Between professional objectivity and Simmel’s moods: a pragmatist-aesthetic proposal for landscape character

References

• Atik, M., Işıklı, R. C., Ortaçeşme, V., & Yıldırım, E. (2017). Exploring a combination of objective and subjective assessment in landscape classification: Side case from Turkey. Applied Geography, 83, 130–140. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berleant, A. (1997). Living in the landscape. Towards an aesthetics of environment. Lawrence, KS: Kansas University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berleant, A. (2012). The art in knowing a landscape. Diogenes, 59(1–2), 52–62. doi:10.1177/0392192112469320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourassa, S. C. (1988). Toward a theory of landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 15(3–4), 241–252. doi:10.1016/0169-2046(88)90048-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, E. (2019). Aesthetic character and aesthetic integrity in environmental conservation. In P. Lamarque & S. H. Olsen (Eds.), Aesthetics and the philosophy of art. The analytic tradition (pp. 684–694). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Brunetta, G., & Voghera, A. (2008). Evaluating landscape for shared values: Tools, principles, and methods. Landscape Research, 33(1), 71–87. doi:10.1080/01426390701773839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, A. (2016). Dynamics of integrating landscape values in landscape character assessment: The hidden dominance of the objective outsider. Landscape Research, 41(2), 239–252. doi:10.1080/01426397.2015.1135315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, A., & Berglund, U. (2014). Landscape character assessment as an approach to understanding public interests within the European landscape convention. Landscape Research, 39(3), 219–236. doi:10.1080/01426397.2012.716404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corner, J. (1999). Eidetic operations and new landscapes. In J. Corner (Ed.), Recovering landscape: Essays in contemporary landscape architecture (pp. 152–169). New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cosgrove, C. (1985). Prospect, perspective and the evolution of the landscape idea. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 10(1), 45–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Angelo, P. (2021). Il paesaggio. Teorie, storie, luoghi. Bari-Roma: Laterza.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1987). Art as experience (J. A. Boydston, Ed.). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Science Foundation & COST (2010). Landscape in a changing world: bridging divides, integrating disciplines, serving society. Science Policy Briefing. http://archives.esf.org/hosting-experts/scientific-review-groups/humanities-hum/strategic-activities/esf-cost-synergy-initiatives/landscape-in-a-changing-world.html
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, G., Sarlöv Herlin, I., & Swanwick, C. (Eds.). (2018). The Routledge Companion to Character Assessment. Current Approaches to Characterisation and Assessment. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, G., & Herring, P. (2016). Lens, mirror, window: Interactions between historic landscape characterisation and landscape character assessment. Landscape Research, 41(2), 186–198. doi:10.1080/01426397.2015.1135318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, G., Sarlöv Herlin, I., & Swanwick, C. (2019). Landscape character assessment. A global practice. In P. Howard, I. Thompson, E. Waterton, & M. Atha (Eds.), The Routledge companion to landscape studies (pp. 576–588). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. B. (1984). The word itself. In J. B. Jackson (Eds.), Discovering the vernacular landscape (pp. 3–8). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kusch, M. (2019). Georg simmel and pragmatism. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 11(1), 1–17. doi:10.4000/ejpap.1490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, E. H. (2020). Portraits of the landscape. In H. Maes (Ed.), Portraits and philosophy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W. J. T. (2002). Imperial landscape. In W. J. T. Mitchell (Ed.), Landscape and power (pp. 5–34). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olwig, K. R. (1996). Recovering the substantive nature of landscape. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 86(4), 630–653. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1996.tb01770.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter, J. (1974). Landschaft. Zur Funktion des Ästhetischen in der modernen Gesellschaft. In J. Ritter (Ed.), Subjektivität. Sechs Aufsätze (pp. 141–190). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Simmel, G. (2007). The philosophy of landscape (J. Bleicher, Trans). Theory, Culture & Society, 24(7–8), 20–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terkenli, T. S., Gkoltsiou, A., & Kavroudakis, D. (2021). the interplay of objectivity and subjectivity in landscape character assessment: Qualitative and quantitative approaches and challenges. Land, 10(1), 1–19. 53, doi:10.3390/land10010053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilley, C. (2006). Introduction: Identity, place, landscape and heritage. Journal of Material Culture, 11(1–2), 7–32. doi:10.1177/1359183506062990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tudor, C. (2014, October). An approach to landscape character assessment. Natural England. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/691184/landscape-character-assessment.pdf
   Google Scholar