Infrastructure territories as moving landscapes: using digital media to narrate a Montreal highway corridor (Canada)

References

• Appleyard, D., Lynch, K., & Myer, J. R. (1965). The View from the Road. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Augé, M. (1992). Non-lieux: Introduction à une anthropologie de la surmodernité [Non-Places: Introduction to An Anthropology of Supermodernity]. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Augé, M. (2009). Non-Places: An Introduction to Supermodernity (J. Howe, Trans.). New York: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Baber, M., & Suba, M. (Eds.). (2016). Infrastructural Monument. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, A. (2007). Drosscape: Wasting Land Urban America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergeron, J., Paquette, S., & Poullaouec-Gonidec, P. (2014). Uncovering landscape values and micro-geographies of meanings with the go-along method. Landscape and Urban Planning, 122, 108–121. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, K., & Spinney, J. (2010). Catching a Glimpse: The value of video in evoking, understanding and representing the practice of cycling. In B. Fincham, M. McGuinness & L. Murray (Eds.), Mobile Methodologies (pp. 130–151). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Buire, C. (2014). Films de terrain: Pratique, réflexivité et écriture—Expérience d’une géographe utilisant l’outil vidéo [Field films: Practice, reflexivity and writing—Experience of a geographer using the video tool]. In S. Breux, J. P. Collin, & C. Gingras (Eds.), Représenter l’Urbain: Apports et Méthodes (pp. 285–313). Laval, QC: Les Presses de L’Université Laval.
   Google Scholar
• Büscher, M., Urry, J., & Witchger, K. (2010). Mobile Methods. Milton Park, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carpiano, R. M. (2009). Come take a walk with me: The “Go-Along” interview as a novel method for studying the implications of place for health and well-being. Health & Place, 15(1), 263–272. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conan, M. (2003). Mouvement et métaphore du temps [Movement and metaphor of time]. In P. Poullaouec-Gonidec, S. Paquette & G. Domon (Eds.) Le Temps Du Paysage (pp. 23–35). Montréal, QC: Presses de L’Université de Montréal.
   Google Scholar
• Cureton, P. (2016). Strategies for Landscape Representation: Digital and Analogue Techniques. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deriu, D., & Kamvasinou, K. (2012). Critical perspectives on landscape: Introduction. The Journal of Architecture, 17(1), 1–9. doi:10.1080/13602365.2012.659896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desportes, M. (2005). Paysages en mouvement: transports et perception de l’espace, XVIIIe siècle-XXe siècle [Landscapes in motion: Transport and perception of space, 18th − 20th century]. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Di Palma, V. (2014). Wasteland: A History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Di Palma, V. (2016). The Mood for Landscape. In C. Girot & D. Imhof (Eds.), Thinking the Contemporary Landscape (pp. 15–29). Princeton, NJ: Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, J. M., & Bowman, J. A. (2017). Geographies on the move: A practical and theoretical approach to the mobile interview. The Professional Geographer, 69(2), 263–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandy, M. (2014). The Fabric of Space: Water, Modernity, and the Urban Imagination. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, B. L. (2011). Videographic geographies: Using digital video for geographic research. Progress in Human Geography, 35(4), 521–541. doi:10.1177/0309132510388337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girot, C. (2006). Vision in motion: Representing landscape in time. In C. Waldheim (Ed.) The Landscape Urbanism Reader (pp. 86–103). Princeton, NJ: Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Girot, C., & Truniger, F. (2012). Landscape Vision Motion. Berlin: Jovis.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, T. D., Stewart, W. P., & Gladdys, K. (2008). Social ethics of landscape change: Toward community-based land-use planning. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(3), 384–401. doi:10.1177/1077800407309409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. Milton Park, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & McFarlane, C. (2015). Infrastructural Lives: Urban Infrastructure in Context. Milton Park, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hein, J. R., Evans, J., & Jones, P. (2008). Mobile methodologies: Theory, technology and practice. Geography Compass, 2(5), 1266–1285. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00139.x
   Google Scholar
• Knoblauch, H. (2006). Video Analysis: Methodology and Methods: Qualitative Audiovisual Data Analysis in Sociology. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Knoblauch, H. (2012). Introduction to the special issue of Qualitative Research: Video-analysis and videography. Qualitative Research, 12(3), 251–254. doi:10.1177/1468794111436144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusenbach, M. (2003). Street phenomenology: The go-along as ethnographic research tool. Ethnography, 4(3), 455–485. doi:10.1177/146613810343007
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, J. K. (2012). Going to measures – Cultivating and appreciating the contemporary landscapes. In D. C. Girot, and F. Truniger (Eds.), Landscape Vision Motion (p. 63–78). Berlin: Jovis.
   Google Scholar
• Low, S., Taplin, D., & Scheld, S. (2005). Rethinking Urban Parks: Public Space and Cultural Diversity. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Masson, H., Balfe, M., Hackett, S., & Phillips, J. (2013). Lost without a trace? Social networking and social research with a hard-to-reach population. British Journal of Social Work, 43(1), 24–40. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcr168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palys, T., & Atchison, C. (2012). Qualitative research in the digital era: Obstacles and opportunities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(4), 352–367. doi:10.1177/160940691201100404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picon, A. (2000). Anxious landscapes: From the ruin to rust. Grey Room 01, 1, 64–83. Fall 2000, doi:10.1162/152638100750173065
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. (2008). Mobilising visual ethnography: Making routes, making place and making images. Forum, Qualitative Social Research/Forum, Qualitative Sozialforschung, 9(3), 166.
   Google Scholar
• Poullaouec-Gonidec, P., Paquette, P., & Marmen, P. (2015). YUL/MTL: Moving Landscapes. San Francisco: Applied Research + Design Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, V. (2015). Infra-city: Speculations on flux and history in infrastructure-making. In S. Graham & C. McFarlane (Eds.), Infrastructural Lives: Urban Infrastructure in Context (pp. 39–58). Milton Park, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rousse, P. (2008). Perception urbaine, distraction et stratification chez Benjamin, Eisenstein et Vertov. Appareil, 2008 (Numéro spécial), 467. doi:10.4000/appareil.467
   Google Scholar
• Sáenz de Tejada Granados, C., & van der Horst, D. (2020). Tabula non-rasa: Go-along interviews and memory mapping in a post-mining landscape designated for urban expansion. Landscape Research, 45(1), 6–25. doi:10.1080/01426397.2019.1569220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikkens, E., van San, M., Sieckelinck, S., Boeije, H., & de Winter, M. (2017). Participant recruitment through social media: Lessons learned from a qualitative radicalization study using Facebook. Field Methods, 29(2), 130–139. doi:10.1177/1525822X16663146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, J. (2008). The cultural values model: An integrated approach to values in landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 84(2), 127–139. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibaud, J. P. (2010). La ville à l’épreuve des sens [The city being tested by the senses]. In O., Coutard & J. P. Lévy (Eds.) Ecologies urbaines: états des savoirs et perspectives (pp.198–213). Paris: Economica-Anthropos.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. (2011). Imagining future places: How designs co-constitute what is, and thus influence what will be. Planning Theory, 10(2), 124–143. doi:10.1177/1473095210386656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar