Land use/cover changes using Landsat TM/ETM images in a tropical and biodiverse mountainous area of central‐eastern Mexico

References

• Acosta, I., 2002. "Vegetación y flora del municipio de Xico, Ver. Tesis de Licenciatura.". 2002, Universidad Veracruzana, Facultad de Biología, Xalapa, Ver. México.
   Google Scholar
• 2000. Aldrich, M, Bubb, P, Hostettler, S, and Van De Wiel, H, eds. Bosques Nublados Tropicales Montanos. Tiempo para la acción. United Kingdom: WWF International/IUCN, The World Conservation Union; 2000. p. 32.
   Google Scholar
• Aylward, B., 2004. "Land use, hydrological function and economic valuation.". In: Bonell, M, and Bruijnzeel, L. A, eds. Forests, Water and People in the Humid Tropics: past, present, and future hydrological research for integrated land and water management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004; 2004. pp. 99–120.
   Google Scholar
• Baban, S. M. J., and Yusof, K. W., 2001. Mapping land use/cover distribution on a mountainous tropical island using remote sensing and GIS., International Journal of Remote Sensing 22 (2001), pp. 1909–1918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bichier, H. P., 2005. Agroforestry and the maintenance of biodiversity., Bioscience (2005), Immediate Online Access.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. D., and Kappelle, M., 2001. "Introducción a los bosques nublados del neotrópico: una síntesis regional.". In: Kappelle, M, and Brown, A. D, eds. Bosques nublados del neotrópico. Costa Rica: Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad, 2001; 2001. pp. 25–40.
   Google Scholar
• Bruijnzeel, L. A., 1990. Hydrology of moist tropical forest and effects of conversion: a state of knowledge. Paris: UNESCO; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Bruijnzeel, L. A., 2004. Hydrological functions of tropical forest: not seeing the soil for the trees?., Agriculture, Ecology and Environment 104 (2004), pp. 185–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruijnzeel, L. A., Eugster, W., and Burkard, R., 2005. "Fog as a hydrological input.". In: Anderson, M. G, and McDonnell, J. J, eds. Encyclopedia of Hydrological Sciences, Chapter 38. Chichester: John Wiley, 2005; 2005. pp. 559–582.
   Google Scholar
• Bruijnzeel, L. A., and Proctor, J., 1995. "Hydrology and biogeochemistry of tropical montane cloud forests: what do we really know?". In: Hamilton, L. S, Juvik, J. O, and Scatena, F. N, eds. Tropical Montane Cloud Forests. New York: Springer Verlarg, 1995; 1995. pp. 38–78.
   Google Scholar
• 2004. Bubb, P, May, I, Miles, L, and Sayer, J, eds. Cloud Forest Agenda. Cambridge: UNEP‐WCMC; 2004. p. 33.
   Google Scholar
• Burstein, J., Chapela, G., Mendoza, Y., Aguilar, J., and De León, E., 2002. Informe sobre la propuesta de pago por servicios ambientales en México. México: Fundación FORD‐Fundación PRISMA; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• 1998. Challenger, A, ed. Utilización y conservación de los ecosistemas terrestres de México. Pasado, presente y futuro. México: CONABIO‐ UNAM‐Agrupación Sierra Madre, S.C.; 1998. p. 847.
   Google Scholar
• Chansheng, H., Malcolm, S. B., Dahlberg, K. A., and Fu, B., 2000. A conceptual framework for integrating hydrological and biological indicators into watershed management., Landscape and Urban Planning 49 (2000), pp. 25–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cingolani, A., Renison, D., Zak, M., and Cabido, M., 2004. Mapping vegetation in a heterogeneous mountain rangeland using landsat data: an alternative method to define and classify land‐cover units., Remote Sensing of Environment 92 (2004), pp. 84–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales., Educational and Psychological Measurement 20 (1960), pp. 37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CNA, 1998. 1998, Estudio de indicadores biológicos en el río Los Pescados, CNA‐IMTA, México.
   Google Scholar
• CONABIO, 2000a. "Programa de Regiones Hidrológicas Prioritarias.". 2000a, CONABIO, México.
   Google Scholar
• CONABIO, 2000b. "Programa de Regiones Prioritarias Terrestres.". 2000b, CONABIO. México.
   Google Scholar
• Debeir, O., Van Den Steen, I., Latinne, P., Van Ham, P., and Wolf, E., 2002. Textural and contextual land‐cover classification using single and multiple classifier systems., Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 68 (2002), pp. 597–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewidar, K. H. M., 2004. Detection of land use/land cover changes for the northern part of the Nile delta (Burullus region), Egypt., International Journal of Remote Sensing 25 (2004), pp. 4079–4089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domínguez Domínguez, E., 2001. "La quema de la caña de azúcar y sus implicaciones ambientales. Tesis de Maestría.". 2001, Colegio de Postgraduados, Veracruz, Ver. México.
   Google Scholar
• FAO, 1996. "Survey of tropical forest cover and study of change processes.". 1996, Forestry Paper 130, Roma.
   Google Scholar
• Fearnside, M. P., 2001. Saving tropical forests as a global warming countermeasure: an issue that divides the environmental movement., Ecological Economics 39 (2001), pp. 167–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 1988. Flores‐Villela, O, and Gerez, P, eds. México: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones sobre Recursos Bióticos; 1988. pp. 31–34, Conservación en México: Síntesis sobre vertebrados terrestres, vegetación y uso del suelo.
   Google Scholar
• Foody, G. M., Mathur, A., Sanchez‐Hernandez, C., and Boyd, D. S., 2006. Training set size requirements for the classification of a specific class., Remote Sensing of Environment 104 (2006), pp. 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foody, G. M., Palubinska, G., Lucas, R. M., Curran, P. J., and Honzak, M., 1996. Identifying terrestrial carbon sinks: classification of successional stages in regeneration tropical forest from Landsat TM data., Remote Sensing of Environment 55 (1996), pp. 205–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 1994. Geissert, D, Dubrecq, D, Campos, A, and Meza, E, eds. Carta de paisajes geomorfoedafológicos de la región volcánica Cofre de Perote, Estado de Veracruz, México. México: Instituto de Ecología, A.C.‐ORSTOM‐CONACYT; 1994, Escala 1 : 75,000.
   Google Scholar
• Geneletti, D., and Gorte, B. G. H., 2003. A method for object‐oriented land cover classification combining Landsat TM data and aerial photographs., International Journal of Remote Sensing 24 (2003), pp. 1273–1286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halhead, V., 1992. "Social dimensions of forest utilization in Mexico: Implications for intervention.". In: Downing, T. E, Hecht, S. B, Pearson, H. A, and Garcia‐Downing, C, eds. Development or Destruction: The Conversion of Tropical Forest to Pasture in Latin America. USA: Westview Press, 1992; 1992. pp. 159–169.
   Google Scholar
• 1995. Hamilton, L. S, Juvik, J. O, and Scatena, F. N, eds. Tropical Montane Cloud Forests. Ecological Studies 110 . New York: Springer Verlag; 1995. p. 407.
   Google Scholar
• Houghton, R. A., Hobbie, J. E., Melillo, J. M., Moore III, B., Peterson, B. J., Shaver, G. R., and Woodwell, G. M., 1983. Changes in the carbon content of terrestrial biota and soils between 1860 and 1980: a net release of CO2 to the atmosphere., Ecological Monographs 53 (1983), pp. 235–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INEGI, 1993. Conjuntos de Datos Vectoriales de Uso del Suelo y Vegetación. Escala 1 : 250 000. Serie II. Mexico: INEGI; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• INEGI, 1995a. "Aerial photographs.". Mexico: INEGI; 1995a, Scale 1 : 20 000.
   Google Scholar
• INEGI, 1995b. "Aerial photographs.". Mexico: INEGI; 1995b, Scale 1 : 75 000.
   Google Scholar
• INEGI, 2000. "Topographic‐land use map.". Mexico: INEGI; 2000, Scale 1 : 50 000.
   Google Scholar
• International Institute for Geo‐Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC) (Ed.), 2000. Principles of remote sensing. Enschede, NL: ITC; 2000. pp. 141–154.
   Google Scholar
• International Institute for Geo‐Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC) (Ed.), 2004. Integrated Land and Water Information System ILWIS, version 3.2. Enschede, NL: ITC; 2004. p. 511.
   Google Scholar
• Jácome, A., 2004. Dealing with risk: small‐scale coffee production systems in Mexico., Perspectivas latinoamericanas 1 (2004), pp. 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• King, R. B., 2002. Land cover mapping principles: a return to interpretation fundamentals., International Journal of Remote Sensing 23 (2002), pp. 3525–3546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambin, E. F., Geist, H. J., and Lepers, E., 2003. Dynamics of land‐use and land‐cover change in tropical regions., Annual Review of Environmental Resources 28 (2003), pp. 205–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambin, E. F., Turner, B. L., Geist, H. J., Agbola, S. B., Arild, A., Bruce, J. W., et al., 2001. The causes of land‐use and land‐cover change: moving beyond the myths., Global Environmental Change 11 (2001), pp. 261–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, D., Mausel, P., Batistella, M., and Moran, E., 2005. Land‐cover binary change detection methods for use in the moist tropical region of the Amazon: a comparative study., International Journal of Remote Sensing 26 (2005), pp. 101–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 1994. Lillesand, T. M, and Kiefer, R. W, eds. Remote sensing and Image Interpretation. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J. Y., Zhuang, D. F., Luo, D., and Xiao, X., 2003. Land‐cover classification of China: integrated analysis of AVHRR imagery and geophysical data., International Journal of Remote Sensing 24 (2003), pp. 2485–2500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luna, I., Velázquez, A., and Velázquez, E., 2001. "El Caribe y los países del continente americano.". In: Kappelle, M, and Brown, A. D, eds. Bosques nublados del neotrópico. Costa Rica: Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad, 2001; 2001. pp. 183–229.
   Google Scholar
• Luna, V., 1997. "Estudio de vegetación y flora del municipio de Coatepec, Ver. Tesis de Licenciatura.". 1997, Universidad Veracruzana, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Xalapa, Ver. México.
   Google Scholar
• Manson, R. H., 2004. Los servicios hidrológicos y la conservación de los bosques de México., Madera y Bosques 10 (2004), pp. 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Maselli, F., Conese, C., De Filippis, T., and Romani, R., 1995. Integration of ancillary data into a maximum‐likelihood classifier with nonparametric priors., Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 50 (1995), pp. 2–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masera, O. R., Ordóñez, M. J., and Dirzo, R., 1997. Carbon emissions from Mexican forests: current situation and long term scenarios., Climatic Change 35 (1997), pp. 265–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montagut‐González, R., 1999. Factors that contributed to the expansion of cattle ranching in Veracruz, Mexico., Mexican Studies 15 (1999), pp. 101–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palacio‐Prieto, J. L., Bocco, G., Velázquez, A., Mas, J. F., Takaki, F., Victoria, A., Luna‐González, L., et al., 2000. La condición actual de los recursos forestales en México: resultados del Inventario Forestal Nacional 2000., Investigaciones Geográficas 43 (2000), pp. 183–203.
   Google Scholar
• 2002. Pagiola, S, Bishop, J, and Landell‐Mills, N, eds. Selling Forest Environmental Services: Market‐based Mechanisms for Conservation. London: Earthscan; 2002. p. 299.
   Google Scholar
• Pedroni, L., 2003. Improved classification of Landsat Thematic Mapper data using modified prior probabilities in large and complex landscapes., International Journal of Remote Sensing 24 (2003), pp. 91–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, T. A., Ortega, M. A., Bartley, J., Sánchez, V., Soberón, J., Buddemeier, R. H., and Stockwell, D. R. B., 2001. Future projections for Mexican faunas under global climate change scenarios., Nature 416 (2001), pp. 626–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponette, A., 2004. Coffee, cattle, and colonialism: historical effects of markets and agricultural policies on cloud forests in central Veracruz, Mexico., Tropical Resources 23 (2004), pp. 37–43.
   Google Scholar
• Prol‐Ledesma, R. M., Uribe‐Alcántara, E. M., and Diaz‐Molina, O., 2002. Use of cartographic data and Landsat TM images to determine land use change in the vicinity of Mexico City., International Journal of Remote Sensing 23 (2002), pp. 1927–1933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, J. M., and Lam, S. N. S., 2002. Spatial methods for characterizing land cover and detecting land‐cover changes for the tropics., International Journal of Remote Sensing 23 (2002), pp. 2457–2474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. A., Keller, M., and Vianei Soares, J., 2003. Studies of land‐cover, land‐use, and biophysical properties of vegetation in the Large Scale Biosphere Atmosphere experiment in Amazonia., Remote Sensing of Environment 87 (2003), pp. 377–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 1988. Rossignol, J. P, Campos, A, Geissert, D, and Quantin, P, eds. Morfoedafología del área Xalapa‐Coatepec y sus aplicaciones a los usos agrícola, pecuario y forestal. Informe explicativo preliminar de los mapas morfoedafológico, de recursos en tierras y de capacidades de uso al 1 : 75,000. México: INIREB‐ORSTOM‐ENITHP; 1988. p. 130.
   Google Scholar
• 1978. Rzedowsky, J, ed. Vegetación de México. México: Limusa; 1978. pp. 315–326.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, A., 1989. Digital change detection techniques using remotely‐sensed data., International Journal of Remote Sensing 10 (1989), pp. 989–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, C., Woodcock, C. E., Seto, K. C., Lenney, M. P., and Macomber, S. A., 2001. Classification and change detection using Landsat TM data: when and how to correct atmospheric effects?., Remote Sensing of Environment 75 (2001), pp. 230–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toledo, V. M., and Ordóñez, M. DE J., 1993. "The biodiversity scenario of Mexico: A review terrestrial habitats.". In: Ramamoorthy, D. P, Bye, R, Lot, A, and Fa, J, eds. Biological diversity of Mexico: origins and distribution. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993; 1993. pp. 757–777.
   Google Scholar
• Velázquez, A., Mas, J. F., Mayorga‐Saucedo, R., Díaz, J. R., Alcántara, C., Castro, R., et al., 2002. Estado actual y dinámica de los recursos forestales de México. CONABIO., Biodiversitas 41 (2002), pp. 8–15.
   Google Scholar
• 2002. UNEP‐WCMC, , ed. Mountain Watch. 2002. p. 80, UK-UNEP.
   Google Scholar
• Williams‐Linera, G., 1992. Ecología del paisaje y el bosque mesófilo de montaña en el centro de Veracruz., Ciencia y Desarrollo 105 (1992), pp. 132–138.
   Google Scholar
• Williams‐Linera, G., Manson, R. H., and Isunza, E., 2002. La fragmentación del bosque mesófilo de montaña y patrones de uso de suelo en la región oeste de Xalapa, Veracruz, México., Madera y Bosques 8 (2002), pp. 73–79.
   Google Scholar
• Whitmore, T. C., and Sayer, J. A., 1992. "Deforestation and species extinction in tropical moist forests.". In: Whitmore, T. C, and Sayer, J. A, eds. Tropical Deforestation and Species Extinction. London: Chapman & Hall, 1992; 1992. pp. 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Xue‐Hua, L., Skidmore, A. K., and Van Oosten, H., 2002. Integration of classification methods for improvement of land‐cover map accuracy., Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 56 (2002), pp. 257–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadroga, F., 1981. "The hydrological importance of a montane cloud forest area of Costa Rica.". In: Lal, R, and Russell, E. W, eds. Tropical Agricultural Hydrology. New York: Wiley, 1981; 1981. pp. 59–73.
   Google Scholar
• Zárate, B. E., 2001. "Ordenamiento ecológico forestal de la cuenca alta del río La Antigua, Veracruz. Tesis de Maestría.". 2001, Universidad Veracruzana, Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas, Xalapa, Ver. México.
   Google Scholar
• Zeleke, G., and Hurni, H., 2001. Implications of land use and land cover dynamics for mountain resource degradation in the northwestern Ethiopian highlands., Mountain Research and Development 21 (2001), pp. 184–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar