Productivity Change and the Effects of the Enhancement of the Mass Transportation Programme on the Bus Transit System in Taiwan

References

• Benjamin , J. and Obeng , K. 1990 . The effect of policy and background variables on total factor productivity for public transit . Transportation Research , 24B (1) : 1 – 14 .
   Google Scholar
• Bly , P. H. and Oldfield , R. H. 1986 . The effects of public transport subsidies on demand and supply . Transportation Research Part‐A , 20A (6) : 415 – 427 .
   Google Scholar
• De Borger , B. , Kerstens , K. and Costa , A. 2002 . Public transit performance: what does one learn from frontier studies? . Transport Reviews , 22 : 1 – 38 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Färe , R. , Griffell‐Tatje , E. , Grosskopf , S. and Knox Lovell , C. A. 1997 . Biased technical change and the Malmquist productivity index . Scandinavian Journal of Economics , 99 (1) : 119 – 127 .
   Google Scholar
• Färe , R. , Grosskopf , S. and Lee , W.‐F. 2001 . Productivity and technical change: the case of Taiwan . Applied Economics , 33 : 1191 – 1925 .
   Google Scholar
• Färe , R. , Grosskopf , S. , Norris , M. and Zhang , Z. 1994 . Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries . American Economic Review , 84 (1) : 66 – 83 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell , M. J. 1957 . The measurement of productive efficiency . Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A , 120 : 253 – 281 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forkenbrock , D. J. and Dueker , K. 1979 . Transit assistance allocation . Transportation Research , 13A (5) : 317 – 327 .
   Google Scholar
• Karlaftis , M. G. and McCarthy , P. S. 1997 . Subsidy and public transit performance: a factor analytic approach . Transportation , 24 : 253 – 270 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nghiem , H. S. and Coelli , T. 2001 . The Effect of Incentive Reforms upon Productivity: Evidence from the Vietnamese Rice Industry , Armidale, , Australia : School of Economics, University of New England . Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis Working Paper
   Google Scholar
• Nolan , J. F. , Ritchie , P. C. and Rowcroft , J. E. 2002 . Identifying and measuring public policy goals: ISTEA and the US bus transit industry . Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization , 48 : 291 – 304 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pucher , J. 1995 . Urban passenger transport in the United States and Europe: a comparative analysis of public policies. Part 2. Public transport, overall comparisons and recommendations . Transport Reviews , 15 (3) : 211 – 227 .
   Google Scholar
• Shughart , W. F. and Kimenyi , M. S. 1991 . A public choice analysis of public transit operating subsidies . Research in Law and Economics , 14 : 215 – 276 .
   Google Scholar
• Tomazinis , A. R. 1975 . Productivity, Efficiency, and Quality in Urban Public Transportation Systems , Lexington, MA : D. C. Heath and Company .
   Google Scholar
• Tomazinis , A. R. 1977 . A Study of Efficiency Indicators of Urban Public Transportation Systems , Washington, DC : USDOT . Final Report, DOT‐TST‐77‐47
   Google Scholar