262
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Investigating the impact of discrete-return lidar point density on estimations of mean and dominant plot-level tree height in Eucalyptus grandis plantations

, &
Pages 2925-2940 | Received 20 Dec 2007, Published online: 19 Jul 2010

References

  • Ackermann, F., 1999, Airborne laser scanning—present status and future expectations. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 54, pp. 64–67.
  • Allen, D.M., 1974, The relationship between variable selection and data augmentation and a method of prediction. Technometrics, 16, pp. 125–127.
  • Baltsavias, E., 1999a, A comparison between photogrammetry and laser scanning. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 54, pp. 83–94.
  • Baltsavias, E., 1999b, Airborne laser scanning: Basic relations and formulas. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 54, pp. 199–214.
  • Beyer, H.L., 2004, Hawth’s Analysis Tools for ArcGIS®, Version 3.21. Available at: www.spatialecology.com/htools.
  • Clark, M.L., Clark, D.B. and Roberts, D.A., 2004, Small-footprint lidar estimation of sub-canopy elevation and tree height in a tropical rain forest landscape. Remote Sensing of Environment, 91, pp. 68–89.
  • Dubayah, R.O. and Drake, J.B., 2000, Lidar remote sensing for forestry. Journal of Forestry, 98, pp. 44–46.
  • Flood, M., 2001. Laser altimetry: from science to commercial lidar mapping. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 67, pp. 1209–1217.
  • García, O., 1998., Estimating top height with variable plot sizes. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 28, pp. 1509–1517.
  • Goodwin, N.R., Coops, N.C. and Culvenor, D.S., 2006, Assessment of forest structure with airborne lidar and the effects of platform altitude. Remote Sensing of Environment, 103, pp. 140–152.
  • Holmgren, J., 2004, Prediction of tree height, basal area, and stem volume in forest stands using airborne laser scanning. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 19, pp. 543–553.
  • Holmgren, J., Nilsson, M. and Olsson, H., 2003, Simulating the effects of lidar scanning angle for estimation of mean tree height and canopy closure. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 29, pp. 623–632.
  • Kozak, A. and Kozak, R., 2003, Does cross validation provide additional information in the evaluation of regression models? Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 33, pp. 976–987.
  • Lefsky, M.A., Cohen, W.B., Parker, G.G. and Harding, D.J., 2002, Lidar remote sensing for ecosystem studies. Bioscience, 52, pp. 19–30.
  • Lim, K., Treitz, P., Wulder, M., St-Onge, B. and Flood, M., 2003, Lidar remote sensing of forest structure. Progress in Physical Geography, 27, pp. 88–106.
  • Lovell, J.L., Jupp, D.L.B., Newnham, G.J., Coops, N.C. and Culvenor, D.S., 2005, Simulation study for finding optimal lidar acquisition parameters for forest height retrieval. Forest Ecology and Management, 214, pp. 398–412.
  • Magnussen, S. and Boudewyn, P., 1998, Derivations of stand heights from airborne laser scanner data with canopy-based quantile estimators. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research, 28, pp. 1016–1031.
  • Magnusson, M., Fransson, J.E.S. and Holmgren, J., 2007, Effects on estimation accuracy of forest variables using different pulse density of laser data. Forest Science, 53, pp. 619–626.
  • Means, J.E., Acker, S.A., Fitt, B.J., Renslow, M., Emerson, L. and Hendrix, C.J., 2000, Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning lidar. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 66, pp. 1367–1371.
  • Næsset, E., 1997, Determination of mean tree height of forest stands using airborne laser scanner data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 52, pp. 49–56.
  • Næsset, E., 2002, Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80, pp. 88–99.
  • Næsset, E., 2004, Effects of different flying altitudes on biophysical stand properties estimated from canopy height and density measured with a small-footprint airborne scanning laser. Remote Sensing of Environment, 91, pp. 243–255.
  • Næsset, E., Gobakken, T., Holmgren, J., Hyyppä, H., Hyyppä, J., Maltamo, M., Nilsson, M., Olsson, H., Persson, Å. and Söderman, U., 2004, Laser scanning of forest resources: The Nordic experience. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 19, pp. 482–499.
  • Næsset, E. and Økland, T., 2002, Estimating tree height and tree crown properties using airborne scanning laser in a boreal nature reserve. Remote Sensing of Environment, 79, pp. 105–115.
  • Nelson, R., 1997, Modeling forest canopy heights: The effects of canopy shape. Remote Sensing of Environment, 60, pp. 327–334.
  • Oliver, M.A., 1990. Kriging: a method of interpolation for Geographical Information Systems. International Journal of Geographic Information Systems, 4, pp. 313–332.
  • Popescu, S.C., Wynne, R.H. and Nelson, R.F., 2002, Estimating plot-level tree heights with lidar: Local filtering with a canopy-height based variable window size. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 37, pp. 71–95.
  • Reutebuch, S.E., McGaughey, R.J., Andersen, H.-E. and Carson, W.W., 2003, Accuracy of a high-resolution lidar terrain model under a conifer forest canopy. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 29, pp. 527–535.
  • Reutebuch, S.E., Andersen, H.-E. and McGaughey, R.J., 2005, Light detection and ranging (lidar): an emerging tool for multiple resource inventory. Journal of Forestry, 103, pp. 286–292.
  • Thomas, V., Treitz, P., McCaughey, J.H. and Morrison, I., 2006, Mapping stand-level forest biophysical variables for a mixedwood boreal forest using lidar: An examination of scanning density. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36, pp. 34–47.
  • von Gadow, K. and Bredenkamp, B., 1992, Forest Management (Pretoria: Academica).
  • Wehr, A. and Lohr, U., 1999, Airborne laser scanning—an introduction and overview. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 54, pp. 68–82.
  • Yang, Y., Monserud, R.A. and Huang, S., 2004, An evaluation of diagnostic tests and their roles in validating forest biometric models. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 34, pp. 619–629.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.