Edgelands of practice: post-industrial landscapes and the conditions of informal spatial appropriation

References

• Berger, A. (2006). Drosscape: Wasting land in urban America. Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, C. (2017). Whose landscape, whose heritage? Landscape politics of ‘swiftlet farming’ in a World Heritage City. Landscape Research, 42(3), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2016.1267128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corijn, E., & Groth, J. (2005). Reclaiming urbanity: Indeterminate spaces, informal actors and urban agenda setting. Urban Studies, 42(3), 503–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500035436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Certeau, M. (1988). The practice of everyday life. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dembski, S. (2015). Structure and imagination of changing cities: Manchester, Liverpool and the spatial in-between. Urban Studies, 52(9), 1647–1664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014539021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doucet, B. (2010). Rich cities with poor people: Waterfront regeneration in the Netherlands and Scotland [Doctoral Dissertation, Utrecht University]. Utrecht University Repository. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/42400
   Google Scholar
• Fabian, L., & Samson, K. (2016). Claiming participation: A comparative analysis of DIY urbanism in Denmark. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 9(2), 166–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2015.1056207
   Google Scholar
• Farley, P., & Roberts, M. S. (2011). Edgelands: Journeys into England’s true wilderness. Jonathan Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, D. (2014). DIY urbanism: Implications for cities. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 7(4), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2014.891149
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and punish. Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Franck, A., & Stevens, Q. (2007). Loose space: Possibility and diversity in urban life. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, O. L. (1989). The ecology of urban habitats. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Godoy, J. (2019, June 17). Traces [video]. Vimeo. https://vimeo.com/342775345
   Google Scholar
• High, S. (2013). “The wounds of class”: A historiographical reflection on the study of deindustrialization, 1973–2013. History Compass, 11(11), 994–1007. https://doi.org/10.1111/hic3.12099
   Google Scholar
• Hou, J. (2010). Insurgent public space: Guerilla urbanism and the remaking of contemporary cities. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Iveson, K. (2013). Cities within the city: Do-it-yourself urbanism and the right to the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(3), 941–956. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, A., & Tylecote, M. (2007). Ambivalent landscapes: Wilderness in the urban interstices. Landscape Research, 32(4), 443–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390701449802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kester, G. (2013). Conversation pieces: Community and communication in modern art. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, R. (2016). Research methods for architecture. Laurence King Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mould, O. (2014). Tactical urbanism: The new vernacular of the creative city. Geography Compass, 8(8), 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12146
   Google Scholar
• Palipane, K. (2019). Multimodal mapping: A methodological framework. The Journal of Architecture, 24(1), 91–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2018.1527384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, H., & Chang, W. (2014). Shrinking cities: A global perspective. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2018). Scottish vacant and derelict land survey. https://www.gov.scot/publications/scottish-vacant-derelict-land-survey-2018/
   Google Scholar
• Shoard, M. (2000). Edgelands of promise. Landscapes, 1(2), 74–93. https://doi.org/10.1179/lan.2000.1.2.74
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (2015). Do-it-yourself urbanism: A history. Journal of Planning History, 4(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538513214549325
   Google Scholar
• Tovar, F. J., Arnal, M., de Castro, C., Lahera-Sánchez, A., & Revilla, J. A. (2011). A tale of two cities: Working class identity, industrial relations and community in declining textile and shoe industries in Spain. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 17(4), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2011.577966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volont, L. (2019). DIY urbanism and the lens of the commons: Observations from Spain. City & Community, 18(1), 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wójcik, M., Tobiasz-Lis, P., & Dmochowska-Dudek, K. (2019). Uneven development of a post-industrial city as exemplified by Łódź (Poland). Annals of the Austrian Geographical Society, 160, 91–114. https://doi.org/10.1553/moegg160s91
   Google Scholar