A spectral-spatial method based on low-rank and sparse matrix decomposition for hyperspectral anomaly detection

References

• Banerjee, A., P. Burlina, and C. Diehl. 2006. “A Support Vector Method for Anomaly Detection in Hyperspectral Imagery.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 44 (8): 2282–2291. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2006.873019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belkin, M., and P. Niyogi. 2003. “Laplacian Eigenmaps for Dimensionality Reduction and Data Representation.” Neural Computation 15 (6): 1373–1396. doi:10.1162/089976603321780317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borghys, D., V. Achard, and C. Perneel. 2012. “Comparative Evaluation of Hyperspectral Anomaly Detectors in Different Types of Background.” Proceedings of SPIE - the International Society for Optical Engineering 8390 (12): 83902J-83902J-12. doi:10.1117/12.920387.
   Google Scholar
• Camps-Valls, G., and L. Bruzzone. 2005. “Kernel-Based Methods for Hyperspectral Image Classification.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 43 (6): 1351–1362. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2005.846154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C. I. 2003. Hyperspectral Imaging: Techniques for Spectral Detection and Classification. USA: Plenum Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Chiang, S. S., C. I. Chang, and I. W. Ginsberg. 2001. “Unsupervised Target Detection in Hyperspectral Images Using Projection Pursuit.” Geoscience & Remote Sensing IEEE Transactions On 39 (7): 1380–1391. doi:10.1109/36.934071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, X., Y. Tian, L. Weng, and Y. Yang. 2013. “Anomaly Detection in Hyperspectral Imagery Based on Low-Rank and Sparse Decomposition.” Proceedings of SPIE - the International Society for Optical Engineering 9069 (4): 90690R-90690R-7. doi:10.1117/12.2050229.
   Google Scholar
• Du, B., and L. Zhang. 2011. “Random-Selection-Based Anomaly Detector for Hyperspectral Imagery.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 49 (5): 1578–1589. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2010.2081677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, B., R. Zhao, L. P. Zhang, and L. F. Zhang. 2016. “A Spectral-Spatial Based Local Summation Anomaly Detection Method for Hyperspectral Images.” Signal Processing 124: 115–131. doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2015.09.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duran, O., and M. Petrou. 2007. “A Time-Efficient Method for Anomaly Detection in Hyperspectral Images.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 45 (12): 3894–3904. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2007.909205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, J. E., and Q. Du. 2011. “Anomaly Detection and Reconstruction from Random Projections.” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing A Publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society 21 (1): 184–195. doi:10.1109/TIP.2011.2159730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, Y. F., Y. Liu, and Y. Zhang. 2008. “A Selective KPCA Algorithm Based on High-Order Statistics for Anomaly Detection in Hyperspectral Imagery.” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 5 (1): 43–47. doi:10.1109/LGRS.2007.907304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton, G., and S. Roweis. 2010. “Stochastic Neighbor Embedding.” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 41 (4): 833–840.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, H., S. Z. Der, and N. M. Nasrabadi. 2003. “Projection-Based Adaptive Anomaly Detection for Hyperspectral Imagery.” International Conference on Image Processing 1: I-1001-4. doi:10.1109/ICIP.2003.1247134.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, H., and N. M. Nasrabadi. 2005. “Kernel RX-Algorithm: A Nonlinear Anomaly Detector for Hyper-Spectral Imagery.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 43 (2): 388–397. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2004.841487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W., and Q. Du. 2015. “Collaborative Representation for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 53 (3): 1463–1474. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2014.2343955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, L., M. M. Crawford, and J. Tian. 2010a. “Anomaly Detection for Hyperspectral Images Based on Robust Locally Linear Embedding.” Journal of Infrared Millimeter and Terahertz Waves 31 (6): 753–762. doi:10.1007/s10762-010-9630-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, L. M., M. Crawford, and J. Tian. 2010b. “Anomaly Detection for Hyperspectral Images Using Local Tangent Space Alignment.” IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IGARSS 45 (1): 824–827. doi:10.1109/IGARSS.2010.5652183.
   Google Scholar
• Madar, E., Q. Kuybeda, D. Malah, and M. Barzohar. 2009. “Local-Global Background Modeling for Anomaly Detection in Hyperspectral Images.” The Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing 1–4. doi:10.1109/WHISPERS.2009.5289036.
   Google Scholar
• Matteoli, S., M. Diani, and G. Corsini. 2010. “A Tutorial Overview of Anomaly Detection in Hyperspectral Images.” IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine 25 (7): 5–28. doi:10.1109/MAES.2010.5546306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matteoli, S., M. Diani, and J. Theiler. 2014. “An Overview of Background Modeling for Detection of Targets and Anomalies in Hyperspectral Remotely Sensed Imagery.” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations & Remote Sensing 7 (6): 2317–2336. doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2315772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, S., D. Mary, and A. Ferrari. 2013. “Detection Tests Using Sparse Models, with Application to Hyperspectral Data.” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 61 (6): 1481–1494. doi:10.1109/TSP.2013.2238533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaza, A., J. A. Benediktsson, J. W. Boardman, J. Brazile, L. Bruzzone, G. Camps-Valls, J. Chanussot, et al. 2009. “Recent Advances in Techniques for Hyperspectral Image Processing.” Remote Sensing of Environment 113 (9): S110–S122. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2007.07.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaza, A., G. Martin, J. Plaza, M. Zortea, and S. Sanchez. 2011. “Recent Developments in Endmember Extraction and Spectral Unmixing.” Optical Remote Sensing 3: 235–267. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14212-3_12.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, I. S., and X. Yu. 1990. “Adaptive Multiple-Band CFAR Detection of an Optical Pattern with Unknown Spectral Distribution.” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics Speech Amd Signal Processing 38 (10): 1760–1770. doi:10.1109/29.60107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roweis, S. T., and L. K. Saul. 2000. “Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction by Locally Linear Embedding.” Science 290: 2323–2326. doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumarsono, A., and Q. Du. 2014. “Robust Principal Component Analysis for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection,” In Proc. IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IGARSS, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, July 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, W. W., C. Liu, J. Li, Y. M. Lai, and W. Li. 2014. “Low-Rank and Sparse Matrix Decomposition-Based Anomaly Detection for Hyperspectral Imagery.” Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 8 (1): 152–160. doi:10.1117/1.JRS.8.083641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenenbaum, J. B., V. D. Silva, and J. C. Langford. 2000. “A Global Geometric Framework for Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction.” Science 290: 2319–2323. doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, J., A. Y. Yang, A. Ganesh, S. S. Sastry, and Y. I. Ma. 2009. “Robust Face Recognition via Sparse Representation.” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 31 (2): 210–227. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2008.79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Z. B. Wu, J. Li, A. Plaza, and Z. H. Wei. 2016. “Anomaly Detection in Hyperspectral Images Based on Low-Rank and Sparse Representation.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 54 (4): 1990–2000. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2015.2493201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J. H., L. G. Wang, and J. X. Qian. 2016. “A New Residual Fusion Classification Method for Hyperspectral Images.” International Journal of Remote Sensing 37 (4): 745–769. doi:10.1080/01431161.2015.1137649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, Z. Z., H. Sun, K. F. Ji, Z. Y. Li, and H. X. Zou. 2014. “Local Sparsity Divergence for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection.” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 11 (10): 1697–1701. doi:10.1109/LGRS.2014.2306209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. L., and C. H. Zhao. 2016. “Sparsity Divergence Index Based on Locally Linear Embedding for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection.” Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 10: 025026. Advance online publication. doi:10.1117/1.JRS.10.025026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, T. H., J. Yang, D. L. Zhao, and X. L. Ge. 2007. “Linear Local Tangent Space Alignment and Application to Face Recognition.” Neurocomputing 70 (7–9): 1547–1553. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2006.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. X., B. Du, L. P. Zhang, and S. G. Wang. 2016. “A Low-Rank and Sparse Matrix Decomposition-Based Mahalanobis Distance Method for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 54 (3): 1–14. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2015.2479299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. X., L. P. Zhang, B. Du, and S. G. Wang. 2015. “A Nonlinear Sparse Representation-Based Binary Hypothesis Model for Hyperspectral Target Detection.” Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing IEEE Journal Of 8: 2513–2522. doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2368173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z. Y., and H. Zha. 2003. ““Zha, H.: Principle Manifolds and Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction via Tangent Space Aligenment. SIAM J. Sci. Compute 26(1),313-338.” Siam Journal of Scientific Computing 26 (4): 313–338. doi:10.1137/S1064827502419154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar