Norm-busting: rightist challenges in US and Australian immigration and refugee policies

Bibliography

• Andrews, K. T., N. Caren, and A. Browne. 2018. “Protesting Trump.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 23 (4): 393–400. doi:10.17813/1086-671X-23-4-393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Human and Rights Commission. 2014. “An overview of the children in detention,” https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/4-overview-children-detention
   Google Scholar
• Bell, S. 2011. “Do We Really Need a New ‘Constructivist Institutionalism’ to Explain Institutional Change?” British Journal of Political Science 41 (4): 883–906. doi:10.1017/S0007123411000147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betts, A., and P. Orchard. 2014. Implementation and World Politics: How International Norms Change Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bier, D. 2017. “A Dozen Times Trump Equated His Travel Ban with a Muslim Ban.” Cato Institute. https://www.cato.org/blog/dozen-times-trump-equated-travel-ban-muslim-ban
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. 2003. “Structures Do Not Come with an Instruction Sheet: Interests, Ideas, and Progress in Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics 1 (4): 695–706. doi:10.1017/S1537592703000471.
   Google Scholar
• Boswell, C., and A. Geddes. 2011. Migration and Mobility in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Brubaker, R. 1992. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brubaker, R. 1995. “Comments on "Modes of Immigration Politics in Liberal Democratic States”.” International Migration Review 29 (4): 903–908. doi:10.1177/2F019791839502900402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callinan, I. 2020. “Review: Section 4 of the Tribunals Amalgamation Act 2015 (CTH).” https://www.ag.gov.au/legal-system/publications/report-statutory-review-tribunals-amalgamation-act-2015
   Google Scholar
• Capoccia, G., and R. D. Kelemen. 2007. “The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism.” World Politics 59 (3): 341–369. doi:10.1017/S0043887100020852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collingwood, L., N. Lajevardi, and K. A. Oskooii. 2018. “A Change of Heart? Why Individual-Level Public Opinion Shifted against Trump’s “Muslim Ban”.” Political Behavior 40 (4): 1035–1072. doi:10.1007/s11109-017-9439-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, C., and M. Foster. 2016. “Non-Refoulement as Custom and Jus Cogens? Putting the Prohibition to the Test.” In Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 2015, edited by M. den Heijer and H. van der Wilt, 273–327. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, L. 2015. “Tony Abbott: Australians ‘Sick of Being Lectured To’ by United Nations.” The Sydney Morning Herald, March 19.
   Google Scholar
• Dastyari, A. 2018. “Let the Asylum Seekers Stay: Strengths and Weaknesses of Church Sanctuary as a Strategy for Law Reform.” Monash University Law Review 44: 341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dastyari, A., and D. Ghezelbash. 2020. “Asylum at Sea: The Legality of Shipboard Refugee Status Determination Procedures.” International Journal of Refugee Law 32 (1): 1–27. doi:10.1093/ijrl/eez046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauvergne, C. 2016. The New Politics of Immigration and the End of Settler Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, K. 2020. “US Officials Say They Are Highly Confident to Have Reached Tally on Separated Children.” Los Angeles Times, January 18.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, B. 2016. “Asylum Seeker Children Still in Detention despite Claims All Have Been Released.” The Guardian, April 2.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, B. “Australia’s immigration policy is meant to be blind to race, but is it?,” The Guardian, April 5, 2018, https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/apr/05/australia-says-its-immigration-policy-is-blind-to-race-what-do-the-facts-show
   Google Scholar
• Dorostkar, K. 2020. “Judicial Review of Refugee Determinations: More by Luck than Judgement.” SSRN. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3536740.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlop, E., J. McAdam, and G. Weeks. 2019. “A Search for Rights: Judicial and Administrative Responses to Migration and Refugee Cases.” In The Legal Protection of Human Rights in Australia, edited by M. Groves, et al., 335–354. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Eckerstrom, P. J. 2018. “The Garland Nomination, the Senate’s Duty, and the Surprising Lessons of Constitutional Text.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 21: 33.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, M. 2001. The Constitutional Foundations of Judicial Review. Oxford: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• FitzGerald, D. S., and D. Cook-Martín. 2014. Culling the Masses: The Democratic Origins of Racist Immigration Policy in the Americas. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• FitzGerald, D. S., D. Cook-Martín, A. S. García, and R. Arar. 2018. “Can You Become One of Us? A Historical Comparison of Legal Selection of ‘Assimilable’ Immigrants in Europe and the Americas.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (1): 27–47. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1313106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, M., and J. Pobjoy. 2011. “A Failed Case of Legal Exceptionalism? Refugee Status Determination in Australia’s ‘Excised’ Territory.” International Journal of Refugee Law 23 (4): 583–631. doi:10.1093/ijrl/eer025.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, G. P. 1995. “Modes of Immigration Politics in Liberal Democratic States.” International Migration Review 29 (4): 881–902. doi:10.2307/2547729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, G. P., and B. Birrell. 2001. “Divergent Paths of Immigration Politics in the United States and Australia.” Population and Development Review 27 (3): 525–551. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2001.00525.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabaccia, D. 2010. “Nations of Immigrants: Do Words Matter?” The Pluralist 5 (3): 5–31. doi:10.1353/plu.2010.0011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghezelbash, D. 2018. Refuge Lost: Asylum Law in an Interdependent World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grier, P. 2021. “‘If You Can Keep It’: Where Next for a Strained Democracy.” Christian Science Monitor.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, S. 2004. Judicial Review and Compliance with Administrative Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hardaker, D., and J. Landis-Hanley, “Anatomy of a scandal,” Crikey, September 24, 2019,” https://www.crikey.com.au/2019/09/24/aat-anatomy-of-a-scandal/
   Google Scholar
• Hamlin, R. 2014. Let Me Be a Refugee: Administrative Justice and the Politics of Asylum in the United States, Canada, and Australia. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, A. L. 2017. “The Borders beyond the Border: Australia’s Extraterritorial Migration Controls.” Refugee Survey Quarterly 36 (3): 48–80. doi:10.1093/rsq/hdx008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollifield, J. 1992. Immigrants, Markets, and States: The Political Economy of Postwar Europe. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hurrell, A. 2011. “Refugees, International Society, and Global Order.” In Refugees in International Relations, edited by A. Betts and G. Loescher, 85–104. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasso, G., and K.-D. Opp. 1997. “Probing the Character of Norms: A Factorial Survey Analysis of the Norms of Political Action.” American Sociological Review 62 (6): 947–964. doi:10.2307/2657349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joppke, C. 1998. “Why Liberal States Accept Unwanted Immigration.” World Politics 50 (2): 266–293. doi:10.1017/S004388710000811X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joppke, C. 2005. Selecting by Origin: Ethnic Migration in the Liberal State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohm, L. M. 2007. “Tracing the Foundations of the Best Interests of the Child Standard in American Jurisprudence.” Journal of Law and Family Studies 10: 337. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1957143.
   Google Scholar
• Law, A. O. 2010. The Immigration Battle in American Courts. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, R. C., S. Mettler, T. B. Pepinsky, K. M. Roberts, and R. Valelly. 2019. “The Trump Presidency and American Democracy: A Historical and Comparative Analysis.” Perspectives on Politics 17 (02): 470–479. doi:10.1017/S1537592718003286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linz, J. J., and A. C. Stepan. 1996. “Toward Consolidated Democracies.” Journal of Democracy 7 (2): 14–33. doi:10.1353/jod.1996.0031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G. and J. P. Olsen. 2006. “Elaborating the “New Institutionalism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, edited by R. Goodin, et al., 3–20. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McClean, A. Y. 2021. “Politics of Refugee Reception in South Korea: Liberal Norms and Restrictive Institutions.” PhD diss. Department of Sociology, University of California San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, E., and M. O’Sullivan. 2018. “Protecting Vulnerable Refugees: Procedural Fairness in the Australian Fast Track Regime.” University of New South Wales Law Journal 41 (3): 1003. doi:10.53637/LQUA4141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. 2021. “Populism in Europe: An Illiberal Democratic Response to Undemocratic Liberalism.” Government and Opposition 56 (4): 577–597. doi:10.1017/gov.2021.15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. J., and J. L. Gibson. 2018. “Has Trump Trumped the Courts.” New York University Law Review 93: 32.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. 2020. “Global Party Survey, 2019.” Harvard Dataverse, V3, UNF:6:ZJDKjnJskyudaqjUu98PPw== [fileUNF] doi:10.7910/DVN/WMGTNS.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, J. P. 2009. “Change and Continuity: An Institutional Approach to Institutions of Democratic Government.” European Political Science Review 1 (1): 3–32. doi:10.1017/S1755773909000022.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, O. K. 1991. “Nine Questions to a Neo-Institutional Theory in Political Science.” Scandinavian Political Studies 14 (2): 125–148. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.1991.tb00408.x.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. 2019. Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G., J. Pierre, and D. S. King. 2005. “The Politics of Path Dependency: Political Conflict in Historical Institutionalism.” The Journal of Politics 67 (4): 1275–1300. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00360.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. 2011. Politics in Time. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, S., and J. Bolter, “Dismantling and Reconstructing the U.S. Immigration System: A Catalog of Changes under the Trump Presidency,” Migration Policy Institute, July 2020, https://www.migrationpolicy.org/sites/default/files/publications/MPI_US-Immigration-Trump-Presidency-Final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, E. A. 2014. The Twilight of Human Rights Law. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., and P. J. DiMaggio. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sackville, J. R. 2000. “The Limits of Judicial Review of Executive Action – Some Comparisons between Australia and the United States.” Federal Law Review 28 (2): 315–330. doi:10.22145/flr.28.2.9.
   Google Scholar
• SBS News. 2019. “Thousands Gather across Australia for Palm Sunday Refugee Rallies.” April 14.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. 2011. “Reconciling Ideas and Institutions through Discursive Institutionalism.” In Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, edited by D. Béland and R. H. Cox, 76–95. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seawright, J., and J. Gerring. 2008. “Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options.” Political Research Quarterly 61 (2): 294–308. doi:10.1177/2F1065912907313077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikkink, K. 2017. Evidence for Hope: Making Human Rights Work in the 21st Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, R. 2020. “Got AATitude? A Quantitative Analysis of Refugee Decision-Making at the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.” Honours thes., University of Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Soennecken, D. 2008. “The Growing Influence of the Courts over the Fate of Refugees.” Canadian Journal of European and Russian Studies 4 (2): 55–88. doi:10.22215/rera.v4i2.199.
   Google Scholar
• Sperling, J., and M. Webber. 2019. “Trump’s Foreign Policy and NATO: Exit and Voice.” Review of International Studies 45 (3): 511–526. doi:10.1017/S0260210519000123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacey, J. 1996. In the Name of the Family: Rethinking Family Values in the Postmodern Age. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Atlantic. n.d. “Unthinkable: 50 Moments That Define an Improbable Presidency.” https://www.theatlantic.com/unthinkable/.
   Google Scholar
• Wadhia, S. S. 2019. Banned: Immigration Enforcement in the Time of Trump. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar