Hyperspectral anomaly detection with vision transformer and adversarial refinement

References

• Bati, E., A. Çalışkan, A. Koz, and A. A. Alatan. 2015. “Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection Method Based on Auto-Encoder.” In Image and Signal Processing for Remote Sensing XXI, edited by L. Bruzzone, 220–226. Vol. 9643. SPIE: International Society for Optics and Photonics.
   Google Scholar
• Bera, S., and V. K. Shrivastava. 2020. “Analysis of Various Optimizers on Deep Convolutional Neural Network Model in the Application of Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Image Classification.” International Journal of Remote Sensing 41 (7): 2664–2683.April 2 https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2019.1694725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candès, E. J., X. Li, Y. Ma, and J. Wright. 2011. “Robust Principal Component Analysis?” Journal of the ACM 58 (3): 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/1970392.1970395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlotto, M. 2005. “A Cluster-Based Approach for Detecting Man-Made Objects and Changes in Imagery.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 43 (2): 374–387. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2004.841481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., N. M. Nasrabadi, and T. D. Tran. 2011. “Simultaneous Joint Sparsity Model for Target Detection in Hyperspectral Imagery.” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 8 (4): 676–680. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2010.2099640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalla Mura, M., J. A. Benediktsson, B. Waske, and L. Bruzzone. 2010. “Morphological Attribute Profiles for the Analysis of Very High Resolution Images.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 48 (10): 3747–3762. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2010.2048116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dosovitskiy, A., L. Beyer, A. Kolesnikov, D. Weissenborn, X. Zhai, T. Unterthiner, M. Dehghani, et al. 2020. “An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale.” CoRr. abs/2010.11929.
   Google Scholar
• Elkholy, M. M., M. Mostafa, H. M. Ebied, and M. F. Tolba. 2020. “Hyperspectral Unmixing Using Deep Convolutional Autoencoder.” International Journal of Remote Sensing 41 (12): 4799–4819. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2020.1724346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, G., Y. Ma, X. Mei, F. Fan, J. Huang, and J. Ma. 2022. “Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection with Robust Graph Autoencoders.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 60:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2021.3097097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, D., L. Liu, V. Le, B. Saha, M. R. Mansour, S. Venkatesh, and A. Van Den Hengel 2019. “Memorizing Normality to Detect Anomaly: Memory-Augmented Deep Autoencoder for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection.” In 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Seoul, Korea (South), 1705–1714.
   Google Scholar
• Green, R. O., M. L. Eastwood, C. M. Sarture, T. G. Chrien, M. Aronsson, B. J. Chippendale, J. A. Faust, et al. 1998. “Imaging Spectroscopy and the Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (Aviris).” Remote Sensing of Environment 65 (3): 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00064-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, K., J. Sun, and X. Tang. 2013 06. “Guided Image Filtering.” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 35 (6): 1397–1409. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2012.213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton, G. E., and R. S. Zemel 1993. “Autoencoders, Minimum Description Length and Helmholtz Free Energy.” In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS’93, 3–10. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hosseiny, B., and R. Shah-Hosseini. 2020. “A Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection Framework Based on Segmentation and Convolutional Neural Network Algorithms.” International Journal of Remote Sensing 41 (18): 6946–6975. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2020.1752413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, M., T. Wang, Y. Su, Y. Cai, and J. Cao. 2022a. “Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection Based on Adaptive Weighting Method Combined with Autoencoder and Convolutional Neural Network.” International Journal of Remote Sensing 43 (7): 2617–2637. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2022.2061876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, M., T. Wang, Y. Su, Y. Cai, and Y. Wang. 2022b. “Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection Based on Score-Guided Cooperative Autoencoders.” International Journal of Remote Sensing 43 (12): 4436–4453. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2022.2112110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao, C., B. Yang, Q. Wang, G. Wang, and J. Wu. 2022. “Discriminative Multiple-Instance Hyperspectral Subpixel Target Characterization.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience & Remote Sensing 60:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2022.3140798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, X., X. Zhang, S. Li, K. Li, J. Li, and J. A. Benediktsson. 2017. “Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection with Attribute and Edge-Preserving Filters.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience & Remote Sensing 55 (10): 5600–5611. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2017.2710145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, B., O. Dikshit, A. Gupta, and M. K. Singh. 2020. “Feature Extraction for Hyperspectral Image Classification: A Review.” International Journal of Remote Sensing 41 (16): 6248–6287. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2020.1736732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, H., and N. Nasrabadi. 2005. “Kernel Rx-Algorithm: A Nonlinear Anomaly Detector for Hyperspectral Imagery.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 43 (2): 388–397. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2004.841487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, J., L. Wang, G. Zhao, and S. Hao. 2019. “Hyperspectral Image Classification Based on Bilateral Filter with Linear Spatial Correlation Information.” International Journal of Remote Sensing 40 (17): 6861–6883. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2019.1597301.
   Google Scholar
• Li, W., and Q. Du. 2015. “Collaborative Representation for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 53 (3): 1463–1474. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2014.2343955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., T. Jiang, W. Xie, J. Lei, and Q. Du. 2022. “Sparse Coding-Inspired Gan for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection in Weakly Supervised Learning.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 60:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2021.3102048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, G., Z. Lin, and Y. Yu 2010. “Robust Subspace Segmentation by Low-Rank Representation.” In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML’10, 663–670. Madison, WI, USA: Omnipress.
   Google Scholar
• Li, W., G. Wu, and Q. Du. 2017. “Transferred Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection in Hyperspectral Imagery.” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 14 (5): 597–601. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2017.2657818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobo, J. M., A. Jimenez-Valverde, and R. Real. 2008. “Auc: A Misleading Measure of the Performance of Predictive Distribution Models.” Global Ecology & Biogeography 17 (2): 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00358.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matteoli, S., T. Veracini, M. Diani, and G. Corsini. 2014. “A Locally Adaptive Background Density Estimator: An Evolution for Rx-Based Anomaly Detectors.” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 11 (1): 323–327. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2013.2257670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paszke, A., S. Gross, S. Chintala, G. Chanan, E. Yang, Z. DeVito, Z. Lin, A. Desmaison, L. Antiga, and A. Lerer. 2017. “Automatic Differentiation in Pytorch.” NIPS-W.
   Google Scholar
• Pepe, M. 2000. “Receiver Operating Characteristic Methodology.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 95 (449): 308–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2000.10473930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirnay, J., and K. Chai. 2021. “Inpainting Transformer for Anomaly Detection.” CoRr. abs/2104.13897.
   Google Scholar
• Quintano, C., A. Fernández-Manso, Y. E. Shimabukuro, and G. Pereira. 2012. “Spectral Unmixing.” International Journal of Remote Sensing 33 (17): 5307–5340. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2012.661095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu, Y., W. Wang, R. Guo, B. Ayhan, C. Kwan, S. Vance, and H. Qi. 2018. “Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection Through Spectral Unmixing and Dictionary-Based Low-Rank Decomposition.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 56 (8): 4391–4405. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2018.2818159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, I., and X. Yu. 1990. “Adaptive Multiple-Band Cfar Detection of an Optical Pattern with Unknown Spectral Distribution.” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 38 (10): 1760–1770. https://doi.org/10.1109/29.60107.
   Google Scholar
• Ren, L., Z. Ma, F. Bovolo, J. Hu, and L. Bruzzone. 2022. “Hyperspectral Unmixing Using Weighted Sparse Regression with Total Variation Regularization.” International Journal of Remote Sensing 43 (15–16): 6124–6151. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2021.2018151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabokrou, M., M. Khalooei, M. Fathy, and E. Adeli 2018. “Adversarially Learned One-Class Classifier for Novelty Detection.” In 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 3379–3388.
   Google Scholar
• Schaum, A. 2004. “Joint Subspace Detection of Hyperspectral Targets.” In 2004 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8720), Big Sky, MT, USA 3:1824.
   Google Scholar
• Tao, R., X. Zhao, W. Li, H. C. Li, and Q. Du. 2019. “Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection by Fractional Fourier Entropy.” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations & Remote Sensing 12 (12): 4920–4929. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2019.2940278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., Q. Li, and X. Li. 2019. “Hyperspectral Band Selection via Adaptive Subspace Partition Strategy.” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 12 (12): 4940–4950. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2019.2941454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., Q. Li, and X. Li. 2021. “A Fast Neighborhood Grouping Method for Hyperspectral Band Selection.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 59 (6): 5028–5039. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2020.3011002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S., X. Wang, L. Zhang, and Y. Zhong. 2022. “Auto-Ad: Autonomous Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection Network Based on Fully Convolutional Autoencoder.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 60:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2021.3057721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang, P., H. Zhou, H. Li, S. Song, W. Tan, J. Song, and L. Gu. 2020. “Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection by Local Joint Subspace Process and Support Vector Machine.” International Journal of Remote Sensing 41 (10): 3798–3819. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2019.1708504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, W., T. Jiang, Y. Li, X. Jia, and J. Lei. 2019. “Structure Tensor and Guided Filtering-Based Algorithm for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 57 (7): 4218–4230. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2018.2890212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, W., Y. Li, J. Lei, J. Yang, C.-I. Chang, and Z. Li. 2020. “Hyperspectral Band Selection for Spectral–Spatial Anomaly Detection.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience & Remote Sensing 58 (5): 3426–3436. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2019.2956159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, W., X. Zhang, Y. Li, J. Lei, J. Li, and Q. Du. 2021. “Weakly Supervised Low-Rank Representation for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection.” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 51 (8): 3889–3900. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2021.3065070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, W., L. Zhang, X. Mou, and A. C. Bovik. 2014. “Gradient Magnitude Similarity Deviation: A Highly Efficient Perceptual Image Quality Index.” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 23 (2): 684–695. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2013.2293423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Z. Wu, J. Li, A. Plaza, and Z. Wei. 2016. “Anomaly Detection in Hyperspectral Images Based on Low-Rank and Sparse Representation.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 54 (4): 1990–2000. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2015.2493201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, G., N. Li, B. Tu, Z. Liao, and Y. Peng. 2020. “Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection via Dual Collaborative Representation.” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 13:4881–4894. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2020.3009324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, K., Q. Han, C. Bin Zhang, J. Xu, and M. Ming Cheng 2021. “Deep Hough Transform for Semantic Line Detection.” In IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI).
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, C., X. Li, and H. Zhu. 2017. “Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection Based on Stacked Denoising Autoencoders.” Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 11 (4): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.11.042605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, W., D. Wu, and Y. Liu. 2021. “Hyperspectral Image Classification with Multi-Scale Graph Convolution Network.” International Journal of Remote Sensing 42 (21): 8380–8397. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2021.1978585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, T., and D. Tao 2011. “Godec: Randomized Low-Rank Sparse Matrix Decomposition in Noisy Case.” In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML’11, 33–40. Madison, WI, USA: Omnipress.
   Google Scholar