Forging alliances: political competition and industrial policy in democratic Brazil

Bibliography

• Acemoglu, D., and J. A. Robinson. 2006. “Economic Backwardness in Political Perspective.” American Political Science Review 100 (1): 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055406062046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agência Brasileira de Desenvolvimento Industrial, ed. 2016. Os Desafios Da Política Industrial Brasileira: Uma Contribuição Da Agência Brasileira de Desenvolvimento Industrial (ABDI), 2004-2014. Brasília, Brasil: ABDI, Agência Brasileira de Desenvolvimento Industrial.
   Google Scholar
• Amable, B. 2003. The Diversity of Modern Capitalism. Reprinted. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amsden, A. H. 1992. Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. Press paperback. Oxford Paperbacks. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andreoni, A., and H.-J. Chang. 2016. “Industrial Policy and the Future of Manufacturing.” Economia e Politica Industriale 43 (4): 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-016-0057-2
   Google Scholar
• Arbix, G. 2016. “2002–2014: trajetória da inovação no Brasil : avanços, indefinições e instabilidade nas políticas públicas de fomento à inovação e tecnologia.” Análise 17. Friedrich-Ebert Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Arbix, G. 2019. “Innovation Policy in Brazil since 2003: Advances, Incoherencies, and Discontinuities.” In Innovation in Brazil: Advancing Development in the 21st Century, edited by E. B. Reynolds, B. R. Schneider, and E. Zylberberg, 74–89. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Band Jornalismo. 2018. “Debate na Band: Presidencial 2002 – 1° turno – Parte 1 [Video].” YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQ1XEGXCLUI&t=620s
   Google Scholar
• Block, F. 2020. “The Ruling Class Does Not Rule.” Jacobin Magazine, April 2020. https://jacobinmag.com/2020/4/ruling-class-capitalist-state-reform-theory
   Google Scholar
• BNDES. 2021. Operações Contratadas Na Forma Direta e Indireta Não Automática. Rio de Janeiro: BNDES.
   Google Scholar
• BNDES. 2022. Aprovações do Sistema BNDES. Rio de Janeiro: BNDES.
   Google Scholar
• BNDES. n.d. “Guia do financiamento: formas de apoio.” https://www.bndes.gov.br/wps/portal/site/home/financiamento/guia/Formas-de-Apoio
   Google Scholar
• Bohle, D., and A. Regan. 2021. “The Comparative Political Economy of Growth Models: Explaining the Continuity of FDI-Led Growth in Ireland and Hungary.” Politics & Society 49 (1): 75–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329220985723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boito, A. 2018. Reforma e crise política no Brasil: os conflitos de classe nos governos do PT. Campinas, SP: Editora da Unicamp.
   Google Scholar
• Brazil. 2003. Diretrizes de Política Industrial, Tecnológica e de Comércio Exterior. Brasília: Chief of Staff of the Presidency of the Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Brazil. 2008. Programa de Desenvolvimento Produtivo: Inovar e Investir Para Sustentar o Crescimento. Brasília: Economic Ministry.
   Google Scholar
• Brazil. 2009. Lei 12096/2009. Brasília: Presidency of the Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Brazil. 2011. Plano Brasil Maior (2011/2014). Brasília: Presidency of the Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Brazil. 2012. Plano Brasil Maior – Coordenação Sistêmica de Condições e Relações Do Trabalho: Diagnósticos e Diretrizes. Brasília: ABDI.
   Google Scholar
• Bruszt, L., and D. Karas. 2020. “Diverging Developmental Strategies beyond “Lead Sectors” in the EU’s Periphery: The Politics of Developmental Alliances in the Hungarian and Polish Dairy Sectors.” Review of International Political Economy 27 (5): 1020–1040. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1646668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camyar, I. 2014. “Political Parties, Supply-Side Strategies, and Firms: The Political Micro-Economy of Partisan Politics.” The Journal of Politics 76 (3): 725–739. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381614000164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso, F. H., and E. Faletto. 1979. Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press
   Google Scholar
• CNI. 2004. Frutos de um diálogo produtivo. Indústria Brasileira, 10/2004.
   Google Scholar
• COMEX STAT-MDIC. 2023. “General Imports and Exports (by ISIC Group).” http://comexstat.mdic.gov.br/pt/geral
   Google Scholar
• Coutinho, L., J. Carlos Ferraz, A. Nassif, and R. Oliva. 2012. Industrial Policy and Economic Transformation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199747504.013.0004
   Google Scholar
• Culpepper, P. D. 2011. Quiet Politics and Business Power: Corporate Control in Europe and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760716
   Google Scholar
• D’Araujo, M. 2009. A elite dirigente do governo Lula. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Getúlio Vargas.
   Google Scholar
• De Toni, J., ed. 2015. Dez Anos de Política Industrial: Balanço & Perspectivas, 2004-2014. Brasília, DF: ABDI, Agência Brasileira de Desenvolvimento Industrial.
   Google Scholar
• Devlin, R., and G. Moguillansky. 2012. “What’s New in the New Industrial Policy in Latin America? Policy Research Working Papers.” The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-6191
   Google Scholar
• Doctor, M. 2015. “Assessing the Changing Roles of the Brazilian Development Bank: Changing Roles of the Brazilian Development Bank.” Bulletin of Latin American Research 34 (2): 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.12210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doner, R. F., and B. R. Schneider. 2016. “The Middle-Income Trap: More Politics than Economics.” World Politics 68 (4): 608–644. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887116000095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, P. 1992. “The State as Problem and Solution: Predation, Embedded Autonomy, and Structural Change.” In The Politics of Economic Adjustment: International Constraints, Distributive Conflicts, and the State, edited by S. Haggard and R. R. Kaufman, 139–181. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairfield, T. 2015. “Structural Power in Comparative Political Economy: Perspectives from Policy Formulation in Latin America.” Business and Politics 17 (3): 411–441. https://doi.org/10.1515/bap-2014-0047
   Google Scholar
• Fajnzylber, F. 1983. La Industrialización Trunca de América Latina. México City: Centro de Economía Transnacional: Editorial Nueva Imagen.
   Google Scholar
• Ferraz, J. C., and L. Coutinho. 2019. “Investment Policies, Development Finance and Economic Transformation: Lessons from BNDES.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 48 (March): 86–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2017.11.008
   Google Scholar
• Flores-Macías, G. A. 2012. After Neoliberalism? The Left and Economic Reforms in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, E. 2014. “Reforming Pharmaceutical Regulation: A Case Study of Generic Drugs in Brazil.” Policy and Society 33 (1): 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2014.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedlander, D., N. Sanches, and G. Camarotti. 2002. “A Elite entra na Sucessão.” Revista Época. https://revistaepoca.globo.com/Revista/Epoca/0,,EDR50750-5990,00.html.
   Google Scholar
• Galantucci, R. 2014. “Policy Space and Regional Predilections: Partisanship and Trade Agreements in Latin America.” Review of International Political Economy 21 (3): 710–734. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2013.824914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galindo-Rueda, F., and F. Verger. 2016. “OECD Taxonomy of Economic Activities Based on R&D Intensity.” OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2016/04.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, K. P. 2015. “Countervailing Monetary Power: Re-Regulating Capital Flows in Brazil and South Korea.” Review of International Political Economy 22 (1): 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2014.915577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvão, A. 2014. “The Brazilian Labor Movement under PT Governments.” Latin American Perspectives 41 (5): 184–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X14545972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. 2007. “Is There a (Viable) Crucial-Case Method?” Comparative Political Studies 40 (3): 231–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006290784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraudo, M. E. 2021. “Taxing the “Crop of the Century”: The Role of Institutions in Governing the Soy Boom in South America.” Globalizations 18 (4): 516–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1795426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker, J. S., and P. Pierson. 2002. “Business Power and Social Policy: Employers and the Formation of the American Welfare State.” Politics & Society 30 (2): 277–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329202030002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A., and D. W. Soskice, eds. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hausmann, R., and D. Rodrik. 2006. Doomed to Choose : Industrial Policy as Predicament. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. J. 2018. “Energy Democracy and Social Movements: A Multi-Coalition Perspective on the Politics of Sustainability Transitions.” Energy Research & Social Science 40 (June): 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.01.003
   Google Scholar
• Hibbs, D. A. 1977. “Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy.” American Political Science Review 71 (4): 1467–1487. https://doi.org/10.2307/1961490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochstetler, K. 2020. Political Economies of Energy Transition: Wind and Solar Power in Brazil and South Africa. Business and Public Policy. 1st ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hochstetler, K., and A. P. Montero. 2013. “The Renewed Developmental State: The National Development Bank and the Brazil Model.” Journal of Development Studies 49 (11): 1484–1499. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2013.807503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBGE. 2021. Sistema de Contas Nacionais. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.
   Google Scholar
• IEDI. 2008. A Política de Desenvolvimento Produtivo. São Paulo: IEDI.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA). 2021. IPEADATA.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. A. 1982. MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, W., P. Lehmann, T. Matthieß, N. Merz, S. Regel, W. Bernhard, and Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin Für Sozialforschung (WZB). 2019. “Manifesto Project Dataset: South America.” Manifesto Project. https://doi.org/10.25522/MANIFESTO.MPDSSA.2019B
   Google Scholar
• Kupfer, D., J. Carlos Ferraz, and F. S. Marques. 2013. “The Return of Industrial Policy in Brazil.” In The Industrial Policy Revolution I, edited by J. E. Stiglitz and J. Y. Lin, 327–339. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137335173_20
   Google Scholar
• Latinobarómetro. 2019. “Latinobarómetro 2019 Dataset.”
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. E. 1995. Politics and Markets: The World’s Political-Economic Systems. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Maggor, E. 2021. “The Politics of Innovation Policy: Building Israel’s “Neo-Developmental” State.” Politics & Society 49 (4): 451–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329220945527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morceiro, Paulo César. 2016. Sectoral demand leakage and competitiveness of the Brazilian manufacturing industry, FEA-USP Working Paper Series, 12: 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Morceiro, P. C., and J. J. M. Guilhoto. 2023. “Sectoral Deindustrialization and Long-Run Stagnation of Brazilian Manufacturing.” Brazilian Journal of Political Economy 43 (2): 418–441. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572023-3340.
   Google Scholar
• Naqvi, N. 2018. “Finance and Industrial Policy in Unsuccessful Developmental States: The Case of Pakistan: Finance and Industrial Policy in Unsuccessful Developmental States.” Development and Change 49 (4): 1064–1092. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naseemullah, A. 2022. “Dependent Development in the Twenty-First Century.” Third World Quarterly 43 (9): 2225–2243. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2022.2089104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Riain, S. 2004. The Politics of High Tech Growth: Developmental Network States in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olander, P. 2019. “Economic Diversification and Institutional Quality – Issues of Concentrated Interests.” Studies in Comparative International Development 54 (3): 346–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-019-09287-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ornston, D. 2013. “Creative Corporatism: The Politics of High-Technology Competition in Nordic Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 46 (6): 702–729. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012463881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palma, J. G. 2011. “Why Has Productivity Growth Stagnated in Most Latin American Countries since the Neo-Liberal Reforms?” Cambridge: Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1030. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199571048.013.0023
   Google Scholar
• Paster, T. 2018. “How Do Business Interest Groups Respond to Political Challenges? A Study of the Politics of German Employers.” New Political Economy 23 (6): 674–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2018.1384453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peres, W., and A. Primi. 2009. Theory and Practice of Industrial Policy: Evidence from the Latin American Experience. Santiago, Chile: Naciones Unidas, CEPAL.
   Google Scholar
• Pompeia, C. 2021. Formação política do agronegócio. São Paulo: Editora Elefante.
   Google Scholar
• PSDB. 2002. “Programa de Governo de José Serra: Trabalho e Progresso Para Todos.” São Paulo: PSDB.
   Google Scholar
• PT. 2006. Partido dos Trabalhadores, Lula Presidente - Programa de Governo (2007-2010). São Paulo: PT.
   Google Scholar
• Raimundo, J. 2016. “‘A Practitioner’s Narrative of Brazil’s Industrialization and the Role of the Brazilian Development Bank.” In Breaking the Oil Spell: The Gulf Falcons’ Path to Diversification, edited by R. Cherif, F. Hasanov, and M. Zhu, 145–153. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Rekha, R., and M. Suresh Babu. 2022. “Premature Deindustrialisation and Growth Slowdowns in Middle-Income Countries.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 62 (September): 377–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2022.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Riesco, M. 2007. Latin America: A New Developmental Welfare State Model in the Making? Houndmills: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, K. M. 2008. “The Mobilization of Opposition to Economic Liberalization.” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (1): 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.183457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. 2016. “Premature Deindustrialization.” Journal of Economic Growth 21 (1): 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-015-9122-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santarcángelo, J. E., D. Schteingart, and F. Porta. 2017. “Industrial Policy in Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Mexico: A Comparative Approach.” Interventions économiques (59): 1–41. https://doi.org/10.4000/interventionseconomiques.3852
   Google Scholar
• Schapiro, M. G. 2013. “Ativismo Estatal e Industrialismo Defensivo: instrumentos e capacidades na política industrial brasileira.” IPEA – Texto Para Discussão 1856: 7–56.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, B. R. 2013. Hierarchical Capitalism in Latin America: Business, Labor, and the Challengesof Equitable Development. 1st ed. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107300446
   Google Scholar
• Silva, P., and J. Bandeira. 2021. “The Political Economy of Neoliberalism in Brazil: Towards a Polanyian Approach.” Third World Quarterly 42 (6): 1176–1195. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1877126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M. M. 2011. “Who Says “It’s the Economy”? Cross-National and Cross-Individual Variation in the Salience of Economic Performance.” Comparative Political Studies 44 (3): 284–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010384371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, G. d. Q., and R. Herrlein Júnior. 2016. “Política industrial no Brasil : uma análise das estratégias propostas na experiência recente (2003-2014).” Planejamento e Políticas públicas (47): 251–287.
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. 2021. State of Commodity Dependence 2021. Geneva: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• UNIDO. n.d. “Classification of Manufacturing Sectors by Technological Intensity (ISIC Revision 4).” https://stat.unido.org/content/learning-center/classification-of-manufacturing-sectors-by-technological-intensity-%28isic-revision-4%29;jsessionid=B99E902A3918AB9F3DF9859923DFC4F4
   Google Scholar
• UNSD. 2023. “Value Added by Economic Activity, Percentage Distribution (Shares).” https://unstats.un.org/unsd/snaama/Basic
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. 1987. “Political Science and the Study of Corporate Power: A Dissent from the New Conventional Wisdom.” British Journal of Political Science 17 (4): 385–408. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400004841
   Google Scholar
• Wade, R. 1990. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weyland, K. G., R. L. Madrid, and W. Hunter, eds. 2010. Leftist Governments in Latin America: Successes and Shortcomings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitfield, L., and L. Buur. 2014. “The Politics of Industrial Policy: Ruling Elites and Their Alliances.” Third World Quarterly 35 (1): 126–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2014.868991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiig, A., and I. Kolstad. 2012. “If Diversification Is Good, Why Don’t Countries Diversify More? The Political Economy of Diversification in Resource-Rich Countries.” Energy Policy 40 (January): 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.041
   Google Scholar
• Young, K., and S. Pagliari. 2017. “Capital United? Business Unity in Regulatory Politics and the Special Place of Finance.” Regulation & Governance 11 (1): 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar