An aesthetic approach to planting design in urban parks and greenspaces

References

• Abkar, M. , Kamal, M. S. , Maulan, S. , & Davoodi, S. R. (2011). Determining the visual preference of urban landscapes. Scientific Research and Essays , 6 (9), 1991–1997.
   Google Scholar
• Appleton, J. (1975). The experience of landscape . Surrey: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Arriaza, M. , Canas-Ortega, J. F. , Canas-Madueno, J. A. , & Ruiz-Aviles, P. (2004). Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning , 69 , 115–125.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S. (1999). Landscape: Pattern, perception, and process . New York, NY : E&Fn Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, S. (2004). Elements of visual design in the landscape (2nd ed.). London: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernasconi, C. , Strager, M. P. , Maskey, V. , & Hasanmyer, M. (2009). Assessing public preferences for design and environmental attributes of an urban automated transportation system. Landscape and Urban Planning , 90 , 155–167.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.10.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beza, B. B. (2010). The aesthetic value of a mountain landscape: A study of the Mt. Everest Trek. Landscape and Urban Planning , 97 , 306–317.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, I. D. , Ye, W. S. , & Karadaglis, C. (2001). Experiential approaches to perception response in virtual worlds. Landscape and Urban Planning , 54 , 115–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blasco, E. , González-Olabarria, J. R. , Rodriguéz-Veiga, P. , Pukkala, T. , Kolehmainen, O. , & Palahí, M. (2009). Predicting scenic beauty of forest stands in Catalonia (North-east Spain). The Journal of Forest Research , 20 (1), 73–78.10.1007/s11676-009-0013-3
   Google Scholar
• Booth, N. (1990). Basic elements of landscape architectural design . Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clay, G. R. , & Daniel, T. C. (2000). Scenic landscape assessment: The effects of land management jurisdiction on public perception of scenic beauty. Landscape and Urban Planning , 49 , 1–13.10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00055-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clay, G. R. , & Smidt, R. K. (2004). Assessing the validity and reliability of descriptor variables used in scenic highway analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning , 66 , 239–255.10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00114-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, T. (2001). Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning , 54 , 267–281.10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00141-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, T. C. , & Boster, R. S. (1976). Measuring landscape esthetics: The scenic beauty estimation method . USDA Forest Service Research Paper, RM-167. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, T. C. , & Vining, J. (1983). Methodological issues in the assessment of landscape quality. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and natural environment (pp. 39–84). New York, NY : Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-9
   Google Scholar
• de Val, G. de la F. , Atauri, J. A., de Lucio, V . (2006). Relationship between landscape visual attributes and spatial pattern indices: A test study in Mediterranean-climate landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning , 77 , 393–407. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De La Fuente De Val, G. , & Mühlhauser, S. H. (2014). Visual quality: An examination of a South American Mediterranean landscape, Andean foothills east of Santiago (Chile). Urban Forestry and Urban Greening , 13 (2), 261–271.10.1016/j.ufug.2014.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dee, C. (2001). Form and fabric in landscape architecture (1st ed.). London: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dee, C. (2012). To design landscape: Art, nature & utility (1st ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ewald, C. K. (2001). The neglect of aesthetics in landscape planning in Switzerland. Landscape and Urban Planning , 54 , 255–266. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00140-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerstenberg, T. , & Hofmann, M. (2016). Perception and preference of trees: A psychological contribution to tree species selection in urban areas. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening , 15 , 103–111. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2015.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.
   Google Scholar
• Ignatieva, M. , Stewart, G. , Meurk, C. (2011). Planning and design of ecological networks in urban areas. Landscape and Ecological Engineering , 7 , 17–25. doi:10.1007/s11355-010-0143-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jianga, B. , Larsenb, L. , Deal, B. , Sullivan, W. C. (2015). A dose–response curve describing the relationship between tree cover density and landscape preference. Landscape and Urban Planning , 139 , 16–25. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joye, Y. (2007). Architectural lessons from environmental psychology: The case of biophilic architecture. Review of General Psychology , 11 (4), 305–328. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.11.4.305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. (1975). An informal model for the prediction of preference. In E. H. Zube , R. O. Brush , & J. Gy Fabos (Eds.). Landscape assessment: Values, perception, and resources (pp. 92–101). Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. (1981). The role of nature in the urban context. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and natural environment (pp. 127–161). New York, NY : Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. , & Kaplan, R. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective (1st ed.). New York, NY : Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A. , Taskın, T. , & Önenc¸ A. (2006). Assessing the visual quality of rural and urban fringed landscapes surrounding livestock Farms. Biosystems Engineering , 95 (3), 437–448.10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koffka, K. (1999). Principles of gestalt psychology (1st ed.). London: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Lafortezza, R. C. , Sanesi, G. , Brown, R. D. (2008). Visual preference and ecological assessments for designed alternative brownfield rehabilitations. Journal of Environmental Management , 89(3), 257–269. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, J. (1984). Formal aesthetics and visual perception: Questions architects ask. Visual Arts Research , 10 , 66–73.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, J. (1987). Creating architectural theory: The role of the behavioural sciences in environmental design . New York, NY : Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, J. (1988). Symbolic aesthetic in architecture: Toward a research agenda. In J. L. Nasar (Ed.), Enviromental aesthetics theory, research, and applications (pp. 11–26). New York, NY : Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511571213
   Google Scholar
• Lang, J. (1994). Urban design: The American experience . New York, NY : Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Laurie, I. C. (1975). Aesthetic Factors in visual evaluation. In Ervin H. Zube , Robert O. Brush , & Julius Gy. Fabos (Eds.) Landscape assessment: Values, perceptions, and resources (pp. 102–117). Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.
   Google Scholar
• Leszczynski, N. A. (1999). Planting the landscape – A professional approach to garden design . New York, NY : Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, E. G. , & Simpson, J. R. (2002). A comparison of municipal forest benefits and costs in Modesto and Santa Monica, California, USA. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening , 1 (2), 61–74. doi:10.1078/1618-8667-00007
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R. W. , Hauer, R. J. , & Werner, L. P. (2015). Urban forestry: Planning and managing urban greenspaces (3rd ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland, Long Grove.
   Google Scholar
• Nasar, J. L. (1994). Urban design aesthetics: The evaluative qualities of building exteriors. Environment and Behavior , 26 , 377–401. doi:10.1177/001391659402600305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. , Johnson, T. , Strong, M. , & Rudakewıch, G. (2001). Perceptıon of tree canopy. Journal of Environmental Psychology , 21 (3), 315–324. doi:10.1006/jevp.2001.0223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, J. F. (2004). Using spatial metrics to predict scenic perception in a changing landscape: Dennis, Massachusetts. Landscape and Urban Planning , 69 (2–3), 201–218. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peron, E. , Purcell, A. T. , Staats, H. , Falchero, S. , & Lamb, R. J. (1998). Models of preference for outdoor scenes: Some experimental evidence. Environment and Behavior , 30 , 282–305. doi:10.1177/001391659803000302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polat, A. T. , & Akay, A. (2015). Relationships between the visual preferences of urban recreation area users and various landscape design elements. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening , 14 (3), 573–582. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2015.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raskovic, S. , & Decker, R. (2015). The influence of trees on the perception of urban squares. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening , 14 (2), 237–245. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2015.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reardon, A. P. (2004). Beyond ıntuition: A perceptual basis for the elements and principles of design . Michigan: Master of Science in Interior Design, Michigan University.
   Google Scholar
• Reis, A. T. L. , & Lay, M. C. D. (2010). Internal and external aesthetics of housing estates. Environment and Behavior , 42 , 271–294. doi:10.1177/0013916509334134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard, E. C. , & Gobster, P. H. (1990). The nature and ecology of aesthetic experiences in the landscape. Landscape Journal , 9 , 1–8. doi:10.3368/lj.9.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Rink, D. , & Arndt, T. (2016). Investigating perception of green structure configuration for afforestation in urban brownfield development by visual methods-A case study in Leipzig, Germany. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening , 15 , 65–74. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2015.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, N. (2004). The planting design handbook (2nd ed.). England: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Rogge, E. , Nevens, F. , & Gulinck, H. (2007). Perception of rural landscapes in Flanders: Looking beyond aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning , 82 , 159–174. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, A. (2002). Assessing public perception of landscape: The LANDMAP experience. Landscape Research , 27 , 271–295. doi:10.1080/01426390220149520
   Google Scholar
• Sevenant, M. , & Antrop, M. (2009). Cognitive attributes and aesthetic preferences in assessment and differentiation of landscapes. Journal of Environmental Management , 90 , 2889–2899. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.10.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smardon, R. C. (1988). Perception and aesthetics of the urban environment: Review of the role of vegetation. Landscape and Urban Planning , 15 (1–2), 85–106. doi:10.1016/0169-2046(88)90018-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamps, A. E., III (2011). Spaciousness effects of area, height, elongation, and color on perceived spaciousness. Environment and Behavior , 43 , 252–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R. S. (1981). Natural versus urban scenessome psychophysiological effects. Environment and Behavior , 13 (5), 523–556.10.1177/0013916581135001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In I., Altman & J. F., Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and natural environment (pp. 85–125). New York, NY : Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-9
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R. S. (1986). Human responses to vegetation and landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning , 13 , 29–44. doi:10.1016/0169-2046(86)90005-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Val, G. F. , Atauri, J. A. , & Luci, J. V. (2006). Relationship between landscape visual attributes and spatial pattern indices: A test study in Mediterranean-climate landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning , 77 , 393–407. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstoerffer, J. , & Girardin, P. (2000). Assessment of the contribution of land use pattern and intensity to landscape quality: Use of a landscape indicator. Ecological Modelling , 130 (1), 95–109. doi:10.1016/s0304-3800(00)00209-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, W. (1993). Principles of form and design . New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, C. , Xiao, Q. , & McPherson, E. G. (2008). A method for locating potential tree-planting sites in urban areas: a case study of Los Angeles, USA. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening , 7 (2), 65–76. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2008.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. , & Lin, S. H. (2011). Affective appraisal of residents and visual elements in the neighborhood: A case study in an established suburban community. Landscape and Urban Planning , 101 , 11–21. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zusne, L. (1970). Visual perception of form . New York, NY : Academic Press.
   Google Scholar