The paradox of competing connectivity strategies in Asia

Bibliography

• Asian Development Bank. Meeting Asia’s Infrastructure Needs. Manila: ADB, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• BDNews24.com. “Bangladesh Infrastructure Is World’s Costliest, Says World Bank.” June 20, 2017. https://bdnews24.com/economy/2017/06/20/bangladesh-infrastructure-is-worlds-costliest-says-world-bank
   Google Scholar
• Benabdallah, Lina. “Contesting the International Order by Integrating It: The Case of China’s Belt and Road Initiative.” Third World Quarterly 40, no. 1 (2019): 92–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2018.1529539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee, Joyeeta. “Act East through Northeast: Success Depends on Implementing CMs’ Suggestions.” New Delhi: Observer Research Foundation. 2018. https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/act-east-through-northeast-success-depends-implementing-suggestions/
   Google Scholar
• Bhaumik, Subir. “Kolktata to Kunming: Indian and Chinese Strategies Converging to Build Land and Trade Ties in Northeast.” The Economic Times, December 5, 2013. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/et-commentary/kolkata-to-kunming-indian-and-chinese-strategies-converging-to-build-land-and-trade-ties-in-northeast/articleshow/26869770.cms
   Google Scholar
• Bolt, Paul J., and Sheryl N. Cross. China, Russia, and Twenty-First Century Global Geopolitics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Business Standard. “Modi Told China, Pakistan Economic Corridor Unacceptable: Sushma.” May 31, 2015. https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ians/modi-told-china-pakistan-economic-corridor-unacceptable-sushma-115053100668_1.html
   Google Scholar
• Destradi, Sandra. Indian Foreign and Security Policy in South Asia. Abingdon: Routledge, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• European Union External Action Service. “Connecting Europe and Asia – Building Blocks for an EU Strategy.” Brussels: EEAS, 2018. https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage/50699/connecting-europe-asia-eu-strategy_en
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, Carla P. “China’s ‘Regionalism Foreign Policy’ and China–India Relations in South Asia.” Contemporary Politics 24, no. 1 (2018): 81–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fünfgeld, Anna. “The Dream of ASEAN Connectivity: Imagining Infrastructure in Southeast Asia.” Pacific Affairs 92, no. 2 (2019): 287–311. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2017.1408168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabusi, Giuseppe. “No Losers? The BRI Factor in the China–EU Relationship.” China: An International Journal 17, no. 4 (2019): 96–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, Arvind. How India Manages Its National Security. Gurgaon: Penguin Viking, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez, Diego. “Are ‘New’ Donors Challenging World Bank Conditionality?” World Development 96 (2017): 529–549. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indiresan, P. V. “The Kunming Initiative.” Frontline 17, no. 7 (2000): 98–102.
   Google Scholar
• Iyer, Roshan. “Reviving the Comatose Bangladesh–China–India–Myanmar Corridor.” The Diplomat. May 3, 2017. https://thediplomat.com/2017/05/reviving-the-comatose-bangladesh-china-india-myanmar-corridor/
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, Happymon. Putting the Periphery at the Center: Indian States’ Role in Foreign Policy. New Delhi: Carnegie India, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Jain, Purnendra, and Tridivesh Singh Maini. “India’s Subnational Governments Foray into the International Arena.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 18, no. 2 (2017): 286–312. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1468109917000032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Lee, and Jinghan Zeng. “Understanding China’s ‘Belt and Road Initiative’: Beyond ‘Grand Strategy’ to a State Transformation Analysis.” Third World Quarterly 40, no. 8 (2019): 1415–1439. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2018.1559046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junxian, Gan, and Mao Yan. “China’s New Silk Road: Where Does It Lead?” Asian Perspective 40, no. 1 (2016): 105–130. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2016.0004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanai, J. Miguel, and Seth Schindler. “Peri-Urban Promises of Connectivity: Linking Project-Led Polycentrism to the Infrastructure Scramble.” EPA: Economy and Space 51, no. 2 (2019): 302–22. https://doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X18763370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavalski, Emilian. “The Unexpected Consequences of China’s Cooperation with Central and Eastern Europe.” International Studies 57, no. 1 (2020): 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0020881719880739.
   Google Scholar
• Khanna, Parag. Connectography: Mapping the Future of Global Civilization. New York: Random House, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, Darl G., “Exploring the Metaphor of Connectivity: Attributes, Dimensions and Duality,” Organization Studies 29, no. 1 (2008): 127–144, https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607084574.
   Google Scholar
• Köstem, Seçkin. “Russia’s Search for a Greater Eurasia: Origins, Promises, Prospects.” Kennan Cable No. 40. Washington: Wilson Center, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, Ananth. “China Highlights Outcome of Manmohan’s Visit.” The Hindu. October 25, 2013. https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/world/china-highlights-outcome-of-manmohans-visit/article5271533.ece
   Google Scholar
• Kurian, Nimmi. The Future Is Federal: Why Indian Foreign Policy Needs to Leverage Its Border States. New Delhi: Centre for Policy Research, 2019. https://www.cprindia.org/news/7818
   Google Scholar
• Li, Mingjiang. “The Belt and Road Initiative: Geo-Economics and Indo-Pacific Security Competition.” International Affairs 96, no. 1 (2020): 169–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lintner, Bertlil. Great Game East: India, China, and the Struggle for Asia’s Most Volatile Frontier. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2015. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz240.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Tianyang, and Yao Song. “Beyond the Hinterland: Exploring the International Actorness of China’s Yunnan Province.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific (2019). https://doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcz026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobo-Guerrero, Christians L., and Friederike Kuntz. “Connectivity as Problem: Security, Mobility, Liberals and Christians.” In Security/Mobility: Politics of Movement, edited by Matthias Leese and Steffen Wittendorp, (2017): 17–34. Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Makocki, Micha. The Silk Road Goes North: Sino–Russian Economic Cooperation and Competition. Brussels: European Council on Foreign Relations, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, Lukas M. “Challenges to ASEAN Centrality and Hedging in Connectivity Governance – Regional and National Pressure Points.” The Pacific Review (2020). doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2020.1757741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, T. V. “When Balance of Power Meets Globalization: China, India and the Small States of South Asia.” Politics 39, no. 1 (2019): 50–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395718779930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plagemann, Johannes. “Small States and Competing Connectivity Strategies: What Explains Bangladesh’s Success in Relations with Asia’s Major Powers?” The Pacific Review (2021). doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2021.1908410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rachman, Gideon. “Worlds Apart: How Decoupling Became the New Buzzword.” Financial Times, December 13, 2019. https://www.ft.com/content/9f50fe40-12a5-11ea-a7e6-62bf4f9e548a
   Google Scholar
• Rafee, Abdullah A. “Bangladesh’s Tryst with China’s BRI: Economic Boom or Debt Trap?” South Asian Voices (2019). https://southasianvoices.org/bangladeshs-tryst-with-chinas-bri-economic-boom-or-debt-trap/
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, Mirza Zulfiqur. “Pickled” Infrastructure and Connectivity: Locating Community Engagement in Northeast India’s Infrastructural Transformation. New Delhi: Heinrich Böll Stiftung India, 2019. https://in.boell.org/2019/06/07/pickled-infrastructure-and-connectivity-locating-community-engagement-northeast-indias
   Google Scholar
• Ramachandran, Sudha. “The Trouble with India’s Projects in Myanmar.” The Diplomat, September 21, 2016. https://thediplomat.com/2016/09/the-trouble-with-indias-projects-in-myanmar/
   Google Scholar
• Rüland, Jürgen. “Old Wine in New Bottles? How Competitive Connectivity Revitalises an Obsolete Development Agenda in Asia.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 50, no. 4 (2020): 653–665. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2019.1705878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rüland, Jürgen, and Michael Arndt. “How China and India Compete in South and Southeast Asia.” In Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32, no. 2 (2019): 178–200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1568393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saran, Shyam. “Role of Border States in India’s Foreign Policy.” Distinguished Lecture Series of Ministry of External Affairs at the Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati, March 29, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Schulze, Kai, and Verena Blechinger-Talcott. “Introduction: Dimensions of Sino–Japanese Rivalry in a Global Context.” The Pacific Review 32, no. 5 (2019): 725–747. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2019.1569116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, Chanchal Kumar, Sandra Destradi, and Johannes Plagemann. “Partisan Federalism and Subnational Governments’ International Engagements: Insights from India.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 50, no. 4 (2020): 566–592. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjaa017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers, Tim. “China’s ‘New Silk Roads’: Sub-National Regions and Networks of Global Political Economy.” Third World Quarterly 37, no. 9 (2016): 1628–1643. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2016.1153415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers, Tim. “(Re)Positioning Yunnan: Region and Nation in Contemporary Provincial Narratives.” Journal of Contemporary China 21, no. 75 (2012): 445–459. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2011.647433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tellmann, Ute, Seven Opitz, and Urs Staehli, “Operations of the Global: Explorations of Connectivity,” Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 13, no. 3 (2012): 209–214, doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2012.728359.
   Google Scholar
• Tubilewicz, Czeslaw. “Paradiplomacy as a Provincial State-Building Project: The Case of Yunnan’s Relations with the Greater Mekong Subregion.” Foreign Policy Analysis 13, no. 4 (2017): 931–949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wroughton, Lesley, and David Brunnstrom. “Wary of China’s Rise, Pompeo Announces US Initiatives in Emerging Asia.” Reuters, July 30, (2018). https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-idUSKBN1KK0V5
   Google Scholar
• Xavier, Constantino. “Sambandh as Strategy: India’s New Approach to Regional Connectivity,” Brookings India Policy Brief (January 2020). https://www.brookings.edu/research/sambandh-as-strategy-indias-new-approach-to-regional-connectivity/
   Google Scholar
• Zeitz, Alexandra O.  “Emulate or Differentiate? Chinese Development Finance, Competition, and World Bank Infrastructure Funding.” The Review of International Organizations 16, no. 2 (2021): 265–292. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-020-09377-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar