061-y
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, D. K. , & Watkins, D. H. (2009). Introduction. In D. K. Hamilton & D. H. Watkins (Eds.), Evidence-based design for multiple building types (pp. 1–6). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Heins, M. (2015). Finding common ground between new urbanism and landscape urbanism. Journal of Urban Design , 20 (3), 293–302.10.1080/13574809.2015.1031002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinchcliffe, T. , & Deriu, D. (2010). Eyes over london: Re-imagining the metropolis in the age of aerial vision. The London Journal , 35 (3), 221–224.10.1179/174963210X12814015170070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollein, H. (1968). Alles ist Architektur [Everything is Architecture]. Bau , 23 , 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Howett, C. (1985). Landscape architecture: Making a place for art. Places , 2 (4), 52–60.
   Google Scholar
• Kullmann, K. (2014). Hyper-realism and loose-reality: The limitations of digital realism and alternative principles in landscape design visualization. Journal of Landscape Architecture , 9 (3), 20–31.10.1080/18626033.2014.968412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kullmann, K. (2015a). The usefulness of uselessness: Towards a landscape framework for un-activated urban public space. Architectural Theory Review , 19 (2), 154–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kullmann, K. (2015b). Grounding landscape urbanism and new urbanism. Journal of Urban Design , 20 (3), 311–313.10.1080/13574809.2015.1030996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kullmann, K. (2016). Disciplinary convergence: Landscape architecture and the spatial design disciplines. Journal of Landscape Architecture , 11 (1), 30–41.10.1080/18626033.2016.1144668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kullmann, K. (2017). The garden of entangled paths: Landscape phenomena at the albany bulb wasteland. Landscape Review , 17 (1), 58–77.
   Google Scholar
• Kurgan, L. (2013). Close up at a distance . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, E. (2002). Visualization in landscape architecture and planning: Where we have been, where we are now and where we might go from here. In E. Buhmann , U. Nothhelfer , & M. Pietsch (Eds.), Trends in GIS and virtualization in environmental planning and design: Proceedings at Anhalt University of applied sciences 2002 (pp. 8–18). Heidelberg, DE: Wichmann.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, E. , & Bishop, I. D. (2005). Communication, perception and visualization. In I. D. Bishop & E. Lange (Eds.), Visualization in landscape and environmental planning (pp. 3–22). London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P. A. (1997). A profession in peril? Landscape Architecture , 87 (8), 66–71, 85–87.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W. (1992). The reconfigured eye . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moffat, S. (2015). Atlas of the Albany bulb. Ground Up , 4 , 46–49.
   Google Scholar
• Monmonier, M. (2002). Spying with maps: Surveillance technologies and the future of privacy . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ninsalam, Y. , & Rekittke, J. (2016). Landscape architectural foot soldier operations. Sustainable Cities and Society , 20 , 158–167.10.1016/j.scs.2015.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, M. (2005). Camera works: Photography and the twentieth-century word . New York, NY : Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195173567.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Nuti, L. (1999). Mapping places. In D. Cosgrove (Ed.), Mappings (pp. 90–108). London: Reaktion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pickles, J. (2004). A history of spaces . London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, N. (2010). The rise of the new amateurs. In J. R. Hall , L. Grindstaff , & M.-C. Lo (Eds.), Handbook of cultural sociology (pp. 398–407). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rekittke, J. , Paar, P. , Lin, E. , & Ninsalam, Y. (2013). Digital reconnaissance. Journal of Landscape Architecture , 8 (1), 74–81.10.1080/18626033.2013.798931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, S. R. J. , & Cizek, P. (2009). The ethics of google earth. Journal of Environmental Management , 90 , 2102–2117.10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.09.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderström, O. (1996). Paper cities: Visual thinking in urban planning. Ecumene , 3 (3), 249–281.10.1177/147447409600300301
   Google Scholar
• de Solà-Morales Rubió, I. (1995). Terrain vague. In C. Davidson (Ed.), Anyplace (pp. 118–123). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• St-Denis, B. (2007). Just what is a garden? Studies in the History of Gardens and Designed Landscapes , 27 (1), 61–76.10.1080/14601176.2007.10435457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaffield, S. , & Deming, M. E. (2011). Research strategies in landscape architecture. Journal of Landscape Architecture , 6 (1), 34–45.10.1080/18626033.2011.9723445
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, I. H. (2012). Ten tenets and six questions for landscape urbanism. Landscape Research , 37 (1), 7–26.10.1080/01426397.2011.632081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldheim, C. (2002). Landscape urbanism: A genealogy. Praxis , 4 , 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Waldheim, C. (2016). Landscape as urbanism: A general theory . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400880546
   Google Scholar
• Weir, I. (2001). Transformative mappings. Landscape Review , 7 (1), 56–67.
   Google Scholar