The iron law of Erdogan: the decay from intra-party democracy to personalistic rule

Bibliography

• Akser, Murat, and Banu Baybars-Hawks. “Media and Democracy in Turkey: Toward a Model of Neoliberal Media Autocracy.” Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication 5, no. 3 (2012): 302–321.
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. Gezi Park Protests: Brutal Denial of the Right to Peaceful Assembly in Turkey. London: Amnesty International, October 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Amundsen, Inge. “Democratic Dynasties? Internal Party Democracy in Bangladesh.” Party Politics (2012): 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C. K., and M. S. Fish. “The Art of Being Indispensable: Noncharismatic Personalism in Contemporary Political Parties.” Comparative Political Studies 32, no. 3 (1999): 283–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilgin, Fevzi. Turkey Brief: Corruption Scandal and Ensuing Political Crisis. Washington, DC: Rethink Institute, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Carkoglu, Ali. “Turkey’s 2011 General Elections: Towards a Dominant Party System?” Insight Turkey 13, no. 3 (2011): 43–62.
   Google Scholar
• Cinar, Menderes. “The Electoral Success of the akp: Cause for Hope and Despair.” Insight Turkey 13, no. 4 (2011): 107–127.
   Google Scholar
• Colburn, Forrest D., and Arturo Cruz S. “Personalism and Populism in Nicaragua.” Journal of Democracy 23, no. 2 (2012): 104–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornell, Svante E. “Erdogan’s Looming Downfall: Turkey at the Crossroads.” Middle East Quarterly XXI, no. 2 (2014). http://www.meforum.org/3767/erdogan-downfall.
   Google Scholar
• Cosar, Simten, and Aylin Ozman. “Centre-right Politics in Turkey after the November 2002 General Election: Neo-liberalism with a Muslim Face.” Contemporary Politics 10, no. 1 (2004): 57–74.
   Google Scholar
• Croissant, Aurel, and Paul Chambers. “Unravelling Intra-party Democracy in Thailand.” Asian Journal of Political Science 18, no. 2 (2010): 195–223.
   Google Scholar
• Dagi, Ihsan. “Turkey’s akp in Power.” Journal of Democracy 19, no. 3 (2008): 25–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duverger, Maurice. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London: Methuen, 1959.
   Google Scholar
• Forestiere, Carolyn, and Christopher S. Allen. “The Formation of Cognitive Locks in Single Party Dominant Regimes.” International Political Science Review 32, no. 4 (2011): 380–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fradkin, Hillel, and Lewis Libby. “Erdogan’s Grand Vision: Rise and Decline.” World Affairs 175, no. 6 (2013): 41–50.
   Google Scholar
• George Alexander, and Andrew Bennett. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: mit Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, John. “What is a Case Study and What is it Good For?” American Political Science Review 98, no. 2 (2004): 341–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorener, Aylin S., and Meltem S. Ucal. “The Personality and Leadership Style of Recep Tayyip Erdogan: Implications for Turkish Foreign Policy.” Turkish Studies 12, no. 3 (2011): 357–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunlicks, Arthur B. “Intraparty Democracy in Western Germany: A Look at the Local Level.” Comparative Politics 2, no. 2 (1970): 229–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, R., and L. Diamond. “Species of Political Parties: A New Typology.” Party Politics 9, no. 2 (2003): 167–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurbuz, Mustafa. The Long Winter: Turkish Politics after the Corruption Scandal. Washington, DC: Rethink Institute, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hadenius, Axel, and Jan Teorell. “Pathways from Authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 18, no. 1 (2007): 143–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartlinski, Maciej. “Contemporary ‘Prince’: Influence, the Position and Authority of Party Leaders.” South-east European Journal of Political Science 1, no. 4 (2013): 131–146.
   Google Scholar
• Heper, Metin, and Jacob Landau. Political Parties and Democracy in Turkey. London: I. B. Tauris, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, Gareth. “Turkey’s Latest Crisis.” Survival 50, no. 5 (2008): 5–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabasakal, Mehmet. “Factors Influencing Intra-party Democracy and Membership Rights: The Case of Turkey.” Party Politics (2012): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Kumbaracibasi, Arda Can. Turkish Politics and the Rise of the akp: Dilemmas of Institutionalization and Leadership Strategy. Abingdon: Routledge, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kuru, Ahmet T. “Constitution, Presidentialism, and Checks and Balances: Turkey and the US.” Turkish Review 3, no. 6 (2013): 572–579.
   Google Scholar
• Lotshwao, Kebapetse. “The Weakness of Opposition Parties in Botswana: A Justification for more Internal-party Democracy in the Dominant Botswana Democratic Party (bdp).” African Journal of Political Science and International Relations 5, no. 2 (2011): 103–111.
   Google Scholar
• Maiyo, Josh. “Political Parties and Intra-party Democracy in East Africa: From Representative to Participatory Democracy.” Unpublished paper. Leiden University, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Mecham, Quinn R. “From the Ashes of Virtue, a Promise of Light: The Transformation of Political Islam in Turkey.” Third World Quarterly 25, no. 2 (2004): 339–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michels, Robert. Political Parties. 1911. Reprint, New York: Free Press, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Mimpen, Jeroen. Intra-party Democracy and its Discontents: Democratization in a Volatile Political Landscape. The Hague: Netherlands Institute for Multiparty Democracy, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Muftuler-Bac, Meltem, and E. Fuat Keyman. “The Era of Dominant-party Politics.” Journal of Democracy 23, no. 1 (2012): 85–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obler, Jeffrey. “Intraparty Democracy and the Selection of Parliamentary Candidates: The Belgian Case.” British Journal of Political Science 4, no. 2 (1974): 163–185.
   Google Scholar
• Ojukwu, Chris C, and Tope Olaifa. “Challenges of Internal Democracy in Nigeria’s Political Parties: The Bane of Intra-party Conflicts in the People’s Democratic Party of Nigeria.” Global Journal of Human Social Science 11, no. 3 (2011): 25–34.
   Google Scholar
• Onis, Ziya, and Emin Fuat Keyman. “A New Path Emerges.” Journal of Democracy 14, no. 2 (2003): 95–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özbudun, Ergun, and William Hale. Islamism, Democracy and Liberalism in Turkey. Abingdon: Routledge, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Bill. “Turkey’s Struggle: Erdogan vs. Gulen.” openDemocracy. 2014. http://www.opendemocracy.net/bill-park/turkeys-struggle-erdoğ-vs-gülen.
   Google Scholar
• Sambur, Bilal. “The Great Transformation of Political Islam in Turkey: The Case of Justice and Development Party and Erdogan.” European Journal of Economic and Political Studies 2, no. 2 (2009): 117–127.
   Google Scholar
• Scarrow, Susan. Political Parties and Democracy in Theoretical and Practical Perspectives. Washington, DC: National Democratic Institute for International Affairs, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Scheiner, Ethan. Democracy without Competition in Japan: Opposition Failure in a One-party Dominant State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Somer, Murat. “Moderate Islam and Secularist Opposition in Turkey: Implications for the World, Muslims and Secular Democracy.” Third World Quarterly 28, no. 7 (2007): 1271–1289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soo Jung Ahn, Julie. “Turkey’s Unraveling Democracy: Reversing Course from Democratic Consolidation to Democratic Backsliding.” Unpublished paper. Claremont, CA: Claremont McKenna College, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Soyler, Mehtap. “Informal Institutions, Forms of State, and Democracy: The Turkish Deep State.” Democratization 20, no. 2 (2011): 310–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tepe, Sultan. “Turkey’s akp: A Model ‘Muslim–Democratic’ Party?” Journal of Democracy 16, no. 3 (2005): 69–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tittensor, David. “Erdogan Moves against ‘Parallel State’.” Asian Currents (2014): 19–20.
   Google Scholar
• Tomsa, Dirk. “Moderating Islamism in Indonesia: Tracing Patterns of Party Change in the Prosperous Justice Party.” Political Research Quarterly 65, no. 3 (2012): 486–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turan, Ilter. The Rule of Law Is the Casualty. Policy Report. Washington, DC: German Marshall Fund of the United States, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Unver, H. Akin. Turkey’s ‘Deep-State’ and the Ergenekon Conundrum. Washington, DC: Middle East Institute, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Yildirim, A. Kadir. “New Democrats: Religious Actors, Social Change and Democratic Consolidation in Turkey.” Contemporary Islam 7, no. 3 (2013): 311–331.
   Google Scholar
• Zudenkova, Galina. A Rationale for Intra-party Democracy. Unpublished Work. Iowa City: University of Iowa, 2012.
   Google Scholar