The cynical state: forging extractivism, neoliberalism and development in governmental spaces

Bibliography

• Andrade, P. “The Government of Nature: Post-Neoliberal Environmental Governance in Bolivia and Ecuador.” In Environmental Governance in Latin America, edited by F. de Castro, 113–136. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Andreucci, D., and G. Kallis. “Governmentality, Development and the Violence of Natural Resource Extraction in Peru.” Ecological Economics 134, (2017): 95–103. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arsel, M., B. Hogenboom, and L. Pellegrini. “The Extractive Imperative and the Boom in Environmental Conflicts at the End of the Progressive Cycle in Latin America.” The Extractive Industries and Society 3, no. 4 (2016): 877–879. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2016.10.013.
   Google Scholar
• Bebbington, A., and D. Humphreys. “An Andean Avatar: Post-Neoliberal and Neoliberal Strategies for Securing the Unobtainable.” New Political Economy 16, no. 1 (2011): 131–145. doi:10.1080/
13563461003789803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, U., K. y Dietz, and M. Lang. “Neo-Extractivism in Latin America. One Side of a New Phase of Global Capitalist Dynamics.” Ciencia Política 11, no. 21 (2016): 125–159. doi:10.15446/cp.v11n21.57551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridge, G. “Contested Terrain: Mining and the Environment.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 29, no. 1 (2004): 205–259. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.28.011503.163434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridge, G. “The Social Regulation of Resource Access and Environmental Impact: Production, Nature and Contradiction in the US Copper Industry.” Geoforum 31, no. 2 (2000): 237–256. doi:10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00046-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridge, G., and P. McManus. “Sticks and Stones: Environmental Narratives and Discursive Regulation in the Forestry and Mining Sectors.” Antipode 32, no. 1 (2000): 10–47. doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchardt, H.-J., and K. Dietz. “(Neo-)Extractivism – A New Challenge for Development Theory from Latin America.” Third World Quarterly 35, no. 3 (2014): 468–486. doi:10.1080/01436597.2014.893488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corson, C., K. MacDonald, and B. Neimark. “Grabbing Green: Markets, Environmental Governance and the Materialization of Natural Capital.” Human Geography 6, no. 1 (2013): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Dargent, E. Technocracy and Democracy in Latin America: The Experts Running Government. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• De Echave, J. “La minería peruana y los escenarios de transición.” In Transiciones Postextractivismo y alternativas al extractivismo en el Perú, edited by A. Alayza and E. Gudynas, pp. 60–85. Lima: CEPES, RedGE, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• De Freitas, C., A. Marston, and K. Bakker. “Not-Quite-Neoliberal Natures in Latin America: An Introduction.” Geoforum 64 (2015): 239–245. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.05.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, S., P. Bond, C. M. Novo, and S. Radcliffe. “Learning from Postneoliberalisms.” Progress in Human Geography 41, no. 5 (2017): 676–695. doi:10.1177/0309132516648539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, J., and A. Gupta. “Spatializing States: Toward an Ethnography of Neoliberal Governmentality.” American Ethnologist 29, no. 4 (2002): 981–1002. doi:10.1525/ae.2002.29.4.981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontaine, G., I. Narvaez, and S. Velasco. “Explaining a Policy Paradigm Shift: A Comparison of Resource Nationalism in Bolivia and Peru.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 20, no. 2 (2018): 142–157. doi:10.1080/13876988.2016.1272234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gago, V. Neoliberalism from below. Popular Pragmatics and Baroque Economies. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• García, A. “El síndrome del perro del hortelano.” El Comercio, October 28, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Goodale, M., and N. Postero. “Revolution and Retrenchment. Illuminating the Present in Latin America.” In Neoliberalism, Interrupted: Social Change and Contested Governance in Contemporary Latin America, 1–22. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, T., and J. Webber. “Imperialism and Resistance: Canadian Mining Companies in Latin America.” Third World Quarterly 29, no. 1 (2008): 63–87. doi:10.1080/01436590701726509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grugel, J., and P. Riggirozzi. “Post-Neoliberalism in Latin America: Rebuilding and Reclaiming the State after Crisis.” Development and Change 43, no. 1 (2012): 1–21. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01746.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudynas, E. “Beyond Varieties of Development: Disputes and Alternatives.” Third World Quarterly 37, no. 4 (2016): 721–732. doi:10.1080/01436597.2015.1126504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudynas, E. “Extractivisms: Tendencies and Consequences.” In Alternative Development Models: Latin American Results and Prospects, edited by R. Munck and H. Veltmeyer, 61–76. London: Routledge, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. The New Imperialism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Holst, J. “Colonial Histories and Decolonial Dreams in the Ecuadorean Amazon. Natural Resources and the Politics of Post-Neoliberalism.” Latin American Perspectives 43, no.1 (2016): 200–220. doi:10.1177/
0094582X15570837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, M. “Fueling Capitalism: Oil, the Regulation Approach, and the Ecology of Capital.” Economic Geography 89, no. 2 (2013): 171–194. doi:10.1111/ecge.12006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, S. “Rethinking the Politics of the Shift Left in Latin America: Towards a Relational Approach.” Bulletin of Latin American Research 35, no. 4 (2016): 437–451. doi:10.1111/blar.12416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lust, J. “Social Struggle and the Political Economy of Natural Resource Extraction in Peru.” Critical Sociology 42, no. 2 (2014): 1–16. doi:10.1177/0896920513501354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, K. I. “Grabbing ‘Green’: Cynical Reason, Instrumental Ethics and the Production of ‘The Green Economy.’” Human Geography 6, no. 1 (2013): 46–63.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez, J. C. “The State in Waiting: State-Ness Disputes in Indigenous Territories.” The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology 22, no. 1 (2017): 62–84. doi:10.1111/jlca.12251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merino, R. “An Alternative to ‘Alternative Development’?: Buen Vivir and Human Development in Andean Countries.” Oxford Development Studies 44, no. 3 (2016): 271–286. doi:10.1080/13600818.
2016.1144733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merino, R. “Re-Politicizing Participation or Reframing Environmental Governance? Beyond Indigenous’ Prior Consultation and Citizen Participation.” World Development 111, (2018): 75–83. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.06.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orihuela, J. “The Making of Conflict-Prone Development: Trade and Horizontal Inequalities in Peru.” The European Journal of Development Research 24no.5 (2012): 688–705. doi:10.1057/ejdr.2012.21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Painter, Joe, “Regulation Theory, Post-Fordism and Urban Politics.” In Readings in Urban Theory, 3rd ed., edited by Susan S. Fainstein and Scott Campbell, 92–109. Oxford: Wiley – Blackwell, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Quijano, A. “Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America.” Nepantla: Views from South 1, no. 3 (2000): 533–580.
   Google Scholar
• Radcliffe, S. “Development Alternatives.” Development and Change 46, no. 4 (2015): 855–874. doi:10.1111/dech.12179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruckert, A., L. Macdonald, and K. Proulx. “Postneoliberalism in Latin America: A Conceptual Review.” Third World Quarterly 38, no. 7 (2017): 1583–1602. doi:10.1080/01436597.2016.1259558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J., and J. Portocarrero. “La violencia de las leyes: el uso de la fuerza y la criminalización 
de protestas socioambientales en el Perú.” Derecho PUCP 79, (2017): 311–352. doi:10.18800/
derechopucp.201702.013.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, A., and Gupta, A., eds. “Introduction: Rethinking Theories of the State in an Age of Globalization.” In The Anthropology of the State, edited by A. Sharma and A. Gupta, 1–41. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, K. Regional Environmental Cooperation in South America, International Political Economy Series, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, P. Critique of Cynical Reason. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Svampa, M. “Commodities Consensus: Neoextractivism and Enclosure of the Commons in Latin America.” South Atlantic Quarterly 114, no. 1 (2015): 65–82. doi:10.1215/00382876-2831290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergara, A., and D. Encinas. “Continuity by Surprise. Explaining Institutional Stability in Contemporary Peru.” Latin American Research Review 51, no. 1 (2016): 159–180. doi:10.1353/lar.2016.0006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, J., and K. Bakker. “Debating the ‘Post-Neoliberal Turn’ in Latin America.” Progress in Human Geography 38, no. 1 (2014): 62–90. doi:10.1177/0309132513500372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar