Differential treatment for developing countries in the WTO: the unmaking of the North–South distinction in a multipolar world

Bibliography

• Acharya, A. 2017. “After Liberal Hegemony: The Advent of a Multiplex World Order.” Ethics & International Affairs 31 (3): 271–285. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S089267941700020X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alami, I., and A. D. Dixon. 2020. “The Strange Geographies of the ‘New’ State Capitalism.” Political Geography 82: 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert, M., B. Buzan, and M. Zürn, eds. 2013. Bringing Sociology to International Relations: World Politics as Differentiation Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bjola, C., and M. Kornprobst, eds. 2010. Arguing Global Governance: Agency, Lifeworld and Shared Reasoning. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bukovansky, M., I. Clark, R. Eckersley, R. Price, C. Reus-Smit, and N. J. Wheeler. 2012. Special Responsibilities: Global Problems and American Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T. J. 2015. The China Challenge: Shaping the Choices of a Rising Power. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, J., and J. Roh. 2019. “South Korea to Give Up Developing Country Status in WTO talks.” Reuters Business News, October 25. Accessed October 3, 2021. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-southkorea-trade-wto/south-korea-to-give-up-developing-country-status-in-wto-talks-idUSKBN1X401W
   Google Scholar
• Daßler, B., A. Kruck, and B. Zangl. 2019. “Interactions between Hard and Soft Power: The Institutional Adaptation of International Intellectual Property Protection to Global Power Shifts.” European Journal of International Relations 25 (2): 588–612. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066118768871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly, J. 2012. “The Elements of the Structures of International Systems.” International Organization 66 (4): 609–643. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818312000240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easterly, W. 2001. “The Lost Decades: Developing Countries’ Stagnation in Spite of Policy Reform 1980-1998.” Journal of Economic Growth 6(2): 135–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckl, J., and R. Weber. 2007. “North–South? Pitfalls of Dividing the World by Words.” Third World Quarterly 28 (1): 3–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590601081732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2011. Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Vol. 1. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2018. WTO Modernisation – Introduction to Future EU Proposals – Concept Note. Brussels: European Commission. Accessed October 3, 2021. https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2018/september/tradoc_157331.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Farias, D. B. L. 2019. “Outlook for the ‘Developing Country’ Category: A Paradox of Demise and Continuity.” Third World Quarterly 40 (4): 668–687. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2019.1573139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehl, C., and K. Freistein. 2020. “Organising Global Stratification: How International Organisations (Re)Produce Inequalities in International Society.” Global Society 34 (3): 285–303. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2020.1739627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopewell, K. 2021. “Heroes of the developing world? Emerging powers in WTO agriculture negotiations and dispute settlement.” The Journal of Peasant Studies, Online First, 1–24.doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2021.1873292.
   Google Scholar
• Hurrell, A. 2007. On Global Order: Power, Values, and the Constitution of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. J. 2018. “The End of Liberal International Order?” International Affairs 94 (1): 7–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lake, D. A. 2009. “Hobbesian Hierarchy: The Political Economy of Political Organization.” Annual Review of Political Science 12: 263–283. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.12.041707.193640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamp, N. 2017. “The ‘Development’ Discourse in Multilateral Trade Lawmaking.” World Trade Review 16 (3): 475–500. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745616000616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lighthizer, R. 2017. Opening Plenary Statement of United States Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer at the WTO Ministerial Conference [Online transcript]. Accessed October 3, 2021. https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2017/december/opening-plenary-statement-ustr
   Google Scholar
• Mano, A. 2019. “‘Brazil’s New Status Would Not Affect Prior AG Commitments: WTO Chief.” Reuters Business News, March 20. Accessed October 3, 2021. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-brazil-trade/brazils-new-status-would-not-affect-prior-ag-commitments-wto-chief-idUSKCN1R12NW
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. J. 2019. “Bound to Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Liberal International Order.” International Security 43 (4): 7–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Trade and Industry Singapore. 2019. Singapore Reaffirms Commitment to Work with Like-Minded Partners to Strengthen the World Trade Organization. Singapore: Ministry of Trade and Industry Singapore. Accessed October 3, 2021. https://www.mti.gov.sg/-/media/MTI/Newsroom/Press-Releases/2019/09/SDT-press-release.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Narlikar, A. 2020. Poverty Narratives and Power Paradoxes in International Trade Negotiations and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nölke, A., T. ten Brink, S. Claar, and C. May. 2015. “Domestic Structures, Foreign Economic Policies and Global Economic Order: Implications from the Rise of Large Emerging Economies.” European Journal of International Relations 21 (3): 538–567. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066114553682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, T. V., D. W. Larson, and W. C. Wohlforth, eds. 2014. Status in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pauwelyn, J. 2013. “The End of Differential Treatment for Developing Countries? Lessons from the Trade and Climate Change Regimes.” Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law 22 (1): 29–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12017.
   Google Scholar
• Pieterse, J. N. 2011. “Global Rebalancing: Crisis and the East–South Turn.” Development and Change 42 (1): 22–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2010.01686.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pu, X. 2017. “Controversial Identity of a Rising China.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 10(2): 131–149.doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pox004
   Google Scholar
• Rajamani, L. 2006. Differential Treatment in International Environmental Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rajamani, L. 2008. From Berlin to Bali and beyond: killing Kyoto softly? International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 57(4), 909–939. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S002058930800064X
   Google Scholar
• Sidaway, J. D. 2012. “Geographies of Development: New Maps, New Visions?” The Professional Geographer 64 (1): 49–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2011.586878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephen, M. D. 2014. “Rising Powers, Global Capitalism and Liberal Global Governance: A Historical Materialist account of the BRICs Challenge.” European Journal of International Relations 20 (4): 912–938. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066114523655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viola, L. A. 2020. The Closure of the International System: How Institutions Create Political Equalities and Hierarchies. Vol. 153. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., E. Hannah, and J. Scott. 2014. “The WTO in Bali: What MC9 Means for the Doha Development Agenda and Why It Matters.” Third World Quarterly 35 (6): 1032–1050. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2014.907726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinhardt, C. 2020. “Emerging Powers in the World Trading System: Contestation of the Developing Country Status and the Reproduction of Inequalities.” Global Society 34 (3): 388–408. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2020.1739632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WTO. 2001. Doha WTO Ministerial Declaration. WT/MIN(01)/DEC/1. Accessed October 3, 2021. https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/min01_e/mindecl_e.htm
   Google Scholar
• WTO. 2019a. An Undifferentiated WTO: Self-Declared Development Status Risks Institutional Irrelevance. Communication from the United States. General Council, WT/GC/W/757. Accessed October 3, 2021. https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/GC/W757.pdf
   Google Scholar
• WTO. 2019b. The Continued Relevance of Special and Differential Treatment in Favour of Developing Members to Promote Development and Ensure Inclusiveness. WT/GC/W/765/Rev.2. Accessed October 3, 2021. https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/FE_Search/FE_S_S009-DP.aspx?language=E&CatalogueIdList=251955&CurrentCatalogueIdIndex=0&FullTextHash=371857150&HasEnglishRecord=True&HasFrenchRecord=True&HasSpanishRecord=True
   Google Scholar
• WTO. 2019c. Draft General Council Decision: Procedures to Strengthen the Negotiating Function of the WTO. Communication circulated by the US. Accessed October 3, 2021. https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/FE_Search/FE_S_S009-DP.aspx?CatalogueIdList=251580
   Google Scholar
• WTO. 2019d. Statement on Special and Differential Treatment to Promote Development. WT/GC/202. Accessed October 3, 2021. https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/GC/202R1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zarakol, A., ed. 2017. Hierarchies in World Politics. Vol. 144. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar