The paradoxes of the ‘everyday’: scrutinising the local turn in peace building

Bibliography

• Albrecht, Peter, and Louise Moe Wiuff. “The Simultaneity of Authority in Hybrid Orders.” Peacebuilding 3, no. 1 (2015): 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargués-Pedreny, Pol. “Realising the Post-modern Dream: Strengthening Post-conflict Resilience and the Promise of Peace.” Resilience 3, no. 2 (2015): 113–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskin, Mark. “Local Governance in Kosovo: A Link to Democratic Development?” In Kosovo between War and Peace: Nationalism, Peacebuilding and International Trusteeship. edited by Tonny Brems Knudsen and Carsten Bagge Laustsen, 76–95. London: Routledge, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Belloni, Roberto. “Hybrid Peace Governance: Its Emergence and Significance.” Global Governance 18, no. 1 (2012): 21–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Guevara, Bliesemann. “Berit. “Introduction: The Limits of Statebuilding and the Analysis of State-formation”.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 4, no. 2 (2010): 111–128.
   Google Scholar
• Boege, Volker. “Hybrid Forms of Peace and Order on a South Sea Island: Experiences from Bougainville (Papua New Guinea).” In Hybrid Forms of Peace: From Everyday Agency to Post-liberalism, edited by Audra Mitchell and Oliver P Richmond, 88–106. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Boege, Volker. “Vying for Legitimacy in Post-conflict Situations: The Bougainville Case.” Peacebuilding 2, no. 3 (2014): 237–252.
   Google Scholar
• Boege, Volker, Anne Brown, Kevin Clements, and Anna Nolan. “Building Peace and Political Community in Hybrid Political Orders.” International Peacekeeping 16, no. 5 (2009): 599–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, Anne, and Alex Gusmao. “Looking for the Owner of the House: Who is Making Peace in Rural East Timor?” In Hybrid Forms of Peace: From Everyday Agency to Post-liberalism, edited by Oliver P Richmond and Audra Mitchell, 107–130. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, Danny. “Facilitating Systemic Conflict Transformation through Systemic Action Research.” In The Non-linearity of Peace Processes: Theory and Practice of Systemic Conflict Transformation, edited by Daniela Körrpen, Norbert Ropers and Hans J Giessmann, 97–109. Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, Kenneth. “Commodification, Compartmentalization, and Militarization of Peacebuilding.” In Building Sustainable Peace, edited by Tom Keating and W. A.Knight, 23–46. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Stephen. “Construing Top-down as Bottom-up: The Governmental Co-option of Peacebuilding ‘from Below’.” Vis-à-vis. Explorations in Anthropology 11, no. 1 (2011): 39–56.
   Google Scholar
• Canclini, Nestor Garcia. Hybrid Cultures: Strategies for Entering and Leaving Modernity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Caplan, Richard. “Who Guards the Guardians? International Accountability in Bosnia.” In State-Building: Theory and Practice, edited by Aidan Hehir and Neil Robinson, 107–124. London: Routledge, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Castañeda, Carla. “How Liberal Peacebuilding may be Failing Sierra Leone.” Review of African Political Economy 36, no. 120 (2009): 235–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, Wren, Tobias Debiel, and Frank Gadinger. Relational Sensibility and the ‘Turn to the Local’: Prospects for the Future of Peacebuilding. Duisburg: Kate Hamburger Kolleg/Centre for Global Cooperation Research, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, David. Bosnia: Faking Democracy after Dayton. London: Pluto Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, David. Empire in Denial: The Politics of State-building. London: Pluto Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, David. “Peacebuilding and the Politics of Non-linearity: Rethinking ‘Hidden’ Agency and ‘Resistance’.” Peacebuilding 1, no. 1 (2013): 17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, David. Resilience: The Governance of Complexity. London: Routledge, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, P. “Hybridity, Holism, and Traditional Justice: The Case of the Gacaca Courts in Post-genocide Rwanda.” George Washington International Law Review 39, no. 4 (2007): 765–837.
   Google Scholar
• Darby, John, and Roger Mac Ginty. “Conclusion: Peace Processes, Present and Future.” In Contemporary Peacemaking: Conflict, Violence and Peace Processes, edited by John Darby and Roger Mac Ginty, 256–274. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• De Coning, Cedric. “Understanding Peacebuilding as Essentially Local.” Stability: International Journal of Security and Development 2, no. 1 (2013): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Debrix, François. Re-envisioning Peacekeeping: The United Nations and the Mobilization of Ideology. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Demmers, Jolle, E. Alex. Fernandez Jilberto, and Barbara Hogenboom. Good Governance in the Era of Global Neoliberalism: Conflict and Depolitisation in Latin America, Eastern Europe, Asia and Africa. London: Routledge, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Devic, Ana. “Transnationalization of Civil Society in Kosovo: International and Local Limits of Peace and Multiculturalism.” Ethnopolitics 5, no. 3 (2006): 257–273.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, Michael, and Julian Reid. The Liberal Way of War: Killing to Make Life Live. London: Routledge, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Donais, Timothy. Peacebuilding and Local Ownership: Post-conflict Consensus-building. London: Routledge, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Duffield, Mark. Development, Security and Unending War: Governing the World of Peoples. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Duffield, Mark. “The Liberal Way of Development and the Development-Security Impasse: Exploring the Global Life-chance Divide.” Security Dialogue 41, no. 1 (2010): 53–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawn, Rick, and Oliver P.Richmond. “De Facto States in the Balkans: Shared Governance versus Ethnic Sovereignty in Republika Srpska and Kosovo.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 3, no. 2 (2009): 205–238.
   Google Scholar
• Felix da Costa Diana, and Karlsrud John. “Contextualising Liberal Peacebuilding for Local Circumstances: UNMISS and Local Peacebuilding in South Sudan.” Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 7, no. 2 (2012): 53–66.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. “The Subject and Power.” Critical Inquiry 8, no. 4 (1982): 777–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. ‘Society must be Defended’: Lectures at the Collège de France 1975–76. New York, NY: Picador, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Franks, Jason. “Beware of Liberal Peacebuilders bearing Gifts: The Deviancy of Liberal Peace in Palestine and Israel.” In New Perspectives on Liberal Peacebuilding, edited by Edward Newman, Roland Paris and Oliver P. Richmond, 267–291. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Galvanek, Janel B. Translating Peacebuilding Rationalities into Practice: Local Agency and Everyday Resistance. Berlin: Bergh of Foundation, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Goodhand, Jonathan, and David Hulme. “From Wars to Complex Political Emergencies: Understanding Conflict and Peace-building in the New World Disorder.” Third World Quarterly 20, no. 1 (1999): 13–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameiri, Shahar. “A Reality Check for the Critique of the Liberal Peace.” In A Liberal Peace? The Problems and Practices of Peacebuilding, edited by Susanna Campbell, David Chandler and Meera Sabaratnam, 191–208. London: Zed Books, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hameiri, Shahar. Regulating Statehood: State Building and the Transformation of the Global Order. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Heathershaw, John. “Towards Better Theories of Peacebuilding: Beyond the Liberal Peace Debate.” Peacebuilding 1, no. 2 (2013): 275–282.
   Google Scholar
• Heathershaw, John, and Daniel Lambach. “Introduction: Post-conflict Spaces and Approaches to Statebuilding.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 2, no. 3 (2008): 269–289.
   Google Scholar
• Hehir, Aidan. “Introduction: Intervention and Statebuilding in Kosovo.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 3, no. 2 (2009): 135–142.
   Google Scholar
• Hopgood, Stephen. “Reading the Small Print in Global Civil Society: The Inexorable Hegemony of the Liberal Self.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 29, no. 1 (2000): 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, Caroline, and Jane Hutchinson. “Development Effectiveness and the Politics of Commitment.” Third World Quarterly 33, no. 1 (2012): 17–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynek, Nik. “Rethinking Human Security: History, Economy, Governmentality.” In Critical Perspectives on Human Security: Rethinking Emancipation and Power in International Relations, edited by David Chandler and Nik Hynek, 157–171. London: Routledge, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Jabri, Vivienne. “Peacebuilding, the Local and the International: A Colonial or a Postcolonial Rationality?” Peacebuilding 1, no. 1 (2013): 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Jabri, Vivienne. War and the Transformation of Global Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Jabri, Vivienne. “War, Government, Politics: A Critical Response to the Hegemony of the Liberal Peace.” In Palgrave Advances in Peacebuilding: Critical Developments and Approaches, edited by Oliver P. Richmond, 41–57. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Jahn, Beate. “Kant, Mill, and Illiberal Legacies in International Affairs.” International Organization 59 (2005): 177–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahn, Beate. “The Tragedy of Liberal Diplomacy: Democratization, Intervention, Statebuilding (Part I).” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 1, no. 1 (2007): 87–106.
   Google Scholar
• Jahn, Beate. “The Tragedy of Liberal Diplomacy: Democratization, Intervention, Statebuilding (Part II).” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 1, no. 2 (2007): 211–229.
   Google Scholar
• Jarstad, Anna K., and Roberto Belloni. “Introducing Hybrid Peace Governance: Impact and Prospects of Liberal Peacebuilding.” Global Governance 18, no. 1 (2012): 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, Jonathan. “Globalization and Governmentality.” International Politics 43, no. 3 (2006): 402–418.
   Google Scholar
• Kapoor, Ilan. The Postcolonial Politics of Development. London: Routledge, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Kingfisher, Catherine. “Spatializing Neoliberalism: Articulations, Recapitulations, and (a Very Few) Alternatives.” In Neoliberalization: States, Networks, Peoples, edited by K England and K Ward, 195–222. Malden: Blackwell, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Körppen, Daniela. “Space beyond the Liberal Peacebuilding Consensus – A Systemic Perspective.” In The Non-linearity of Peace Processes: Theory and Practice of Systemic Conflict Transformation, edited by Daniela Körppen, Norbert Ropers and Hans J Giessmann, 77–96. Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kraushaar, Maren, and Daniel Lambach. Hybrid Political Orders: The Added Value of a New Concept. ACPACS Occasional Paper. Brisbane: ACPACS, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Larner, Wendy, and William Walters (eds.). Global Governmentality: Governing International Spaces. London: Routledge, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Lederach, John Paul. “Cultivating Peace: A Practitioner’s View of Deadly Conflict and Negotiation.” In Contemporary Peacemaking: Conflict, Violence and Peace Processes, edited by John Darby and Roger Mac Ginty, 30–37. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Lemay-Hébert, Nicolas. “The Bifurcation of the Two Worlds: Assessing the Gap between Internationals and Locals in State-building Processes.” Third World Quarterly 32, no. 10 (2011): 1823–1841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemay-Hébert, Nicolas, and Xavier Mathieu. “The OECD’s Discourse on Fragile States: Expertise and the Normalisation of Knowledge Production.” Third World Quarterly 35, no. 2 (2014): 232–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidén, Kristoffer. “Building Peace between Global and Local Politics: The Cosmopolitical Ethics of Liberal Peacebuilding.” International Peacekeeping 16, no. 5 (2009): 616–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger. “Hybrid Peace: How does Hybrid Peace come About.” In A Liberal Peace? The Problems and Practices of Peacebuilding, edited by Susanna Cambpell, David Chandler and M. Sabaratnam, 209–225. London: Zed Books, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger. “Hybrid Reconstruction: The Case of Waad in Lebanon.” In Hybrid Forms of Peace: From Everyday Agency to Post-liberalism, edited by Audra Mitchell and Oliver P. Richmond, 208–225. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger. “Roger. “Indigenous Peace-making versus the Liberal Peace”.” Cooperation and Conflict 43, no. 2 (2008): 139–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger. “Introduction: The Transcripts of Peace – Public, Hidden or Non-obvious?”.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 7, no. 4 (2013): 423–430.
   Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger, and Oliver P. Richmond. “The Local Turn in Peace Building: A Critical Agenda for Peace.” Third World Quarterly 34, no. 5 (2013): 763–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger, and Gurchathen Sanghera. “Hybridity in Peacebuilding and Development: An Introduction.” Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 7, no. 2 (2012): 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger, and Andrew Williams. Conflict and Development. London: Routledge, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, Gearoid. “Disaggregating Hybridity: Why Hybrid Institutions do not produce Predictable Experiences of Peace.” Journal of Peace Research 51, no. 4 (2012): 501–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Audra, and L. Kelly. “Peaceful Spaces? ‘Walking’ through the New Liminal Spaces of Peacebuilding and Development in North Belfast.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 36, no. 4 (2011): 307–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Audra, and Oliver P. Richmond. “Introduction – Towards a Post-liberal Peace: Exploring Hybridity via Everyday Forms of Resistance, Agency and Autonomy.” In Hybrid Forms of Peace: From Everyday Agency to Post-liberalism, edited by Audra Mitchell and Oliver P. Richmond, 1–38. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Mulaj, Klejda. “The Problematic Legitimacy of International-led statebuilding: Challenges of Uniting International and Local Interests in Post-conflict Kosovo.” Contemporary Politics 17, no. 3 (2011): 241–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdoch, Jonathan. Post-structuralist Geography: A Guide to Relational Space. London: Sage, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, Edward. “A Human Security Peace-building Agenda.” Third World Quarterly 32, no. 10 (2011): 1737–1756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paffenholz, Thania. “Civil Society beyond the Liberal Peace and its Critique.“ In A Liberal Peace? The Problems and Practices of Peacebuilding, edited by S. Campbell, David Chandler, and Meera Sabaratnam, 138–158. London: Zed Books, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, Roland. “Peacebuilding and the Limits of Liberal Internationalism.” International Security 22, no. 2 (1997): 54–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, Roland. “Saving Liberal Peacebuilding.” Review of International Studies 36, no. 2 (2010): 337–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, Jenny H. “A Conceptual Unpacking of Hybridity: Accounting for Notions of Power, Politics and Progress in Analyses of Aid-driven Interfaces.” Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 7, no. 2 (2012): 9–22.
   Google Scholar
• Pouligny, Beatrice. Peace Operations seen from Below: UN Missions and Local People. London: Hurst & Company, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, Michael. “Towards Life Welfare.” In New Perspectives on Liberal Peacebuilding, edited by Edward Newman, Roland Paris and Oliver P. Richmond, 78–96. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, Michael. “Transformation in the Political Economy of Bosnia since Dayton.” International Peacekeeping 12, no. 3 (2005): 448–462.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsbotham, Oliver. “Radical Disagreement and Systemic Conflict Transformation.” In The Non-linearity of Peace Processes: Theory and Practice of Systemic Conflict Transformation, edited by Daniela Körppen, Norbert Ropers and Hans J Giessmann, 57–76. Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. “Becoming Liberal, Unbecoming Liberalism: Liberal-Local Hybridity via the Everyday as a Response to the Paradoxes of Liberal Peacebuilding.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 3, no. 3 (2009): 324–344.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. “Foucault and the Paradox of Peace-as-Governance versus Everyday Agency.” International Political Sociology 4, no. 2 (2010): 199–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. Peace in International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. A Post-liberal Peace. London: Routledge, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. “A Post-liberal Peace: Eirenism and the Everyday.” Review of International Studies 35, no. 3 (2009): 557–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. “Reclaiming Peace in International Relations.” Millennium 36, no. 3 (2008): 439–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. “Resistance and the Post-liberal Peace.” Millennium 38, no. 3 (2010): 665–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. “Resistance and the Post-liberal Peace.” In A Liberal Peace? The Problems and Practices of Peacebuilding, edited by Susanna Campbell, David Chandler and Meera Sabaratnam, 226–244. London: Zed Books, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. “UN Peace Operations and the Dilemmas of the Peacebuilding Consensus.” International Peacekeeping 11, no. 1 (2004): 83–101.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P., and Jason Franks. “Liberal Hubris? Virtual Peace in Cambodia.” Security Dialogue 38, no. 1 (2007): 27–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P., and Roger Mac Ginty. “Where Now for the Critique of the Liberal Peace?” Cooperation and Conflict 50, no. 2 (2015): 171–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, David. Liberal Peacebuilding and Global Governance: Beyond the Metropolis. London: Routledge, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Robins, Simon. “An Empirical Approach to Post-conflict Legitimacy: Victims’ Needs and the Everyday.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 7, no. 1 (2013): 45–64.
   Google Scholar
• Sabaratnam, M. “IR in Dialogue … But can we change the Subjects? A Typology of Decolonising Strategies for the Study of World Politics.” Millennium 39, no. 3 (2011): 781–803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabaratnam, M. “Situated Critiques of Intervention: Mozambique and the Diverse Politics of Response.” In A Liberal Peace? The Problems and Practices of Peacebuilding, edited by Susanna Campbell, David Chandler and Meera Sabaratnam, 245–264. London: Zed Books, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Selby, Jan. “The Myth of Liberal Peace-building.” Conflict, Security & Development 13, no. 1 (2013): 57–86.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, Kamil. “The Failure of State Building and the Promise of State Failure: Reinterpreting the Security-Development Nexus in Haiti.” Third World Quarterly 30, no. 1 (2009): 17–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinko, Rosemary E. “Agonistic Peace: A Postmodern Reading.” Millennium 36, no. 3 (2008): 473–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smoljan, Jelena. “The Relationship between Peace Building and Development.” Conflict, Security & Development 3, no. 2 (2003): 233–250.
   Google Scholar
• Tadjbakhsh, Shahrbanou. “Introduction: Liberal Peace in Dispute.” In Rethinking the Liberal Peace: External Models and Local Alternatives, edited by Shahrbanou Tadjbakhsh, 1–16. London: Routledge, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Dianna. “Normativity and Normalization.” Foucault Studies, no. 7 (2009): 45–63.
   Google Scholar
• Vimalarajah, Luxshi, and Suthaharan Nadarajah. “Thinking Peace: Revisiting Analysis and Intervention in Sri Lanka.” In The Non-linearity of Peace Processes: Theory and Practice of Systemic Conflict Transformation, edited by Daniela Körppen, Norbert Ropers and Hans J Giessmann, 129–145. Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Visoka, Gezim. “Three Levels of Hybridisation Practices in Post-conflict Kosovo.” Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 7, no. 2 (2012): 23–36.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, Alison M. S. “Agency and the Everyday Activist” In Hybrid Forms of Peace: From Everyday Agency to Post-liberalism, edited by Audra Mitchell and Oliver P. Richmond, 39–57. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Wilde, Ralph. “Colonialism Redux? Territorial Administration by International Organizations, Colonial Echoes and the Legitimacy of the ‘International’.” In State-building: Theory and Practice, edited by Aidan Hehir and Neil Robinson, 29–49. London: Routledge, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Wiuff Moe, Louise. “Relationality and Pragmatism in Peacebuilding: Reflections on Somaliland.” In Relational Sensibility and the ‘Turn to the Local’: Prospects for the Future of Peacebuilding, edited by Wren Chadwick, Tobias Debiel and Frank Gadinger, 44–53. Duisburg: Kate Hamburger Kolleg/Centre for Global Cooperation Research, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, Stefan. “Post-conflict State Building: The Debate on Institutional Choice.” Third World Quarterly 32, no. 10 (2011): 1777–1802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar