Unpacking the local turn in peacebuilding: a critical assessment towards an agenda for future research

Bibliography

• Alihodžic, Sead. “Electoral Violence Early Warning and Infrastructures for Peace.” Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 7, no. 3 (2012): 54–69.
   Google Scholar
• Autesserre, Séverine. Peaceland: Conflict Resolution and the Everyday Politics of International Intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Autesserre, Séverine. The Trouble with the Congo: Local Violence and the Failure of International Peacebuilding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Azar, Edward E. The Management of Protracted Social Conflict. Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Azar, Edward E. “Protracted Social Conflict: 10 Propositions.” International Interactions 12, no. 1 (1985): 59–70.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, Michael, and Christopher Zuercher. “The Peace Builder’s Contract.” In Statebuilding after Civil War, edited by Roland Paris and Timothy Sisk, 23–52. New York: Routledge, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bayart, Jean-François, Stephen Ellis, and Béatrice Hibou. Criminalization of the State in Africa. Oxford/Bloomington: James Currey/Indiana University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Bayart, Jean-Fançois. “Africa in the World: A History of Extraversion.” African Affairs 99 (2000): 217–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayart Jean-François. The State in Africa: The Politics of the Belly. Cambridge: Polity, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Belloni, Roberto. “Hybrid Peace Governance: Its Emergence and Significance.” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 18, no. 1 (2012): 21–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belloni, Roberto. “Civil Society and Peacebuilding in Bosnia and Herzegovina.” In Civil Society and Peacebuilding: A Critical Assessment, edited by Thania Paffenholz, 105–128. Boulder, CO: Lynee Reinner, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bendaña, Alejandro. “What Kind of Peace is Being Built? Stock Taking of Post-conflict Peacebuilding and Charting Future Directions.” Paper prepared for the International Development Research Council (IDRC) on the 10th anniversary of ‘An Agenda for Peace’, Ottawa, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, John, Jon Bennett, Sara Pantuliano, Wendy Fenton, Anthony Vaux, Chris Barnett, and Emery Brusset. Aiding the Peace: A Multi-donor Evaluation of Support to Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding Activities in Southern Sudan 2005–2010. Stockholm: SIDA, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bhabha, Homi K. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Boege, Volker. “How to Maintain Peace and Security in a Post-conflict Hybrid Political Order – the Case of Bougainville.” Journal of International Peacekeeping 14, nos. 3–4 (2010): 330–352.
   Google Scholar
• Boege, Volker, Anne Brown, and Kevin Clements. “Hybrid Political Orders, Not Fragile States.” Peace Review 21, no. 1 (2009): 13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Böhnke, J.R., Koeler, J., and Zürcher, C. Assessing the Impact of Development Cooperation in North East Afghanistan 2005–2009: Final Report. Evaluation Report 049. Bonn: BMZ, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Brusset, Emery et al. Evaluation Report: Amani Labda, Peace Maybe, Joint Evaluation of Conflict Prevention and PeaceBuilding in the Democratic Republic of Congo – Synthesis Report. Ohain: Channel Research, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Call, Charles T., and Elizabeth M. Cousens. “Ending Wars and Building Peace: International Responses to War-torn Societies.” International Studies Perspectives 9, no. 1 (2008): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chabal, Patrick, and Jean-Pascal Daloz. Africa Works: Disorder as Political Instrument. Oxford/Bloomington: James Currey/Indiana University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, David. “Peacebuilding and the Politics of Non-linearity: Rethinking ‘Hidden’ Agency and ‘Resistance’.” Peacebuilding 14, no. 1 (2013): 17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, N., Duncan, D., Timberman, D., and Abeygunawardana, K. “Evaluation of Donor-supported Activities in Conflict-sensitive Development and Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding in Sri Lanka – Final Report.” Joint evaluation commissioned by FPS Foreign Affairs, Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation, Belgium; the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Policy and Operations Evaluation Department, The Netherlands; the Department for International Development (DFID), UK; and the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Chopra, Tanja. “When Peacebuilding contradicts Statebuilding: Notes from the Arid Lands of Kenya.” International Peacekeeping 16, no. 4 (2009): 531–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curle, Adam. Making Peace. London: Tavistock Press, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• David, Charles-Philippe. “Does Peacebuilding Build Peace? Liberal (Mis) Steps in the Peace Process.” Security Dialogue 30, no. 1 (1999): 25–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Soto, “Alvaro, and Graciana del Castillo. “Obstacles to Peacebuilding.” Foreign Policy 94 (1994): 69–83.
   Google Scholar
• Debiel, Tobias, Rainer Glassner, Conrad Schetter, and Ulf Terlinden. “Local Statebuilding in Afghanistan and Somaliland.” Peace Review 21, no. 1 (2009): 38–44.
   Google Scholar
• Donais, Timothy. “Empowerment or Imposition? Dilemmas of Local Ownership in Post-conflict Peacebuilding Processes.” Peace & Change 34, no. 1 (2009): 3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Duffield, Mark. Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merging of Development and Security. London: Zed Books, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Duffield, Mark. “Governing the Borderlands: Decoding the Power of Aid.” Disasters 25, no. 4 (2001): 308–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farah, Ahmed Yusuf. “Roots of Reconciliation in Somaliland.” In Peacebuilding: A Field Guide, edited by Luc Reychler and Thania Paffenholz, 138–144. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Fetherston, Betts. “Anne. “Peacekeeping, Conflict Resolution and Peacebuilding: A Reconsideration of Theoretical Frameworks”.” International Peacekeeping 7, no. 1 (2000): 190–218.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Robert J., and Herbert C. Kelman. “Conflict Analysis and Resolution.” In Political Psychology, edited by O. David, Leonie Huddy Sears and Robert Jervis, 315–353. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. Translated by Colin Gordon. Brighton: Harvester Press, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction. Translated by R. Hurley. New York: Vintage, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, Paulo, Myra Bergman Ramos, and P. Donaldo Macedo. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. 30th anniversary ed. New York: Bloomsbury, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Galtung, Johan. “Violence, Peace, and Peace Research.” Journal of Peace Research 6, no. 3 (1969): 167–191.
   Google Scholar
• Ginty, Mac. “Roger. “Indigenous Peace-Making Versus the Liberal Peace”.” Cooperation and Conflict 43, no. 2 (2008): 139–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampson, Fen Osler. Nurturing Peace: Why Peace Settlements Succeed or Fail. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Heathershaw, John. “Towards Better Theories of Peacebuilding: Beyond the Liberal Peace Debate.” Peacebuilding 1, no. 2 (2013): 275–282.
   Google Scholar
• Heathershaw, John. “Unpacking the Liberal Peace: The Dividing and Merging of Peacebuilding Discourses.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 36, no. 3 (2008): 597–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagmann, Tobias, and Didier Péclard. “Negotiating Statehood: Dynamics of Power and Domination in Africa.” Development and Change 41, no. 4 (2010): 539–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höglund, Kristine, and Camilla Orjuela. “Hybrid Peace Governance and Illiberal Peacebuilding in Sri Lanka.” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 18, no. 1 (2012): 89–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopp-Nishanka, Ulrike. Giving Peace an Address? Reflections on the Potential and Challenges of Creating Peace Infrastructures. Berlin: Berghof Foundation, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hoving, Isabel. “Hybridity: A Slippery Trail.” In Travelling Concepts I: Text, Subjectivity, Hybridity, edited by Joyce Goggin and Sonja Neef, 185–200. Amsterdam: ASCA Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Hudakova, Zuzana. “Protest in Authoritarian Regimes: From Everyday Resistance to Popular Uprisings – A Conceptual Framework.” Masters thesis, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• International Crisis Group. Kenya’s 2013 Elections. Africa Report 197. Brussels: ICG, January 17, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• International Crisis Group. Kenya after the Elections. Africa Report 94. Brussels: ICG, May 15, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Jabri, Vivienne. “Peacebuilding, the Local and the International: A Colonial or a Postcolonial Rationality?” Peacebuilding 1, no. 1 (2013): 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Jarstad, Anna K., and Roberto Belloni. “Introducing Hybrid Peace Governance: Impact and Prospects of Liberal Peacebuilding.” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 18, no. 1 (2012): 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraushaar, Maren, and Daniel Lambach. Hybrid Political Orders: The Added Value of a New Concept. Brisbane: Australian Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kraidy, Marwan. “Hybridity in Cultural Globalization.” Communication Theory 12, no. 3 (2002): 316–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreutzer, Peter. Violence as a Means of Control and Domination in the Southern Philippines: How Violence is used to Consolidate Power in the Southern Phillipines. Frankfurt: PRIF Report 105. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, Chetan. “Building National ‘Infrastructures for Peace’: UN Assistance for Internally Negotiated Solutions to Violent Conflict.” In Peacemaking: From Practice to Theory, edited by Susan Allen Nan, Zacharia Cherian Mampilly and Barbara Bartoli, 384–399. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, Chetan, and Jos de la Haye. “Hybrid Peacemaking: Building National ‘Infrastructures for Peace’.” Global Governance 18 (2012): 13–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederach, John Paul. Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, Michael S. What Kind of Peace is Being Built? Assessing Post-conflict Peacebuilding, Charting Future Directions. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, Michael S. “Why are some Ethnic Disputes settled Peacefully, while Others become Violent? Comparing Slovakia, Macedonia, and Kosovo.” In Journeys through Conflict, edited by Hayward R. Alker, Ted Robert Gurr and Kumar Rupesinghe, 128–178. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger. “Hybrid Peace: The Interaction between Top-down and Bottom-up Peace.” Security Dialogue 41, no. 4 (2010): 391–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger. International Peacebuilding and Local Resistance: Hybrid Forms of Peace. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger. No War, No Peace. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger. Routledge Handbook of Peacebuilding. New York: Routledge, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger, and Oliver Richmond. “The Local Turn in PeaceBuilding: A Critical Agenda for Peace.” Third World Quarterly 34, no. 5 (2013): 763–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCandless, Erin, and Necla Tschirgi. “Hybridity and Policy Engagement.” Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 7, no. 2 (2012): 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Menkhaus, Ken. 2012. “Somalia’s 20-year Experiment in Hybrid Governance.” World Politics Review, August 8.
   Google Scholar
• Miall, Hugh. “Conflict Transformation: A Multi-dimensional Task.” In The Berghof Handbook for Conflict Transformation, edited by Alex Austin, Martina Fischer and Norbert Ropers, 67–89. Berlin: Berghof Research Centre for Constructive Conflict Management, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Odendaal, Andries. “An Architecture for Building Peace at the Local Level: A Comparative Study of Local Peace Committees.” Discussion Paper for UNDP, New York, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. Development Co-operation Report: Efforts and Policies of the Members of the Development Assistance Committee. Paris: OECD, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. Ensuring Fragile States are not Left Behind: Summary Report. February 2010. http://www.oecd.org/dacfragilestates/44822042.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. Major Aid Uses by Individual DAC Donors, 2000–2001. http://ebookbrowse.com/2-major-aid-uses-by-individual-dac-donors-xls-d124367987.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. Major Aid Uses by Individual DAC Donors, 2008–2009. www.oecd.org/dac/aidstatistics/47452921.xls.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. Principles for Good International Engagement in Fragile States and Situations. 2007. http://www.oecd.org/dacfragilestates/aboutthefragilestatesprinciples.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Online Berghof Handbook for Conflict Transformation. Berlin: Berghof Research Centre for Constructive Conflict Management.
   Google Scholar
• Orjuela, Camilla. “Building Peace in Sri Lanka: A Role for Civil Society?” Journal of Peace Research 40, no. 2 (2003): 195–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paffenholz, T., et al. “The German Civil Peace Service: Synthesis Report. Volume I: Main Report.” Unpublished Evaluation Report for the Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung, Bonn.
   Google Scholar
• Paffenholz, Thania. “Civil Society and Peacebuilding.” In Civil Society and Peacebuilding: A Critical Assessment, edited by Thania Paffenholz, 43–64. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Paffenholz, Thania. “Critical Peacebuilding Research, Power and Politics.” Paper presented at the HCRI Conference ‘Power and Peacebuilding’. Manchester, September 12–13, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Paffenholz, Thania. “International Peacebuilding goes Local: Analysing Lederach’s Conflict Transformation Theory and its Ambivalent Encounter with 20 Years of Practice.” Peacebuilding 2, no. 1 (2014): 11–27.
   Google Scholar
• Paffenholz, Thania. Construire La Paix Sur Le Terrain Brussels: Mode d’emploi, Groupe de recherche et d’information sur la paix et la sécurité (GRIP), 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Paffenholz, Thania. “Western Approaches to Negotiation and Mediation: An Overview.” In Peacebuilding: A Field Guide, edited by Luc Reychler and Thania Paffenholz, 75–80. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Paffenholz, Thania. “Kenya Case Study” Broadening Participation Project. Forthcoming. http://graduateinstitute.ch/files/live/sites/iheid/files/sites/ccdp/shared/Docs/Publications/briefingpaperbroader%20participation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, Roland. At War’s End: Building Peace after Civil Conflict. Cambridge University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, Roland. “Peacebuilding and the Limits of Liberal Internationalism.” International Security 22, no. 2 (1997): 54–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, Jenny H. “A Conceptual Unpacking of Hybridity: Accounting for Notions of Power, Politics and Progress in Analyses of Aid-driven Interfaces.” Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 7, no. 2 (2012): 9–22.
   Google Scholar
• Prabu, Anjhali. Hybridity: Limits, Transformations, Prospects. New York: SUNY Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, Michael. “Local Agency and Political Economies of Peacebuilding.” Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism 11, no. 2 (2011): 308–320.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, Michael. “Peacekeeping and Critical Theory.” International Peacekeeping 11, no. 1 (2004): 39–58.
   Google Scholar
• Reychler, Luc, and Thania Paffenholz, eds. Peacebuilding: A Field Guide. Lynne Rienner: Boulder, CO, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Reyntjens, Filip, and Stef Vandeginste. “Traditional Approaches to Negotiation and Mediation: Examples from Africa.” In Peacebuilding: A Field Guide, edited by Luc Reychler and Thania Paffenholz, 128–138. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. “A Pedagogy of Peacebuilding: Infrapolitics, Resistance, and Liberation.” International Political Sociology 6, no. 2 (2012): 115–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. A Post-liberal Peace. Abingdon: Routledge, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. “Understanding the Liberal Peace.” Paper presented at the Experts’ Seminar on ‘Transformation of War Economies’, University of Plymouth, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, Jordan. “Infrastructures for Peace as a Path to Resilient Societies: An Institutional Perspective.” Journal of Peacebuilding and Development 7, no. 3 (2012): 14–24.
   Google Scholar
• Sabaratnam, M. “Avatars of Eurocentrism in the Critique of the Liberal Peace.” Security Dialogue 44, no. 3 (2013): 259–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, James C. The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. Yale University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, James C. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, James C. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Shahrbanou, T. (ed.). Rethinking the Liberal Peace: External Models and Local Alternatives. New York, NY: Routledge, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In The Post-colonial Studies Reader, edited by Bill Ashcroft, Gareth Griffiths and Helen Tiffin, 24–28. London: Routledge, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Stedman, Stephen John. “Spoiler Problems in Peace Processes.” International Security 22, no. 2 (1997): 5–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN Secretary-General. An Agenda for Peace: Preventive Diplomacy, Peacemaking and Peace-keeping. Report of the Secretary-General Pursuant to the Statement Adopted by the Summit Meeting of the Security Council on 31 January 1992. New York: United Nations, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• UN Secretary-General. Report of the Secretary-General on Peacebuilding in the Immediate Aftermath of Conflict. UN doc. A/63/881-S/2009/304. New York: United Nations, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Van Tongeren, Paul. “Potential Cornerstone of Infrastructures for Peace? How Local Peace Committees Can Make a Difference.” Peacebuilding 1, no. 1 (2013): 39–60.
   Google Scholar
• Van Tongeren, Paul. “Creating Infrastructures for Peace: Experiences at Three Continents.” Pensamiento Propio 36–37(2013): 91–128.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, Barbara F. “The Critical Barrier to Civil War Settlement.” International Organization 51, no. 3 (1997): 335–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahar, Marie-Joëlle. “Norm Transmission in Peace- and Statebuilding: Lessons from Democracy Promotion in Sudan and Lebanon.” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 18, no. 1 (2012): 73–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaum, Dominik. “Beyond the ‘Liberal Peace’.” Global Governance 18, no. 1 (2012): 121–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar