Advanced search
Publication Cover
Third World Quarterly Volume 43, 2022 - Issue 5
Submit an article Journal homepage
285
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Crafting constraints: Latin American support for humanitarian-intervention norms

J. Luis RodriguezCenter for International Security and Cooperation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USACorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7354-4373View further author information
ORCID Icon
Pages 1217-1235 | Received 10 Jul 2020, Accepted 16 Mar 2022, Published online: 08 Apr 2022

Bibliography

  • Acharya, A. 2018. Constructing Global Order: Agency and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Almeida, P. 2014. “Brazilian View of Responsibility to Protect: From Non-Indifference to Responsibility While Protecting.” Global Responsibility to Protect 6 (1): 29–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984X-00601003.
  • Almeida, P. 2017. “Brazil’s Inconsistent Approach towards International Organizations and R2P: Theory and Practice.” In Southern Democracies and the Responsibility to Protect: Perspectives from India, Brazil and South Africa, edited by D. Peter and D. Krause, 71–100. Munich: Nomos.
  • Amorim, C. 2004. Conceitos e Estratégias da Diplomacia Do Governo Lula. Brasilia: Brazilian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
  • Amorim, C. 2013. Breves Narrativas Diplomáticas. Sao Paulo: Benvirá.
  • Annan, K. 2000. We the Peoples: The Role of the United Nations in the 21st Century. New York: UN.
  • Arredondo, R. 2011. “La responsabilidad de proteger en América Latina: su aplicabilidad y desafíos.” In Responsabilidad de proteger y prevención en América Latina y el Caribe: El rol de la sociedad civil, edited by R. Arredondo, G. Rodríguez, and A. Serbin, 7–22. Buenos Aires: CRIES.
  • Badescu, C, and T. Weiss. 2010. “Misrepresenting R2P and Advancing Norms: An Alternative Spiral?” International Studies Perspectives 11 (4): 354–374. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3585.2010.00412.x.
  • Becker Lorca, A. 2014. Mestizo International Law: A Global Intellectual History 1842-1933. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bellamy, A. 2009. Responsibility to Protect: The Global Effort to End Mass Atrocities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Bellamy, A. 2011. Global Politics and the Responsibility to Protect: From Words to Deeds. New York: Routledge.
  • Berruga, E. 2005. “Statement by the Permanent Representative of Mexico to the UN, in the General Debate of the 60th General Assembly.” September 23. New York: United Nations.
  • Bosco, D. 2011. “Abstention Games on the Security Council.” Foreign Policy, March 17. https://foreignpolicy.com/2011/03/17/abstention-games-on-the-security-council/
  • Brun, É, and M. F. Valette. 2016. “Los fundamentos de la diversidad del Sur ante la intervención militar.” Foro Internacional 223 (56): 120–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.24201/fi.v56i1.2308.
  • Bukovansky, M., I. Lark, R. Eckersley, R. Price, C. Reus-Smit, and N. J. Wheeler. 2012. Special Responsibilities: Global Problems and American Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cater, C, and D. Malone. 2016. “The Origins and Evolution of Responsibility to Protect at the UN.” International Relations 30 (3): 278–297. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117816659586.
  • Chilean Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2016. Vocación de paz: la política exterior de Chile. Santiago: Chilean Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
  • Coe, B. 2015. “Sovereignty Regimes and the Norm of Noninterference in the Global South: Regional and Temporal Variation.” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 21 (2): 275–298. doi:https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02102006.
  • Covarrubias, A., and D. Ortega Nieto, eds. 2007. La protección internacional de los derechos humanos: un reto en el siglo XXI. Mexico City: COLMEX.
  • da Silva, L. 2004. “Speech by President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva in the 59th United Nations General Assembly.” September 21. New York: United Nations.
  • David, S. 2008. Catastrophic Consequences: Civil Wars and American Interests. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Deitelhoff, N, and L. Zimmermann. 2020. “Things We Lost in the Fire: How Different Types of Contestation Affect the Robustness of International Norms.” International Studies Review 22 (1): 51–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viy080.
  • Deudney, D. 1997. “Geopolitics and Change.” In New Thinking in International Relations Theory, edited by M. W. Doyle and G. J. Ikenberry, 91–123. Boulder: Westview Press.
  • Deudney, D. 2007. Bounding Power: Republican Security Theory Form the Polis to the Global Village. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Deudney, D. 2016. “The Great Descent: Global Governance in Historical and Theoretical Perspective.” In Why Govern?: Rethinking Demand and Progress in Global Governance, edited by A. Acharya, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Engstrom, P, and A. Hurrell. 2010. “Why the Human Rights Regime in the Americas Matters?” In Human Rights Regimes in the Americas, edited by M. Serrano and V. Popovski, 29–55. New York: UN University Press.
  • Fermandois, J. 2011. “Pragmatism, Ideology, and Tradition in Chilean Foreign Policy since 1990.” In Latin American Foreign Policies, edited by G. L. Gardini and P. Lambert, 35–52. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Finnemore, M., and K. Sikkink. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52 (4): 887–917. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550789.
  • Fioretos, O. 2017. “Institutions and Time in International Relations.” In International Politics and Institutions in Time, edited by O. Fioretos, 3–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Fuentes Julio, C. 2020. “Norm Entrepreneurs in Foreign Policy: How Chile Became an International Human Rights Promoter.” Journal of Human Rights 19 (2): 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2020.1720628.
  • Getachew, A. 2019. Worldmaking after Empire: The Rise and Fall of Self-Determination. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Gómez Robledo. J. M. 2010. “Universalidad de los derechos humanos y asistencia humanitaria: la evolución inexorable del principio de no intervención.” In Los Grandes Problemas de México: Relaciones Internacionales, edited by B. Torres and G. Vega, 133–176. Mexico City: COLMEX.
  • Harig, C, and K. M. Kenkel. 2017. “Are Rising Powers Consistent or Ambiguous Foreign Policy Actors? Brazil, Humanitarian Intervention and the “Graduation Dilemma.” International Affairs 93 (3): 625–641. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix051.
  • Hermann, B. 2011. Soberania, não intervenção e não indiferença: reflexões sobre o discurso diplomático brasileiro. Brasilia: FUNAG.
  • Hurd, I. 2019. How to Do Things with International Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • ICISS. 2001. Responsibility to Protect: Report of the International Commission on Intervention & State Sovereignty. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.
  • Keene, E. 2002. Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kelly, P. 2018. Sovereign Emergencies: Latin America and the Making of Global Human Rights Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kenkel, K. 2012. “Brazil and R2P: Does Taking Responsibility Mean Using Force?” Global Responsibility to Protect 4 (1): 5–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1163/187598412X619649.
  • Kenkel, K. 2015. “Brazil and the Responsibility to Protect.” Asia Pacific Center for the Responsibility to Protect Brief 5 (1): 1–11. https://r2pasiapacific.org/files/2781/r2pbrief_2015_brazil_r2p.pdf.
  • Kenkel, K, and P. Cunliffe. 2016. “Introduction: Rebels or Aspirants: Rising Powers, Normative Contestation, and Intervention.” In Brazil as a Rising Power: Intervention Norms and the Contestation of Global Order, edited by K. Kenkel and P. Cunliffe, 1–20. New York: Routledge.
  • Krasner, S. 1985. Structural Conflict: The Third World against Global Liberalism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Krasner, S. 2004. “Sharing Sovereignty: New Institutions for Collapsed and Failing States.” International Security 29 (2): 85–120. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/0162288042879940.
  • Labbé, A. 2005. Meeting of the Plenary Assembly on the Reform of the UN. New York: United Nations.
  • Long, T., and M. Friedman. 2020. “The Promise of Precommitment in Democracy and Human Rights: The Hopeful, Forgotten Failure of the Larreta Doctrine.” Perspectives on Politics 18 (4): 1088–1103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592719002676.
  • Long, T., and C. A. Schulz. 2021. “Republican Internationalism: The Nineteenth-Century Roots of Latin American Contributions to International Order.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2021.1944983.
  • Mabera, F., and Y. Spies. 2016. “How Well Does R2P Travel beyond the West?” In The Oxford Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect, edited by A. Bellamy and T. Dunne, 208–226. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Menon, R. 2016. The Conceit of Humanitarian Intervention. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Muñoz, H. 2009a. “The Responsibility to Protect: Three Pillars and Four Crimes.” Human Rights and Human Welfare Working Paper 53. https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/wps/hrhw/0017114/f_0017114_14638.pdf
  • Muñoz, H. 2009b. “Statement by the Permanent Representative of Chile to the UN on the Occasion of the Debate of the General Assembly on the Responsibility to Protect.” July 23. New York: United Nations.
  • Nexon, D. 2009. The Struggle for Power in Early Modern Europe: Religious Conflict, Dynastic Empires, and International Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Nunn, F. M. 1995. “The South American Military and (Re)Democratization: Professional Thought and Self-Perception.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 37 (2): 1–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/166270.
  • Rao, R. 2010. Third World Protest: Between Home and the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Rio Group. 1999. “Communiqué Issued on 25 March 1999 by the Rio Group.” New York: United Nations. http://repository.un.org/bitstream/handle/11176/35671/A_53_884%3bS_1999_347-EN.pdf?sequence=21&isAllowed=y
  • Rodrigues, G. 2012. “La Responsabilidad al Proteger: Motivaciones, contenidos y cambios.” Pensamiento Propio 17 (35): 169–191. http://www.cries.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/pp35-web1.pdf.
  • Rodriguez, J. L. 2022. “Contemporary Humanitarians: Latin America and the Ordering of Responses to Humanitarian Crises.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2022.2044755.
  • Salgado Espinoza, R. 2016. “Responsibility to Protect as a Norm under Construction: The Divergent Views from the South.” LASA Forum 47 (2): 21–25. https://forum.lasaweb.org/files/vol47-issue2/Debates5.pdf
  • Saltalamacchia, N., and Covarrubias, A., eds. 2011. Los derechos humanos en la política exterior: seis casos latinoamericanos. Mexico City: Miguel Ángel Porrúa-ITAM.
  • Saraiva, M. 2011. “Brazilian Foreign Policy: Causal Beliefs in Formulation and Pragmatism in Practice.” In Latin American Foreign Policies, edited by G. L. Gardini and P. Lambert, 53–66. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Scarfi, J. P. 2017. The Hidden History of International Law in the Americas: Empire and Legal Networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Schulz, C. A. 2014. “Civilization, Barbarism and the Making of Latin America’s Place in Nineteenth- Century International Society.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 42 (3): 837–859. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829814541318.
  • Schweller, R. 2011. “Emerging Powers in an Age of Disorder.” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 17 (3): 285–297. doi:https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-01703002.
  • Serbin, A, and A. Serbin Pont. 2015. “Latin America and the Responsibility to Protect: Divergent Views from the South?” Pensamiento Propio 20 (41): 11–34. http://www.cries.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/pp41-web-FINAL-Corr.pdf
  • Serrano, M. 2000. “Latin America: The Dilemmas of Intervention.” In Kosovo and the Challenge of Humanitarian Intervention: Selective Indignation, Collective Action, and International Citizenship, edited by A. Schnabel and R. Thakur, 223–244. New York: UN University Press.
  • Serrano, M. 2016. “Latin America.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect, edited by A. Bellamy and T. Dunne, 429–450. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Serrano, M., and T. Weiss. 2014. “Introduction: Is R2P “Cascading”?.” In The International Politics of Human Rights: Rallying to the R2P Cause?, edited by M. Serrano and T. Weiss, 1–26. New York: Routledge.
  • Sikkink, K. 1996. “Reconceptualizing Sovereignty in the Americas: Historical Precursors and Current Practices.” Houston Journal of International Law 19 (3): 705–724. http://www.hjil.org/articles/hjil-19-3-sikkink.pdf
  • Sikkink, K. 2015. “Latin America and the Idea of International Human Rights.” In Routledge Handbook of Latin America in the World, edited by J. Domínguez and A. Covarrubias, 349–361. New York: Routledge.
  • Simpson, G. 2017. “The Globalization of International Law.” In The Globalization of International Society, edited by C. Reus-Smit and T. Dunne, 265–283. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Slater, D, and D. Ziblatt. 2013. “The Enduring Indispensability of the Controlled Comparison.” Comparative Political Studies 46 (10): 1301–1327. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012472469.
  • Somavía, J., and P. Oyarce, eds. 2018. Chile, actor del sistema multilateral, una tradición nacional. Santiago: Chilean Diplomatic School Andrés Bello and Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
  • Sotomayor, A. 2010. “Peacekeeping Effects in South America: Common Experiences and Divergent Effects on Civil-Military Relations.” International Peacekeeping 17 (5): 629–643. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2010.516946.
  • Spektor, M. 2012. “Humanitarian Interventionism Brazilian Style?” Americas Quarterly. https://www.americasquarterly.org/humanitarian-interventionism-brazilian-style
  • Stephen, M. 2014. “States, Norms and Power: Emerging Powers and Global Order.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 42 (3): 888–896. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829814537363.
  • Stimmer, A. 2019. “Beyond Internalization: Alternate Endings of the Norm Life Cycle.” International Studies Quarterly 63 (2): 270–280. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqz001.
  • Stuenkel, O. 2016a. Post-Western World: How Emerging Powers Are Remaking Global Order. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Stuenkel, O. 2016b. “Brazil and Responsibility to Protect: A Case of Agency and Norm Entrepreneurship in the Global South.” International Relations 30 (3): 375–390. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117816659594.
  • Stuenkel, O., and M. Tourinho. 2014. “Regulating Intervention: Brazil and the Responsibility to Protect.” Conflict, Security & Development 14 (4): 379–402. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2014.930593.
  • Thakur, R. 2006. The United Nations, Peace and Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tourinho, M. 2015. “For Liberalism without Hegemony: Brazil and the Rule of Non-Intervention.” In Brazil on the Global Stage: Power, Ideas, and the Liberal International Order, edited by O. Stuenkel and M. M. Taylor, 79–94. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Resolution 60/1, 2005 World Summit Outcome, A/RES/60/1, 24 October. Available at undocs.org/en/A/RES/60/1.
  • Walker, I. 2005. Sixtieth Session of the UN General Assembly. New York: United Nations.
  • Weiss, T. 2007. Humanitarian Intervention: Ideas in Action. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Weiss, T. 2016. “The Turbulent 1990s, R2P Precedents and Prospects.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect, edited by A. Bellamy and T. Dunne, 56–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Weller, M. 2015. “Introduction: International Law and the Problem of War.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law, edited by M. Weller, 3–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Zarakol, A. 2017. “Theorising Hierarchies: An Introduction.” In Hierarchies in World Politics, edited by A. Zarakol, 1–14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ziemath, G. O. 2016. Brasil no Conselho de Segurança das Nações Unidas (1945-2011). Brasilia: FUNAG.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.