Recentring industrial policy paradigm within IPE and development studies

Bibliography

• Aiginger, K., and D. Rodrik. 2020. “Rebirth of Industrial Policy and an Agenda for the Twenty-First Century.” Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 20 (2):189–207. doi:10.1007/s10842-019-00322-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alami, I., M. Babic, A. D. Dixon, and I. T. Liu. 2022. “Special Issue Introduction: What is the New State Capitalism?” Contemporary Politics 28 (3):245–263. doi:10.1080/13569775.2021.2022336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alami, I., A. D. Dixon, and E. Mawdsley. 2021. “State Capitalism and the New Global D/Development Regime.” Antipode 53 (5):1294–1318. doi:10.1111/anti.12725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang, Y. Y. 2016. How China Escaped the Poverty Trap. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ang, Y. Y. 2018. “Domestic Flying Geese: Industrial Transfer and Delayed Policy Diffusion in China.” The China Quarterly 234:420–443. doi:10.1017/S0305741018000516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang, Y. Y. 2020. China’s Gilded Age: The Paradox of Economic Boom and Vast Corruption. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ban, C. 2013. “Brazil’s Liberal Neo-Developmentalism: New Paradigm or Edited Orthodoxy?” Review of International Political Economy 20 (2):298–331. doi:10.1080/09692290.2012.660183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, J., C. Hay, G. LeBaron, and D. Mügge. 2021. “Seeing and Not-Seeing like a Political Economist: The Historicity of Contemporary Political Economy and Its Blind Spots.” New Political Economy 26 (2):217–228. doi:10.1080/13563467.2020.1841143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitabarova, A. G. 2018. “Unpacking Sino-Central Asian Engagement along the New Silk Road: A Case Study of Kazakhstan.” Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies 7 (2):149–173. doi:10.1080/24761028.2018.1553226.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., J. Peck, and N. Theodore. 2010. “Variegated Neoliberalization: Geographies, Modalities, Pathways.” Global Networks 10 (2):182–222. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0374.2009.00277.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulfone, F. 2023. “Industrial Policy and Comparative Political Economy: A Literature Review and Research Agenda.” Competition & Change 27 (1):22–43. doi:10.1177/10245294221076225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, K. G. 2018. “The One Belt One Road and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: Beijing’s New Strategy of Geoeconomics and Geopolitics.” Journal of Contemporary China 27 (114):831–847. doi:10.1080/10670564.2018.1488101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camba, A., G. Lim, and K. Gallagher. 2022. “Leading Sector and Dual Economy: How Indonesia and Malaysia Mobilised Chinese Capital in Mineral Processing.” Third World Quarterly 43 (10):2375–2395. doi:10.1080/01436597.2022.2093180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L. 2004. Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L., and O. K. Pedersen. 2001. The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press. doi: 10.1515/9780691188225
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L., and O. K. Pedersen. 2014. The National Origins of Policy Ideas: Knowledge Regimes in the United States. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carmody, P., and J. Wainwright. 2022. “Contradiction and Restructuring in the Belt and Road Initiative: Reflections on China’s Pause in the “Go World.” Third World Quarterly 43 (12):2830–2851. doi:10.1080/01436597.2022.2110058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., and G. C. Chen. 2021. “The Changing Political Economy of Central State-Owned Oil Companies in China.” The Pacific Review 34 (3):379–404. doi:10.1080/09512748.2019.1679229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L., and B. Chulu. 2023. “Complementary Institutions of Industrial Policy: A Quasi-Market Role of Government Inspired by the Evolutionary China Model.” Third World Quarterly 44 (9):1981–1996. doi:10.1080/01436597.2022.2142551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H., and M. Rithmire. 2020. “The Rise of the Investor State: State Capital in the Chinese Economy.” Studies in Comparative International Development 55 (3):257–277. doi:10.1007/s12116-020-09308-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherif, R., and F. Hasanov. 2019. “The Return of the Policy That Shall Not Be Named: Principles of Industrial Policy’. WP/19/74.” IMF Working Paper. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. 2011. The Strange Non-Death of Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doner, R. F., G. W. Noble, and J. Ravenhill. 2021. The Political Economy of Automotive Industrialization in East Asia. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doner, R. F., B. K. Ritchie, and D. Slater. 2005. “Systemic Vulnerability and the Origins of Developmental States: Northeast and Southeast Asia in Comparative Perspective.” International Organization 59 (2):327–361. doi:10.1017/S0020818305050113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doner, R. F., and B. R. Schneider. 2016. “The Middle-Income Trap: More Politics than Economics.” World Politics 68 (4):608–644. doi:10.1017/S0043887116000095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte, B. P. A., and L. C. Ferreira-Pereira. 2022. “The Soft Power of China and the European Union in the Context of the Belt and Road Initiative and Global Strategy.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 30 (4):593–607. doi:10.1080/14782804.2021.1916740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, Z. 2009. “Rethinking the “Tribute System”: Broadening the Conceptual Horizon of Historical East Asian Politics.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 2 (4):597–626. doi:10.1093/cjip/pop010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorini, D. J. 2018. A Good Life on a Finite Earth: The Political Economy of Green Growth. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flores-Macías, G. A. 2012. After Neoliberalism? The Left and Economic Reforms in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerschenkron, A. 1962. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grugel, J., and P. Riggirozzi. 2012. “Post-Neoliberalism in Latin America: Rebuilding and Reclaiming the State after Crisis.” Development and Change 43 (1):1–21. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01746.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauge, J. 2023. “Manufacturing-Led Development in the Digital Age: How Power Trumps Technology.” Third World Quarterly 44 (9):1960–1980. doi:10.1080/01436597.2021.2009739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C. 2004. “The Normalizing Role of Rationalist Assumptions in the Institutional Embedding of Neoliberalism.” Economy and Society 33 (4):500–527. doi:10.1080/0308514042000285260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C. 2020. “Does Capitalism (Still) Come in Varieties?” Review of International Political Economy 27 (2):302–319. doi:10.1080/09692290.2019.1633382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heberer, T. 2016. “The Chinese “Developmental State 3.0” and the Resilience of Authoritarianism.” Journal of Chinese Governance 1 (4):611–632. doi:10.1080/23812346.2016.1243905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helleiner, E. 2021. “The Diversity of Economic Nationalism.” New Political Economy 26 (2):229–238. doi:10.1080/13563467.2020.1841137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. 1945. National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoberg, G. 2021. The Resistance Dilemma: Place-Based Movements and the Climate Crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, J. M. 2013a. “Part 1 – Revealing the Eurocentric Foundations of IPE: A Critical Historiography of the Discipline from the Classical to the Modern Era.” Review of International Political Economy 20 (5):1024–1054. doi:10.1080/09692290.2012.704519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson, J. M. 2013b. “Part 2 – Reconstructing the Non-Eurocentric Foundations of IPE: From Eurocentric “Open Economy Politics” to Inter-Civilizational Political Economy.” Review of International Political Economy 20 (5):1055–1081. doi:10.1080/09692290.2012.733498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson, J. M. 2020. Multicultural Origins of the Global Economy: Beyond the Western-Centric Frontier. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108892704.
   Google Scholar
• Hsueh, R. 2011. China’s Regulatory State. 1st ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, D. C. 2010. East Asia before the West. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. 2018. “Matchmaking: Establishment of State-Owned Holding Companies in Indonesia.” Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies 5 (2):313–330. doi:10.1002/app5.238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. 2021. “Indonesia’s Restrained State Capitalism.” Development and Policy Challenges 51 (3):419–446. doi:10.1080/00472336.2019.1675084.
   Google Scholar
• Knio, K. 2019. “Diffusion of Variegated Neoliberalization Processes in Euro-Mediterranean Policies: A Strategic Relational Approach.” Globalizations 16 (6):934–947. doi:10.1080/14747731.2018.1560181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, A. 2002. Why Crony Capitalism is Bad for Economic Growth, edited by Stephen Haber, 1–23. Washington DC: Hoover Press.
   Google Scholar
• LeBaron, G., D. Mügge, J. Best, and C. Hay. 2021. “Blind Spots in IPE: Marginalized Perspectives and Neglected Trends in Contemporary Capitalism.” Review of International Political Economy 28 (2):283–294. doi:10.1080/09692290.2020.1830835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, F. 1841. The National System of Political Economy. Translated by Sampson S. Lloyd. London: Longmans, Green and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Madariaga, A. 2020. “The Three Pillars of Neoliberalism: Chile’s Economic Policy Trajectory in Comparative Perspective.” Contemporary Politics 26 (3):308–329. doi:10.1080/13569775.2020.1735021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milanovic, B. 2016. Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Naseemullah, A. 2017. Development after Statism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naseemullah, A. 2022. “The International Political Economy of the Middle-Income Trap.” The Journal of Development Studies 58 (10):2154–2171. doi:10.1080/00220388.2022.2096440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nem Singh, J. 2014. “Towards Post-Neoliberal Resource Politics? The International Political Economy (IPE) of Oil and Copper in Brazil and Chile.” New Political Economy 19 (3):329–358. doi:10.1080/13563467.2013.779649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nem Singh, J. 2021. “Mining Our Way out of the Climate Change Conundrum? The Power of a Social Justice Perspective.” Latin America’s Environmental Policies in Global Perspective. Washington, DC: The Wilson Center.
   Google Scholar
• Nem Singh, J. 2023. “The Advance of the State and the Renewal of Industrial Policy in the Age of Strategic Competition.” Third World Quarterly 44 (9):1919–1937. doi:10.1080/01436597.2023.2217766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nem Singh, J., and G. C. Chen. 2018. “State-Owned Enterprises and the Political Economy of State–State Relations in the Developing World.” Third World Quarterly 39 (6):1077–1097. doi:10.1080/01436597.2017.1333888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nem Singh, J. 2022. “The Renaissance of the Developmental State in the Age of Post-Neoliberalism.” In Handbook of Governance and Development, edited by Wil Hout and Jane Hutchison, 97–114. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nem Singh, J., and J. S. Ovadia. 2018. “The Theory and Practice of Building Developmental States in the Global South.” Third World Quarterly 39 (6):1033–1055. doi:10.1080/01436597.2018.1455143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odijie, M. E. 2023. “Tension between State-Level Industrial Policy and Regional Integration in Africa.” Third World Quarterly 44 (9):1997–2014. doi:10.1080/01436597.2022.2107901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohno, K. 2013. “The East Asian Growth Regime and Political Development.” In Eastern and Western Ideas for African Growth: Diversity and Complementarity in Development Aid, edited by Kenichi Ohno and Izumi Ohno, 30–52. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ovadia, J. S., and C. Wolf. 2018. “Studying the Developmental State: Theory and Method in Research on Industrial Policy and State-Led Development in Africa.” Third World Quarterly 39 (6):1056–1076. doi:10.1080/01436597.2017.1368382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickup, M. 2019. “The Political Economy of the New Left.” Latin American Perspectives 46 (1):23–45. doi:10.1177/0094582X18803878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piletic, A. 2019. “Variegated Neoliberalization and Institutional Hierarchies: Scalar Recalibration and the Entrenchment of Neoliberalism in New York City and Johannesburg.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 51 (6):1306–1325. doi:10.1177/0308518X19853276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. 2006. “Goodbye Washington Consensus, Hello Washington Confusion? A Review of the World Bank’s Economic Growth in the 1990s: Learning from a Decade of Reform.” Journal of Economic Literature 44 (4):973–987. doi:10.1257/jel.44.4.973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. 2008. “Normalizing Industrial Policy”. 3. Working Paper. Washington, DC: Commission on Growth and Development/World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. 2014. “Green Industrial Policy.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 30 (3):469–491. doi:10.1093/oxrep/gru025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. 2016. “Premature Deindustrialization.” Journal of Economic Growth 21 (1):1–33. doi:10.1007/s10887-015-9122-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. 2002. “After Neoliberalism, What?” New Rules for Global Finance Coalition. https://drodrik.scholar.harvard.edu/files/dani-rodrik/files/after-neoliberalism-what.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Schlogl, L., and K. Kim. 2023. “After Authoritarian Technocracy: The Space for Industrial Policy-Making in Democratic Developing Countries.” Third World Quarterly 44 (9):1938–1959. doi:10.1080/01436597.2021.1984876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha, A. 2016. Globalizing India: How Global Rules and Markets are Shaping India’s Rise to Power. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press; pp. 354, ₹2509, ISBN 9781108447706.
   Google Scholar
• Storm, S. 2015. “Structural Change.” Development and Change 46 (4):666–699. doi:10.1111/dech.12169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurbon, E. 2016. Developmental Mindset. 1st ed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. doi:10.7591/j.ctt18kr603.
   Google Scholar
• Thurbon, E., and L. Weiss. 2021. “Economic Statecraft at the Frontier: Korea’s Drive for Intelligent Robotics.” Review of International Political Economy 28 (1):103–127. doi:10.1080/09692290.2019.1655084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjia, L. Y-n. 2020. “The Unintended Consequences of the Politicization of the Belt and Road’s China-Europe Freight Train Initiative.” The China Journal 83:58–78. doi:10.1086/706743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toby, C., and D. Jarvis (eds.). 2017. Asia after the Developmental State: Disembedding Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, K. S., and B. Naughton. 2015. “Introduction.” In State Capitalism, Institutional Adaptation, and the Chinese Miracle: Comparative Perspectives in Business History, edited by Barry Naughton and Kellee S. Tsai, 1–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139962858.001.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, K. S. 2007. “Capitalism without Democracy: The Private Sector in Contemporary China.” 1st ed. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, R. H. 2003. “What Strategies Are Viable for Developing Countries Today? The World Trade Organization and the Shrinking of “Development Space.” Review of International Political Economy 10 (4):621–644. doi:10.1080/09692290310001601902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedeman, A. 2012. Double Paradox: Rapid Growth and Rising Corruption in China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, H. W-c. 2017. “State-Led Development Reconsidered: The Political Economy of State Transformation in East Asia since the 1990s.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 10 (1):rsw031. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsw031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar