Ethno-territorial rights and the resource extraction boom in Latin America: do constitutions matter?

Bibliography

• Collier, R. B., and S. Handlin (eds.). Reorganizing Popular Politics: Participation and the New Interest Regime in Latin America. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Correa Delgado, R. “Cadena Nacional sobre Iniciativa Yasuní ITT.” Televised speech. August 15, 2013. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFc1topfPqM.
   Google Scholar
• Dávalos, P. “‘No podemos ser mendigos sentados en un saco de oro’: las falacias del discurso extractivista.” In El Correísmo al desnudo, edited by J. Cuvi, D. Machado, A. Oviedo and Natalia Sierra, 190–215. Quito: Montecristi Vive, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. “Latin America at a Crossroads: Alternative Modernizations, or Post-Development?” Cultural Studies 24, no. 1 (2010): 1–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flesher Fominaya, C. Social Movements & Globalization: How Protests, Occupations & Uprisings are changing the World. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Fontana, L. P. “Indigenous Peoples vs. Peasant Unions: Land Conflicts and Rural Movements in Plurinational Bolivia.” Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 3 (2014): 297–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fundación Tierra. Marcha indígena por el TIPNIS: La lucha en defensa de los territorios. La Paz: Comunicaciones El País, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• García Linera, Á., Los desafíos del proceso de cambio en Bolivia. Conference, Centro Cultural de Cooperación Floreal Gorini, Buenos Aires. http://www.centrocultural.coop/videos/la-patria-grande-alvaro-garcia-linera--1-.html (accessed 27 June 27, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Gudynas, E. “El nuevo extractivismo progresista en América del Sur: tesis sobre un viejo problema bajo nuevas expresiones.” In Colonialismos del Siglo XXI: Negocios extractives y defense del territorio en América Latina, edited by VVAA. Barcelona: Icaria Editorial, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Gudynas, E. “Buen Vivir: Today’s Tomorrow.” Development 54 (2011): 441–447.
   Google Scholar
• Gudynas, E. “Estado compensador e nuevos extractivismos: Las ambivalencias del progresismo sudamericano.” Nueva Sociedad 237 (2012): 128–146.
   Google Scholar
• Gudynas, E. “El postdesarrollo como crítica y el Buen Vivir como alternativa.” In Buena Vida, Buen Vivir: imaginarios alternativos para el bien común de la humanidad, edited by GC Delgado Ramos, 61–95. Mexico City: UNAM, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Gudynas, E. Extractivismos: ecología, economía y política de un modo de entender el desarrollo y la naturaleza. Cochabamba: CLAES/CEDIB, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Guzmán, T. Native and National in Brazil: Indigeneity after Independence. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, C. “Neoliberal Multiculturalism: The Remaking of Cultural Rights and Racial Dominance in Central America.” POLAR. Political and Legal Anthropology Review 28, no. 1 (2005): 10–28.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, S. “From Eco-catastrophe to Zero Deforestation? Interdisciplinarities, Politics, Environmentalisms and Reduced Clearing in Amazonia.” Environmental Conservation 39, no. 1 (2011): 4–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochstetler, K., and M. Keck. Greening Brazil: Environmental Activism in State and Society. London: Duke University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Kröger, M. “Promotion of Contentious Agency as a Rewarding Movement Strategy: Evidence from the MST–Paper Industry Conflicts in Brazil.” Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 2 (2011): 435–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kröger, M. “Neo-mercantilist Capitalism and Post-2008 Cleavages in Economic Decision-making Power in Brazil.” Third World Quarterly 33, no. 5 (2012): 887–901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kröger, M. Contentious Agency and Natural Resource Politics. London: Routledge, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kröger, M. “O papel do estado brasileiro na criação de fronteira capitalista e novas naturezas no passado e futuro.” In Estado, burocracia e controle democrático, edited by C Santana and W Iglecias, 171–196. São Paulo: Alameda, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Lalander, R. “The Ecuadorian Resource Dilemma: Sumak Kawsay or Development?” Critical Sociology, December 23, 2014. doi: 10.1177/0896920514557959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalander, R. “Entre el ecocentrismo y el pragmatismo ambiental: consideraciones inductivas sobre desarrollo, extractivismo y los derechos de la naturaleza en Bolivia y Ecuador.” Revista Chilena de Derecho y Ciencia Política 6, no. 1 (2015): 109–152.
   Google Scholar
• Leite, I. “The Brazilian Quilombo: ‘Race’, Community and Land in Space and Time.” Journal of Peasant Studies (2015): doi:10.1080/03066150.2015.1016919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeish, J. A. “Extraction, Protest and Indigeneity in Bolivia: The TIPNIS Effect.” Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies 8, no. 2 (2013): 221–242.
   Google Scholar
• Nolte, D., and A. Schilling-Vacaflor (eds.). New Constitutionalism in Latin America: Promises and Practices. Farnham: Ashgate, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Nolte, C., A. Agrawal, K. Silvius, and B. Soares-Filho. “Governance Regime and Location Influence avoided Deforestation Success of Protected Areas in the Brazilian Amazon.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, no. 13 (2013): 4956–4961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz, T. P. “Justicia comunitaria y pluralismo jurídico en América Latina: una panorámica de cuarto de siglo.” IWGIA, Quito, 2014. http://repositorio.uasb.edu.ec/handle/10644/4003.
   Google Scholar
• Rosales, A. “Going Underground: The Political Economy of the ‘Left Turn’ in South America.” Third World Quarterly 34, no. 8 (2013): 1443–1457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling-Vacaflor, A. “Prior Consultations in Plurinational Bolivia: Democracy, Rights and Real Life Experiences.” Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies 8, no. 2 (2013): 202–220.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling-Vacaflor, A., and R. Kuppe. “Plurinational Constitutionalism: A New Era of Indigenous-State Relations?” In New Constitutionalism in Latin America: Promises and Practices, edited by D Nolte and A Schilling-Vacaflor, 347–370. Farnham: Ashgate, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. The New Transnational Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Valenta, L. “Disconnect: The 1988 Brazilian Constitution, Customary International Law, and Indigenous Land Rights in Northern Brazil.” Texas International Law Journal 38, no. 4 (2003): 643–662.
   Google Scholar
• Van Cott, D. L. “Constitutional Reform in the Andes: Redefining Indigenous-State Relations.” In Multiculturalism in Latin America: Indigenous Rights, Diversity and Democracy, edited by R Sieder, 45–73. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Van Cott, D. L. The Friendly Liquidation of the Past: The Politics of Diversity in Latin America. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Vergara-Camus, L. “Neoliberal Globalization, Peasant Movements, Alternative Development and the State in Brazil and Mexico.” PhD dissertation, Department of Political Science, York University, Toronto, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Yashar, D. Contesting Citizenship in Latin America: The Rise of Indigenous Movements and the Postliberal Challenge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar