The side doors of immigration: multi-tier migration regimes in Japan and South Korea

Bibliography

• Arrington, Celeste L. 2016. Accidental Activists: Victim Movements and Government Accountability in Japan and South Korea. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beine, Michel, Anna Boucher, Brian Burgoon, Mary Crock, Justin Gest, Michael Hiscox, Patrick McGovern, Hillel Rapoport, Joep Schaper, and Eiko Thielemann. 2016. “Comparing Immigration Policies: An Overview from the MPALA Database.” International Migration Review 50 (4): 827–863. doi:10.1111/imre.12169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carens, Joseph H. 1987. “Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders.” The Review of Politics 49 (2): 251–273. doi:10.1017/S0034670500033817.
   Google Scholar
• Carens, Joseph H. 2000. Culture, Citizenship, and Community: A Contextual Exploration of Justice as Evenhandedness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castles, Stephen, Hein de Haas, and Mark J. Miller. 2014. The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World. 5th ed.New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Castles, Stephen, and Mark J. Miller. 2009. The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World. 4th ed. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, Sheena. 2008. “Politics, Commerce and Construction of Chinese ‘Otherness’ in Korea: Open Port Period (1876–1910).” In At Home in the Chinese Diaspora: Memories, Identities and Belongings, edited by Kuah-Pearce Khun Eng and Andrew Davidson, 128–154. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, Erin Aeran. 2010a. Immigration and Citizenship in Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, Erin Aeran. 2010b. “Workers or Residents? Diverging Patterns of Immigrant Incorporation in Korea and Japan.” Pacific Affairs 83 (4): 675–696. doi:10.5509/2010834675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, Erin Aeran. 2019a. “Ethnic Return Migration and Noncitizen Hierarchies in South Korea and Japan.” In Diasporic Returns to the Ethnic Homeland the Korean Diaspora in Comparative Perspective, edited by Takeyuki Tsuda and Changzoo Song, 179–197. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, Erin Aeran. 2019b. “Japan’s Model of Immigration without Immigrants.” Current History 118 (809): 215–221. doi:10.1525/curh.2019.118.809.215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, Erin Aeran. 2020a. “Creating Hierarchies of Noncitizens: Race, Gender, and Visa Categories in South Korea.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46 (12): 2497–2514. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2018.1561061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, Erin Aeran. 2020b. Immigrant Incorporation in East Asian Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, Erin Aeran, and Daisy Kim. 2012. “Citizenship and Marriage in a Globalizing World: Multicultural Families and Monocultural Nationality Laws in Korea and Japan.” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 19 (1): 195–219. doi:10.2979/indjglolegstu.19.1.195.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, Erin Aeran, and Yunchen Tian. 2018. “Is Japan Becoming a Country of Immigration?” Foreign Affairs. (August 3). https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/japan/2018-08-03/japan-becoming-country-immigration
   Google Scholar
• de Haas, Hein, Katharina Natter, and Simona Vezzoli. 2015. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Migration Policy Change.” Comparative Migration Studies 3 (1): 15. doi:10.1186/s40878-015-0016-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodman, Sara Wallace. 2012. “Fortifying Citizenship: Policy Strategies for Civic Integration in Western Europe.” World Politics 64 (4): 659–698. doi:10.1017/S0043887112000184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiraudon, Virginie. 1998. “Citizenship Rights for Non-Citizens.” In Challenge to the Nation-State: Immigration in Western Europe and the United States, edited by Christian Joppke, 272–318. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hammar, Tomas. 1990. Democracy and the Nation State: Aliens, Denizens, and Citizens in a World of International Migration. Brookfield, VT: Gower Pub. Co.
   Google Scholar
• Helbling, Marc, and Dorina Kalkum. 2018. “Migration Policy Trends in OECD Countries.” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (12): 1779–1797. doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1361466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollifield, James F. 1992. Immigrants, Markets, and States: The Political Economy of Postwar Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollifield, James F. 2004. “The Emerging Migration State.” Internat=[ional Migration Review 38 (3): 885–912. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00223.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollifield, James F., and Michael O. Sharpe. 2017. “Japan as an ‘Emerging Migration State’.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 17 (3): 371–400. doi:10.1093/irap/lcx013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwasawa, Yuji. 1986. “Legal Treatment of Koreans in Japan: The Impact of International Human Rights Law on Japanese Law.” Human Rights Quarterly 8 (2): 131–179. doi:10.2307/762281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joppke, Christian. 1999. Immigration and the Nation-State: The United States, Germany, and Great Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joppke, Christian. 2017. “Citizenship in Immigration States.” In Oxford Handbook of Citizenship, edited by Ayelet Shachar, Rainer Bauböck, Irene Bloemraad, and Maarten Vink, 386–406. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, Jae-Eun, and Tong Hoon Kim. 1989. Zainichi Kankoku Chosenjin: Rekishi to Tembo [South and North Korean Residents in Japan: History and Prospects]. Tokyo: Rodo Keizaisha.
   Google Scholar
• Kashiwazaki, Chikako. 2013. “Incorporating Immigrants as Foreigners: Multicultural Politics in Japan.” Citizenship Studies 17 (1): 31–47. doi:10.1080/13621025.2013.764216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Jaeeun. 2016. Contested Embrace: Transborder Membership Politics in Twentieth-Century Korea. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Nora Hui-Jung. 2008. “Korean Immigration Policy Changes and the Political Liberals’ Dilemma.” International Migration Review 42 (3): 576–596. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2008.00138.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmans, Ruud, and Ines Michalowski. 2017. “Why Do States Extend Rights to Immigrants? Institutional Settings and Historical Legacies across 44 Countries Worldwide.” Comparative Political Studies 50 (1): 41–74. doi:10.1177/0010414016655533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korea Immigration Service, Ministry of Justice. 2020. K.I.S. Statistics 2019 (2019 Chulipguk Oegukin Tong’gye Yonbo).
   Google Scholar
• Lai, Ah Eng, Francis L. Collins, and Brenda S. A. Yeoh. 2013. Migration and Diversity in Asian Contexts. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Chulwoo. 2002. “Us’ and ‘Them’ in Korean Law: The Creation, Accommodation, and Exclusion of Outsiders in Korean Law.” In East Asian Law: Universal Norms and Local Cultures, edited by Arthur Rosett, Lucie Cheng, and Margaret Woo, 105–134. London: RoutledgeCurzon.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Tae-hoon. 2010. “Dual Citizenship to Be Allowed.” Korea Times, April 21. http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2011/04/116_64629.html.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, Timothy C. 2003. “Racing from the Bottom in South Korea? The Nexus between Civil Society and Transnational Migrants.” Asian Survey 43 (3): 423–442. doi:10.1525/as.2003.43.3.423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lori, Noora. 2017. “Statelessness, ‘in-Between’ Statuses, and Precarious Citizenship.” In Oxford Handbook of Citizenship, edited by Ayelet Shachar, Rainer Bauböck, and Irene Vink Bloemraad, 743–766. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lori, Noora. 2019. Offshore Citizens: Permanent Temporary Status in the Gulf. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matias, Gonçalo Saraiva. 2016. Citizenship as a Human Right: The Fundamental Right to a Specific Citizenship. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Messina, Anthony M. 2007. The Logics and Politics of Post-Wwii Migration to Western Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milly, Deborah J. 2014. New Policies for New Residents: Immigrants, Advocacy, and Governance in Japan and Beyond. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice, Japan. 2020. Reiwa Gannenmatsu Genzaini Okeru Gaikokujintorokusha Toukeini Tsuite [Report on Current Foreign Resident Statistics at the End of 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Park, Jung-Sun, and Paul Y. Chang. 2005. “Contention in the Construction of a Global Korean Community: The Case of the Overseas Korean Act.” Journal of Korean Studies 10 (1): 1–27. doi:10.1353/jks.2005.0002.
   Google Scholar
• Rubio-Marín, Ruth. 2000. Immigration as a Democratic Challenge: Citizenship and Inclusion in Germany and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sakanaka, Hidenori. 1989. Kongo No Shutsunyūkoku Kanri Gyōsei No Arikata Ni Tsuite: Sakanaka Ronbun No Fukusei to Shuyō Ronpyō [On the the Future of Immigration Control Administration: A Reprint of the Sakanaka Thesis and Its Major Criticisms]. Tokyo: Nihon kajo shuppan.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, Saskia. 1996. Losing Control?: Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sellek, Yoko. 2001. Migrant Labour in Japan. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Seol, Dong-Hoon. 2000. “Past and Present of Foreign Workers in Korea 1987-2000.” Asia Solidarity Quarterly 2 (2): 6–31.
   Google Scholar
• Seol, Dong-Hoon, and John D. Skrentny. 2009. “Why is There so Little Migrant Settlement in East Asia?” International Migration Review 43 (3): 578–620. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2009.00778.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpe, Michael O. 2014. Postcolonial Citizens and Ethnic Migration: The Netherlands and Japan in the Age of Globalization, Palgrave Studies in International Relations. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, Gi-Wook, and Paul Y. Chang, eds., 2011. South Korean Social Movements: From Democracy to Civil Society. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shipper, Apichai W. 2006. “Foreigners and Civil Society in Japan.” Pacific Affairs 79 (2): 269–289. doi:10.5509/2006792269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SOPEMI. 2008. International Migration Outlook: Annual Report. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Soysal, Yasemin Nuhoglu. 1994. Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spinner, Jeff. 1994. The Boundaries of Citizenship: Race, Ethnicity, and Nationality in the Liberal State. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strausz, Michael. 2006. “Minorities and Protest in Japan: The Politics of the Fingerprinting Refusal Movement.” Pacific Affairs 79 (4): 641–656. doi:10.5509/2006794641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surak, Kristin. 2018. “Migration Industries and the State: Guestwork Programs in East Asia.” International Migration Review 52 (2): 487. doi:10.1111/imre.12308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, Yunchen. 2019. “Workers by Any Other Name: Comparing Co-Ethnics and “Interns” as Labour Migrants to Japan.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 45 (9): 1496–1514. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2018.1466696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuda, Takeyuki. 2003. Strangers in the Ethnic Homeland: Japanese Brazilian Return Migration in Transnational Perspective. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsuda, Takeyuki, ed., 2006. Local Citizenship in Recent Countries of Immigration: Japan in Comparative Perspective. Lanham: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Vink, Maarten P. 2017. “Comparing Citizenship Regimes.” In Oxford Handbook of Citizenship, edited by Ayelet Shachar, Rainer Bauböck, Irene Bloemraad, and Maarten Vink, 221–244. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walzer, Michael. 1983. Spheres of Justice. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar