What if the subaltern speaks? Traditional knowledge policies in Brazil and India

Bibliography

• Allegretti, M. “A Construção Social de Políticas Públicas. Chico Mendes e o Movimento Dos Seringueiros.” Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente 18 (2008): 39–59. doi:10.5380/dma.v18i0.13423.
   Google Scholar
• Azevedo, C. M. d. A. “Regulation to Access to Genetic Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge in Brazil.” Biota Neotropica 5, no. 1 (2005): 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Barpujari, I., and U. K. Sarma. “Traditional Knowledge in the Time of Neo-Liberalism: Access and Benefit-Sharing Regimes in India and Bhutan.” International Indigenous Policy Journal 8, no. 1 (2017): 1–22. doi:10.18584/iipj.2017.8.1.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benford, R. T., and D. A. Snow. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26, no. 1 (2000): 611–639. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhabha, H. K. “Freedom’s Basis in the Indeterminate.” October 61 (1992): 46–57. doi:10.2307/778784.
   Google Scholar
• Bhabha, H. K. “Of Mimicry and Man: The Ambivalence of Colonial Discourse.” October 28 (1984): 125–133. doi:10.2307/778467.
   Google Scholar
• Bhabha, H. K. “Signs Taken for Wonders: Questions of Ambivalence and Authority under a Tree outside Delhi, May 1817.” Critical Inquiry 12, no. 1 (1985): 144–165. doi:10.1086/448325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borde, R. “How Popular Culture at Different Scales Influenced the Representation of the Nature Religiosity of the Indigenous People in the Niyamgiri Movement in India.” In Protecting Indigenous Land from Mining. A Study of Activist Representations of Indigenous People, in the Context of Anti-Mining Movements, with a Focus on an Indian Case, 31–44. PhD thesis, Wageningen: Wageningen University, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Borras, S. M., Jr., T. Moreda, A. Alonso-Fradejas, and Z. W. Brent. “Converging Social Justice Issues and Movements: Implications for Political Actions and Research.” Third World Quarterly 39, no. 7 (2018): 1227–1246. doi:10.1080/01436597.2018.1491301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortoluci, J. H., and R. S. Jansen. “Toward a Postcolonial Sociology: The View from Latin America.” Postcolonial Sociology 24 (2013): 199–229.
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, S. Der Schutz von Genetischen Ressourcen Und Indigenem Wissen in Lateinamerika. Baden Baden: Nomos, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Byrd, J. A., and M. Rothberg. “Between Subalternity and Indigeneity: Critical Categories for Postcolonial Studies.” Interventions 13, no. 1 (2011): 1–12. doi:10.1080/1369801X.2011.545574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cott, D. L. v. “Indigenous Peoples’ Politics in Latin America.” Annual Review of Political Science 13 (2010): 385–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Cruz, J. G., and Sayago, D. A. V. “Povos Indígenas no Cenário das Discussões sobre Desenvolvimento Sustentável: Conctextualização das Propostas dos Povos Indígenas do Alto Rio Negro.” Somanlu. Revista de Estudos Amazônicos 12, no. 1 (2012): 41–59.
   Google Scholar
• Drahos, P. Intellectual Property, Indigenous People and Their Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Dutfield, G. “Protecting the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: Can Prior Informed Consent Help?” In Indigenous Peoples, Consent and Benefit Sharing, edited by R. Wynberg, D. Schroeder, and R. Chennels, 53–67. Berlin: Springer, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Dutfield, G. “TRIPS-Related Aspects of Traditional Knowledge.” Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 33 (2001): 233–275.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, Z. “Labor, Agency, and State‐Building in Trinidad and Tobago: Toward a Postcolonial Sociological Approach to Development.” Journal of Historical Sociology 31, no. 2 (2017): 134–153. doi:10.1111/johs.12168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eimer, T., and T. Bartels. “From Consent to Consultation? Indigenous Rights and the New Environmental Constitutionalism.” Environmental Politics (2019). doi:10.1080/09644016.2019.1595884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, K. The Elusive Promise of Indigenous Development. Durham: Duke University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. “Imagining a Post-Development Era? Critical Thought, Development and Social Movements.” Social Text, 31/32 (1992): 20–56. doi:10.2307/466217.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. Territories of Difference. Place, Movements, Life, Redes. Durham: Duke University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Faizi, S., and P. K. Nair. “Adivasis: The World’s Largest Population of Indigenous People.” Development 59, no. 3–4 (2017): 350–353. doi:10.1057/s41301-017-0115-8.
   Google Scholar
• Fanon, F. The Wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove Press, 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, L. Postcolonial Theory. A Critical Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Grosfoguel, R. “Decolonizing Post-Colonial Studies and Paradigms of Political-Economy: Transmodernity, Decolonial Thinking, and Global Coloniality.” Transmodernity: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World 1, no. 1 (2011): 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Guha, R. “Gramsci in India: Homage to a Teacher.” Journal of Modern Italian Studies 16, no. 2 (2011): 288–295. doi:10.1080/1354571X.2011.542989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guha, R. “Neel‐Darpan: The Image of a Peasant Revolt in a Liberal Mirror.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 2, no. 1 (1974): 1–46. doi:10.1080/03066157408437914.
   Google Scholar
• Guzmán, T. D. “Subalternidade e Soberania: Autorepresentação Indígena e a Reformulação da Política Nacional.” 2011. Accessed September 20, 2013. http://alainet.org/active/51026&lang=es
   Google Scholar
• Hadden, J. Networks in Contention. The Divisive Politics of Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hathaway, D. “A Biopirateria No Brasil.” Sob o Signo Das Bios: Reflexões No Brasil 1 (2004): 39–49.
   Google Scholar
• Henne, K. “Multi-Sited Fieldwork in Regulatory Studies.” In Regulatory Theory, edited by P. Drahos, 97–116. Acton: ANU Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Hufty, M., T. Schulz, and M. Tschopp. “The Role of Switzerland in the Nagoya Protocol Negotiations.” In Access to and Benefit-Sharing after the Nagoya Protocol, edited by S. Oberthür and G. K. Rosendal, 116–133. London: Routlege, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kapoor, I. The Postcolonial Politics of Development. London: Routledge, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Kashwan, P. Democracy in the Woods. Environmental Conservation and Social Justice in India, Tanzania, and Mexico. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Keck, M. E. “Social Equity and Environmental Politics in Brazil: Lessons from the Rubber Tappers of Acre.” Comparative Politics 27, no. 4 (1995): 409–424. doi:10.2307/422227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keck, M. E., and K. Sikkink. Activists beyond Borders. Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Kohli, K., and S. Bhutani. The ‘Balancing’ Act. Experiences with Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) under India’s Biodiversity Regime. New Delhi: Kalpavriksh, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kyrillos, G. d. M., and S. Stolz. “Políticas Indigenistas No Brasil: Passado Assimilacionista, Futuro Emancipatório?” Revista Jurídica 1, no. 30 (2013): 91–111.
   Google Scholar
• Lerche, J. “A Global Alliance against Forced Labour? Unfree Labour, Neo-Liberal Globalization and the International Labour Organization.” Journal of Agrarian Change 7, no. 4 (2007): 425–452. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0366.2007.00152.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacSheoin, T. “The World according to Social Movement Journals: A Preliminary Mapping.” Interface: A Journal for and about Social Movements 8, no. 1 (2016): 181–204.
   Google Scholar
• Maggio, J. “‘Can the Subaltern Be Heard?’: Political Theory, Translation, Representation, and Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 32, no. 4 (2007): 419–443. doi:10.1177/030437540703200403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malayali. “Bio-Cultural Community Protocol of the Traditional Healers of the Malayali Tribes.” 2009. Accessed November 3, 2011. http://www.unep.org/communityprotocols/PDF/MalayaliVaidyasBCP.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Alier, Joan, Leah Temper, Daniela Del Bene, and Arnim Scheidel. “Is There a Global Environmental Justice Movement?” The Journal of Peasant Studies 43, no. 3 (2016): 731–755. doi:10.1080/03066150.
2016.1141198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgera, E. The EU and Environmental Multilateralism: The Case of Access and Benefit-Sharing and the Need for a Good-Faith Test. University of Edinburgh School of Law. Research Paper Series No. 2014/40, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Movimento dos Pequenos Agricultores. “Brasil: Organizações Populares Definem Dia de Luta Pela Soberania Nacional.” Accessed September 28, 2017. http://www.biodiversidadla.org/Principal/Secciones/Noticias/Brasil_Organizacoes_populares_definem_Dia_de_Luta_pela_Soberania_Nacional
   Google Scholar
• Narula, M. “Impact of Indian Patent Law on Traditional Knowledge.” International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences 3, no. 6 (2014): 40–58.
   Google Scholar
• Nordin, R., K. H. Hassan, and Z. A. Zainol. “Traditional Knowledge Documentation: Preventing or Promoting Biopiracy.” Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 20 (2012): 11–22.
   Google Scholar
• Rucht, D. “Movement Allies, Adversaries, and Third Parties.” In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, and H. Kriesi, 197–216. Malden: Blackwell, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Said, E. W. Culture & Imperialism. London: Vintage, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Said, E. W. “Identity, Authority, and Freedom: The Potentate and the Traveler.” Transition 54 (1991): 4–18. doi:10.2307/2934899.
   Google Scholar
• Santilli, J. “Biodiversidade e Conhecimentos Tradicionais Associados: O Novo Regime Jurídico de Proteção.” Revista Do Ministério Público do Distrito Federal e Territórios 9 (2015): 21–73.
   Google Scholar
• Schittecatte, C. “Opposing Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights and Dependency: Back to the Future?” Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue Canadienne D’études du Développement 28, no. 1 (2007): 119–136. doi:10.1080/02255189.2007.9669190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, A. In the Shadows of the State. Indigenous Politics, Environmentalism, and Insurgency in Jharkhand, India. Durham: Duke University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Shiva, V. Protect or Plunder? Understanding Intellectual Property Rights. London: Zed Books, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory, edited by P. Williams and L. Chrisman, 66–111. New York: Columbia University Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. “Righting Wrongs.” South Atlantic Quarterly 103, no. 2–3 (2004): 523–581. doi:10.1215/00382876-103-2-3-523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. “Scattered Speculations on the Subaltern and the Popular.” Postcolonial Studies 8, no. 4 (2005): 475–486. doi:10.1080/13688790500375132.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. “The Dualities of Transnational Contention: ‘Two Activist Solitudes’ or ‘a New World Altogether’?” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 10, no. 1 (2005): 53–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. “Outsiders Inside and Insiders Outside: Linking Transnational and Domestic Public Action for Human Rights.” Human Rights Review 11, no. 2 (2010): 171–182. doi:10.1007/s12142-009-0115-5.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. Strangers at the Gates. States, Movements, and Opportunities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Tebtebba Foundation. “Manaus Declaration.” Tebtebba Foundation, 2011. Accessed September 28, 2017. http://www.tebtebba.org/index.php/content/our-vision-mission/86-frontpage/210-manaus-
declaration
   Google Scholar
• Thapa, N. and S. Devi. “Preservation of the Traditional Knowledge of Tribal Population in India. The Government Initiatives.” 4th International Symposium on Emerging Trends and Technologies in Libraries and Information Services (ETTLIS), Noida, January 6–8, 2015, 99–103.
   Google Scholar
• Tramel, S. “Convergence as Political Strategy: Social Justice Movements, Natural Resources and Climate Change.” Third Word Quarterly 39, no. 7 (2018): 1290–1307. doi:10.1080/01436597.2018.1460196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdum, R. “Povos Indígenas no Brasil: O desafio da Autonomia.” In Povos Indígenas. Constituições e Reformas Políticas na América Latina, edited by R. Verdum, 91–112. Brasília: Instituto de Estudos Socioeconômicos, 2009.
   Google Scholar