Recalcitrant spoiler? Contesting dominant accounts of India’s role in global trade governance

Bibliography

• Alejandro, Lisa, et al. “Overview and Examination of the Indian Services Sector.” International Trade Commission, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• BBC. 2008. “World Trade Talks End in Collapse.” July 29.
   Google Scholar
• Bjerga, Alan, and Julie Bykowicz. 2014. “A Farm Bill Only a Lobbyist Could Love.” Bloomberg, January 30.
   Google Scholar
• Biswas, S. Nuclear Desire. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2014.10.5749/minnesota/9780816680979.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Bukovansky, Mlada. “Institutionalized Hypocrisy and the Politics of Agricultural Trade.” In Constructing the International Economy, edited by Rawi Abdelal, Mark Blyth, and Craig Parsons, 68–89. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Castañeda, Jorge. “Not Ready for Prime Time.” Foreign Affairs 89, no. 5 (2010): 109–122.
   Google Scholar
• Chadee, Doren, Revti Raman, and Snejina Michailova. “Sources of Competitiveness of Offshore IT Service Providers in India.” Competition & Change 15, no. 3 (2011): 196–220.10.1179/102452911X13046725211256
   Google Scholar
• Chanda, Rupa, and G. Sasidaran. “GATS and Developments in India’s Service Sector.” In India’s Liberalization Experience, edited by Suparna Karmakar, Rajiv Kumar and Bibek Debroy, 169–212. New Delhi: Sage, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, Gregory. “The State of the Art: Trends in the Study of the BRICS and Multilateral Organizations.” In Rising Powers and Multilateral Institutions, edited by Dries Lesage and Thijs Van de Graaf, 19–41. London: Palgrave, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Das, Runa. “A Post-Colonial Analysis of India–US Nuclear Security.” Journal of Asian and African Studies (2015): 741–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, L. R. “Labour Mobility and the WTO: The Limits of GATS Mode 4.” International Migration 52, no. 6 (2013): 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Shutter, Olivier. “The WTO and the Post-Global Food Crisis Agenda.” UN Special Rapporteur, Briefing Note 4, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Downes, Gerard. “China and India - the New Powerhouses of the Semi-Periphery?” In Globalization and the ‘New’ Semi-Peripheries, edited by Owen Worth and Phoebe Moore, 102–119. New York: Palgrave, 2009.10.1057/9780230245167
   Google Scholar
• Eagleton-Pierce, Matthew. Symbolic Power in the World Trade Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199662647.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Economic Times. 2013. “2.97 Million Professionals Employed in IT-ITES Sector.” May 3.
   Google Scholar
• Efstathopoulos, Charalampos, and Dominic Kelly. “India, Developmental Multilateralism and the Doha Ministerial Conference.” Third World Quarterly 35, no. 6 (2014): 1066–1081.10.1080/01436597.2014.907728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, Jane. A Social Theory of the WTO. London: Palgrave, 2003.10.1057/9781403943712
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, Kevin. “Understanding Developing Country Resistance to the Doha Round.” Review of International Political Economy 15, no. 1 (2008): 62–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, K., and C. N. Murphy (eds.). Rising Powers and the Future of Global Governance. New York: Routledge, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Guardian. 2008. “WTO Talks Collapse after India and China Clash with America over Farm Products.” July 30.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, Surupa and Sumit Ganguly. 2014. “Modi Bets the Farm.” Foreign Affairs. August 12.
   Google Scholar
• Hannah, Erin, and James Scott. “From Palais De Nations to Centre William Rappard: Raúl Prebisch and UNCTAD as Sources of Ideas in the GATT/WTO.” In The Global Political Economy of Raúl Prebisch, edited by Matias E. Margulis, 116–134. New York: Routledge, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Hoekman, Bernard, and Aaditya Mattoo. “Services, Economic Development and the Doha Round.” In The WTO after Hong Kong, edited by Donna Lee and Rorden Wilkinson, 169–185. New York: Routledge, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Hopewell, Kristen. Breaking the WTO: How Emerging Powers Disrupted the Neoliberal Project. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• ICTSD. National Agricultural Policies, Trade, and the New Multilateral Agenda. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• India. “Plurilateral Request on Cross-Border Supply.” Presentation by Krishna Gupta, Government of India, Geneva, April 23–27, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Jha, Veena, James Nedumpara, Abhijit Das, Kailas Karthikeyan, and Shailaja Thakur. “Services Liberalisation.” In India and the Doha Work Programme, edited by Veena Jha, 143–219. New Delhi: MacMillan, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, A. I. “Is China a Status Quo Power?” International Security 27, no. 4 (2003): 5–56.10.1162/016228803321951081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Emily, and Claire Weinhardt. “Echoes of Colonialism in Trade Negotiations between the European Union and African, Caribbean and Pacific Countries.” In Echoes of Empire, edited by K. S. Nicolaidis, B. Sebe, and G. Maas, 225–248. London: I.B. Tauris, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, Shangrila. “Postcoloniality and the North–South Binary Revisited: The Case of India’s Climate Politics.” In International Handbook of Political Ecology, edited by R. L. Bryant, 117–130. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Jurje, Flavia, and Sandra Lavenex. “Rising Powers’ Venue-Shopping on International Mobility.” NCCR Trade Working Paper No 3, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kanth, R. D. 2008. “Revised Text Needed for Doha Round Success.” Business Standard. May 8.
   Google Scholar
• Margulis, Matias E. “Trading out of the Global Food Crisis?” Geopolitics 19, no. 2 (2014): 322–350.10.1080/14650045.2014.920233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L. “GATS, Migration, and Labor Standards.” ILO Discussion Paper 165, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Narlikar, Amrita, and Diana Tussie. “The G20 at the Cancun Ministerial: Developing Countries and Their Evolving Coalitions in the WTO.” World Economy 27, no. 7 (2004): 947–966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NASSCOM. IT-BPO Sector in India. New Delhi: National Association of Software and Service Companies, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Nayak, M. V., and C. Malone. “American Orientalism and American Exceptionalism: A Critical Rethinking of US Hegemony.” International Studies Review 11, no. 2 (2009): 253–276.10.1111/misr.2009.11.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick, S. “Irresponsible Stakeholders? The Difficulty of Integrating Rising Powers.” Foreign Affairs 89, no. 6 (2010): 44–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, T. V. (ed.). Accommodating Rising Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Rachman, Gideon. 2016. “War and Peace in Asia.” Financial times, August 5.
   Google Scholar
• Raman, Revti, and Doren Chadee. “A Comparative Assessment of the Information Technology Services Sector in India and China.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 41, no. 3 (2011): 452–469.10.1080/00472336.2011.582714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RBI. 2010. “Remittances from Overseas Indians.” Reserve Bank of India, Monthly Bulletin, April.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, James. “The Role of Southern Intellectuals in Contemporary Trade Governance.” New Political Economy 20, no. 5 (2015): 633–652.10.1080/13563467.2014.951615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, James, and Rorden Wilkinson. “China Threat? Evidence from the WTO.” Journal of World Trade 47, no. 4 (2013): 761–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrano, Omar. “China and India’s Insertion in the Intellectual Property Rights Regime: Sustaining or Disrupting the Rules?” New Political Economy (2016): 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J. P. Sweet Talk: Paternalism and Collective Action in North–South Trade Relations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, Aseema. “Partial Accommodation without Conflict: India as a Rising Link Power.” In Accommodating Rising Powers, edited by TV Paul, 222–245. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.10.1017/CBO9781316460191
   Google Scholar
• Stephen, Matthew D. “Rising Powers, Global Capitalism and Liberal Global Governance.” European Journal of International Relations 20, no. 4 (2014): 912–938.10.1177/1354066114523655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, Richard. “In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining in the GATT/WTO.” International Organization 56, no. 2 (2002): 339–374.10.1162/002081802320005504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strange, Michael. Writing Global Trade Governance. New York: Routledge, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Subramanian, Arvind. India’s WTO Problem. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, Oliver. “China, India and the US Rebalance to the Asia Pacific.” Geopolitics 21, no. 4 (2016): 922–944.10.1080/14650045.2016.1190708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winters, L. A., T. L. Walmsley, Z. K. Wang, and R. Grynberg. “Liberalising Temporary Movement of Natural Persons.” World Economy 26, no. 8 (2003): 1137–1161.10.1111/1467-9701.00566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. Sustaining India’s Services Revolution. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2012. “Developing Countries to Receive over $400 Billion in Remittances in 2012.” Press Release, November 20.
   Google Scholar
• WTO. “Revised Draft Modalities for Agriculture.” TN/AG/W/4/Rev.4. 2008.
   Google Scholar
• WTO. “Trade Profiles.” 2013.
   Google Scholar
• WTO. “World Trade Report.” 2010.
   Google Scholar