The communitarian revolutionary subject: new forms of social transformation

Bibliography

• Álvarez, S. E., E. Dagnino, and A. Escobar. Culture of Politics, Politics of Culture: Re-visioning Latin American Social Movements. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Ameso, E. A., S. A. Bukachi, C. O. Olungah, T. Haller, S. Wandibba, and S. Nangendo. “Pastoral Resilience among the Maasai Pastoralists of Laikipia County, Kenya.” Land 7 (2018): 78. doi: 10.3390/land7020078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C., C. Buchanan, M. Chang, J. Sanchez Rodriguez, and T. Wakeford, eds. Everyday Experts: How People’s Knowledge Can Transform the Food System. Coventry: Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience, Coventry University, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Armenta, W. “Acumulación de capital extra-económica en el México rural. Cuetzalan del Progreso, Puebla” [“Accumulation of Non-monetary Capital in Rural Mexico”]. PhD diss., Economic Sciences, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Arsel, M., B. Hogenboom, and L. Pelligrini, eds. “The Extractive Boom in Latin America.” Special Issue. The Extractive Industries and Society 3, no. 4 (2016): 880–1129. doi: 10.1016/j.exis.2016.10.014.
   Google Scholar
• Baran, P. “On the Evolution of Economic Surplus.” [In Spanish.] El Trimestre Económico 25, no. 4 (100) (1958): 735–748. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20855461
   Google Scholar
• Baran, P. The Political Economy of Growth. New York: Monthly Review, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Barkin, D. De La Protesta a La Propuesta: 50 años imaginando y construyendo el futuro [From Protest to Proposal: 50 Years of Imagining and Building the Future]. México: Siglo XXI Editores, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Barkin, D. “Communities Constructing Their Own Alternatives in the Face of Crisis.” Mountain Research and Development 32, (Suppl.) (2012): S12–S22. doi:MRD-JOURNAL-D-11-00088.S1. doi: 10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-11-00088.S1.
   Google Scholar
• Barkin, D. Innovaciones Mexicanas en el Manejo del Agua [Mexican Innovations in Water Management]. México: Centro de Ecología y Desarrollo, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Barkin, D. “Overcoming the Neoliberal Paradigm: Sustainable Popular Development.” Journal of Developing Societies 16, no. 2 (2000): 163–180. doi: 10.1163/156852200512030.
   Google Scholar
• Barkin, D. “Radical Ecological Economics,” ch. 3.1. In Imperiled Economies: 2018, edited by P. Cooney, A. Davis, J. Huato, P. Quick, G. Schneider, R. Vasudevan, and M. Vernengo, 101–113. Boston: Dollars and Sense, 2018. http://www.radicalecologicaldemocracy.org/radical-ecological-economics/
   Google Scholar
• Barkin, D., W. Armenta, D. Cabrera, E. Carcaño, and G. Parra. “Social Capacity for Surplus Management: Building Alternative Societies,” 543–557. [In Spanish.] In La UAM ante la Sucesión Presidencial, edited by F. Novelo. México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Xochimilco, División de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 2011. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304542041_Capacidad_social_para_la_gestion_del_excedente_la_construccion_de_sociedades_alternativas.
   Google Scholar
• Barkin, D., and B. Lemus. “Local Solutions for Environmental Justice.” In Environmental Governance in Latin America: Conflicts, Projects and Possibilities, edited by F. De Castro, B. Hogenboom, and M. Baud, 257–286. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-1-137-50572-9_11.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Baronnet, B., M. Mora Bayo, and R. Stahler-Sholk, eds. Luchas “muy otras”: Zapatismo y autonomía en las comunidades indígenas de Chiapas [Other Peoples’ Struggles: Zapatismo and Autonomy in the Indigenous Communities of Chiapas]. México: UAM–Xochimilco, CIESAS y Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas, 2011. https://zapatismoyautonomia.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/luchas-muy-otras-2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bartra, A., and G. Otero. “Indian Peasant Movements in Mexico: The Struggle for Land, Autonomy and Democracy.” In Reclaiming the Land: The Resurgence of Rural Movements in Africa, Asia and Latin America, edited by S. Moyo and P. Yeros, 383–409. London: Zed Books, 2005. https://www.sahistory.org.za/sites/default/files/file%20uploads%20/sam_moyo_paris_yeros_reclaiming_the_land_the_rbookos.org_.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Baschet, J. Resistencia, Rebelión, Insurrección. Conceptos y fenómenos fundamentales de nuestro tiempo [Resistance, Rebellion, Insurrection. Concepts and Fundamental Phenomena of Our Time]. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Beaucage, P. “Belleza, placer y sufrimiento: reflexiones sobre cuerpo y género entre los nahuas de la Sierra Norte de Puebla.” Culturas y Representaciones Sociales 6, no. 12 (2012): 165–196. http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/crs/article/download/30479/28292
   Google Scholar
• Bengoa, J. La emergencia indígena en América Latina [Indigenous Emergence in Latin America]. 3rd ed. Santiago: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Berkes, F. Sacred Ecology. 4th ed. Abington: Routledge, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Bonfil-Batalla, G. México Profundo: Reclaiming a Civilization. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1996 [1987].
   Google Scholar
• Borras Jr., S. M., M. Edelman, and C. Kay. Transnational Agrarian Movements Confronting Globalization. London: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Borrini-Feyerabend, G., M. Pimbert, T. Farvar, A. Kothari, and Y. Renard. Sharing Power: Learning by Doing in Co-management of Natural Resources throughout the World. London: Earthscan, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Borsatto, R. S., and V. F. Souza-Esquerdo. “MST’s Experience in Leveraging Agroecology in Rural Settlements: Lessons, Achievements, and Challenges.” Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems Online (2019). doi: 10.1080/21683565.2019.1615024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce, J., S. Narain, and E. Stanton, eds. Reclaiming Nature: Environmental Justice and Ecological Restoration. New York: Anthem, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Carcaño, Valencia, E. “Las mujeres indígenas en la Nueva Ruralidad Comunitaria (NRC) y su implicación en la generación de excedentes. El caso de la organización Masehualsihuamej Monsenyolchicahuanij” [“Women in the New Communitarian Rurality”]. PhD diss., Economic Sciences, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Caycedo, J. The Historical Subject and Its Complexity. [In Spanish.] Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 1999. http://www.cronicon.net/paginas/Documentos/No.39.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Coalition Against Land Grabbing (CALG). Defending Commons’ Land and ICCAs. Palawan, Philippines: CALG, 2018. https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/16abfd_c3e762deb8ad41f1a64d139b95ab2e5c.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Desmarais, Annette-Aurélie. La Vía Campesina: Globalization and the Power of Peasants. London: Pluto Press. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Enlace Zapatista. “May the Earth Tremble at Its Core.” 2016. http://enlacezapatista.ezln.org.mx/2016/10/18/may-the-earth-tremble-at-its-core/
   Google Scholar
• Enlace Zapatista. “What Is Missing Is yet to Come.” 2018. http://enlacezapatista.ezln.org.mx/2018/05/06/whats-missing-is-yet-to-come/
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A., F. Demaria, A. Kothari, and A. Salleh, eds. Pluriverse: The Post-Development Dictionary. Delhi and Chicago: Authors Up Front and University of Chicago Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Esteva, G. “Time to Enclose the Enclosers with Marx and Illich.” The International Journal of Illich Studies 4, no. 1 (2015): 70–96.
   Google Scholar
• Esteva, G. “The Zapatistas and People’s Power.” Capital & Class 68 (1999): 153–183. doi: 10.1177/030981689906800108.
   Google Scholar
• Esteva, G., S. Babones, and P. Babcicky. The Future of Development: A Radical Manifesto. Bristol: Policy Press/Bristol University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, K. N. “Snow White and the Wicked Problems of the West.” Science, Technology & Human Values 38, no. 3 (2011): 334–361. doi: 10.1177/0162243910385796.
   Google Scholar
• Fenelon, J. V., and T. D. Hall. “Revitalization and Indigenous Resistance to Globalization and Neoliberalism.” American Behavioral Scientist 51, no. 12 (2008):1867–1901. doi: 10.1177/0002764208318938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzwater, D. E. Autonomy Is in Our Hearts: Zapatista Autonomous Government through the Lens of the Tsotsil Language. Oakland: PM Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, S. O., and J. Ravetz. “Science for the Post-Normal Age.” Futures 25 (1993): 739–755. doi: 10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnett, S. T., N. D. Burgess, J. E. Fa, Á. Fernández-Llamazares, Z. Molnár, C. J. Robinson, J. E. M. Watson, et al. “A Spatial Overview of the Global Importance of Indigenous Lands for Conservation.” Nature Sustainability 1, no. 7 (2018): 369–374. doi: 10.1038/s41893-018-0100-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K., J. Cameron, and S. Healy. Take Back the Economy: An Ethical Guide for Transforming Our Communities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales, T., and M. González, eds. “Introduction: Indigenous Peoples and Autonomy in Latin America.” Special Issue. Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies 10, no. 1 (2015): 1–9. doi: 10.1080/17442222.2015.1034437.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. “‘Listen, Anarchist!’ A Personal Response to Simon Springer’s ‘Why a Radical Geography Must Be Anarchist.’” Dialogues in Human Geography 7, no. 3 (2017): 233–250. doi: 10.1177/2043820617732876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. “Marxism, Metaphors, and Ecological Politics.” Monthly Review 49, no. 11 (1998): 17–31. doi: 10.14452/MR-049-11-1998-04_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huanacuni Mamani, F. Buen Vivir/Vivir Bien. Filosofía, políticas, estrategias y experiencias regionales andinas [Philosophy, Politics, Strategies and Regional Andean Experiences]. Lima: CAOI, 2010. https://www.escr-net.org/sites/default/files/Libro%20Buen%20Vivir%20y%20Vivir%20Bien_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Illich, I. Tools for Conviviality. London: Calder and Boyers, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Kovach, M. Indigenous Methodologies: Characteristics, Conversations, and Contexts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, M., C.-D. König, and A.-C. Regelmann. Alternatives in a World of Crisis: Seeking Alternatives beyond Development. Brussels: Rosa-Luxemburg Foundation, 2018. https://www.rosalux.eu/publications/alternatives-in-a-world-of-crisis/
   Google Scholar
• Lenkersdorf, C. Cosmovisiones [Cosmovisions]. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 1998. https://alfarcolectivo.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/cosmovisiones.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Linsalata, L. “De la defensa del territorio maseual a la reinvención comunitario-popular de la política: crónica de una lucha” [“From Maseual Territorial Defense to the Communitarian: Popular Reinvention of Politics”]. Estudios Latinoamericanos 40 (2017): 117–136.
   Google Scholar
• Little, D. “Marx on Peasant Consciousness.” 2015. http://understandingsociety.blogspot.com/2015/09/marx-on-peasant-consciousness.html
   Google Scholar
• Lönnqvist, L. Morral de experiencias para la seguridad y soberanía alimentarias: Aprendizajes de organizaciones civiles en el sureste mexicano [Handbag of Experiences for Food Security and Sovereignty]. San Cristobal, Mexico and Santa Cruz, CA: EcoSur/Community Agroecology Network, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez Luna, J. Comunalidad y Desarrollo [Communality and Development]. Oaxaca: Conaculta-Culturas Populares e Indígenas y Centro de Apoyo al Movimiento Popular Oaxaqueño, AC, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. Precapitalist Economic Formations. 2015. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1857/precapitalist/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K., and F. Engels. Communist Manifesto. 2010. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch01.htm#007
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, D., J. Randers, and D. Meadows. Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update. London: Earthscan, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Nations, J. D. “Naming the Dragonfly: Why Indigenous Languages Matter in the 21st Century.” Langscape 5, no. 1 (2016): 20–24. https://medium.com/langscape-magazine/naming-the-dragonfly-why-indigenous-languages-matter-in-the-21st-century-885025c8cbc1
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, J. “Capitalism, Nature, Socialism: A Theoretical Introduction.” Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 1, no. 1 (1988): 11–38. http://www.columbia.edu/~lnp3/second_contradiction.htm
   Google Scholar
• Oldekop, J. A., K. Sims, B. Karna, M. Whittingham, and A. Agrawal. “Reductions in Deforestation and Poverty from Decentralized Forest Management in Nepal.” Nature Sustainability 2 (2019): 421–428. doi: 10.1038/s41893-019-0277-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palerm, A. Obras hidráulicas prehispánicas en el sistema lacustre del Valle de México [Prehispanic Waterworks in the Lake System of the Mexico City Valley]. México: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Centro de Investigaciones Superiores, Seminario de Etnohistoria del Valle de México, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Palerm, J. “A Comparative History, from the 16th to 20th Centuries, of Irrigation Water Management in Spain, Mexico, Chile, Mendoza (Argentina) and Peru.” Water Policy 12, no. 6 (2010): 779–797. doi: 10.2166/wp.2010.110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Participación de la Comisión Sexta del EZLN. El Pensamiento Crítico Frente a la Hidra Capitalista, Volumen 1 [Critical Thought in the Face of the Capitalist Hydra, Volume 1]. Mexico: UAM-Xochimilco, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Petras, J., and H. Veltmeyer. “Are Latin American Peasant Movements Still a Force for Change? Some New Paradigms Revisited.” Journal of Peasant Studies 28, no. 2 (2001): 83–118. doi: 10.1080/03066150108438767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petras, J., and H. Veltmeyer, eds. Extractive Imperialism in the Americas: Capitalism’s New Frontier, Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Pimbert, M. P. ed. Food Sovereignty, Agroecology and Biocultural Diversity: Constructing and Contesting Knowledge. London: Routledge, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press, 1944 [2001].
   Google Scholar
• Porto-Gonçalves, C. W., and E. Leff. “Political Ecology in Latin America: The Social Re-Appropriation of Nature, the Reinvention of Territories and the Construction of an Environmental Rationality.” Desenvolvimento e Meio Amiente 35 (2015): 65–88. http://revistas.ufpr.br/made/article/viewFile/43543/27087
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Wallenius, C. A., ed. Defensa comunitaria del territorio en la zona central de México, Enfoques teóricos y análisis de experiencias [Communitarian Defence of Territory in Central Mexico]. Mexico: Juan Pablos Editor, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Rosset, P. M., and A. Khadse. “Zero Budget Natural Farming in India – from Inception to Institutionalization.” Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems Online (2019). doi: 10.1080/21683565.2019.1608349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosset, P. M., V. Val, L. Barbosa, and N. McCune. “Agroecology and La Vía Campesina II. Peasant Agroecology Schools and the Formation of a Sociohistorical and Political Subject.” Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems Online (2019). doi: 10.1080/21683565.2019.1617222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saed. “Rojava.” Capitalism Nature Socialism 26, no. 1 (2015): 1–15. doi: 10.1080/10455752.2015.1006948.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Serna de la Garza, M. E., and D. C. Martínez Garcés. “Integralidad en la responsabilidad social empresarial: caso de la cooperativa Tosepan Titataniske.” Otra Economía 3, no. 4 (2009): 122–139. http://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/otraeconomia/article/view/1128/307
   Google Scholar
• Shattuck, A., C. Schiavoni, and Z. VanGelder. The Politics of Food Sovereignty: Concept, Practice and Social Movements. London: Routledge, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Silva Rivera, E., M. del Carmen Vergara Tenorio, and E. Rodríguez Luna, eds. Casos Exitosos en la Construcción de Sociedades Sustentables [Successful Cases in Building Sustainable Societies]. Xalapa, Veracruz: Universidad Veracruzana, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. T. The Challenges of Kaupapa Maori Research in the 21st Century. Wellington, NZ: New Zealand Council for Educational Research, 2011. http://www.nzcer.org.nz/system/files/Hui_Procedings__v3_Web_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. T. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. 2nd ed. London: Zed Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. “The Revolutionary Imperative.” Antipode 41, no. S1 (2010): 50–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00716.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SOCLA (Latin American Scientific Society of Agroecology). “Scaling up Agroecology to Contribute to the Sustainable Development Goals.” 2018. https://foodfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Final-2018-Statement-of-The-Latin-American-Scientific-Society-of-Agroecology-SOCLA-regarding-FAO%E2%80%99s-2nd-International-Sympos.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, C., R. Winterbottom, K. Reytar, and J. Springer. Securing Rights, Combating Climate Change: How Strengthening Community Forest Rights Mitigates Climate Change. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Toledo, V. Ecocidio en México. La batalla final es por la vida [Ecocide in Mexico. The Final Battle Is for Life]. México: Grijalbo, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Toledo, V., and N. Barrera-Bassols. “Political Agroecology in Mexico: A Path toward Sustainability.” Sustainability 9, no. 2 (2017): art. 268. doi: 10.3390/su9020268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toledo, V., and B. Ortiz-Espejel. México, Regiones que caminan hacia la sustentabilidad [Mexico, Regions that Advance towards Sustainability]. Puebla: Universidad Iberoamericana, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Val, V., P. Rosset, C. Zamora Lomeli, O. Giraldo, and D. Rocheleau. “Agroecology and La Vía Campesina I. The Symbolic and Material Construction of Agroecology through the Dispositive of ‘Peasant-to-Peasant’ Processes.” Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems Online (2019). doi: 10.1080/21683565.2019.1600099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergara-Camus, L. “The MST and the EZLN Struggle for Land: New Forms of Peasant Rebellions.” Journal of Agrarian Change 9, no. 3 (2009): 365–393. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2009.00216.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villoro, L. De la libertad a la comunidad [On the Freedom of Community]. México: FCE-ITESM. Cuadernos de la Cátedra Alfonso Reyes, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Villoro, L. “Sobre el concepto de revolución” [“On the Concept of Revolution”]. Revista del Centro de Estudios Constitucionales, no. 11 (1992): 277–290. http://www.cepc.gob.es/publicaciones/revistas/revistaselectronicas?IDR=15&IDN=1240&IDA=35439
   Google Scholar
• Wen, T., K. Lau, C. Cheng, J. Qui, and H. He. “Ecological Civilization, Indigenous Culture, and Rural Reconstruction in China.” Monthly Review 63, no. 9 (2012): 29–44. http://monthlyreview.org/2012/02/01/ecological-civilization-indigenous-culture-and-rural-reconstruction-in-china/
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. Research Is Ceremony. Halifax, NS: Fernwood Publishing, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, E. R. Europe and the People without History. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, E. R. Peasant Wars of the Twentieth Century. New York: Harper & Row, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Wrenn, M., and W. Waller. “Care and the Neoliberal Individual.” Journal of Economic Issues 52, no. 2 (2017): 495–502. doi: 10.1080/00213624.2017.1321438.
   Google Scholar
• Zermeño, S. Reconstruir a México en el Siglo XXI: Estrategias para mejorar la calidad de vida y enfrentar la destrucción del medio ambiente [Reconstruct Mexico in the 21st Century: Strategies to Improve the Quality of Life and Confront the Destruction of the Environment]. México: Océano, 2015.
   Google Scholar