Intimate technologies for affective development: how crowdfunding platforms commodify interpersonal connections

Bibliography

• Anderson, B. 2014. Encountering Affect: Capacities, Apparatuses, Conditions. Surrey, UK: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, S. A. 2020. “Intimate Technologies for Development: Micro-Philanthropy, Crowdfunding Platforms, and NGO Fundraising in India.” Doctoral diss., University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, M., and M. Green. 2010. Philanthrocapitalism: How Giving Can Save the World. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, E., and A. Sharma. 2016. “The Righteous and the Rightful: The Technomoral Politics of NGOs, Social Movements, and the State in India.” American Ethnologist 43 (1): 76–90. doi:10.1111/amet.12264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo, M., R. Petrie, and C. Wardell. 2014. “Fundraising through Online Social Networks: A Field Experiment on Peer-to-Peer Solicitation.” Journal of Public Economics 114: 29–35. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J. 2018. “Understanding Development Impact in International Development Volunteering: A Relational Approach.” The Geographical Journal 184 (2): 138–147. doi:10.1111/geoj.12208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouliaraki, L. 2010. “Post-Humanitarianism: Humanitarian Communication beyond a Politics of Pity.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 13 (2): 107–126. doi:10.1177/1367877909356720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouliaraki, L. 2012. “The theatricality of humanitarianism: A critique of celebrity advocacy.” Communication and critical/cultural studies 9 (1): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer, C. 2002. “Own up! Does Anyone Out There Have a Decent Theory of Ownership?” First Workshop of Sida Ownership Evaluations Project, Centre for Development Policy and Research, 1–22. SOAS, University of London. January 2002. eprints.soas.ac.uk/135/1/SidaPaperChris__2_.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dogra, N. 2013. Representations of Global Poverty: Aid, Development and International NGOs. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Elyachar, J. 2002. “Empowerment Money: The World Bank, Non-Governmental Organizations, and the Value of Culture in Egypt.” Public Culture 14 (3): 493–513. doi:10.1215/08992363-14-3-493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fechter, A. M. 2019. “Development and the Search for Connection.” Third World Quarterly 40 (10): 1816–1831. doi:10.1080/01436597.2019.1649089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harriss, J. 2001. “Social Capital Construction and the Consolidation of Civil Society in Rural Areas.” WP. No. 00-16. Destin. LSE. Nov, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, R. 2010. “Do information and communication technologies (ICTs) contribute to development?.” Journal of international development 22 (5): 625–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez, K., and T. Roberts. 2018. “Leaving No One Behind in a Digital World.”
   Google Scholar
• Jakimow, T. 2021. “Emotions, Affect and Power: Research Directions in Development Studies.” Third World Quarterly. Under review.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. 2013. “Multimodal Methods for Researching Digital Technologies.” The SAGE Handbook of Digital Technology Research 250: 265.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, N., and S. Sharma. 2017. “Survey Analysis on the Usage and Impact of Whatsapp Messenger.” Global Journal of Enterprise Information System 8 (3): 52–57. doi:10.18311/gjeis/2016/15741.
   Google Scholar
• Light, A., and J. Briggs. 2017. “Crowdfunding Platforms and the Design of Paying Publics.” Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, May, 797–809.
   Google Scholar
• Masiero, S. 2017. “New Routes to Cashlessness? ICTs, Demonetisation, and the Indian Informal Economy.”
   Google Scholar
• McKay, D., and P. Perez. 2019. “Citizen Aid, Social Media and Brokerage after Disaster.” Third World Quarterly 40 (10): 1903–1920. doi:10.1080/01436597.2019.1634470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moodie, M. 2013. “Microfinance and the Gender of Risk: The Case of Kiva. org.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 38 (2): 279–302. doi:10.1086/667448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajasekhar, D. 2000. “Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) in India: Opportunities and Challenges.” Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore Working Papers, (66).
   Google Scholar
• Roy, S. 2015. “The Indian Women’s Movement: Within and beyond NGOization.” Journal of South Asian Development 10 (1): 96–117. doi:10.1177/0973174114567368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudnyckyj, D., and A. Schwittay. 2014. “Afterlives of Development.” PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 37 (1): 3–9. doi:10.1111/plar.12047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwittay, A. 2011. “New Media Practices in India: Bridging past and Future, Markets and Development.” International Journal of Communication 5: 31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwittay, A. 2014. New Media and International Development: Representation and Affect in Microfinance. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wohn, D. Y., C. T. Carr, and R. A. Hayes. 2016. “How Affective Is a “Like”?: The Effect of Paralinguistic Digital Affordances on Perceived Social Support.” Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking 19 (9): 562–566. doi:10.1089/cyber.2016.0162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar