The political economy of neoliberalism in Brazil: towards a Polanyian approach

Bibliography

• Abdal, A. 2019. “Contribuição à crítica da política industrial no Brasil entre 2004 e 2014.” Novos Estudos - CEBRAP 38 (2): 437–456. doi:10.25091/S01013300201900020008.
   Google Scholar
• Afonso, J., E. Araújo, and B. Fajardo. 2016. “The Role of Fiscal and Monetary Policies in the Brazilian Economy: Understanding Recent Institutional Reforms and Economic Changes.” The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 62: 41–55. doi:10.1016/j.qref.2016.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal, V. 1996. Debt Games: Strategic Interaction in International Debt Rescheduling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arbix, Glauco, Mario Sergio Salerno, Guilherme Amaral, and Leonardo Melo Lins. 2017. “Avanços, equívocos e instabilidade das políticas de inovação no Brasil.” Novos Estudos - CEBRAP 36 (3): 9–27. doi:10.25091/s0101-3300201700030002.
   Google Scholar
• Averbug, A. 2002. “The Brazilian Economy in 1994–1999: From the Real Plan to Inflation Targets.” The World Economy 25 (7): 925–944. doi:10.1111/1467-9701.00472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ban, C. 2013. “Brazil’s Liberal Neo-Developmentalism: New Paradigm or Edited Orthodoxy?” Review of International Political Economy 20 (2): 298–331. doi:10.1080/09692290.2012.660183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ban, C. 2016. Ruling Ideas: how Global Neoliberalism Goes Local. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bizberg, I. 2019. Diversity of Capitalisms in Latin America. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. 2002. Great Transformations: economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohle, D., and B. Greskovits. 2007. “Neoliberalism, Embedded Neoliberalism and Neocorporatism: Towards Transnational Capitalism in Central-Eastern Europe.” West European Politics 30 (3): 443–466. doi:10.1080/01402380701276287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohle, D., and B. Greskovits. 2012. Capitalist Diversity on Europe’s Periphery. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boito, A. 2020. “Lulism, Populism, and Bonapartism.” Latin American Perspectives 47 (1): 134–151. doi:10.1177/0094582X19887910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boito, A. 2007. “Class Relations in Brazil’s New Neoliberal Phase.” Latin American Perspectives 34 (5): 115–131. doi:10.1177/0094582X07306304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschi, R., and C. Pinho. 2019. “Crisis and Austerity: The Recent Trajectory of Capitalist Development in Brazil.” Contemporary Politics 25 (3): 292–312. doi:10.1080/13569775.2018.1555783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga, R., and S. Purdy. 2019. “A Precarious Hegemony: neo-Liberalism, Social Struggles, and the End of Lulismo in Brazil.” Globalizations 16 (2): 201–215. doi:10.1080/14747731.2018.1479013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brasil. 1990. Diretrizes Gerais Para a Política Industrial e de Comércio Exterior. Brasília: MEFP.
   Google Scholar
• Brasil. 2003. Diretrizes de Política Industrial, Tecnológica e de Comércio Exterior. Brasília: MDIC.
   Google Scholar
• Brasil. 2008. Política de Desenvolvimento Produtivo: inovar e Investir Para Sustentar o Crescimento. Brasília: MDIC.
   Google Scholar
• Brasil. 2016. Emenda Constitucional n° 95. Brasília: Congresso Nacional.
   Google Scholar
• Bresser-Pereira, L. 2009. “From Old to New Developmentalism in Latin America.” In The Oxford Handbook of Latin American Economics, edited by J. Ocampo and J. Ros, 108–130. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caldentey, E. 2008. “The Concept and Evolution of the Developmental State.” International Journal of Political Economy 37 (3): 27–53. doi:10.2753/IJP0891-1916370302.
   Google Scholar
• Cano, W., and A. Silva. 2010. “Política industrial do governo Lula.” In Texto Para Discussão n. 181. Campinas: IE/UNICAMP.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, J., and C. Hamasaki. 2015. “Development Patterns, Labor Market, and Social Protection: The Brazilian Experience between the Liberal Decade (1990s) andDevelopmentalism Decade (2000s).” In The Brazilian Economy Today towards a New Socio-Economic Model? edited by A. Pereira and L. Mattei. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Carrillo, I. 2014. “The New Developmentalism and the Challenges to Long-Term Stability in Brazil.” Latin American Perspectives 41 (5): 59–74. doi:10.1177/0094582X14543791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, F. 2006. “As origens e a gênese do Plano Collor.” Nova Economia 16 (1): 101–134. doi:10.1590/S0103-63512006000100003.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, L. 2018. Valsa Brasileira: do Boom ao Caos Econômico. Rio de Janeiro: Todavia.
   Google Scholar
• Castro, J., and J. Cardoso. 2005. “Políticas sociais no Brasil: gasto social do governo federal de 1988 a 2002.” In Questão social e políticas sociais no Brasil contemporâneo, edited by L. Jaccoud. Brasília: IPEA.
   Google Scholar
• Chodor, T. 2015. Neoliberal Hegemony and the Pink Tide in Latin America. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cunha, A., M. T. C. Lélis, A. E. F. Haines, P. P. da Silva. 2017. “The Brazilian Credit Market during the Great Recession.” In The Brazilian Economy since the Great Financial Crisis of 2007/2008 edited by P. Arestis, C. Baltar and D. Prates. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Doctor, M. 2007. “Lula’s Development Council: Neo-Corporatism and Policy Reform in Brazil.” Latin American Perspectives 34 (6): 131–148. doi:10.1177/0094582X07308265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draibe, S. 2003. “A política social no período FHC e o sistema de proteção social.” Tempo Social 15 (2): 63–101. doi:10.1590/S0103-20702003000200004.
   Google Scholar
• Etchemendy, S. 2011. Models of Economic Liberalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Etchemendy, Sebastián, and Ignacio Puente. 2017. “Power and Crisis: Explaining Varieties of Commercial Banking Systems in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 9 (1): 3–31. doi:10.1177/1866802X1700900101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, B., and A. Saad-Filho. 2017. “Thirteen Things You Need to Know about Neoliberalism.” Critical Sociology 43 (4–5): 685–706. doi:10.1177/0896920516655387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores-Macias, G. 2012. After Neoliberalism? New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, P. 1993. “Collor, Corruption and Crisis: Time for Reflection.” Journal of Latin American Studies 25 (2): 351–371. doi:10.1017/S0022216X00004697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, P. 1999. “Brazil: The Politics of Crisis.” Third World Quarterly 20 (2): 287–317. doi:10.1080/01436599913776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz, B., and D. Prates. 2018. “Capital account Regulation as Part of the Macroeconomic Regime: comparing Brazil in the 1990s and 2000s.” European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies 15 (3): 313–334. doi:10.1590/0101-31572016v37n01a06.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, K. 2014. Ruling Capital: emerging Markets and the Re-Regulation of Cross Border Finance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galvão, A. 2014. “The Brazilian Labor Movement under PT Governments.” Latin American Perspectives 41 (5): 184–199. doi:10.1177/0094582X14545972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. 2012. “Mere Description.” British Journal of Political Science 42 (4): 721–746. doi:10.1017/S0007123412000130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gezmis, H. 2018. “From Neoliberalism to Neo-Developmentalism? The Political Economy of Post-Crisis Argentina (2002–2015).” New Political Economy 23 (1): 66–87. doi:10.1080/13563467.2017.1330877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggard, S., and S. Maxfield. 1996. “The Political Economy of Financial Internationalization in the Developing World.” International Organization 50 (1): 35–68. doi:10.1017/S0020818300001661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopewell, K. 2015. “Different Paths to Power: The Rise of Brazil, India and China at the World Trade Organization.” Review of International Political Economy 22 (2): 311–338. doi:10.1080/09692290.2014.927387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, W. 2014. “Making Citizens: Brazilian Social Policy from Getúlio to Lula.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 6 (3): 15–37. doi:10.1177/1866802X1400600302.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. 1999. “The Developmental State: Odyssey of a Concept.” In The Developmental State edited by M. Woo-Cummings. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaltenbrunner, A., and J. Painceira. 2015. “Developing Countries’ Changing Nature of Financial Integration and New Forms of External Vulnerability: The Brazilian Experience.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 39 (5): 1281–1236. doi:10.1093/cje/beu038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasahara, Y., and A. Botelho. 2019. “Ideas and Leadership in the Crafting of Alternative Industrial Policies: Local Content Requirements Brazilian Oil and Gas Sector.” Comparative Politics 51 (3): 385–405. doi:10.5129/001041519X15647434969993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirshner, J. 2003. “Money is Politics.” Review of International Political Economy 10 (4): 645–660. doi:10.1080/09692290310001601911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirshner, J. 2014. American Power after the Financial Crisis. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krein, J. 2018. “O desmonte dos direitos, as novas configurações do trabalho e o esvaziamento da ação coletiva Consequências da reforma trabalhista.” Tempo Social 30 (1): 77–104. doi:10.11606/0103-2070.ts.2018.138082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladosky, M., and I. Rodrigues. 2018. “A CUT e o Sindicalismo Brasileiro Nos Anos Recentes.” Tempo Social 30 (1): 53–76. doi:10.11606/0103-2070.ts.2018.138079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavinas, L. 2017. The Takeover of Social Policy by Financialization the Brazilian Paradox. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lavoie, M., and E. Stockhammer. eds. 2013. Wage-Led Growth. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Leopoldi, M. 2016. “Políticas de Internacionalização em face dos Desafios do Século XXI: Instituições e Políticas Voltadas Para a Ampliação do Comércio Exterior e o Apoio às Multinacionais Brasileiras.” In Capacidades Estatais em Países Emergentes - o Brasil em perspectiva comparada, edited by A. Gomide and R. Boschi, 387–423. Rio de Janeiro: IPEA.
   Google Scholar
• Loureiro, P., and A. Saad-Filho. 2019. “The Limits of Pragmatism. The Rise and Fall of the Brazilian Workers’ Party (2002–2016).” Latin American Perspectives 46 (1): 66–84. doi:10.1177/0094582X18805093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loureiro, P. 2018. “Reformism, Class Conciliation and the Pink Tide: Material Gains and Their Limits.” In The Social Life of Economic Inequalities in Contemporary Latin America: Decades of Change, edited by M. Ystanes and I. Stronen, 35–56. Cheltenham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Loureiro, P. 2019. “Class Inequality and Capital Accumulation in Brazil, 1992–2013.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 44 (1): 181–206. doi:10.1093/cje/bez030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, R., S. Ximenes, and C. Ugino. 2018. “Governos Lula e Dilma em matéria de seguridade social eacesso à educação superior.” Brazilian Journal of Political Economy 38 (3): 526–547. doi:10.1590/0101-35172018-2784.
   Google Scholar
• Marquetti, A., C. Hoff, and A. Miebach. 2020. “Profitability and Distribution: The Origin of the Brazilian Economic and Political Crisis.” Latin American Perspectives 47 (1): 115–133. doi:10.1177/0094582X19887751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massi, E., and J. Singh. 2018. “Industrial Policy and State-Making: Brazil’s Attempt at Oil-Based Industrial Development.” Third World Quarterly 39 (6): 1133–1150. doi:10.1080/01436597.2018.1455144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarty, N., K. Poole, and H. Rosenthal. 2013. Political Bubbles: Financial Crises and the Failure of American Democracy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mera, L. 2007. “Macroeconomic Concerns and Intrastate Bargains: Explaining Illiberal Policies in Brazil’s Automobile Sector.” Latin American Politics and Society 49 (1): 113–140. doi:10.1111/j.1548-2456.2007.tb00376.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modenesi, Rui Lyrio, André de Melo Modenesi, Norberto Montani Martins, and Patrick Fontaine . 2015. “Restructuring the Economic Policy Framework in Brazil: Genuine or Gattopardo Change?” Revue de la Régulation 17 (17): 11322. doi:10.4000/regulation.11322.
   Google Scholar
• Musacchio, A., and S. Lazzarini. 2014. Reinventing State Capitalism: Leviathan in Business, Brazil and Beyond. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nassif, A., and C. Feijó. 2013. “Liberal versus Neo-Developmental Convention to Growth: why Has Brazil Shown a Poor Performance since the 1980s?” Revista de Economia Política 33 (4): 555–557. doi:10.1590/S0101-31572013000400001.
   Google Scholar
• Nassif, A. 2017. “An Analysis of Brazil’s Economic Situation: 2014-2017, the Short-Term Outlook and Policy Alternatives.” Brazilian Keynesian Review 3 (1): 95–108. doi:10.33834/bkr.v3i1.106.
   Google Scholar
• Ocampo, J. 2014. “The Latin American Debt Crisis in Historical Perspective.” In Life after Debt edited by J. Stiglitz and D. Heymann. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Panizza, F. 2000. “Neopopulism and Its Limits in Collor’s Brazil.” Bulletin of Latin American Research 19 (2): 177–192. doi:10.1111/j.1470-9856.2000.tb00098.x.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., and A. Tickell. 2002. “Neoliberalizing Space.” Antipode 34 (3): 380–404. doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. 1980. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, D., and C. Inclán. 1997. “The Origins of Financial Openness: A Study of Current and Capital account Liberalization.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 771–813. doi:10.2307/2111675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, C., and V. Jurgenfeld. 2019. “Desnacionalização e financeirização: um estudo sobre as privatizações brasileiras.” Economia e Sociedade 28 (2): 393–420. doi:10.1590/1982-3533.2019v28n2art05.
   Google Scholar
• Rugitsky, F. 2017. “The Rise and Fall of the Brazilian Economy (2004–2015): The Economic Antimiracle.” FEA/USP Working Paper Series 29: 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Saad-Filho, A., and L. Morais. 2018. Brazil: Neoliberalism versus Democracy. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saad-Filho, A. 2010. “Neoliberalism, Democracy, and Development Policy in Brazil.” Development and Society 39 (1): 1–28. doi:10.1057/9781137028303_7.
   Google Scholar
• Saad-Filho, A. 2020. “Varieties of Neoliberalism in Brazil (2003–2019).” Latin American Perspectives 47 (1): 9–27. doi:10.1177/0094582X19881968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sátyro, N., and E. Cunha. 2014. “The path of brazilian social welfare policy post-1988: The significance of institutions and ideas.” Brazilian Political Science Review 8 (1): 80–108. doi:10.1590/1981-38212014000100004.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, A. 2012. Os Sentidos Do Lulismo: Reforma Gradual e Pacto Conservador. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, A. 2017. “The Failure of the Developmentalist Experiment in Three Acts.” Critical Policy Studies 11 (3): 358–364. doi:10.1080/19460171.2017.1363067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, A. 2020. “The Failure of Dilma Rousseff’s Developmentalist Experiment.” Latin American Perspectives 47 (1): 152–168. doi:10.1177/0094582X19877187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stallings, B., and W. Peres. 2011. “Is Economic Reform Dead in Latin America? Rhetoric and Reality since 2000.” Journal of Latin American Studies 43 (4): 755–786. doi:10.1017/S0022216X11000435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, D. 2016. “Developmental States and Undervalued Exchange Rates in the Developing World.” Review of International Political Economy 23 (3): 418–449. doi:10.1080/09692290.2015.1135177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unified Workers’ Central, Union Force, and Federation of Industries of São Paulo. 2011. “Brasil do Diálogo pela Produção e Emprego.” https://www.fiesp.com.br/indices-pesquisas-e-publicacoes/documento-brasil-do-dialogo-pela-producao-e-emprego/.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, S. 2008. “A New Approach for Determining Exchange-Rate Level Preferences.” International Organization 62 (3): 405–438. doi:10.1017/S0020818308080144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wylde, C. 2012. Latin America after Neoliberalism: Developmental Regimes in Post-Crisis States. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar